OMNIHASH: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/ tohle je bulvarni ci dezinformacni zdroj? ja jen abych vedel

OMNIHASH: Ze je to oboji bulvar vi kazdej, kapitane Obvious :) Aj zbytek tveho prispevku je take jen ad hominem .. no facts.. drzis svou latku :)

Za me bych rad slysel vysvetleni, proc nemam chapat tohle https://web.archive.org/web/20170202040923/https://photos.state.gov/libraries/ukraine/895/pdf/dtro-lviv-dl-eng.pdf jako doklad financovani. Asi jsem blazen, ale imho jsou duvody se zabyvat, co se tam delo. Ostatne kdzy uz se kolem toho toci i valka, si apriori zacpat usi a oci, co tvrdi domnely nepritel, mi prijde dost sileny

Jinak jak koukam

Contractor Team - Integrating Contractor: Black & Veatch. Ukrainian Subcontractors: Central Design
Institute - Lviv (Designer) & RK-Center (Construction) & Mediamax (equipment supply).

To je mi povedome.. nebylo to v tom CNN Prima clanku?

Jo bylo

Metabiota totiž na Ukrajině pracovala pro Black & Veatch, dodavatele amerického ministerstva obrany s vazbami na vojenské rozvědky, jenž na Ukrajině vybudoval zabezpečené laboratoře, které zkoumaly smrtící nemoci a biologické zbraně, tvrdí Daily Mail.

Ja bych opravdu cekal, kdyz uz nekde umiraj lidi na tohle tema, ze se bude brat trochu vaznejc to rozporovani tech tvrzeni. Imho by to na boj s ruskou propagandou fungovalo lip, nez ji cenzurovat. Fact checkeri neco trochu takoveho delaji, ale ciste ideologicky si najdou nejslabsi clanek, a ten rozcupujou. Casto i v duchu strawman argument resp. ze si vyberou nejaky post na socialni siti kohosi a ten rozporujou.

V tomhle pripade si dovolim tedy predikovat, ze se mozna fakt ukaze, ze USA skutecne financoval biolaby na Ukrajine pracujici s patogeny. Fact checkeri budou tedy vyvracet, ze ty laboratore mely za ukol vyrabet biologicke zbrane. Ale to vubec nebylo tematem. Tema je kdo to financoval a ze bylo udajne vyvraceno a zasmesneno to ruske tvrzeni o americkem financovani.

Eugenics, Malthus and the Roots of the New Cold War [TNT Radio]
https://youtu.be/A6hN_wsnJGI


In this episode of TNT Radio's Perspectives with Jesse Zurawell, Matt Ehret was invited to speak about the origins of eugenics, and how this cultish ideology masquerading as a science transmogrified into new costumes after WWII shaping the transhumanist movement, ecologism, the cult of artificial intelligence and much more. We also discuss the clash between open vs closed system paradigms now underway between the unipolar Trans Atlantic neoliberal order vs the multipolar Eurasian partnership.

https://mobile.twitter.com/CorbettCopy/status/1497206979424657409

1/ who are 'they' & the useful idiots

Crypto definitely has fanatics who can't see the downsides.

If we don't know who made Bitcoin, we'll never understand why 'they' made it.

After all, the biggest financial shift in history started from an anonymous programmer.
2/ The argument that Crypto was designed to gently nudge us from one failing currency to another is not implausible.

Given that we don't know who started it.

Having said that Bitcoin and other crypto's are unlikely to be the 'alternative' currency.

Read on 👇
3/ Most crypto's are decentralized and the 'network' can't be controlled by one entity.

It can't be frozen, moved, destroyed or stolen easily (or at all).

We've recently seen Bitcoin put to the test in Canada under Trudeau's 'Emergency powers act'

As shown below. ✉️ 💸
4/ Nunchuk is a non-custodial Bitcoin wallet that was recently ordered by Canada's courts to freeze certain user's assets.

With the results that you'd expect. 👇 🤷
Image
5/ Despite this Crypto isn't immortal.

Government's can ban shops from accepting payments, Bank's can stop you from sending money to exchanges and some government's have turned the internet off in their country before

All of these will affect crypto if done on a global scale.
6/ But the real threat is CBDC's.

'Centralized bank digital currencies'

As I've mentioned earlier Bitcoin (and crypto) is unlikely to be the 'alternative' that the post claims.

For the exact reason's that Canada found out when trying to freeze BTC assets.
7/ CBDC's like all crypto are programmable.

'They' can decide what you buy/sell and when you can do so.

This is why the 'become a commodities chad' is useless advice.

You can't sell your gold if the currency you're selling it for doesn't allow you to do so.
8/ This also goes for Crypto.

Santander blocked me from sending money to an exchange last year under the excuse 'we're protecting you from financial damage'.

I got around it by using Revolut but imagine if the money itself blocked you? You're fucked. No work arounds.
9/ And look, I'm being sparing with the details on just how fucked CBDCs could make us. I suggest you all dive into them deeper.

But for now... What can we do?

A few things.
10/ Support decentralized projects and fill a portion of your portfolio's with their coins.

Buying commodities on the side isn't a bad idea either.

Stay the fuck away from NFTs and all that metaverse shit, unless you're just doing it for money.
11/ Follow this account 👍 💸 @CorbettCopy

I tweet a lot about crypto, marketing and wealth creation methods.

I also have an eBook coming out in the next few days that specifically targets crypto trading & asset management.

First 10 copies are free.
12/ That's it, that's all I got. Peace ☮️

Thread by @CorbettCopy on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1497206979424657409.html