ještě jednou bush

http://www.blesk.cz/Clanek54908.htm

Hugo Chavez Says He Has Documentary Evidence That U.S. Plans to Invade Venezuela

WASHINGTON Sep 17, 2005 — Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said Friday he has documentary evidence that the United States plans to invade his country.

Chavez, interviewed on ABC's "Nightline," said the plan is called "Balboa" and involves aircraft carriers and planes. A transcript of the interview was made available by "Nightline."

He said U.S. soldiers recently went to Curacao, an island off Venezuela's northwest coast. He described as a "lie" the official U.S. explanation that they visited Curacao for rest and recreation.


"They were doing movements. They were doing maneuvers," Chavez said, speaking through a translator.

He added: "We are coming up with the counter-Balboa plan. That is to say if the government of the United States attempts to commit the foolhardy enterprise of attacking us, it would be embarked on a 100-year war. We are prepared."

Chavez has been attending the summit of world leaders at the United Nations in New York this week. On Thursday, he denounced the U.S.-led war in Iraq and told other leaders they should consider moving the U.N. headquarters out of the United States.

To prove U.S. intentions to invade Venezuela, Chavez offered to send "Nightline" host Ted Koppel maps and other documentation.

"What I can't tell you is how we got it, to protect the sources, how we got it through military intelligence," he said.

In the event of a U.S. invasion, Chavez said the United States can "just forget" about receiving any more oil from his country.

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=1135500

New Orleans: A New World Order Showcase

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2005/150905nwoshowcase.htm

"Abu Musab al-Zarqawi died. His name is used by the occupants to remain in Iraq "

Babel Fish translation of http://www.lemonde.fr/web/article/0,1-0,36-689730,0.html

Sheikh Jawad Al-Khalessi is Imam Shiite of mosque Al-Kazemiya, in Baghdad, and senior of the contiguous religious school. He is in Paris after the interreligieuse meeting of Sant' Egidio, in Lyon.

Abu Musab al-Zarqawi declared the "all-out war" with the Shiites and perpetrated the bloodiest massacre in Baghdad, Wednesday September 14, since the beginning of the war in Iraq. What do you think of this declaration?

I do not think that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi exists as such. He is only one invention of the occupants to divide the people because he was killed in the north of Iraq at the beginning of the war whereas it was with the group of Ansar Al-Islam, in Kurdistan. His family, in Jordan, even proceeded to a ceremony after her death. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi is thus a toy used by the Americans, an excuse to continue the occupation.

It is a pretext not to leave Iraq. But why declare the "all-out war" with the Shiites?

In order to bring them closer the occupying forces. In this manner, the Shiites will find refuge near the Americans rather than to join resistance. Because the Shiites take part in resistance to the south, as the recent made attacks testify, in particular, in Bassora.

However, it has been just announced that Nadjaf had passed under the control of the Iraqi forces and that other cities of the South were going to follow?

It is not true. It is right an effect of advertisement for the media. Actually, the Iraqi forces do not control the situation and the troops of occupation remain with the periphery to intervene as soon as there are problems.

The project of Constitution adopted will be subjected to a referendum on October 15. What do you think about it?

It is a text adopted with haste to answer the diary of the Americans. It does not reflect the hopes of the Iraqi people, which are worried more by his survival from day to day and his safety. The project was concocted in the "green zone", in Baghdad, under the crook of the American ambassador. Like said it a British specialist in Iraq: "the Constitution, it is as if one occupied oneself of arranging the deckchairs on the bridge of Titanic running". However Iraq is sinking.

Will the referendum be a success, like were to it the elections of January 30?

Personally, I call with the boycotting, but if my fellow-citizens decide to go to vote "not", we will not oppose it. In any event, - George Bush has prepared a declaration affirming that this consultation was a success and a progress on the way of the democracy. But what will that change for Iraq?

What is the position of grand ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani on this referendum?

He did not give an opinion yet. Those which are in favour of the process will try to use it to encourage the population to vote. It can say "yes" or not speak. For January 30, it had supported the elections, but the Iraqi people of not drawn the discounted effects and the promises were not held. Since, the situation did nothing but worsen. Those which were elected are worried by their place and their wellbeing that by that of the people.

The corruption is generalized. Even the budget of the rebuilding could not start to be carried out. Ibrahim Al-Jaafari is a bad Prime Minister as he is a bad doctor. It is not like your Pétain, which was a good General before being a bad politician...

Then, in your opinion, what are the solutions to save Iraq?

First thing: a calendar of withdrawal of the troops. Secondly: to put national competences under the supervision of UNO at the service of the country, and either of the politicians. Thirdly: a national dialogue with the organization of elections under international supervision. If the occupation continues, the situation only will not worsen and Iraqi will join resistance more and more.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/zarqawi_dead.html

comment: The only living Al Qaeda they seem to be able to come up with is Adam Pearlman!

a takhle to vypada, kdyz se vrati z WC.... co tam delaji ??? ;))

IMHO LOL - hlavně obsah článku, aneb jak se elegantně nezeptat na to podstatné...
Smím jít na WC? ptal se Bush v OSN Riceové

PETVAL: great

tak za 2-3 hodiny bude na FTP dokoncen upload
Alex.Jones-Martial.Law-911.Rise.Of.The.Police.State.DVDRip.XviD

vymena stran jako problem-reaction-solution? jerusalemsky chram zase o krucek bliz? tak to uz fakt jen

Chavez Takes Bush to Task Over Iraq War

By KIM GAMEL, Associated Press Writer Fri Sep 16, 5:20 AM ET

UNITED NATIONS - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez took
President Bush to task in front of a global summit for waging war in
Iraq without U.N. consent and won rousing applause for his critique.

The leftist leader told a U.N. summit on Thursday that fighting the war without U.N. authorization showed Washington did not respect the world body. He recommended moving U.N. headquarters to a country that has more regard for the organization.

"There were never weapons of mass destruction but Iraq was bombed, and over U.N. objections, (it was) occupied and continues being occupied," Chavez said. Bush alleged that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction but none have been found, shattering one of his main arguments for going to war.

"That's why we propose to this assembly that the United Nations leave this country, which is not respectful of the very resolutions of this assembly," Chavez said.

Chavez, a close ally of Cuban leader

Fidel Castro, suggested moving U.N. headquarters New York to an international city "outside the sovereignty of any state" and said some have mentioned Jerusalem as one possibility

...

World leaders at the summit had been asked to speak for five minutes but Chavez ran long and when the presiding diplomat passed him a note saying his time was up, he threw it on the floor. He said if Bush could speak for 20 minutes, so could he.

When he finally stopped, he got what observers said was the loudest applause of the summit.

Relations between Chavez and Washington have become increasingly strained, though the United States remains the top buyer of Venezuelan oil.

...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050916/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/un_chavez;_ylt=ApokShHYCEUKrfFg1DE0Tv0Qr7sF;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chavez calls for new international political, economic order

UPDATED: 13:29, September 16, 2005

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez on Thursday called for the establishment of a new international political and economic order.

Speaking at the UN Summit, Chavez said this historic meeting dismisses to secondary importance a most urgent need, which is to adopt measures that will confront the real problems hindering the whole world's development.

"Five years have passed since the Millennium Summit took place, " he said. "The crude reality is that most of the goals we then set, as modest as they were, will not be accomplished."

Thus Chavez called on nations to build a new international economic order, saying "it is practically and ethically unacceptable to sacrifice the human species, by outrageously defending the legitimacy of a socioeconomic model with destructive capability."

It is suicidal to insist on spreading and imposing this model as the infallible remedy for the evils that it itself causes, he added.

Meanwhile, the president also appealed for the establishment of a new international political order.

"We must not allow a handful of nations to reinterpret the principles of international law with impunity, in order to impose doctrines such as preemptive war, and the so-called duty to protect, which are incompatible with effective International Law," he said.

Chavez stressed that the full respect of the principles of international law and of the UN Charter must be the fundamentals of international relations in today's world, and also the basis for a new world order.

"The reform of the United Nations cannot be limited to a simple cosmetic change of the Security Council, aimed at ensuring the unipolar hegemony of developed countries," he declared.

When talking about terrorism, he said the international community must confront terrorism with effective policies.

"We cannot allow (terrorism) to be used as a pretext for unjustified military aggressions which violate international law, and which seem to be the ruling doctrine after the Sept. 11 attacks," he stressed.

...

http://english1.people.com.cn/200509/16/eng20050916_208939.html

Fake Al Qaeda - UPDATED

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/fakealqaeda.html

Weldon: Atta Papers Destroyed on Orders

By DONNA DE LA CRUZ, Associated Press Writer Thu Sep 15, 7:43 PM ET

WASHINGTON - A Pentagon employee was ordered to destroy documents that identified Mohamed Atta as a terrorist two years before the 2001 attacks, a congressman said Thursday.

The employee is prepared to testify next week before the Senate Judiciary Committee and was expected to name the person who ordered him to destroy the large volume of documents, said Rep. Curt Weldon (news, bio, voting record), R-Pa.

Weldon declined to name the employee, citing confidentiality matters. Weldon described the documents as "2.5 terabytes" — as much as one-fourth of all the printed materials in the
Library of Congress, he added.

...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050915/ap_on_go_co/sept11_hijackers

"i think i may need a bathroom..." dal to nevidim

není to k přečtení. vidíte to někdo ?

snímek z konference, Bush se ptá Condi, jestli může na wc ,)

dobra kniha k tematu, cela online jako html nebo pdf...

Michael Nield - The Police State Road Map

http://www.policestateplanning.com/id19.htm

Peak Oil, Pandemic, and 78 Dead Scientists

A commemorative essay dedicated to the victims of 9/11 and countless millions of others sacrificed on the altar of the New World Order

http://www.policestateplanning.com/peak_oil_pandemic_and_78_dead_scientists.htm

Marines Question The Sophistication Of Latest Attacks

Tanks and armored vehicles aren't easy to take out.



vice: http://judicial-inc.biz/Mossad_bombs__sophisticated.htm

teď mi někdo vysvětlete, proč autor vůbec nezmínil rozhlas - to nemůže být náhoda; tady něco nesedí; imho podvrženo hady, kteří předstírají že jsou nehadi a snaží se vzbudit dojem, že jsou nehadi špatně přestírající, že jsou hadi čímž má vzniknout dojem, že nejsou, a to vůbec nemluvím o tom rádiu