Roberts Questioned on Implantable Chip During Hearings



Prison Planet | September 12 2005

During the the confirmation hearings for John Roberts Jr., George W. Bush's nominee for Supreme Court chief justice, Roberts was questioned by Senator Joseph R. Biden on whether he would rule against a mandatory implantable microchip to track American citizens.

Click here to listen to the clip taken from today's Alex Jones show: http://prisonplanet.com/audio/120905chip.mp3

Jedním z cílů teroristů v roce 2001 měla být i budova mexického kongresu. Dva agenti Mossadu dne 10. října 2001 využili situace, kdy do budovy mexického kongresu vstoupila početná delegace odborářských dělníků a předstírajíc profesionální fotografy se vyhnuli kontrole bezpečnostním detektorem. Potom se s delegací dostali až do kanceláří prezidenta mexického kongresu. Někteří dělníci ale zjistili, že povedení fotografové jsou ozbrojeni a uvědomili bezpečnostní službu kongresu. Šéf kongresové bezpečnostní služby Salvador Alacrón potvrdil, že zadržení Izraelci měli u sebe devět ručních granátů, dynamitové patrony, detonátor, dráty a dvě automatické zbraně ráže 9 mm. Izraelská ambasáda okamžitě po zadržení obou agentů použila nejsilnější diplomatické prostředky k jejich propuštění. Z Izraele přiletěl speciální vyslanec Ariela Šarona a setkal se generálem Macedo de la Concha a státním sekretářem Jorge Gutmanem z mexického ministerstva zahraničních věcí. Mimochodem Jorge Gutman je židovského původu. Přestože držení zbraní a jakýchkoliv výbušnin je v Mexiku ilegální, byli oba agenti po této intervenci propuštěni. Proto se o pozadí celé akce víc asi nedovíme. Nicméně pokud by byl mexický kongres vyhozen do vzduchu a mexická veřejnost byla patřičně mediálně masírována, že jde o akci Osamy bin Ladina, bylo by dnes Mexiko patrně pevnou vojenskou součástí tzv. protiteroristické koalice. O celém incidentu informovala mexická televize a noviny La Vox De Aztlan / http://www.aztlan.net/mexmossad.htm /, moskevská Pravda / http://english.pravda.ru/main/2001/10/13/17982.html /, ale i židovské stránky USAJewish.com

http://zpravy24.pantax.cz/

PETVAL --- --- 9.07:30 14.9.2005
FESTER: tak se bav potichu, puso

FESTER --- --- 8.53:52 14.9.2005 --- [9.07:24 :: nejnovějsí příspěvky]
SWEDE: jaky je rozdil mezi mejma blabolama a vasima ???

co tak se vyspat ty ???
SWEDE --- --- 8.51:38 14.9.2005 --- [9.04:37 :: sledované diskuze]
FESTER: běž se už vyspat, už od noci všude blábolíš nesmysly
FESTER --- --- 8.50:44 14.9.2005 --- [9.07:24 :: nejnovějsí příspěvky]
PETVAL: a vyhrozuj si Ban...vazne... je mi to putna
FESTER --- --- 8.49:36 14.9.2005 --- [9.07:24 :: nejnovějsí příspěvky]
PETVAL: tvoje starosti bych tel mit...:) ja mam spis tady srandu...:)
PETVAL --- --- 8.48:05 14.9.2005
FESTER: k prispevku jsi zapomnel prilozit informacni hodnotu. vyber si diskuzi podlozenou argumenty nebo zvasty a writeban
FESTER --- --- 2.56:40 14.9.2005 --- [9.07:24 :: nejnovějsí příspěvky]
GORG: paci paci pacicky tata koupil boticky a maminka pasek za mysi ocasek
FESTER --- --- 2.51:50 14.9.2005 --- [9.07:24 :: nejnovějsí příspěvky]
GORG: j ya right zamestnace FEMA :)

Gold and Economic Freedom, by Alan Greenspan, Published in 1966

"Stripped of its academic jargon, the welfare state is nothing more than a mechanism by which governments confiscate the wealth of the productive members of a society to support a wide variety of welfare schemes."

"In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value."

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/fema.html

I just got back from a FEMA Detainment Camp

Bush vows action over Iran

http://dailytelegraph.news.com.au/story/0,20281,16599889-5001028,00.html

US President George W. Bush, bound for the United Nations, said overnight that he would try to rally China and Russia this week behind possible UN action to ensure Iran does not get nuclear weapons.

"It is very important for the world to understand that Iran with a nuclear weapon will be incredibly destabilising. And therefore, we must work together to prevent them from having the wherewithal to develop a nuclear weapon," he said.

...

// on si neda pokoj :)

POTLAČENÁ PRAVDA?
Otazníky kolem 11. září
http://blisty.cz/2005/9/13/art24946.html

Time For Ford Foundation & CFR To Divest?
by bob feldman
8 October 2002



Like MIT and Harvard University, the Ford Foundation and the Council on Foreign Relations [CFR] also may invest in Big Oil stock, U.S. war machine stock, and in the stock of U.S. corporations that do business under the Sharon regime in Israel/Palestine. One way to more effectively resist the U.S. Establishment's militaristic foreign policy might be to seriously demand that MIT, Harvard, the Ford Foundation and the Council on Foreign Relations divest themselves of their Big Oil, war machine and Israeli-linked corporate stockholdings.

Some of the investment income which the multi-billion dollar Ford Foundation may gain from its investment in Big Oil, war machine stock and Israeli-linked corporations is used to pay excessively high salaries to Ford Foundation executives. Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations member Susan Berresford, for instance, was paid an annual salary of $615,934 (plus an additional $114,095 in benefits) in 2001 by the "non-profit" Ford Foundation for serving as the Ford Foundation President. The chief investment officer of the Ford Foundation (who also moonlights as the Ms.Foundation for Women board member responsible for managing that "non-profit" group's investment portfolio), Linda Strump, was paid an even greater annual salary in 2001 of $890,217 by the "non-profit" Ford Foundation.

Some of the Ford Foundation's investment income is also used to fund the alternative media work of groups that generally exclude 9/11 conspiracy journalists and researchers from their radio and tv shows, such as FAIR and DEMOCRACY NOW/Deep Dish TV/Pacifica. And an even greater portion of the Ford Foundation's investment income is used to help fund the Council on Foreign Relations [CFR] Inc. which has played an especially influential role in developing the U.S. Establishment's militaristic foreign policy--in addition to (like the Ford Foundation) receiving dividends from a stock portfolio which may contain Big Oil, war machine and Israeli-linked stock. As Thomas Dye noted in a book that was published during the Bush I Administration, entitled WHO'S RUNNING AMERICA? THE BUSH ERA:
The most influential policy-planning group in foreign affairs is the Council on Foreign Relations [CFR]...The CFR by-laws limit membership to 1,900 individuals who are proposed by existing members...The CFR's list of former members includes every person of influence in foreign affairs...CFR meetings are secret...A discussion of the CFR would be incomplete without some reference to its multinational arm, the Trilateral Commission...The Trilateral Commission was established by CFR Board Chairman David Rockefeller in 1972, with the backing of the Council and the Rockefeller Foundation.

THE CIA AND THE CULT OF INTELLIGENCE by Victor Marchetti and John Marks also made the following reference to the Council on Foreign Relations:
It was no accident that former Clandestine Services Chief Richard Bissell...was talking to a Council on Foreign Relations discussion group in 1968 when he made his 'confidential' speech on covert action. For the influential but private Council, composed of several hundred of the country's top political, military, business and academic leaders, has long been the CIA's principal 'constituency' in the American public. When the agency has needed prominent citizens to front for its proprietary companies or for other special assistance, it has often turned to Council members.

Former Ford Foundation executive and CIA official Bissell apparently told the Council on Foreign Relations discussion group the following in 1968:
If the agency is to be effective, it will have to make use of private institutions on an expanding scale, though those relations which have been 'blown' cannot be resurrected. We need to operate under deeper cover, with increased attention to the use of 'cut-outs' (i.e., intermediaries). CIA's interface with the rest of the world needs to be better protected. If various groups hadn't been aware of the source of their funding, the damage subsequent to disclosure might have been far less than occurred. The CIA interface with various private groups, including business and student groups, must be remedied. (quote contained in THE PIED PIPER: ALLARD K. LOWENSTEIN AND THE LIBERAL DREAM by Richard Cummings)

Seventeen years before he moved into the Ford Foundation presidential office, the now-deceased former Ford Foundation President, McGeorge Bundy, also worked with the Council on Foreign Relations. As NATION magazine contributing editor Kai Bird recalled in his MacArthur Foundation, LBJ Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation-subsidized book THE COLOR OF TRUTH: MC GEORGE BUNDY AND WILLIAM BUNDY: BROTHERS IN ARMS:

[In 1949,] Mac took on a project with the Council on Foreign Relations in New York to study Marshall Plan aid to Europe...The council's study group on aid to Europe included some of the foreign policy establishment's leading figures. Working with young Bundy on the project were Allen Dulles, David Lilienthal, Dwight Eisenhower, Will Clayton, George Kennan, Richard M. Bissell and Franklin A. Lindsay. Dulles, Bissell and Lindsay...would shortly become high-ranking officials of the newly formed Central Intelligence Agency...Their meetings were considered so sensitive that the usual off-the-record transcript was not distributed to council members. There was good reason for the secrecy. These were probably the only private citizens privy to the highly classified fact that there was a covert side to the Marshall Plan. Specifically, the CIA was tapping into the $200 million a year in local currency counterpart funds contributed by the recipients of Marshall Plan aid. These unvouchered monies were being used by the CIA to finance anti-communist electoral activities in France and Italy and to support sympathetic journalists, labor union leaders and politicians.

Both Bundy brothers were also good friends of Frank Wisner, the legendary intelligence officer who ran these covert programs in Western Europe. They socialized with Wisner and his...wife Polly, often at dinner parties hosted by Joe Alsop...Phil and Kay Graham of the WASHINGTON POST were also part of the same social scenery. In short, the council's study group placed Mac Bundy among a small group of like-minded men who fully understood and endorsed the necessity for waging psychological warfare against the Soviet Union.

The policy paper Mac wrote that summer, "Working Paper on the Problem of Political Equilibrium," assumed that such covert activities in Western Europe were worthy endeavors.

THE COLOR OF TRUTH book also contains the following additional reference to the ties between former Ford Foundation President Bundy, the CIA and the Council on Foreign Relations:
Bundy...thought it only natural that the historian William L. Langer...had taken a leave from Harvard to organize the CIA's Office of National Estimates [ONE]...Langer had gone to Washington at the call of the CIA and promptly hired Mac's brother Bill as one of his top aides. They were old friends and political allies...Mac had published a review in THE REPORTER of a massive two volume study of America's entry into World War II written by Langer and S. Everett Gleason. Langer had finished the project while at the CIA and Gleason was a high-ranking official in the National Security Council. Bundy called it a "magnificent achievement...so thorough that it will never be done again"...Funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and the Council on Foreign Relations to the tune of $139,000--an extraordinary sum in those years--and written with privileged acces to classified documents, the Langer-Gleason volumes were official history parading as independent scholarship...

According to a chapter entitled "How The Power Elite Make Foreign Policy" that appeared in the 1970 book THE HIGHER CIRCLES by G. William Domhoff, the Ford Foundation-subsidized Council on Foreign Relations has historically operated in the following way:

...Political scientist Lester Milbrath notes that "The council on Foreign Relations, while not financed by government, works so closely with it that it is difficult to distinguish Council actions stimulated by government from autonomous actions"...Aside from membership dues, dividends from invested gifts and bequests, and profits from the sale of FOREIGN AFFAIRS, the most important sources of income are leading corporations and major foundations. In 1957-58, for example, Chase Manhattan, Continental Can, Ford Motor, Bankers Trust, Cities Service, Gulf, Otis Elevator, General Motors Overseas Operations, Brown Brothers, Harriman, and International General Electric were paying from $1,000 to $10,000 per year for the corporation service, depending upon the size of the company and its interest in international affairs...More generally, in 1960-61, eighty-four large corporations and financial institutions contributed 12% ($112,200) of CFR's total income. As to the foundations, the major contributors over the years have been the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Corporation, with the Ford Foundation joining in with a large grant in the 1950's. According to [newspaper columnist Joseph] Kraft, a $2.5 million grant in the early 1950's from the Ford, Rockefeller, and Carnegie foundations made the Council "the most important single private agency conducting research in foreign affairs." In 1960-61, foundation money accounted for 25% of CFR income.

All foundations which support the CFR are in turn directred by men from Bechtel Construction, Chase Manhattan, Cummins Engine, Corning Glass, Kimberly-Clark, Monsanto Chemical, and dozens of other corporations. Further, to complete the circle, most foundation directors are members of CFR. In the early 1960's, Dan Smoot found that twelve of twenty Rockefeller Foundation trustees, ten of fifteen Ford Foundation trustees, and ten of fourteen Carnegie Corporation trustees were members of CFR. Nor is this interlock of recent origin. In 1922, for example, former Secretary of State Elihu Root, a corporation lawyer, was honorary CFR president as well as president of the Carnegie Corporation, while John W. Davis, the corporation lawyer who ran for President on the Democratic ticket in 1924, was a trustee of both the Carnegie Corporation and CFR...

Turning to the all-important question of government involvement, the presence of CFR members in government has been attested to by Kraft, Cater, Smoot, CFR histories and THE NEW YORK TIMES, but the point is made most authoritatively by John J. McCloy, Wall Street lawyer, former chairman of Chase Manhattan, trustee of the Ford Foundation, director of CFR and a government appointee in a variety of roles since the early 1940's: "Whenever we needed a man," said McCloy in explaining the presence of CFR members in the modern defense establishment that fought World War II, "we thumbed through the roll of council members and put through a call to New York."...

Despite the importance of speeches and publications, I think the most important aspects of the CFR program are its special discussion groups and study groups. These small groups of about twenty-five bring together businessmen, government officials, military men and scholars for detailed discussions of specific topics in the area of foreign affairs. Discussion groups explore problems in a general way, trying to define issues and alternatives. Such groups often lead to a study group as the next stage. Study groups revolve around the work of a Council research fellow (financed by Carnegie, Ford and Rockefeller) or a staff member...In 1957-58...the Council published six books which grew out of study groups. Perhaps the most famous of these was written by Henry Kissinger, a bright young McGeorge Bundy protege at Harvard who was asked by the CFR to head a study group. His NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND FOREIGN POLICY was "a best seller which has been closely read in the highest Administration circles and foreign offices abroad"...

It is within these discussion groups and study groups, where privacy is the rule to encourage members to speak freely, that members of the power elite study and plan as to how best to attain American objectives in world affairs...It was supposedly a special CFR briefing session in early 1947 that convinced Undersecretary of State Robert Lovett of Brown Brothers, Harriman that "it would be our principal task at State to awaken the nation to the dangers of Communist aggression."

Despite the fact that the CFR is an organization most Americans have never heard of, I think we have clearly established by a variety of means that it is a key connection between the federal government and the owners and managers of the country's largest financial institutions and corporations. It is an organization of the power elite...In my view, what knowledge we have of CFR suggests that through it the power elite formulate general guidelines for American foreign policy and provide the personnel to carry out this policy...

From a $135,057,600 stock portfolio which may be invested in Big Oil stock, U.S. war machine stock and Israeli-linked corporate stock, the Council on Foreign Relations, itself, earned an investment income of $2,905,350 between July 21, 2000 and June 30, 2001. Some of this investment income of the "non-profit" Council on Foreign Relations Inc. was then used to pay Council on Foreign Relations President Leslie Gelb an annual salary of $258,686.

The Ford Foundation-subsidized Council on Foreign Relations is one of the U.S. governing elite institutions responsible for formulating the U.S. Establishment's militaristic foreign policy and an institution that may profit from investments in Big Oil, U.S. war machine and Israeli-linked corporate stock. So it might be politically productive for the U.S. anti-war movement to seriously start making stock divestment demands on both the Countil on Foreign Relations and the Ford Foundation, as well as on MIT and Harvard University.

http://www.questionsquestions.net/feldman/ff_divest.html

a samozrejme tady, ale to mame na home uz 4 roky :)

Fractional Reserve Banking as Economic Parasitism - Scientific, Mathematical & Historical Expose, Critique and Manifesto - by Vladimir Z. Nuri, PDF, 62 stran
ftp://wueconb.wustl.edu/econ-wp/mac/papers/0203/0203005.pdf

JAXXE: hezka podrobnejsi analyza, jak to funguje, je napr. tady

THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM:
A FATAL PARASITE ON THE AMERICAN BODY POLITIC
by
Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr.

http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/VieiraMono4.htm

Virtuální peníze = virtuální moc?

Peníze hýbou světem. Ale co jsou to vlastně peníze? Jak se změnily v průběhu historie? Peníze umožnily a usnadňují směnu mezi lidmi. V dávné minulosti byly peníze z drahých kovů – ze zlata a ze stříbra. Revoluci do peněžnictví přinesly papírové peníze. Od té doby začaly všechny problémy v peněžnictví. Nastala éra inflace, krachu měn a dalších zlořádů. Nové peníze se staly předmětem podnikání. Přesto všechno byly stále tyto peníze kryty zlatem. Každý mohl přijít do banky a své peníze vyměnit za zlato. Dýku do zad peněžnictví vrazil prezident Nixon, když zrušil zlatý standard dolaru. Od té doby je možné všechno. Začala éra virtuálních peněz. Statistické údaje Bank of England z roku 1997 uvádí celkový stav peněz ve Velké Britanii celkem 680 miliard liber sterlingů (Lstg). Je to celkový obraz financí, pohybujících se v ekonomice. Jde o mince, bankovky, bankovní vklady, vklady stavebních spořitelen, všech lidí, veřejných i soukromých obchodních společností. Celkový obraz financí nám objasní, jak tento objem peněz rostl v čase. V roce 1963 to bylo jen 14 miliard, v roce 1975 to bylo už 53 miliard. Za 5 let toto množství stouplo v roce 1980 na 205 miliard Lstg. V roce 1997 dosáhlo množství peněz v ekonomice na celkem 680 miliard. Virtuálních peněz ! Většina lidí si myslí, že peníze může vydávat jen vláda a vláda si peníze ohlídá. Ze stejných statistických údajů Anglické banky vyplývá, že vláda Velké Britanie vydala celkem jenom asi 25 miliard Lstg. Kde se tedy vzalo zbývajících 655 miliard, které nevytvořila vláda? Celý ten zbytek 655 miliard liber – což dělá 97% všech peněz Velké Britanie – byl vytvořen bankami a stavebními společnostmi a byl vytvořen z ničeho. Každému, kdo by si chtěl přilepšit výrobou peněz, hrozí trest 20 let vězení. Nikoli lidem, kteří se pohybují v bankovním sektoru. Když by se někdo zeptal, jak můžou soukromé společnosti „vyrábět“ peníze, dostane se jim odpovědi, že jsou to hypotéky, soukromé půjčky a přečerpávání účtů, které vedou k vytvoření tohoto dluhu. Vlády se přímo spoléhají na to, že se lidé zadluží, aby tak byly vytvořeny peníze, které proudí do ekonomiky. K roztáčení kol ekonomiky je pak nutné, aby každá libra, koruna, dolar měly své ekvivalenty v nějakém dluhu. Ale Británie v tom není sama. Situace ve Spojených státech je stejná. Dluh USA dosahuje v současnosti 7 790 miliard dolarů.
To znamená, že na každého Američana včetně starců a kojenců je tady státní dluh v částce 31 160 dolarů. Stejně jsou na tom všechny státy světa. Dluh Britanie jsme již vzpomínali, ale i Kanada má svůj dluh ve výšce 650 miliard dolarů, Japonsko dalších 2 000 miliard dolarů a Německo 300 miliard euro. Vypadá to, že čím bohatší země, tím je více zadlužená. Mohli bychom naopak říci, že čím je stát více zadlužený, tím je bohatší. Možná jen virtuálně. Ale nejen vlády jsou zadlužené. Rostou i dluhy osob a domácností. Američané jsou nejbohatším národem na světě hlavně díky tomu, že jsou také nejzadluženější. Celkový dluh lidí a firem v USA dosahuje dalších 4 200 miliard dolarů. V Británii je to 780 miliard liber, z toho domácnosti si půjčily přes 500 miliard. Ale dluhy se musí jednou splácet. Zatím to vypadá, že svět se řídí heslem Madame de Pompadour – „po nás potopa“. Většina lidí žije v bláhové představě, že když si půjčují peníze v bance, tak si půjčují peníze jiných lidí, kteří je do banky uložili. Jenže na výše uvedených číslech jsme si ukázali, že to není pravda. (když Bank of England vydala jen 25 miliard liber, není možné vytvořit dluhy ve výši 680 (stát) + 780 (lidé) miliard liber). Když banky půjčují lidem peníze, tak ve skutečnosti vytvoří nové peníze. Peníze půjčované bankou nejsou už existující peníze, ale jsou to nově vytvořené peníze jen k tomu účelu. Všichni se spoléhají na to, že tento proud peněz vytvořený dlužníky bude zásobovat ekonomiku jako celek a tím ji udržovat v chodu. Tato zadluženost žene státy k neustálému růstu ekonomiky. Ekonomika musí růst, státy musí exportovat, aby získaly peníze, aby mohly splácet dluhy. Jenže - to tak nefunguje. Ekonomika roste, ale ještě rychleji rostou dluhy. Rostou úroky a úroky z úroků. USA si musí každý den vypůjčit 2 miliardy dolarů, aby udržely ekonomiku v chodu. Vypůjčují si hlavně v Číně. Čína už má v USA aktiva za více než 400 miliard dolarů ve formě státních dluhopisů. Žijeme v éře stále rychlejšího ekonomického růstu. A dluhy dosahují astronomických výšek. Ve skutečnosti jediné co roste, jsou virtuální peníze na účtech několika jednotlivců, kterým poskytuje jen pocit moci. Virtuální moci. Neoliberální svět ekonomiky tak drží lidi pod krkem a nikdo neví, kam kráčí – přesto rychle kráčíme k zářným zítřkům. Zářným zítřkům pro koho??

--------------------------------------------

Demokracie je iluze, které vládnou banky

Demokracie je pouhou iluzí ve světě řízeném bankéřskými kruhy, který směřuje ke globální centralistické vládě kapitálu. Skutečnými světovými vládci jsou nejvlivnější bankéřské kruhy, které se snaží nastolit globální policejní stát. Tato skupina má navíc spoustu následovníků, kteří si myslí, že chce budovat lepší svět. Jejich pravou tvář však ukazuje kromě jiného i dílo Nahý kapitalista (v originále The Naked Capitalist) od W. C. Skousena. Skousen, který 16 let působil jako agent FBI a čtyři roky jako šéf policie v Salt Lake City, ukázal ve svém díle jak funguje mezinárodní bankovní konspirace. Píše se tu například o síti bankovních dynastií, které začaly získávat moc od založení Bank of England v roce 1694. Jejich transformace do systému národních bank jim teď umožňuje disponovat s penězi celých států. Bankéřské kruhy pak řídí politiku většiny vlád. Bankéři, vytvářející peníze z ničeho, si nakradli většinu světového bohatství. V éře tzv. finančního kapitalismu (mezi lety 1884 až 1933) tyto kruhy rozšiřovaly klasickou bankovní sféru a pojišťovnictví na jedné straně a těžký průmysl a železnice na straně druhé: mobilizovaly tím obrovské bohatství a posílily ekonomicky, politicky i sociálně. Globálnímu kapitálu ale již nejde o nic jiného, než vytvořit světový systém finanční kontroly nad politickým systémem všech zemí a světovou ekonomikou jako celkem. Tento systém má být ovládán centrálními bankami. Bankéřské kruhy proto financují celé politické spektrum, včetně extrémistů, a získávají tak vliv nad státními rozpočty, zdroji, světovými trhy a pracovními silami. Například drobná pomoc partyzánům jim vzápětí poskytne obrovské zbrojní zakázky diktátorských vlád ohrožených sílícím lidovým povstáním. Propagandou demokracie si bankéři získali miliony idealistů, kteří vůbec netuší, že podpora tzv. demokratických vlád žene svět do totalitního područí. Zřejmě nepřekvapí odhalení společnosti Johna Birche, že útoky proti USA z 11. září 2001 byly součástí této velké hry a světová média kontrolovaná bankovními kruhy směřují po těchto aktech většinu lidstva žádoucím směrem, tedy ke globálnímu otroctví. Globalizace je proces vedoucí svět pod jednu vládu a potírající rasu, náboženství, národnost a rodinu. Cílem je homogenní svět kontrolovaný policejními silami bez možnosti odporu. Neschopnost globálně bojovat proti světovému kapitálu dokládá i mizivý prostor dávaný médii protiválečnému hnutí ve věci irácké války, v porovnání například s Vietnamem před asi 40 lety. Přestože tzv. válka proti terorismu je nejhorší koloniální expanzí za nejméně poslední dvě dekády, děti se v okleštěném vzdělávacím systému učí o ochraně demokratického světa a lidských hodnot. Stejně jako ztráta politické objektivity dotýká se nové konzumní generace odklon od kulturních hodnot. Demokracie je proto nutná součást tohoto globalizačního procesu, který jde proti člověku a jeho hodnotám.

http://zpravy24.pantax.cz/

'EXPLOSIVE RESIDUE FOUND ON FAILED LEVEE DEBRIS'

'Divers inspecting the ruptured levee walls surrounding New Orleans found something that piqued their interest: Burn marks on underwater debris chunks from the broken levee wall! One diver, a member of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, saw the burn marks and knew immediately what caused them. When he surfaced and showed the evidence to his superior, the on-site Coordinator for FEMA stepped-in and said "You are not here to conduct an investigation as to why this rupture occurred, but only to determine how best to close it."

The FEMA coordinator then threw the evidence back into the water and said "You will tell no one about this."At that point, the diver went back down to do more inspection of the levee. On the second dive, he secreted a small chunk of the debris inside his wet suit and later arranged for it to be sent to trusted military friends at the U.S. Army Forensic Laboratory at Fort Gillem, Georgia for testing. According to well placed sources, a military forensic specialist determined the burn marks on the cement chunks did, in fact, come from high explosives. The source, speaking on condition of anonymity said "We found traces of boron-enhanced fluoronitramino explosives as well as PBXN-111 embedded in the debris. This would indicate at least two separate types of explosive devices."'

http://www.halturnershow.com/DiversFindExplosiveResidueOnRupturedLevy.html

JAXXE: metavylhedávače znám různý, Kartoo bylo první s kterým sem se seznámil, rozhodně mě ale nikdy nenapadlo na to aplikovat nwo apod. Každopádně díky za dobrej nápad :)

ONDREX: a tohle znas ? ;) tady si ty mapky muzes generovat sam a jsou interaktivni, staci tam zadat slova jako "new world order", illuminati, "911 truth" atd... doporucuju v options zvednout tu prvni hodnotu na 30

na home pls:

Fractional Reserve Banking Prevents Gold Standard

August 30, 2004
By Clinton P. Desveaux

A bank requires one simple rule to ensure it's continued existence in times of financial and /or economic crisis:

100 per cent reserves in safe storage to satisfy a call on all deposits when required

Anyone with even a passing interest in economic issues should be aware of how monetary policy operates and in turn the banking industry; otherwise what is the point in discussing something if the issue debated is from the ignorance of utopia?

Now most people who read my columns are, by now, aware of how monetary policy has been manipulated on the altar of statism at which many worship. For more information on monetary policy and the gold standard please look at the following link:

Gold Standard

Fractional Reserve Banking is nothing more than the ability to artificially inflate the money supply; commercial banks do so by printing and lending money, which a bank does not have in safe storage. No other business is allowed to print money, because it is viewed as being criminal. What special powers or veto does a bank hold over the masses, which allows it to flaunt the law? The issue of state banks which practice fractional reserve banking is an entirely other topic loaded with unintended humour.

How does Fractional Reserve Banking operate? Well here is a simple explanation, which anyone will understand:

Let us pretend that a new bank has been created and it’s called “HalifaxLive Bank”, this new bank operates just like any other bank in North America. Now I deposit $10.00 into this bank, which for the sake of this discussion is backed 100 per cent by a commodity. The commodity backing represents hard currency. The currency we use may be gold or platinum. Now most people think, hey it’s backed by a hard currency so this is a legitimate and trustworthy bank to deal with, right?

I turn around as the head of this bank and “lend out” $100 to someone, either for personal spending or to invest in his/her business venture, it doesn’t really matter. How can I "lend out" 10 times more than I have? Is the type of bank you would want to deal with? This is the black magic voodoo art we call “fractional reserve banking”, only a fraction of what I’m lending out actually exists. I simply open up a chequing account of $100, which I am happy to lend to Mr. Kevin Smith. Why does Mr. Kevin Smith choose to borrow from me? I charge a lower rate of interest than what real legitimate banks with 100 per cent backed reserves or some larger percentage of backed reserves. Then what I would have in my bank if any such place really existed in the current market place? I don't have to save up the money myself, but simply can print it, and do so by claiming, “fractional reserve banking”, and the government gives it a thumbs up! Since demand deposits at the “HalifaxLive Bank” act as the equivalent to cash, the nation's money supply has grown by $90. This also causes inflation and it also causes the money supply to be further debased, and the entire deviant action is under way undermining capitalism and the money supply; all with the support and endorsement of the state. Banks create more than 90 per cent of all deposits, when a bank creates a loan it also at the very same time creates a deposit.

Conservative/Liberal Keynesian economic theory and Friedmanite monetarism policy is where the current manipulation of the banking industry has found its unfortunate societal acceptance through the notion of Fractional Reserve Banking.

An official storage or warehouse location of any product ensures that the goods and products entrusted to its care are there at all times. Commercial banks operate very differently. Banks create warehouse receipts (originally bank notes and now deposits) out of thin air. Essentially, they are counterfeiters of fake warehouse-receipts to cash, which circulate as if they were genuine, 100 per cent backed notes or checking accounts. Banks under the current system make money by literally creating money out of thin air through the magic of the printing press; currently deposits rather than bank notes are what is in vogue. This type of action is almost like a money laundering operation, counterfeiting is being accepted simply because the state backs the practice. This practice has been coined, "fractional-reserve banking", which means that bank deposits are backed by only a small fraction of the cash they promise to have at hand at any give time to satisfy a call on all deposits.

Here in Canada for example the numbers from the Bank of Canada explain that by 1998 the ratio of all Canadian bank cash reserves ($3.893 billion) to their total assets ($1393 billion) have jumped to a level of 1:358, a number that is unheard of when considering that historically during the first 50 years of the 19th century the ratio never exceeded 1:15. That means for every dollar of cash in their vaults or deposited with the Bank of Canada, the banks have conjured up $357 from the gap that they've invested or lent out with interest. Now you understand why the record profits for all commercial banks is so silly most people are unable to even laugh.

A long time ago in Canada commercial banks were required to have and hold “reserves” of 50 per cent. With reserves of 50 per cent, banks could “create” new loans (deposits) twice over the totals of their deposits. Through a series of legislative statist amendments to the bank act, the reserve requirement threshold was clawed back to 10% (allowing for new loans (deposits) of 10 times the amount of deposits on hand), then Pierre Trudeau’s socialist utopia pushed the number to 8 per cent (which allowed for new loans (deposits) of 12.5 times the amount of deposits on hand, then to 3 per cent (33.3 times) and then to zero. On Dec. 9,1991, the Parliamentary majority Progressive “Conservative” government of Brian Mulroney amended the Bank Act with Bill C-19, which provided for the reduction of any reserve requirement by commercial banks over the next 3 years to zero percent. This nonsense came into full effect January 1, 1994. Banks are no longer required to hold any reserves. This means the banks have unlimited power to create new loans (deposits) through deposit expansion. On page 257 of the Canadian Bank Act, Section 457 (4) states the following:

"On the first day of the first month following the month this section comes into force, the primary reserve referred to in subsection (2) shall be reduced by 3 per cent, and thereafter on the first day of the first month of each of the next three succeeding six month periods, the primary reserve as modified by this subsection shall be reduced by 3 per cent, and on the first day of the twenty-fifth month following the month in which this section comes into force, the primary referred to in subsection (1) shall be NIL."

Gary Huskins (ATLLITCON@AOL.com) a conservative Nova Scotia author with some libertarian leanings currently shopping his latest novel likes to point out that “fractional reserve banking is the equivalent to mass manipulation of the free-market. It is the sort of manipulation one would find with my fictitious characters I create with my novels.”

What happens if everyone begins to feel nervous about the current system of Fractional Reserve Banking and nanny state, and growing numbers of people withdraw savings held in a bank? A bank run occurs, as witnessed by the tragic events of the Great Depression in the 1930’s. For more recent events consider 1985 when numerous regional banks in the northeastern United States faced bankruptcy due to a run on credit when individuals demanded a call on deposits. Just recently in Argentina, we witnessed a bank run in 2001. The police were called, and customers were refused entry into commercial banks to withdraw savings. This continued for extend amounts of time so as to allow a socialist demagogue maintain his grip on power. Elected officials and governments in various countries (tyranny of the majority as some may call it) have gone so far as to force the closure of banks, to prevent a bank run from happening and causing a chain of events which could become uncontrollable and essentially destroy the current banking system.

The solution put in place once a bank has been closed is to use everyone 's tax dollars through central banking insurance to eliminate the problem until it occurs again.

States not only condone (actually, forcing) the reserve limits, but also in allegedly "protecting" them from bank runs with deposit insurance, ultimately compounding the problem by fractionating the central bank reserves on which the banks draw from to begin with.

The current banking industry in the Western World is regulated from competition in such a manner and a legitimate cartel has been created. This banking cartel has state authorization to protect it from the normal rational and logical thought processes and laws of the free market. Banking should be treated as any other segment of the economy in a capitalist system, and face competition.

What is even more worrying with the current state - accepted banking industry practice of fractional reserve banking are the lower and middle-income earners who end up most likely to be harmed. With the current system, the most damage during a bank run happens to lower and middle income earners for 1 simple reason: high income earners tend to have the most diversification with their retirement portfolios, which almost always consist of some large percentage of a commodity like silver, gold, platinum and or oil/gas investments plus any additional private property one has at ones disposal which all represent hard currency to some extent. This hard currency is insulated from the debasing of the money supply and inflation unlike most other things in the free-market.

Only one alternative exists to the current fractional reserve and printing press mess we find ourselves in today with so-called “commercial” banks. That alternative would be a decentralized private system of commodity money. The bank could not lend out any of its deposits, only the equity in the bank. The practice of issuing receipts, or bank notes, for exactly the amount of commodity on deposit would follow from here on out. For every bank note in circulation, the bank would always have in its possession the commodity to which the note entitles the holder.

The commodity of Gold just happens to be what the market has chosen historically as money and it has certain valuable properties as money. Gold is divisible, interchangeable, etc. and when combined with 100 per cent back reserves, the banking industry then has honest money. A Gold Standard, that represents honest money, being protected by honest practices. Now that is a commercial bank, which everyone can feel secure in having! Is anyone else interested in a legitimate alternative to the mess we have today?

The bank would still make money however by charging a storage fee of some sort. The fee collected from storage could be lent out for borrowing purposes by the bank if the management felt it was making a wise financial business choice for its shareholder interest; this eliminates fractional reserve banking. The reserves would be backed by a hard currency like gold for example, and paper money would continue to be used only it would be backed by something legitimate and honest.

http://www.halifaxlive.com/fractional_reserve_08302004_0390.php

Locals, Officials Suggest Levees were Intentionally Blown
http://prisonplanet.com/Pages/090905levees.htm

...

Some final intriguing footage reveals a journalist questioning former President Bill Clinton as to why many locals feel that the levees were purposefully broken.



This was during the press conference with Clinton and George Bush Snr announcing their combined "relief effort" for New Orleans. Ignore the first 15 minutes of sickening joking and backslapping between the two and skip to the last minute of footage. Upon hearing the question Clinton appears to be surprised and then simply walks off.

rtsp://video.c-span.org/project/hur/hur090505_clintonbush.rm

http://prisonplanet.com/audio/090905clinton.mp3