mineral sovereignty
2018 On mineral sovereignty: towards a political theory of geological powerhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/325607784_On_mineral_sovereignty_towards_a_political_theory_of_geological_power_-_Energy_Research_Social_ScienceThe Anthropocene thesis invokes the ‘enormous geological power’ of industrialism: driven by
hydrocarbon combustion, manifest in planetary heating. Yet political theory has proceeded as if the
organisation of geological power were incidental to history. Geological agency, we submit, is
precisely what mining industries are organised to achieve, materially and politically.
We propose mineral sovereignty as a term of method to analyse ‘geological power’ in its legible, institutional and
intentional forms. We deploy it to excavate an entwined genealogy of state and corporation: one
evident in the constitutional (or extra-parliamentary) technologies of sovereignty and property that
order the appropriation and distribution of mineral wealth. Through three provocations, we ‘stratify’
the concept of sovereignty: in the ‘royal metals’ of early modern states; in the rise of neoliberalism as
a re-privatisation of mineral-energy infrastructures against the claims of social democracy; and in
anticipatory extensions of mineral sovereignty to outer space. Mineral sovereignty discloses
methodological problems for energy and climate policy. Pre-analytical distinctions between public
law and the private power of fossil capital imply a hierarchy and separation that cannot be presumed,
but must be achieved. We must ‘leave it in the ground’: this requires the re-assertion of democratic
control over the mineral estate.
dl:
https://cssn.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/WalkerJohnsonOnMineralSovereigntyPreprintDraft.pdf