NAZI GERMANY’S WAR ON TERRORISM


Hitler used the 1933 burning of the Reichstag (Parliament) building by a deranged Dutchman to declare a “war on terrorism,” establish his legitimacy as a leader (even though he hadn’t won a majority in the previous election).



“You are now witnessing the beginning of a great epoch in history,” he proclaimed, standing in front of the burned-out building, surrounded by national media. “This fire,” he said, his voice trembling with emotion, “is the beginning.” He used the occasion – “a sign from God,” he called it – to declare an all-out war on terrorism and its ideological sponsors, a people, he said, who traced their origins to the Middle East and found motivation for their “evil” deeds in their religion.



Two weeks later, the first prison for terrorists was built in Oranianberg, holding the first suspected allies of the infamous terrorist. In a national outburst of patriotism, the nation’s flag was everywhere, even printed in newspapers suitable for display.



Within four weeks of the terrorist attack, the nation’s now-popular leader had pushed through legislation, in the name of combating terrorism and fighting the philosophy he said spawned it, that suspended constitutional guarantees of free speech, privacy, and habeas corpus. Police could now intercept mail and wiretap phones; suspected terrorists could be imprisoned without specific charges and without access to their lawyers; police could sneak into people’s homes without warrants if the cases involved terrorism.



To get his patriotic “Decree on the Protection of People and State” passed over the objections of concerned legislators and civil libertarians, he agreed to put a 4-year sunset provision on it: if the national emergency provoked by the terrorist attack on the Reichstag building was over by then, the freedoms and rights would be returned to the people, and the police agencies would be re-restrained.



Within the first months after that terrorist attack, at the suggestion of a political advisor, he brought a formerly obscure word into common usage. Instead of referring to the nation by its name, he began to refer to it as The Fatherland. As hoped, people’s hearts swelled with pride, and the beginning of an us-versus-them mentality was sewn. Our land was “the” homeland, citizens thought: all others were simply foreign lands.



Within a year of the terrorist attack, Hitler’s advisors determined that the various local police and federal agencies around the nation were lacking the clear communication and overall coordinated administration necessary to deal with the terrorist threat facing the nation, including those citizens who were of Middle Eastern ancestry and thus probably terrorist sympathizers. He proposed a single new national agency to protect the security of the Fatherland, consolidating the actions of dozens of previously independent police, border, and investigative agencies under a single powerful leader.



Most Americans remember his Office of Fatherland Security, known as the Reichssicherheitshauptamt and Schutzstaffel, simply by its most famous agency’s initials: the SS.



And, perhaps most important, he invited his supporters in industry into the halls of government to help build his new detention camps, his new military, and his new empire which was to herald a thousand years of peace. Industry and government worked hand-in-glove, in a new type of pseudo-democracy first proposed by Mussolini and sustained by war.

http://www.c0balt.com/resources/terror/terror.shtml

Megiddo Project

What is supposed to be a "strategic assessment of the potential for domestic terrorism" gets scary when it names Christians who believe in a second coming of Christ and those who believe in a secret shadow government as well as a new world government being ushered in, as possible terrorists. Time to persecute the Christians in this new Rome.

FBI's J.T.T.F. Pamphlets

As seen with The Megiddo Project, this scan shows both sides of a pamphlet that was printed for the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force. This one comes right out and shows that any of the suspects who would "Make numerous references to the U.S. Constitution" are possible terrorists as well as people who "defend the United States Constitution" Welcome to Amerika...



Northwoods Document

The US is no stranger to creating terrorism. As an excuse to invade Cuba, the great old United States Government had drawn up plans to create a false terror campaign. In their own words, "Casualty lists in US Newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation." All this as a way to gain support to invade the island of Cuba.

http://www.c0balt.com/docs.shtml

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2003 5:26 pm Post subject: YOU COULD BE A TERRORIST IF

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

YOU COULD BE A TERRORIST IF ... Could you be a full-blown terrorist and
not know it? Should you turn yourself in to the authorities right now? Take
the following quick quiz and find out. Answer "True" or "False" to each of
the following questions:

01. You believe in the Constitution.
02. You believe in the "Rule of Law."
03. You believe in gold as real money.
04. You believe in silver as real money.
05. You believe in limited government.
06. You believe in a free market system.
07. You believe in abolishing the Federal Reserve System.
08. You believe in balanced budgets.
09. You believe in the right to possess property.
10. You believe the income tax is misapplied.
11. You believe in God.
12. You believe there is a 9/11 WTC conspiracy to suppress facts and
evidence.
13. You believe in the Family Unit.
14. You believe welfare is unconstitutional.
15. You believe the financial markets are corrupt.
16. You believe the judiciary is corrupt.
17. You believe the body politic is corrupt.
18. You believe the Warren Commission findings were corrupted or covered up.
19. You believe the Educational System is failing.
20. You believe the U. S. Government is bankrupt.
21. You believe the "War On Terrorism" is a fraud perpetuated to enrich oil
companies.
22. You believe the dollar is a fraud.
23. You believe that fractional banking is a swindle.
24. You believe that government officials possessed prior knowledge of
'9/11'.
25. You believe that Social Security is bankrupt.
26. You believe in a gold cartel suppressing the price of gold.
27. You believe in privacy and the right to be left alone.
28. You believe in the New World Order conspiracy.
29. You believe the CFR operates as a shadow government on foreign policy.
30. You believe in your sovereignty as a Citizen.
31. You believe there is too much government regulation.
32. You believe the United Nations should be abolished.
33. You believe the stock market is a rigged scheme.
34. You believe the economy is likely to collapse.
35. You believe that many government statistics are false and/or
deliberately corrupted.
36. You believe the media is controlled.
37. You believe that Home Land Security is a threat to your constitutional
liberties.
38. You believe in gun ownership and the right to protect yourself and your
family.
39. You believe "innocent until proven guilty."
40. You believe there are too many laws, lawyers, prosecutors and judges.
41. You believe there are to many prisons and prisoners.
42. You believe that Law Enforcement wields too much force and authority.
43. You believe the "War On Drugs" is a dismal failure.
43. You believe the Patriot Act should be abolished.
44. You believe in term limits for Politicians.
45. You believe America is becoming a Police State.
46. You believe lobbying and lobbyists should be banned.
47. You believe immigration is out of control.
48. You believe the government lies routinely.
49. You believe corrupt politicians should be incarcerated.
50. You believe the system is broken and may only be fixed by adherence to
the Constitution.

GRADING SCALE: How many of the above statements do you believe to be true?

5 or Less: You are a Model Sheeple. Please bleat in the affirmative.
6 to 10: Hmmmm .... you could be considered unstable and in need of
political re-education.
11 to 20: You are seriously unstable and likely under occasional
surveillance by the ABC agencies!
21 to 30: You are most likely under 24-hour surveillance by the
Authorities!!
31 or More: Hide, the Black Suburbans are coming!!!


http://forum.c0balt.com/viewtopic.php?t=546

If This Is Freedom, What Exactly Is Dictatorship?

Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2003 2:14 pm Post subject: If This Is Freedom, What Exactly Is Dictatorship?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Jacob G. Hornberger


Let me see if I have this right. In the United States of America:

1. The president now has the unrestricted power to declare war against a country that has not attacked the United States, wreaking death and destruction on both sides of the conflict.

2. The president now has the unrestricted power to round up unlimited numbers of American citizens within the United States and incarcerate them in military brigs or concentration camps for the rest of their lives and keep them from ever again communicating with friends, families, and attorneys, simply on the president’s certification that the incarcerated Americans are “terrorists,” as he has done with Jose Padilla and Yaser Esam Hamdi.

3. The president now has the unrestricted power to seize American citizens abroad and remove them to its military base in Cuba, where they can be kept for the rest of their lives and kept from ever again communicating with friends, family, and attorneys, solely on the basis of his certification that the imprisoned Americans are “terrorists,” as he initially did with Yaser Esam Hamdi.

4. The president now has the unrestricted power to kill American citizens abroad solely on the basis of his certification that the killed Americans are “terrorists,” as he did to Ahmed Hijazi, the American who was killed with a U.S.-fired missile in Yemen.

Pardon me for asking the following two indelicate questions:

First, if all this is freedom, what exactly is dictatorship?

Second, after the Iraqi people are freed from dictatorship, would it be asking too much to do the same for the American people through the adoption of the following two amendments to the U.S. Constitution:

“The Congress shall have the power to declare war, and this time we really do mean it.”

“No person shall be denied life, liberty, or property without due process of law, and this time we really do mean it.”

Mr. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation.


http://forum.c0balt.com/viewtopic.php?t=552

GORG: Omen IV - American congress ;))

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=LWJFAQTRML4XACRBAEOCFEY?type=topNews&storyID=3885936

ty voe.. to je z Omen IV, ne? :) kde si to vzal...co je to za typky?

here we go...

Gen. Franks Doubts Constitution Will Survive WMD Attack

John O. Edwards, NewsMax.com
Friday, Nov. 21, 2003

Gen. Tommy Franks says that if the United States is hit with a weapon of mass destruction that inflicts large casualties, the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government.

Franks, who successfully led the U.S. military operation to liberate Iraq, expressed his worries in an extensive interview he gave to the men’s lifestyle magazine Cigar Aficionado.

In the magazine’s December edition, the former commander of the military’s Central Command warned that if terrorists succeeded in using a weapon of mass destruction (WMD) against the U.S. or one of our allies, it would likely have catastrophic consequences for our cherished republican form of government.

Discussing the hypothetical dangers posed to the U.S. in the wake of Sept. 11, Franks said that “the worst thing that could happen” is if terrorists acquire and then use a biological, chemical or nuclear weapon that inflicts heavy casualties.

If that happens, Franks said, “... the Western world, the free world, loses what it cherishes most, and that is freedom and liberty we’ve seen for a couple of hundred years in this grand experiment that we call democracy.”

Franks then offered “in a practical sense” what he thinks would happen in the aftermath of such an attack.

“It means the potential of a weapon of mass destruction and a terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event somewhere in the Western world – it may be in the United States of America – that causes our population to question our own Constitution and to begin to militarize our country in order to avoid a repeat of another mass, casualty-producing event. Which in fact, then begins to unravel the fabric of our Constitution. Two steps, very, very important.”

Franks didn’t speculate about how soon such an event might take place.

Already, critics of the U.S. Patriot Act, rushed through Congress in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, have argued that the law aims to curtail civil liberties and sets a dangerous precedent.

But Franks’ scenario goes much further. He is the first high-ranking official to openly speculate that the Constitution could be scrapped in favor of a military form of government.

....

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/11/20/185048.shtml

JAXXE: Nevyhrabal bys plís někde odkaz na nějaký umučený vězně v Guantanamu? Mám pocit, že jsem někde něco čet a nemůžu to najít... (nacházím jen umučený na jinejch základnách v Afghanistánu, ale konkrétní případ z Guantanama nic....)

nevim

Majority believe JFK assassination a conspiracy

Poll: 57% reject government's lone-gunman explanation

Posted: November 14, 2003
3:40 p.m. Eastern


© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

With the 40th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy days away, a new poll indicates a majority of Americans don't believe the government's official version of how he was killed.

Only one in five likely voters polled by Zogby International, or 22 percent, said they believe the Warren Commission's determination that a lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, committed the crime.

In contrast, nearly three in five, or 57 percent, believe a conspiracy of at least two or more gunmen was responsible for the slaying. Another 10 percent had another theory, and 11 percent were not sure.

The poll involved 1,103 adults called at random across the country. It has a margin of error of +/- 3.2 percent.

...

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35618

Tesco RFID Rollout Starts in April

http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/658/1/1/

Cameras Trace Students' Every Move

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/11/17/eveningnews/main584085.shtml

Is RFID Technology Easy to Foil?

By Mark Baard | Also by this reporter Page 1 of 2 next »

02:00 AM Nov. 18, 2003 PT

CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts -- You may need to read the following sentence twice: Aluminum foil hats will block the signals emitted by the radio tags that will replace bar-code labels on consumer goods.

That is, of course, if you place your tin-foil hat between the radio tag and the device trying to read its signal.

Makers of RFID (or radio frequency identification) tags, along with the retailers and suppliers who plan to use them, are saying the technology they spent millions of dollars developing is too weak to threaten consumer privacy. Metals, plastics and liquids, they say, all block radio signals before they reach RFID reader devices.

"Any conductive material can shield the radio signals," said Matt Reynolds, a principal at ThingMagic, which develops RFID systems. "There are all kinds of ways to render the tags inoperable."

That means Coca-Cola, which eventually wants to put an RFID tag on every can of soda it sells, will have a hard time getting around the metals, plastics and liquids that block the radio signals from the tags.

...

http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,61264,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_1

How could the flag flutter when there's no wind on the moon?

During an interview with Stanley Kubrick's widow an extraordinary story came to light. She claims Kubrick and other Hollywood producers were recruited to help the U.S. win the high stakes race to the moon.

In order to finance the space program through public funds, the U.S. government needed huge popular support, and that meant they couldn't afford any expensive public relations failures. Fearing that no live pictures could be transmitted from the first moon landing, President Nixon enlisted the creative efforts of Kubrick, who produced 2001: a Space Odyssey (1968), to ensure promotional opportunities wouldn't be missed. In return, Kubrick got a special NASA lens to help him shoot Barry Lyndon (1975). A subtle blend of facts, fiction and hypothesis around the first landing on the moon, Dark Side Of The Moon illustrates how the truth can be twisted by the manipulation of images.

With use of 'hijacked' archival footage, false documents, real interviews taken out of context or transformed through voice-over or dubbing, staged interviews, as well as, interviews with astronauts like Buzz Aldrin and others, Dark Side Of The Moon navigates the viewer through lies and truth; fact and fiction. This is no ordinary documentary. Its intent is to inform and entertain the viewer, but also to shake him up - make him aware that one should always view television with a critical eye.

Dark Side Of The Moon is written and directed by William Karel and co-produced by Point du Jour Production and ARTE France.

http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunday/darksideofthemoon/about.html

U.N. group seeks control of Internet

http://www.washtimes.com/world/20031117-113002-7678r.htm

60 minutovy dokument o skull and bones

...

Skull And Bones

CBS News

(CBS) There are secrets that George W. Bush guards at least as carefully as any entrusted to a president.

He's forbidden to share these secrets even with the vice president -- secrets he has held ever since his days as an undergraduate at Yale.

In his senior year, Mr. Bush - like his father and his grandfather - belonged to Skull and Bones, an elite secret society that includes some of the most powerful men of the 20th century.

...

http://www.prisonplanet.com/111803skullandbones.html

U.S.'s 'Iron Hammer' code name 1st used by Nazis


REUTERS

9:17 a.m. November 18, 2003

WASHINGTON – The U.S. military's code name for a crackdown on resistance in Iraq was also used by the Nazis for an aborted operation to damage the Soviet power grid during World War Two.

"Operation Iron Hammer" this week launched the 1st Armored Division's 3rd Brigade into the roughest parts of Baghdad to ferret out the attackers who have killed scores of U.S. troops since Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was ousted in April.

A Pentagon official said the name was chosen because of the "Old Ironsides" nickname of the 1st Armored Division. He was unaware of any connection to any Nazi operation.

"Eisenhammer," the German for "iron hammer," was a Luftwaffe code name for a plan to destroy Soviet generating plants in the Moscow and Gorky areas in 1943, according to Universal Lexikon on the http://www.infobitte.de Web site.

...

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/military/20031118-0917-iraq-hammer.html

More Schools Using Surveillance Cameras To Track Students

http://www.thewbalchannel.com/education/2647172/detail.html

http://www.gulfnews.com/Articles/news.asp?ArticleID=103188
nepřipadá vám to podezřelý?