Rousky a agrese okolo mi pripomely casy hlubokeho covidu, kdy jsem v tramvaji nemel nahubek a sedim si, a dla naproti nejaka pani.. ukazala si po chvili na jeji rousku.. ja na to neco ze ja v tom nejedu ale v poho..

docela jsme v p oklidu o tom klabosili.. v jednu chvili si ji rukou stahla na chvili dolu, ze jsem teda videl jeji oblicej , coz je fakt psycho cumet na ty apokalypsy vvsude okolo, a ze prej ona by to zejo radeji nenosila, ale ze jako mysli, ze by se melo

no co me prekvapilo, kdyz rekla, ze je rada, ze jsem ji nejak nenapadl, neuhodil. zajimavy, jak ta perspektiva muze byt uplne jina.. ja spis zas si vsimal tech excesu nekterych takyobcanu, co nekoho za rousku mlatili.. ona zas naopak mela zas obavu, ze by mohla neco schytat za pruzeni s rouskou.

ale bylo fajn, ze oproti nyxu se dalo normalne konverzovat. ten online prostor je desne toxickej..
jeste vyzvidala, co ji jeste reknu zajimavyho, tak j sem ji prepadl s metaversem, at je nejaka sranda.. ze to bude dalsi faze.. ze nas apichaj do pocitacu a metaversa, ze uz nikdo nikam chodit nebude, a ostatni body vize WEF pana Svaba.

Hlavne takova konverzace je na nyxu science fiction. ze by dvva lidi o necem bez urazek konverzovali.

Dost lidi se tu prezentuje jako takovy ti sigri, co sikanujou deti ve skole.. A obhajujou si to, ze k tomu maji nejaky moralni duvody.

teda uz jsem videl fake posty i treba na piraty, ale zajimavy videt ten dvoji metr, ze skandal se z fejku dela jenom v nekterych pripadech..

Jinak co jsem tu ted natrefil

[MARTYKRIST @ USTAV . PRO . DUSEVNE . VYSMATE]



celkem dlouhodobe pozoruju, ,jak se lidi bavi preposilanim ruznych fake postu.

jo ten dvoji metr.. nekdy se proti fejkum desne bojuje, a pak jsou tyhle kampane, kde si lidi sdili ruzne smyslene posty

Schvalne jsem si tu fb skupinu dohledal a zadny takovy post tam neprekvapive neni.

Jedak je to sireni dezinformaci, druhak me napada, jestli je ta Hamplova tak mimo, proc je potreba si nejake fake posty vymyslet? :-)

mozna nejvymluvnejsi jsou empiricka data, kde se porovnaval vliv rousek na ona cisla, resp. porovnavaly oblasti, kde byl mandat k nnoseni rousek s mistem, kde zadny takovy mandat nebyl.
i v tom roce 1919

ale nekteri to udelali i v porovnani ruznych statu USA.. zeme s rouskovym mandatem s temi staty, kde povinne nebyly

na grafech nebyl videt zadny rozdil.

Tomu Woodsovi to prislo tak vtipny, ,ze to prezentoval formoou tohodle webu

COVID Charts Quiz
https://www.covidchartsquiz.com/

Tak ona treba prave ta vytka, ze v te studii jsou pochyby, jak konzistentne nosili ty rousky - jestli si ji v prubehu ruzne sundavaji nandavaji, jestli se dotykaji, meni ji dostatecne za novou.. jak jsem psal uz nekdy vv 2020.. to neni v moznostech normalnich lidi, kteri v tom maji zit mesice sve zivoty.

neustale jsem videl mezi lidma i v mediich televiznich debata ruznych i samotnych covidistu, jak si furt na ty rousky a respiratory sahaj, aby si ji nejak posunuli.. takze pokud neco zachytily , budou to mit na rukou. nebo si ji zejo naopak z ruky neco na rousku prenese atd. atd. noseni promocene rousky..

to dava smysl leda u nekoho, kdo je nemocnej, a jede k doktorovi. kratkodobe si muze dat pozor. 12 hodin za kasou v Kauflandu je to demence.

na co my si tu hrali spis vstoupi do ucebnic historie... o ztrate rozumu

i kdyz uz ubehl n ejaky patek od te spanelske chripky v 1918.. a kupodivu, ze i tehdy se v nekterych mestech USA nosily rousky bylo davano za priklad ormalnosti jejich povinnosti dneska.

kdyz jsem se onehda zacetl do textu historiku nebo dobovych zprav,, tak ten obrazek byl uplne jiny, nez byl predkladan, a zrovna ucinnost tohodle masoveho noseni rousek byla tehdy pak zpetne zpochybnovana.
celkkove byla ta situace v reakci lidi dost podobna covidismu.. rada lidi to odmitala nosit, popotahovani policajtama a vsudypritomna masirka

najdu vam k tomu neco

https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2020/04/02/everyone-wore-masks-during-1918-flu-pandemic-they-were-useless/

Did Masks Work? — The 1918 Flu Pandemic and the Meaning of Layered Interventions - UC Berkeley Library Update
https://update.lib.berkeley.edu/2020/05/23/did-masks-work-the-1918-flu-pandemic-and-the-meaning-of-layered-interventions/

...


This is from a study published in 1919 by the California State Department of Health. The above graph showed very little difference in death rates between Stockton, which mandated the wearing of masks in public, and Boston, which did not. So, early on, authorities were skeptical of the effectiveness of masks, but they also felt that masks were not used properly.

...


“One difficulty in the use of the face mask is the failure of cooperation on the part of the public. When, in pneumonia and influence wards, it has been nearly impossible to force the orderlies or even some of the physicians and nurses to wear their masks as prescribed, it is difficult to see how a general measure of this nature could be enforced in the community at large.”

William T. Vaughan, Influenza: An Epidemiologic Study, (Baltimore, MD: American Journal of Hygiene Monographic Series, No.1, 1921) 241.

Mask skepticism was officially sanctioned by the Surgeon General of the US Navy in a 1919 report:

“No evidence was presented which would justify compelling persons at large to wear masks during an epidemic. The mask is designed only to afford protection against a direct spray from the mouth of the carrier of pathogenic microorganisms … Masks of improper design, made of wide-mesh gauze, which rest against the mouth and nose, become wet with saliva, soiled with the fingers, and are changed infrequently, may lead to infection rather than prevent it, especially when worn by persons who have not even a rudimentary knowledge of the modes of transmission of the causative agents of communicable diseases.”

“Epidemiological and Statistical Data, US Navy, 1918,” Reprinted from the Annual Report of the Surgeon General, US Navy, (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1919) 434.

fascinujici je ,ze kdyz jsem ja na tohle (nespravne noseni rousek) upozornoval, dostal jsem na nnyxu ban

PALEONTOLOG: kdyz nekdo prokazuje, ze opatreni byla uplne na hovno.. neucinna, vytahovat slagr, ze fugovala, je trochu zvlastni

jestli sis tam nasel nejakou peknou korelaci, prokazuje to hned kauzalitu?

Also this week, researchers examined the efficacy of local COVID-19 vaccine mandates implemented across the United States in 2021 and found they didn’t work.

“These mandates imposed severe restrictions on the lives of many citizens and business owners,” the researchers said in a study conducted by George Mason University’s Mercatus Center. “Yet, we find no evidence that the mandates were effective in their intended goals of reducing COVID-19 cases and deaths.”

The researchers evaluated the District of Columbia, New York, Los Angeles, Boston, Chicago, New Orleans, Philadelphia, San Francisco and Seattle.

“We find no evidence that the announcement or implementation of indoor vaccine mandates in the cities listed had any significant effect on vaccine uptake, COVID-19 cases, or COVID-19 deaths, and this is largely consistent for all US cities that implemented the mandate,” the researchers wrote.

rozhodne jsou na to jiny pohledy. mne by byly vakciny u prdele, kdybyste to neudelali v podstate povinny. to samy ty nahubky