KAJJAK: ad ta paralela s Ukrajinou: takze si necetl nic z toho, co jsem tu postoval? :)

In Davos, global elites conspire to take away your rights - Washington Times
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/may/25/in-davos-global-elites-conspire-to-take-away-your-/

Protecting their power, money and control amassed during the COVID-19 pandemic

“The future is built by us, by a powerful community as you here in this room,” Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chair of the World Economic Forum reminded the attendees at his conference in Davos, Switzerland, this week.

However, this perfect future is achievable only if the global elites act as “stakeholders of larger communities” and if they “collaborate,” he said. Mr. Schwab, a German economist, was born in Ravensburg in 1938. His father was a Nazi who served the Third Reich war effort as the director of Escher Wyss AG, an industrial company that manufactured flamethrowers to kill Allied soldiers.

Today, Mr. Schwab hosts a conference nestled in the Swiss Alps for high-powered leaders to “shape global, regional and industry agendas.” He has urged politicians, bankers, oligarchs and autocrats alike to seize on the COVID-19 pandemic to “reset and reshape the world” — basically, to use the crisis as a way to make governments bigger, more powerful and globally intertwined, while curtailing citizens’ individual liberties to quiet any dissent.

In one forum this week, Australian Safety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant, whose nation imposed a “zero-COVID policy,” locking down cities and detaining citizens who violated mandatory quarantines, suggested that some human rights, such as freedom of speech, need to be sacrificed.

“We are finding ourselves in a place where we have increasing polarization everywhere and everything feels binary when it doesn’t need to be,” she explained. “So, I think we’re going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online, from freedom of speech to the freedom to be free from online violence.”

The user who first tweeted the clip of Ms. Grant saying this was suspended from Twitter shortly thereafter. Perhaps this is the “recalibration” of freedom of speech Ms. Grant was suggesting.

Conservative journalist Jack Posobiec, who was in Davos filming a documentary on the conference and its founder for Turning Point USA, said he was detained by armed police officers at the forum on Monday. More than 5,000 military personnel and local police are on the ground, and a no-fly zone over Davos has been enforced by fighter jets.

The global elites love their privacy — just not for the ordinary citizens they rule over.

In another Davos forum this week, Yuval Noah Harari, an Israeli public intellectual and a professor in the Department of History at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, outlined how COVID-19 should be used to track everyday people.

“COVID is critical because this is what convinces people to accept to legitimize total biometric surveillance,” Mr. Harari said. “We need to not just monitor people; we need to monitor what’s happening under their skin.”

If that’s not creepy enough — in the name of climate change, Alibaba Group President J. Michael Evans detailed plans on how to accomplish this “total surveillance.”

“We’re developing through technology an ability for consumers to measure their own carbon footprint. What does that mean?”

He then explained exactly: “Where are they traveling? How are they traveling? What are they eating? What are they consuming on the platform? An individual carbon footprint tracker … stay tuned!”

Curbing global climate change, which Davos attendees claim is triggered by human-generated carbon emissions, was the original purpose of the WEF conference. COVID-19, however, became the new tool for these elites to amass and exact their power.

More than 2,000 billionaires across the globe became $3.78 trillion richer during the COVID-19 pandemic. On Monday, Oxfam International said 573 people became new billionaires during the crisis, at the rate of one every 30 hours. In the first 24 months of COVID-19, billionaires’ wealth rose more than in 23 years combined, according to the report.

Meanwhile, a million people could fall into poverty at the same rate this year, as the cost of essential goods rises faster than it has in decades, the report detailed.

Davos attendees discussed how the global energy upheaval will serve as a “transition” to green energy. This, as experts predicted up to 1,500 individual private flights flew in and out of airfields serving the Swiss ski town this week.

Norwegian finance CEO Kjerstin Braathen admitted there will be mass shortages and economic hardship for millions, but the “pain” is “worth it” for a green economy.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the “economies of the future” no longer will rely on oil and coal. And President Joe Biden — while not in Davos — echoed their comments Monday, saying: “When it comes to the gas prices, we’re going through an incredible transition.”

The ruling class can afford this transition, but can the rest of us? The billionaires in Davos don’t care — so long as they can hold onto their wealth, power and position.

And this week, they were hatching a plan to do just that.

• Kelly Sadler is the commentary editor at The Washington Times.

Pushing Czechoslovakia to commit suicide
At the same time, France and Britain ordered the Czech government not to mobilize its troops for fear of provoking Germany, and pressured them to accept the Anglo-French solution to the crisis. But the Anglo-French proposal would further weaken Czechoslovakia’s security in exchange for vague promises of international guarantees. The government of President Edvard Beneš protested vigorously and rejected the solution. In their turn, London and Paris rejected the Czech refusal and mounted further pressure on the Czechs. Chamberlain explained the imperative to force Czechoslovakia’s government to yield: “The idea of territorial cession would be likely to have a more favorable reception from the British public if it could be represented as the choice of the Czechoslovak Government themselves and it could be made clear that they had been offered the choice of a plebiscite or of territorial cession and had preferred the latter. This would dispose of any idea that we were ourselves carving up Czechoslovak territory.” To turn up the pressure, France threatened to revoke their alliance and abandon the Czechs to Germany. Finally, on 21 September 1938 the Czech government relented and accepted the Anglo-French dictate.



Back in London, on 23rd September the British Cabinet overtly rejected Hitler’s Godesberg ultimatum and agreed to support France if it chose to go to war against Germany. The French government also rejected Hitler’s ultimatum as did the Czechs. The Soviets responded by explicitly reiterating their security commitment to Czechoslovakia. However, this last-moment appearance of a united front against an aggressive Germany finally shaping up was yet another deception.

Chamberlain’s perfidious double game
On 27 September 1938, Chamberlain delivered a radio address to the nation feigning his dismay at the incomprehensible events on the continent: “How horrible, fantastic, incredible it is that we should be digging trenches and trying on gas masks here because of a quarrel in a far-away country between people of whom we know nothing…” The very same day, Chamberlain sent a telegram to Czechoslovakia’s President Beneš, warning him that if he failed to accept Hitler’s ultimatum by 2 PM on the following day (28 September), Czechoslovakia would be overrun by the German Army and nothing could save her. After that he sent a message to Hitler to propose holding a four-power conference and reassuring him that Britain and France would force Czechoslovakia to accept any agreement, on condition that Germany abstained from going to war.



Then German troops overran Czechoslovakia, they captured 469 tanks which were much superior to German tanks, along with 1,500 planes, 43,000 machine guns, and over 1 million rifles. The unused arsenal was a posthumous testament to the power that failed to defend itself against Hitler’s aggression. It was sedated and paralyzed through the devious activities by Neville Chamberlain and his cabal.

...

In May 1939, Bank of England’s Montagu Norman turned over to Germany the £6,000,000 in Czech gold reserves held in London. When the news of this transfer leaked out, the cabinet hid behind the preposterous excuse that the British government could not give orders to the Bank of England.

MTP 015: 1938 Appeasement - THE TRUE STORY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ActnQ6aec0g


// a co se delo po 2. svetove valce? USA nadale (prokazatelne) podporovali nacisty na Ukrajine od samotneho konce valky a zrejme az dodnes. jako rameno proti Rusku. stejne jako vyzbrojili vycvicili muhadzince v Afghanistanu proti Rusku a vytvorili Al Kaidu. ten zamer zni podobne.. nepritel nepritele je nas spojenec. at je to Al Kaida nebo nacisti

Appeasement: the betrayal in Munich (part 2 of 3) | The Naked Hedgie
https://thenakedhedgie.com/2021/12/18/appeasement-the-betrayal-in-munich-part-2-of-3/

The sacrifice of Czechoslovakia
The treacherous sacrifice of Czechoslovakia to Germany is one of the least well understood episodes leading to the tragedy of World War lI. Conventional history associates the Czech crisis with Neville Chamberlain’s appeasement at Munich. The story we were taught in school was that the British government agreed to partition Czechoslovakia only as a desperate measure to avoid a greater European war. This view is based on the idea that Germany was already an overwhelming military power that could easily crush Czechoslovakia’s weak defenses. However, this idea is patently false. In late 1938 Czechoslovakia did in fact capitulate without resistance, but this was not because her defenses were weak. Rather, Czechoslovakia’s government was paralyzed and sedated as a result of the treacherous scheming of Britain’s secret diplomacy.

The beginnings of the Czech crisis
Created in 1919, Czechoslovakia was the most prosperous, most democratic, most powerful and best administered of the states that emerged from the Habsburg Empire. Situated along its northwest frontier with Germany, the Sudeten region was the most industrialized part of the country and had a majority German population. Although Czechoslovakia instituted equitable treatment for all of its minorities, in the 1930s, Sudeten Germans began to press for greater political power and autonomy within Czechoslovakia. They established their own Nazi party and with funding from Berlin their relentless agitation and propaganda became a destabilizing factor for the nation.


In 1934 the Czech government finally banned the party, but under Konrad Henlein’s leadership, they merely changed the party’s name to Sudeten German Party and continued to consolidate influence and power. Henlein coordinated his party’s agenda with Hitler and their strategy was to keep pressing the Czech government for ever greater concessions which escalated the crisis to a boiling point in1938.

The school curriculum vs. the truth

Conventional history holds that Britain only became involved in this crisis in order to prevent a greater war from erupting. The Wikipedia entry says that, “Germany had started a low-intensity undeclared war on Czechoslovakia on 17 September 1938. In reaction, the United Kingdom and France on 20 September formally asked Czechoslovakia to cede its territory to Germany…” That pretty much sums up history as it is still being taught in schools everywhere. The truth is very different: as early as March 1938 and until the very end, British representatives took a very active role in the negotiations between the Germans and the Czech government.

Behind the false cloak of impartiality, the British representatives consistently bolstered German demands and pressured the Czechs to yield. The Czech government responded by offering substantial concessions and formulating a plan for the minorities that included economic benefits, cultural and administrative autonomy and even political federalism. This was however brushed aside by the German and British counterparts as inadequate. Then, on 24 April 1938, Henlein formulated the extreme “Karlsbad Demands.” After months of torturous negotiations, and under severe pressure from Britain, in September 1938 the Czech government yielded on most of these demands. But at that point, rather than declaring victory and accepting a settlement, Henlein abruptly broke off the negotiations and fled to Germany.

The balance of military power
History regards Chamberlain’s 1938 appeasement of Hitler as an ill-advised and cowardly policy, but ultimately a justifiable, or at least well-intentioned bid to prevent a greater European war. The Czech situation was invariably presented as a lost cause since the overwhelming power of the German Wehrmacht could easily crush Czechoslovakia’s weak defenses. But the ideas that the Germans had a military advantage and that Czech’s security was weak were both fabrications of a sustained propaganda campaign, which was orchestrated by the British media and government representatives to mislead the British and European public.

To be sure, Germany had been building up its military power since the early 1930s, but in 1938 it was still no match for Czech defenses: the Germans had 35 infantry divisions and only 4 motorized divisions, none of them fully manned or equipped. Of these, only 22 partially trained divisions were stationed near the Czech frontier. At the same time, Czechoslovakia had 34 well equipped divisions and was able to mobilize and arm fully 1,000,000 troops. While all of Germany’s tanks were below 10 tons (except for a handful of Mark III 18-ton tanks) and armed with 37-mm guns, the Czech army had hundreds of 38-ton tanks armed with 75-mm cannons.


Moreover Czech army was better trained, had very high morale and had built powerful fortifications along its borders. In terms of quality, armaments and fortifications, the Czech army was known to be the best in Europe and was superior to German army in every way except for air support. On September 3rd 1938 the British military attaché in Prague wrote a cable to London, stating: “There are no shortcomings in the Czech army, as far as I have been able to observe…” In addition, Czech security was supported by strategic alliances with France and the Soviet Union both of whom were at that time very keen on holding Germany in check and both of whom were significantly superior to Germany in terms of military strength



..

// tohle je hodne kontrastni k pohledum, ze soucasne rusko je novodobe nacisticke Nemecko po napadeni Polska. radi prirovnavaji mnichovskou dohodu appeasmentu ted k Putinovi.. spravny hrdy slava ukrajine cech je ted pro valku a militarismus.. pro vyzbrojovani Ukrajiny tanky, aby se zastavilo cituji "zlo z Ruska". nekteri cesti dovolenkari se i vydali osobne se ucastit boju a ceska vlada se verejne zarucila, ze za to nebudou trestne stihani.

https://twitter.com/MaajidNawaz/status/1527975589235376128

Y.N Harari:

"Covid is critical because this is what convinces people to accept to legitimize total biometric surveillance. We need to not just monitor people, we need to monitor what’s happening under their skin”

OMNIHASH: zajimavy, ze ten Oleg Tsarov, co urcite nema v nicem pravdu, presne predikoval udalosti, co prisly o rok pozdeji

[GORG @ world conspiracy // 911 // free world order! ... part 5 ::]

neni dobry skocit do nejasnych vod kolem anexe, aby clovek znovu odvratil pozornost od toho, co te obcanske valce predchazelo.

je to retro, co jsem tu hazel 2016

[GORG @ world conspiracy // 911 // free world order! ... part 5 ::]

a nejake noviny kolem Olega

Subscribe to read | Financial Times
https://www.ft.com/content/57792de1-664f-4d8e-a706-c8cea30015f0

Oleg Tsarev was sentenced in absentia to 12 years in prison
https://babel.ua/en/news/78286-the-former-mp-oleg-tsarev-was-sentenced-in-absentia-to-12-years-in-prison