• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    KERRAYoO( ) psychedelické memy ( )O๑.. ॐ ..๑O( ) psychedelic memes ( )Oo
    LOOKASH_II
    LOOKASH_II --- ---
    At least one of the following three
    propositions must be true:

    1) Almost all civilisations at our level of development become extinct before becoming technologically mature.

    2) The fraction of technologically mature civilisations that are interested in creating ancestor simulations is almost zero.

    3) You are almost certainly living in a computer simulation.

    http://www.simulation-argument.com/computer.pdf
    DARUMA
    DARUMA --- ---
    "The stronger and more forceful the disturbing emotions are, the greater the potential for recognizing our original wakefulness."
    Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche
    KERRAY
    KERRAY --- ---
    LOOKASH_II
    LOOKASH_II --- ---
    “The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it.”
    YBUKO
    YBUKO --- ---
    Začala doba, kdy jediným omezujícím faktorem se stala schopnost dané myšlenky vyprovokovat nás k jejímu novému a neobvyklému šíření. Myšlenka přestala být
    závislá na autoritě svého tvůrce - bude se šířit a replikovat tak dlouho, dokud ji budou živit naše pochybná očekávání. V téměř darwinovském boji o přežití zvítězí mezi myšlenkami pouze ty nejlepší. Tyto nové formy mediálních mutantů budou motorem kulturní evoluce, vloží moc do rukou konkrétních lidí a dají hlasy těm, kteří nikdy dříve neměli přístup na globální scénu.
    Douglas Rushkoff - Manipulativni natlak [ SMRGL @ psychologie.....nova anketka:)) ]
    CONTINUITY
    CONTINUITY --- ---
    Jeden člověk nemůže změnit svět, může však předat poselství, které svět změní.

    (z dokumentu, co překládám, kterej jinak není vůbec nic moc;)
    KERRAY
    KERRAY --- ---
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Open yourself to knowing only the form love is taking in this moment. When you know that you are fine regardless of whether or not you are in a sexual relationship with zero, one, two or more people you can feel free. Do not cling to what was or what is. Let it be, evolve and become.

    Surrender into your own wholeness. Feel its warmth and genuine comfort.

    Our sociobiological tendency [is] to believe that wholeness comes in the form of partnership/coupling/tripling, etc.

    People do not own each other in any manner.

    You’re whole. Love is an expansion of your wholeness.

    There is no greater sense of security in a relationship than knowing that your love is not threatened by the presence of more love.


    Here are the typical stages of an intimate
    relationship:
    1. Have sex.
    2. Live together.
    3. Get married.
    4. Have children.
    5. Divorce or stay together until death.

    Here is my suggestion for a new progression of an intimate
    relationship:
    1. Learn to experience yourself as whole.
    2. Let your lover/s and yourself be free.
    3. Continue to love more.
    4. Remain unconcerned about the form in which your love manifests itself.
    (The order in which these occur is not important.)


    In a traditional monogamous relationship you are typically given societal “permission” to:
    1. Judge your lover’s desires towards others.
    2. Not forgive any “straying” or “cheating” behavior.
    3. Attach your sense of wholeness to the other’s behavior.
    4. Show compassion unless their behavior threatens your sense of safety.


    Excerpts from: Spiritual Polyamory by Mystic Life
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Plainly said: there's not too much that tends to keep the illusion of the separate me, *or* the separate "you" in place, than the ego's ideas about love.

    A lot of people hear "Love your neighbor as yourself" and think that it means we should love our neighbor with kindness and caring because they're just like us. Or something. Which misses the entire point.
    "Love your neighbor as Your SELF."

    Ideas about possession in love, and what's "right" or "wrong"; or jealousy, or even good ol' well-meaning but always-insane insecurity .... are not love.
    They have nothing to do with love.
    Neither does having "my needs met." <- Gotta give the thought-self *some* credit .... it's *good* in a perpetuating-hell kinda way .....

    We all know real loving.
    Because at Heart, *as* Heart - we are real loving.

    Love doesn't "get" .... Love getting is kinda like "wind sucking" .... some thought-me could probably dream up a way this happens .... but it's at odds with the very reality.

    When Loving is fully in place ... you know yourself, fundamentally, to BE your Beloved.
    Her/His joy is your joy.
    Her/His sorrow is your sorrow.
    Her/His enlightenment is your highest priority -- first and foremost by realizing true nature in each/both/all of you ..... because in real loving, it can't be any other way.

    True loving can't see the Beloved as an object.
    It's too busy knowing the Beloved as "shared subject" - as the Oneness.

    Loving isn't something you can get.
    Loving isn't something you can do.
    Ultimately - LOVING *is* True Nature.

    Relationship (of any/all kinds, apparently ....) is an ideal opportunity for realizing ... because realization isn't about you attaining something .... realization is about union.

    If the thought-self is dropped, and relationship - giving loving - is present - union *is* -- and there is no greater joy, anywhere.

    It's why we do this.
    This.
    This human thing.

    As Abhinavagupta says: The true nature of 'I', in embodied humanity, is called 'Us'".


    - Kirtanman (... excerpts)
    HESPELER
    HESPELER --- ---
    Kazdy clovek ma v druhem cloveku zrcadlo, v nemz muze jasne videt sve vlastni chyby. Vetsinou se vsak pri tom chova jako pes, ktery steka na zrcadlo v domneni, ze tam vidi ciziho psa a ne sebe.

    -- Shopenhauer
    HESPELER
    HESPELER --- ---
    timto jste mi pripomneli genialni scenu z filmu star trek V: final frontier.. spock je sam o sobe casto dost psychedelickej.. :]

    James T. Kirk, Leonard McCoy: Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily
    James T. Kirk: Life-- Spock, why didn't you jump in?
    Spock: I was trying to comprehend the words' meaning.
    Leonard McCoy: It's a song, you green-blooded Vulcan! The words aren't important. What's important is that you have fun singing it!
    Spock: Oh, I am sorry, Doctor. Were we having fun?
    Leonard McCoy: God, I liked him better before he died.

    Spock: Captain.
    James T. Kirk: Spock, we're on leave. You can call me Jim.
    Spock: Jim.
    James T. Kirk: Yes, Spock?
    Spock: Life is not a dream.
    James T. Kirk: Go to sleep, Spock.
    Spock: Yes, Captain.
    YBUKO
    YBUKO --- ---
    Row, row, row your boat,
    Gently down the stream.
    Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily,
    Life is but a dream.
    YMLADRIS
    YMLADRIS --- ---
    odlouceni je pro lasku jako vitr pro ohen: maly uhasi, velky rozhori.

    -- arabske prislovi
    TLUSTEI
    TLUSTEI --- ---
    "It's unkind to point out the Obvious to those who don't want to see it.
    But it's worse to point out the Invisible to those conviced it doesn't exist."

    Ingo Swann
    SKYLAR
    SKYLAR --- ---
    If a person's dearest dreams can come true, then real failure, too, is possible. As failure is the most feared of misfortunes, being responsible for pursuing and perhaps failing to achieve precious dreams is everyone's ultimate terror. On the other hand, if the realization of such dreams is impossible, then we are free of this terrible responsibility: many people find it easier to endure the idea that everything they want is impossible than to face down the terror of being responsible for attaining it. And once they decide that what they really want is impossible, from that moment on they are invested in that being the truth--otherwise they are fools who have thrown away their lives for nothing.
    YBUKO
    YBUKO --- ---
    When you come to think of it, almost all human behavior and activity is not essentially any different from animal behavior. The most advanced technologies and craftsmanship bring us, at best, up to the super-chimpanzee level. Actually, the gap between, say, Plato or Nietzsche and the average human is greater than the gap between that chimpanzee and the average human. The realm of the real spirit, the true artist, the saint, the philosopher, is rarely achieved. Why so few? Why is world history and evolution not stories of progress... but rather this endless and futile addition of zeroes? No greater values have developed. Hell, the Greeks 3,000 years ago were just as advanced as we are. So what are these barriers that keep people from reaching anywhere near their real potential?
    The answer to that can be found in another question, and that's this: Which is the most universal human characteristic-- fear or laziness?
    ( [ YBUKO @ oO( ) psychedelické memy ( )Oo.. ॐ ..oO( ) psychedelic memes ( )Oo ] )
    LOOK
    LOOK --- ---
    TLUSTEI:
    "Nerikej nikomu, ze bys nechtel byt jako on"

    jj, nebudte osklivi na lidi

    "Iluze jsou investice. Budou trvat tak dlouho, jak dlouho jim budes pripisovat hodnotu."

    iluze je, kdyz: nekdo necemu priklada hodnotu, nejakemu postoji treba. pak ho to bude ovlivnovat, bude diky tomu v iluzi. iluze prestanou az tomu hodnotu prikladat prestane
    TLUSTEI
    TLUSTEI --- ---
    "Teach no one that he is what you would not want to be."

    "Illusions are investments. They will last as long as you value them."


    A Course in Miracles, p. 127 - 3 - 8 + p. 127 - 4 -1
    YMLADRIS
    YMLADRIS --- ---
    Vzdělávání je státem ovládaná výroba ozvěn.

    -- Norman Douglas
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam