Interview se Sharonem

17.8.2003 / Amos Oz

Tento rozhovor urobil zidovsky spisovatel Amos Oz s Arielom Sharonom v roku 1982. Je uverejneny v Amosovej knihe Poh va-sham be-Erets - Yisra'el bi-setav, ktora vysla v roku 1982 v Izraeli. (preklad z hebrejstiny)

Mozte ma volat ako sa vam zachce. Kludne ma nazvite zrudou, alebo vrahom. Uvedomte si len, ze ja necitim nenavist k Arabom. Naopak. Osobne sa s nimi citim lepsie, specialne s Beduinmi, ako s Zidmi. Arabi ktorych sme este neznicili su hrdi ludia, su neracionalni a aj kruti, ale su velkodusni. Su to Yids (stredoeuropski zidia), ktori su zhrbeni. A aby ich clovek narovnal, je treba ich energicky pretiahnut na druhu stranu. V tomto, v skratke, spociva cela moja ideologia.

Povedzte o Izraeli co chcete, povedzte, ze je to zidovsko-nacisticky stat, ako to robi Leibowitz. A preco nie? Lepsi je zivy Zid - nacista, ako mrtvy svatec. Nezalezi mi na tom byt ako Gaddafi. Nehladam obdiv [Ariel Sharon]Slusnych. Nepotrebujem aby ma milovali. A nepotrebujem ani, aby ma milovali zidia ako vy (A. Oz). Ja musim zit a mam v umysle zaistit, aby aj moje deti mohli zit s, alebo bez Papezovho pozehnania, alebo inych nabozenskych lidrov spomenutych v New York Times. Ja znicim kazdeho kto dvihne ruku na moje deti s, alebo bez slavnej cistoty nasich zbrani. A je mi jedno, ci to bude krestan, muslim, alebo zid. Minulost nas uci, ze ten kto nezabija, bude zabity. Toto je zelezny zakon.

Ak by ste mi s matematickou presnostou dokazali, ze sucasna vojna v Libanone je spinava a nemoralna, nezaujimalo by ma to. Poviem este viac: Ani keby ste mi dokazali, ze v Libanone nedosiahneme ziadny zo svojich objektyvou, ze nevytvorime spriateleny rezim a neporazime ani Syriu, ani OOP, ani tak by ma to nezaujimalo. My by sme zacali dalsiu a dalsiu vojnu a nicili by sme, kym by oni nemali dost. A viete preco to stoji za to? Lebo sa zda, ze tato vojna nas pravila este menej oblubenymi v takzvanom civilnom svete.

Uz nebudeme pocuvat nezmysly o slavnej zidovskej moralke, moralnej lekcie holokaustu, alebo o cistom obraze a vlastnostiach Zidov, ktore vzisli z plynovych komor. Skoncime s tym. Znicenie Eyna Hilweho, pozdravne bombardovanie Bejrutu, a ten skromny masaker ktory sme museli uskutocnit s nasimi delikatnymi rucickami, miesto toho aby sme to nechali falangistom, tieto skvele akcie konecne skoncovali so vsetkymi tymi zasratymi diskusiami o "specialnom narode, majaku narodov". Dost s tymto specialnym narodom, dobrym, majakom civilizacie. Zbavme sa ho.

Osobne netuzim byt vobec lepsi ako Khomeini, alebo Breznev, Ghaddafi, Assad, alebo pani Thatcher a ani ako Harry Truman, ktory zabil pol miliona Japoncov dvoma bombami. Ja chcem byt inteligentnejsi, rychlejsi ucinnejsi ako oni. Nie lepsi, alebo krajsi. Podla vas, zli tohoto sveta sa maju zle? Ak sa niekto odvazi dotknut sa ich, ti mu odrezu ruky a aj nohy. Su to predatori ktori prenasleduju a chytaju vsetko, co sa im zda dobre na roztrhanie. Netrpia trviacimi problemami a Nebesa ich netrestaju. Ja chcem, aby sa Izrael stal clenom tohto klubu a tak sa ma mozno zacnu bat, miesto toho aby si ma vazili. Mozno potom sa zacnu triast, desit sa mojho hnevu miesto toho aby obdivovali moju slachetnost. Chvala Bohu. Nechajte neh sa trasu a neh nas nazivaju agresivnym statom. Nechajte nech si mysli, ze sme divou krainou, nebezpecnou pre narody, co nas obklopuju, nenormalni, ze sa mozme stat zdiveni ak zabiju co i len jedno nase dieta. Nechajte nech si mysli, ze mozeme uplne stratit kontrolu a zapalit vsetky ropne veze na strednom vychode. Nech si uvedomia vo Washingtone, Moskve, Damasku aj v Cine, ze ak by bol jeden z nasich velvyslancov zabity, alebo konzul, alebo mladucky uradnik velvyslanectva, my mozme rozputat tretiu svetovu vojnu iba kvoli tomu.

Leibowitz mal pravdu. Naozaj sma Zidia nacisti. Preco nie? Muz, ktory sa nacha zabit, ktory necha robit mydlo zo svojich deti, kozene pasiky zo svojej zeny, je vacsi kriminalnik, ako jeho vrahovia. Ak by jeho zhrbeni a slusni rodicia prisli zavcasu sem, miesto toho aby pisali knihy o laske k ludskosti, a spievali "pocuj Izraeli", iduc do plynovej komory, ak by (a teraz sa zdesite) miesto toho zabili sest milionov Arabov, alebo len milion, co by sa stalo? Urcite by sa napisali dve alebo tri skarede stranky v historickych knihach, prisudili by nam mnoho skaredych pridavnych mien, ale dnes nas tu mohlo byt 22 milionov.

Este dnes som ochotny ponuknut sa na spinavu pracu pre Izrael, pre zabitie tolkych Arabov, kolko je potrebne, na ich deportaciu, vyhostenie, na ich spalenie, tak aby nas vsetci nenavideli. Aj ked to znamena ze tu a tam vyleti nejaka synagoga do vzduchu, nevadi mi to. A nevadi mi, ak po skonceni prace budem postaveny pred norimbersky sud. Obeste ma, ak chcete, ako vojnoveho zlocinca. Tak vy budete moct ocistit vase zidovske svedomie a vstupit do vazeneho klubu civilnych krajin, ktore su velke a zdrave. To, co vsetci nechapete, je to, ze spinava praca sionizmu este neskoncila. Sme daleko od konca. Pravda, mohla skoncit v 1948, ale vy ste to zastavili. A to vsetko kvoli zidovstvu vo vasich dusiach. Kvoli vasej mentalite diaspory. Lebo Zidia nechapu veci s rychlostou. Ak by ste otvorili oci, videli by ste, ze temnota znovu pada na svet. A my vieme co sa stane Zidovi izolovanemu v tme.

Napiste kludne, ze som nestastim pre ludstvo. Nevadi mi to, naopak. Spravme dohodu: ja spravim vsetko pre to aby som vyhnal Arabov. Urobim vsetko mozne aby som zvysil antisemitsku nenavist, a vy budete pisat basne a mudrosti o arabskom nestastie a pripravite sa na prichod Yids, ktorych ja donutim, aby sa uchylili v tejto krajne, a ktorych naucim byt majakom pre Slusnych. Co poviete?

Zbytek textu byl překládán jiným člověkem. Proto nyní dochází ke změně slovenštiny na češtinu. Pozn. vydavatele.

Davejte pozor, co je na tom vsem nejdulezitejsi, co je nejsladsim ovocem valky v Libanonu: Nyni uz je nenaviden nejen Izrael. Diky nam, nenavidi tez vsechy ty Feinschmecker Zidy v Parizi, Londyne, NewYorku, Frankfurtu a Montrealu, ve vsech jejich dirach. Konecne nenavidi ty vsechny slusne Zidy, kteri rikaji, ze jsou jini nezli my, ze oni nejsou izraelsti gangsteri, ze oni jsou jini Zide, civilizovani a pocestni. Tak jako asimilovani Zide ve Vidni a v Berline, kteri prosili antisemity, aby si je nepletli s hlucnymi a smradlavymi Ostjuden, kteri se propasovali do tohoto kulturniho prostredi ze spinavych ghet Ukrajiny a Polska. Nebude jim to nic platne, temto cistotnym Zidum, tak jako jim to nebylo nic platne ve Vidni a v Berline. Jen at krici, ze odsuzuji Izrael, ze oni se niceho nedopustili, ze neublizili a neublizi ani mouse, ze oni vzdy se radsi nechaji zabit, nez aby bojovali, ze jejich vlastni ulohou je naucit goje jak se stat lepsimi krestany, a to tim, ze vzdy nastavi druhou tvar. Vubec nic jim to nepomuze. Nyni jsou tam trestani za nas, a jak Vam pravim, s potesenim to sleduji.

Jsou to ti sami Zidi, kteri presvedcili Goje kapitulovat pred temi bastardy ve Vietnamu, ustoupit Chomejnimu, Breznevovi, litovat sejka Yamaniho, nebot ten mel obtizne detstvi; jsou to ti, kteri nabadaji k milovani a ne k valce (to make love not war). Ci spis, ani k jednomu, a misto toho pisi dizertace o lasce a valce. S tim jsme skoncovali. Zid byl odmitnut, on ukrizoval nejen Jezise, ale ukrizoval taktez Arafata v taborech Sabra a Shatila. Nyni je jejich totoznost spojovana s nasi a tak je to dobre. Jejich hrbitovy jsou znesvecovany, jejich synagogy jsou zapalovany, opet dostavaji stare hanlive prezdivky, jsou vylucovani z nejlepsich klubu, lide strili do jejich etnickych restauraci a vrazdi male deti, nuti je sundavat napisy, ktere je identifikuji jako Zidy, nuti je prestehovat se a pozmenit si jmena.

Brzo jejich palace budou pomalovany hesly: "Zidi, tahnete do Palestiny!" A vite co? Oni pujdou do Palestiny, protoze nebudou mit jinou volbu. Toto vse je pridavkem k tomu, co jsme obdrzeli z teto libanonske valky. No, reknete mi, nevyplatilo se to? Brzo nastanou dobre casy. Zide budou opet prijizdet, Izraelci prestanou emigrovat a ti, kteri jiz emigrovali se navrati zpet. Ti, kteri zvolili asimilaci, konecne pochopi, ze jim nic nepomuze, kdyz se budou snazit byt svedomim sveta. "Svedomi sveta" bude muset pochopit svou prdeli to, co nemohlo dostat do sve hlavy. Gojove byli vzdy znechuceni z Zidu a jejich svedomi, a nyni maji Zide jenom jednu volbu: vratit se domu, vsichni, rychle, instalovat tluste ocelove dvere, postavit silny plot, rozmistit samopaly do kazdeho rohu jejich plotu a bojovat jako dabel proti komukoliv, kdo se odvazi v teto oblasti jen pipnout.
Slovo autora Amose Oze

Verim, ze som vsetkym antisionistom urobil tymto clankom radost... Sharon je naozaj zruda... Len vdaka takym zrudam dnes Izrael este existuje. Osobne sa s Sharonovymi nazormi stotoznujem na 95%. Takze som asi skutocny sionista. Ja si to ale priznavam... Stvrdol nam zadok, a ja som rad, ze uz si nekopnete... Kym je Izrael silny a nebezpecny, sialeny a divy, tak z mojich deti nikto mydlo neurobi a ostatne si rieste ako chcete... Ovca nemoze zozrat leva. No a co?

http://www.zvedavec.org/zpravySQL.php?clanek_id=662

Dr Kelly, 59, bumped into widow Ruth Absalom - probably the last person to see him alive - about a mile from his house in the village of Southmoor, Oxon, last Thursday.

Ruth, who is in her 70s, said: "He seemed jolly and was smiling. He didn't seem to have a care in the world.

"We talked about the weather and about my dog Buster. It was just pleasantries and small talk. I said, 'I hope you sort out your problems' and he replied, 'Everything will be fine'."

Dr Kelly, a member of the Baha'i Church, a liberal off-shoot of Islam, then continued his tragic walk to wooded Harrowdown Hill, the beauty spot where his body was found on Friday after a huge police search.

http://www.people.co.uk/homepage/news/page.cfm?objectid=13197177&method=thepeople_full&siteid=79490

NATIONAL GUARD MOBILIZED YESTERDAY! IS POWER OUTAGE REALLY AN ACCIDENT?

New York National Guard now mobilized! 9:30pm curfew announced in Cleveland! 8pm curfew announced in Orange County! This is the perfect police state drill for the coming bio-attack.

podla mna sa to cele zacne schvalenim ustavy EU, cim vznikne prve biblicke kralostvo a na jej cele bude prezident - antikrist - bojovnik za svetovy mier. Takze este pred tym nastane Rapture - vytrzenie/spasenie krestanov. Odporucam film Left Behind, tam je to vsetko pekne ukazane /hladajte na Kazee, ma to len 280MB/.
Znie to sice sialene, ale velmi realisticky.

JAXXE --- --- 20:23:20 14.8.2003
wow

Is Bush getting apocalyptic advice ?

With Ashley Pearson / MSNBC

Aug. 13 — Is the Bush administration turning to a televangelist doomsayer for political predictions? Apocalyptic preacher Jack Van Impe is claiming that he was contacted by Condoleezza Rice’s office and the White House Office of Public Liaison for an “outline” of his take on world events.

...

VAN IMPE is the author of such books as “Israel’s Final Holocaust” and “The Great Escape: Preparing for the Rapture, the Next Event on God’s Prophetic Clock.”
He has predicted that the end of the world will strike somewhere between 2003 and 2012 and one reviewer has called his TV preaching show with wife Rexella “a fantastically loopy apocalyptic take on the week’s news.”
The issue of the alleged involvement with the Bush administration came up on his Web site when someone asked Van Impe, “Do you think that President Bush, apparently a Christian man, believes and knows he is involved in prophetic events concerning the Middle East and final battle between good and evil?”
“I believe he is a wonderful man,” Van Impe responded, and goes on to say, “I was contacted a few weeks ago by the Office of Public Liaison for the White House and by the National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice to make an outline. And I’ve spent hours preparing it. I will release this information to the public in September, but it’s in his hands. He will know exactly what is going to happen in the Middle East and what part he will have under the leading of the Holy Spirit of God. So, it’s a tremendous time to be alive.”
“My investigation into it is that there’s no truth to it,” National Security Council spokesman Sean McCormack told The Scoop, “but I’m continuing to look into it.”3

...

http://www.msnbc.com/news/943879.asp?0cv=CB20&cp1=1

...

The missile shipped into the New York area last month was not a real missile — just a mockup — also arranged entirely by the government. The government also arranged the meetings at a New Jersey hotel and elsewhere, where Lakhani allegedly told undercover agents posing as al Qaeda terrorists about his support of bin Laden.

"One would have to ask yourself, would this have occurred at all without the government?" said Gerald Lefcourt, a criminal defense attorney.

...

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/World/missile030813_sting.html

Defense Department funding brain-machine work

BY GARETH COOK
The Boston Globe

Even by Washington scandal standards, the "terrorism futures" scandal was strange and dramatic.

It started when two senators discovered an obscure military program designed to gauge the chances of various geopolitical developments, including terrorist attacks, by asking people to bet money on them. Within 48 hours -- or, more precisely, two news cycles -- the program was canceled and the man behind it, John Poindexter of Iran-contra fame, had tendered his resignation.

What most people don't know is that the Department of Defense is already funding a research program with far creepier implications.

The $24 million enterprise called Brain Machine Interfaces is developing technology that promises to directly read thoughts from a living brain -- and even instill thoughts as well.

The research, some of which is being done at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is already surprisingly advanced. Monkeys in a laboratory can control the movement of a robotic arm using only their thoughts. And last year scientists in New York announced they could control the skittering motions of a rat by implanting electrodes in its brain, steering it around the lab floor as if it were a radio-controlled toy car.

It does not take much imagination to see in this the makings of a "Matrix"-like cyberpunk dystopia: chips that impose false memories, machines that scan for wayward thoughts, cognitively augmented government security forces that impose a ruthless order on a recalcitrant population.

...

http://www.charleston.net/stories/080503/wor_05darpa.shtml

Facing increasing resistance and concerns about privacy, the United States' largest food companies and retailers will try to win consumer approval for radio identification devices by portraying the technology as an essential tool for keeping the nation's food supply safe from terrorists.

The companies are banding together and through an industry association are lobbying to have the Department of Homeland Security designate radio frequency identification, or RFID, as an antiterrorism technology.

...

http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,59624,00.html

From an address to a joint session of the US Congress: President George W. Bush.

"Americans are asking ``Why do they hate us?'' They hate what they see right here in this chamber: a democratically elected government. Their leaders are self-appointed. They hate our freedoms: our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other. " George W. Bush, 20 September, 2001

http://www.indystar.com/library/factfiles/crime/national/2001/sept11/transcripts/0921bush.html

From Goebbels' New Year address to Germany

They hate our people because it is decent, brave, industrious, hardworking and intelligent. They hate our views, our social policies, and our accomplishments. They hate us as a Reich and as a community. They have forced us into a struggle for life and death. We will defend ourselves accordingly. All is clear between us and our enemies. Goebbels 31 December 1939

http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/goeb21.htm

Richard Perle, policy advisor to G.W. Bush, 2001

"No stages. This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq, then we take a look around and see how things stand. That is entirely the wrong way to go about it ... If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely, and we don't try to ... piece together clever diplomatic solutions ... but just wage a total war against these tyrants, I think we will do very well. Our children will sing great songs about us years from now." ---

- Richard Perle, policy advisor to G.W. Bush, 2001

http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=11938


Joseph Goebbels, 1943

So total war is the demand of the hour. We must put an end to the bourgeois attitude which we have also seen in this war: Wash my back, but don't get me wet! The danger facing us is enormous. The efforts we take to meet it must be just as enormous. The time has come to remove the gloves! We must use our fists now! There is no excuse for only superficially and carelessly making use of the war potential at home and throughout Europe. We must use the full resources, as quickly and thoroughly as it is organizationally and practically possible. Unnecessary concern is wholly out of place. The future of Europe hangs on our success in the East! We are ready to defend it! The German people are shedding their most valuable blood in this battle. The rest of Europe should at least work to support us. Those who do not understand this fight today will thank us on bended knee tomorrow that we took it!

- Joseph Goebbels, 1943

http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/goeb36.htm

America, the Fourth Reich

By Ian Gurney
Online Journal Contributing Writer

"Dictatorships start wars because they need external enemies to exert internal control over their own people." —Richard Perle

August 13, 2003

Americans are the new Nazis. There, that's earned me a lot of enemies very quickly hasn't it?

"How dare you," comes the riposte from the neo-cons in the administration and the right-wing think tanks like JINSA and the PNAC, as well as the "Fox news compliant" brigade whose heads are still stuck up their backsides enjoying the televised view. "America is a democracy, a free country run by a democratically elected government. It is the land of the free, the home of the brave and the protector of the free world," I hear them chorus.

To that I say, bullshit.

To say America is a democracy these days is just stretching things too far. Consider: Bush was not elected by the majority of people in the USA. Admittedly the turnout was low (you do, after all, get the government you deserve if you don't exercise your franchise) but George W didn't get a mandate. To do that more than 50 percent of the voters have to vote for you, and that didn't happen. In fact, Georgie boy lost. However, good old George made sure that, mandate or not, win or not, with a little help from friends and family in Florida he could win it by cheating. Let's not mince words, George W Bush stole the presidency of the United States. He is not the democratically elected leader of America.

It also appears that some unelected officials in the Bush administration may have acquired more power than the president himself. Perle, Wolfowitz, Feith, Bolton, Abrams, Rumsfeld all share the same right-wing neo-conservative views held by organisations such as the Project for a New American Century, the Zionist Organisation of America and the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs. As members of these organisations, it could be said that this unelected cabal of neo-cons in the White House and the Pentagon have interests other than America at heart. This is not only undemocratic, it is treason.

So, we now see that America is governed by a president who was not democratically elected, supported by an unelected cabal of people with very extreme and in some cases, very un-American views. This cannot, therefore, classify America as a democratic country. A country that is governed by a non-elected power is, as we have seen and heard these last few months concerning Iraq, Iran and North Korea, classed as a "dictatorship". Dictatorships are fascist by nature. Fascism is described as "right-wing dictatorship". Look up the word fascism. See what I mean?

Now let's take a quick look at Germany in the 1930s and '40s as the Nazis reared their ugly heads. Here was a country that was financially crippled with a massive budget deficit owing billions of dollars to the rest of the world. Just like the USA.

In the 1930s Germany was a country where the burning of the Reichstag, Germany's 9/11, engineered by Hitler and his henchmen, was used to create external enemies and to exert internal control over the German people. Hitler then used the media to lie, frighten and deceive the population, allowing a bunch of vicious, extreme, right-wing megalomaniacs to gain power. Just like the USA.

In the 1930s Hitler was surrounded by a group of unelected officials whose sole objective was to take control of Germany for their own ends and with the use of their military might, take control of the assets and prosperity of other, weaker countries. Just like the USA.

In 1939 Hitler embarked on a series of pre-emptive attacks on sovereign nations in the name of "freeing the people" of that country. Just like the USA.

In 1940 the German hierarchy started building special "camps" or detention centres in which to incarcerate and eventually execute those people considered to be "against" their regime. Just like the USA.

As Germany invaded the countries surrounding them during World War II, they found that far from having conquered the country and "liberated" the people, the people of that country formed nationalist "resistance" groups and used guerilla warfare to kill, harass and slowly demoralise the occupying army. Just like the USA.

"History is little more than the register of crimes, follies, and misfortunes of mankind" wrote Edward Gibbon, the British historian in The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. History should teach us a great many things, but unfortunately the majority of Americans know very little about history, or for that matter, the rest of the world. Don't believe me? Ask an American where Admiral Lord Nelson, one of the worlds greatest naval commanders, died or what nationality Alexander the Great was? Better still, ask an American to point to pretty much any foreign country on a map. Try North Korea.

If you know nothing of history, you cannot learn the lessons history teaches. You continue to make the same mistakes. Hitler's mistake was to wage war on too many fronts at once and underestimate the ferocity of the guerilla wars being fought against him by resistance groups all over Europe. Eventually it was Russia, or to be more precise, the Russian winter and Hitler's hubris, that proved to much for the disillusioned German troops, sick and tired of fighting and dying for a regime that they belatedly realised was illegitimate.

Hitler, in the last desperate act of a cowardly tyrant, committed suicide. Germany, defeated and destroyed, had lost everything. Those who had been instrumental in Germany's war and propaganda machine were tried and executed. Eventually Germany once again became a democracy, but it had taken the deaths of many millions of people to restore that democracy.

Despite Germany's huge arsenal of weapons, it had lost the war because those running Germany were not the democratic leaders of a democratic country, but were fascist, right-wing neo-conservatives: Nazis, who propagated an illegal war through lies and deception and stirred up the anger of all decent thinking people on the planet with their evil deeds.

Just like the USA.

Copyright © 2003 Ian Gurney

Ian Gurney is a broadcaster, journalist and the author of the bestseller, "The Cassandra Prophecy-Armageddon Approaches," published by International Global Press. ISBN: 0953581314. Ian welcomes your comments at info@caspro.com

http://www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/081303Gurney/081303gurney.html

A proč jsme napadli Irák, tatínku?

1: Tatinku, proc jsme napadli Irak?
2: Protoze meli zbrane hromadneho niceni, broucku.
1: Ale inspektori nenasli zadne zbrane hromadneho niceni.
2: To proto, ze je Iracani schovali.
1: A proto jsme napadli Irak?
2: Ano. Invaze vzdycky funguji lepe, nez inspekce.
1: Ale potom, co jsme je napadli, jsme stejne nenasli zadne zbrane hromadneho niceni, ne?
2: No, protoze jsou dobre schovane. Nedelej si starosti, urcite neco najdeme, pravdepodobne tesne pred volbami 2004.
1: Na co Irak vsechny ty zbrane hromadneho niceni potreboval?
2: Aby je pouzil ve valce, hlupacku!
1: Tak to jsem zmateny... Kdyz meli vsechny ty zbrane, ktere chteli pouzit ve valce, proc zadne nepouzili, kdyz jsme s nimi valcili my?
2: No, samozrejme nechteli, aby nekdo vedel, ze ty zbrane maji, takze radsi po tisicovkach umirali, nez by se branili.
1: To nedava smysl, tatinku. Proc by radsi umreli, kdyz meli vsechny ty velike zbrane proti nam.
2: Je to odlisna kultura. To nemusi davat smysl.
1: Ja nevim, jak ty, ale ja si myslim, ze nemeli zadne z tech zbrani, ktere vlada rika, ze meli.
2: No, vis, na tom tak nezalezi. Meli jsme dalsi dobry duvod, abychom je napadli.
1: A jaky?
2: I kdyby Irak nemel zbrane hromadneho niceni, Sadam Husajn byl kruty diktator, coz je dalsi dobry duvod, abychom je napadli.
1: Proc? Co dela takovy kruty diktator, aby bylo v poradku napadnout jeho zem?
2: No, treba tryznil svuj vlastni lid.
1: Neco jako v Cine?
2: Nesrovnavej Cinu s Irakem. Cina je dobra ekonomicka konkurence, miliony lidi pracuji za otrocke mzdy v manufakturach, a vydelavaji americkym korporacim.
1: Takze kdyz zeme zneuziva sve lidi pro zisk americkych korporaci, je to dobra zeme, i kdyz trapi lidi?
2: Spravne.
1: A proc trapili lidi v Iraku?
2: Hlavne za politicke zlociny, treba kritizovani vlady. Lide, kteri kritizovali vladu v Iraku byly zavirani do vezeni a muceni.
1: Neni to presne tak, jako v Cine?
2: Rikal jsem ti, ze Cina je jina!
1: A jaky je rozdil mezi Cinou a Irakem?
2: No, za prve, Irak vedla strana Ba'ath, zatimco Cina je komunisticka.
1: Nerikal jsi mi jednou, ze komunisti jsou spatni?
2: Nene, jenom kubansti komunisti jsou spatni.
1: A jak jsou kubansti komunisti spatni?
2: No, za prve, lide, kteri kritizuji vladu na Kube, jdou do vezeni a muci je.
1: Jako v Iraku?
2: Presne.
1: A jako v Cine?
2: Rikal jsem ti, ze Cina je dobra ekonomicka konkurence. Na druhe strane Kuba neni.
1: A proc Kuba neni?
2: No, vis, nekdy v sedesatych letech nase vlada schvalila nektere zakony, ktere zpusobily, ze obchodovat s Kubou je nelegalni. Dokud neprestanou byt komunisty a nestanou se kapitalisty, jako jsme my.
1: A kdybychom se zbavili tech zakonu, otevreli s Kubou hranice a zacali s nimi obchodovat, nepomohlo by to, aby se z nich stali kapitalisti?
2: Nedelej chytryho!
1: Nechtel jsem delat chytryho...
2: V kazdem pripade, taky na Kube nemaji svobodu nabozenstvi!
1: Neco jako Cina a hnuti Falun Gong?
2: Rikal jsem, abys o Cine osklive nemluvil! A Sadam Husajn ziskal moc vojenskym prevratem, takze stejne neni legitimni vudce.
1: Co je to vojensky prevrat?
2: To je kdyz vojensky general ziska vladu v zemi nasilim, namisto svobodnych voleb, jako mame tady ve Spojenych Statech.
1: A neziskal pakistansky vudce vladu taky prevratem?
2: Myslis generala Perveze Musharrafa? Ehm, jo, ziskal, ale Pakistan jsou nasi pratele.
1: A proc jsou Pakistan nasi pratele, kdyz nemaji legitimniho vudce?
2: Nerikal jsem, ze Pervez Musharraf neni legitimni.
1: Ale vzdyt jsi rikal, ze vojensky general, ktery ziska moc tim, ze premuze silou legitimni vladu v zemi, neni legitimni vudce?
2: Jenom Sadam Husajn. Pervez Musharraf je nas pritel, protoze nam pomahal v invazi do Afghanistanu.
1: A proc jsme napadli Afghanistan?
2: Kvuli tomu, co nam udelali 11. zari.
1: A co nam Afghanistan udelal 11. zari?
2: No, 11. zari devatenact muzu (patnact z nich bylo ze Saudske Arabie) uneslo nase letadla a tri z nich nasmerovali do budov, a zabili pres 3000 Americanu.
1: A jak do toho zapada Afghanistan?
2: V Afghanistanu vsechny ty muze vycvicili, pod krutou vladou Talibanu.
1: Nejsou Taliban ti radikalni islamci, co sekaji lidem hlavy a ruce?
2: Ano, to byli presne oni. Sekali lidem hlavy a ruce, a taky utlacovali zeny.
1: A nedala Bushova administrativa Talibanu v kvetnu 2001 43 milionu?
2: Ano, to byla odmena, za jejich uspesny boj proti drogam.
1: Boj proti drogam?
2: Ano, Taliban byl velmi uspesny v zabranovani lidem pestovat opium.
1: A jak se jim to tak dobre povedlo?
2: Jednoduse. Koho chytili, ze pestoval opium, tomu sekali ruce a hlavy.
1: Takze kdyz Taliban sekal lidem hlavy a ruce kvuli pestovani kytek, bylo to v poradku, ale uz nebylo v poradku kdyz sekal hlavy a ruce z jinych duvodu?
2: Ano. To je v poradku, kdyz radikalni islamci sekaji lidem hlavy a ruce za pestovani kytek, ale je krute, kdyz jim sekaji ruce a hlavy za kradeni chleba.
1: A nesekaji lidem ruce a hlavy i v Saudske Arabii?
2: To je rozdil. Afghanistan byl tyransky patriarchat, ktery utlacoval zeny a chtel po nich, aby na verejnosti oblekaly burku, pod pohruzkou smrti ukamenovanim pro ty, ktere to nedodrzely.
1: A Saudske zeny nemusi na verejnosti chodit v burce?
2: Ne, Saudske zeny nosi jenom tradicni Islamsky odev.
1: A jaky je v tom rozdil?
2: Tradicni islamsky odev, ktery nosi saudske zeny, je prosty, lec elegantni sat, ktery zakryva cele zenske telo, krome oci a prstu. Naproti tomu burka je odporny nastroj patriarchalniho utlaku, ktery zakryva cele zenske telo, krome oci a prstu.
1: Zni to jako stejna vec pod jinym jmenem.
2: Nesrovnavej tady Afghanistan a Saudskou Arabii. Arabove jsou nasi pratele!
1: Ale ja myslel, ze jsi rikal, ze 15 z 19 unoscu z 11. zari bylo ze Saudske Arabie?
2: Ano, ale vycvicil je Afghanistan.
1: A kdo je vycvicil?
2: Velmi spatny muz, Osama bin Ladin.
1: Z Afghanistanu?
2: Eh, ne, byl take ze Saudske Arabie. Ale byl to spatny clovek, velmi spatny clovek.
1: Vzpominam si, ze kdysi byl taky nas pritel...
2: Jenom kdyz jsme pomahali jemu a mudzahedinskemu odporu Sovetske invazi v 80tych letech.
1: Kdo jsou Soveti? To je to Zle Komunisticke Imperium, o kterem mluvil Ronald Reagan?
2: Soveti uz nejsou. Sovetsky svaz se rozpadl nekdy kolem 1990 a ted maji volby a kapitalismus jako my. Ted jim rikame Rusove.
1: Aha, a tak teda Soveti... chci rict Rusove? Jsou ted nasi pratele?
2: No, ne uplne. Vis, byly nasimi prateli dlouha leta potom, co prestali byt Sovety, ale pak se rozhodli nepodporit nasi invazi do Iraku, takze jsme na ne ted nastvani. Taky jsme nastvani na Francouze a Nemce, protoze nam taky nepomohli napadnout Irak.
1: Takze Francouzi a Nemci jsou taky zli?
2: Ne uplne zli, ale dost zli na to, abychom prejmenovali hranolky French fries a tousty French toast na Freedom fries a Freedom toast.
1: To vzdycky prejmenovavame jidlo kdyz nejaka zeme nedela to, co chceme my?
2: Jenom kdyz to jsou nasi pratele. Nepratele napadame.
1: Ale nebyl Irak taky jednim z pratel, tehdy v 80tych letech?
2: No, ano. Chvili.
1: A byl tehdy vudce Iraku Sadam Husajn?
2: Ano, ale tehdy bojoval proti Iranu, coz z nej na chvili udelalo naseho pritele.
1: Proc to z nej udelalo naseho pritele?
2: Protoze tehdy byl Iran nas nepritel.
1: Nebylo to tehdy, jak posilali Kurdy do plynu?
2: Jo, ale protoze zrovna bojoval proti Iranu, tak jsme privreli oci, abychom mu ukazali, ze jsme pratele.
1: Takze ten, kdo bojuje proti nekomu z nasich nepratel, se automaticky stane nasim pritelem?
2: Ano, vetsinou.
1: A ten, kdo bojuje proti nekomu z nasich pratel je automaticky nepritel?
2: To je taky nekdy pravda. Nicmene kdyz americke korporace muzou vydelavat na prodeji zbrani obema stranam, tim lepe.
1: Proc?
2: Protoze valka je dobra pro ekonomiku, coz znamena, ze valka je dobra pro Ameriku. A take, protoze Buh je na strane Ameriky, kazdy kdo odporuje valce je bezbozny neamericky komunista. Uz rozumis, proc jsme napadli Irak?
1: Myslim, ze jo. Napadli jsme ho, protoze to po nas Buh chtel, je to tak?
2: Ano.
1: Ale jak jsme vedeli, ze Buh po nas chce, abychom napadli Irak?
2: No, vis, Buh osobne mluvi s Georgem W. Bushem a rika mu, co ma delat.
1: Takze v podstate, podle toho, co rikas, jsme napadli Irak, protoze George W. Bush slysi hlasy?
2: Ano! Konecne rozumis tomu, jak funguje svet.
1: A ted zavri oci, pohodlne si lehni a uz spi. Dobrou noc.
2: Dobrou noc, tatinku.

http://www.osud.cz/cs/clanek.php?id=1897

...

A man faces being sent to jail if he uses a specific term of racial abuse in public.

Michael Guilfoyle, 31, is believed to be the first person in the UK to be banned from using a particular word - "Paki" - under the terms of an anti-social behaviour order. He could also be prosecuted for behaving anti-socially or using insulting or abusive, including homophobic, language.

...

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/legal/story.jsp?story=433113

Condoleeza Rice Warned Willie Brown Not To Fly On 9-11

Bush administration foreknowledge of 9-11 hijackings confirmed by condoleezza Rice herself.

http://www.sf.indymedia.org/news/2003/08/1634286.php

Human shields face 12 years' jail for visiting Iraq

http://www.guardian.co.uk/antiwar/story/0,12809,1017347,00.html

US tried to plant WMDs, failed: whistleblower

Daily Times Monitor

According to a stunning report posted by a retired Navy Lt Commander and 28-year veteran of the Defense Department (DoD), the Bush administration’s assurance about finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq was based on a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) plan to “plant” WMDs inside the country. Nelda Rogers, the Pentagon whistleblower, claims the plan failed when the secret mission was mistakenly taken out by “friendly fire”, the Environmentalists Against War report.

Nelda Rogers is a 28-year veteran debriefer for the DoD. She has become so concerned for her safety that she decided to tell the story about this latest CIA-military fiasco in Iraq. According to Al Martin Raw.com, “Ms Rogers is number two in the chain of command within this DoD special intelligence office. This is a ten-person debriefing unit within the central debriefing office for the Department of Defense.”

The information that is being leaked out is information “obtained while she was in Germany heading up the debriefing of returning service personnel, involved in intelligence work in Iraq for the DoD and/or the CIA. “According to Ms Rogers, there was a covert military operation that took place both preceding and during the hostilities in Iraq,” reports Al Martin Raw.com, an online subscriber-based news/analysis service which provides “Political, Economic and Financial Intelligence”.

Al Martin is a retired Lt Commander (US Navy), the author of a memoir called “The Conspirators: Secrets of an Iran-Contra Insider,” and is considered one of America’s foremost experts on corporate and government fraud. Ms Rogers reports that this particular covert operation team was manned by former military personnel and “the unit was paid through the Department of Agriculture in order to hide it, which is also very commonplace”.

According to Al Martin Raw.com, “the Agriculture Department has often been used as a paymaster on behalf of the CIA, DIA, NSA and others”. According to the Al Martin Raw.com story, another aspect of Ms Rogers’ report concerns a covert operation which was to locate the assets of Saddam Hussein and his family, including cash, gold bullion, jewelry and assorted valuable antiquities. The problem became evident when “the operation in Iraq involved 100 people, all of whom apparently are now dead, having succumbed to so-called ‘friendly fire’. The scope of this operation included the penetration of the Central Bank of Iraq, other large commercial banks in Baghdad, the Iraqi National Museum and certain presidential palaces where monies and bullion were secreted.”

“They identified about $2 billion in cash, another $150 million in Euros, in physical banknotes, and about another $100 million in sundry foreign currencies ranging from Yen to British Pounds,” reports Al Martin.

“These people died, mostly in the same place in Baghdad, supposedly from a stray cruise missile or a combination of missiles and bombs that went astray,” Martin continues. “There were supposedly 76 who died there and the other 24 died through a variety of ‘friendly fire’, ‘mistaken identity’ and some of them—their whereabouts are simply unknown.” Ms Rogers’ story sounds like an updated 21st-century version of Treasure Island meets Ali Baba and the Bush Cabal Thieves, writes Martin.

“This was a contingent of CIA/ DoD operatives, but it was really the CIA that bungled it,” Ms Rogers said. “They were relying on the CIA’s ability to organise an effort to seize these assets and to be able to extract these assets because the CIA claimed it had resources on the ground within the Iraqi army and the Iraqi government who had been paid. That turned out to be completely bogus. As usual.”

“CIA people were supposed to be handling it,” Martin continues. “They had a special ‘black’ aircraft to fly it out. But none of that happened because the regular US Army showed up, stumbled onto it and everyone involved had to scramble. These new Iraqi “asset seizures” go directly to the New US Ruling Junta. The US Viceroy in Iraq Paul Bremer is reportedly drinking Saddam’s $2000 a bottle Napoleon-era brandy, smoking his expensive Davidoff cigars and he has even furnished his office with Saddam’s Napoleon-era furniture.

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_12-8-2003_pg1_9

Mississippi school district installs Web cams in every hallway and classroom

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2003/08/12/national1827EDT0680.DTL

NWO Conditioning Discovered in NBC's 'Frasier' Sitcom

Paul Joseph Watson August 13 2003

The nexus between societal engineering and popular television has always existed but the brainwashing is no more evident than today. We have a whole raft of recent movies and television shows that portray anyone who thinks there is a New World Order agenda to be a raving lunatic. We also have so-called fictional TV programs that predict future events to an astounding degree of accuracy.

Films like Spy Kids 2, Men in Black 2, XXX and SWAT - almost every other movie at the cinema, has a consistent and sinister message. The heroes work for the government and anyone who disagrees with the government is mentally unstable or worse, a terrorist.

This sea change is not by accident. Just as Nokia or Budweiser would pay film companies to have their products featured, (such as in the recent Terminator 3) so too the government pay to have a particular brand of 'acceptable' thinking ingrained into the masses via their favourite movie and TV characters. Just after September 11th, Hollywood agreed to a Pentagon demand that government must be involved in all movies that even lightly touch upon national security issues - despite the fact that the plots are obviously fictional.

Stunningly Accurate Forecasts

The Lone Gunmen is a Fox spin-off of the X-files and in July 2001 aired an episode where a plane is electronically hijacked by a secret government cabal who try to crash it into the World Trade Center to get martial law, start wars and increase weapons sales.

Perhaps then we should be anxious about the plot of another Fox propaganda crusade, 24, where an element within the government tied to the multinational oil industry is the hidden hand behind a nuclear explosion over Los Angeles. A war is then initiated based on forged evidence tying three middle eastern countries to the attack (Niger uranium anyone?).

Frasier's New World Order Pitch

Another example of social steering occured in a recent episode of Frasier, I will quote the relevent script segments, just read along and you will soon realize the trick. Anyone who believes in a 'New World Order' is a dangerous mentally ill terrorist who wants to overthrow the government. This, despite the fact that world leaders call for a New World Order in public speeches every week.

Frasier Season 10 - Episode 23: Analyzed Kiss

vice:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_watson.html

US ADMIT USING 'SON OF NAPALM' ON IRAQIS Aug 10 2003


The generals love it, says Colonel

From Bob Graham In Baghdad


AMERICAN jets killed Iraqi troops with a controversial napalm-type weapon during the war in Iraq, the Pentagon has admitted.

Mark 77 firebombs were dropped on Iraq on at least two occasions during the recent conflict.

A senior Pentagon colonel confirmed the bombs have "similar destructive characteristics" to napalm - the use of which sparked world outrage in the Vietnam war. The photograph of nine-year-old Kim Phuc, screaming in pain from napalm burns, turned public opinion in America against the war. In 1980 napalm was banned by the United Nations, but the US did not sign the agreement.

Three months ago, after Gulf War II, the Pentagon denied using napalm against Iraqi troops. However, it has now admitted using "Mark 77 firebombs", which are produced using a similar fuel-gel mixture.

Colonel Mike Daily of the US Marines confirmed Mark 77 bombs were dropped around the Kuwait-Iraq border at the start of the war.

He said they had "similar destructive characteristics" to the Vietnam-era napalm.

...

http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/content_objectid=13274923_method=full_siteid=106694_headline=-U-S--ADMIT-USING--SON-OF-NAPALM--ON-IRAQIS-name_page.html