Vyraz uboheho zvirete, ktery maji lide v cekarne u lekare.

Descartuv formalni dukaz boha (volna interpretace)

1. Everything, including ideas, has formal reality.
2. Ideas have objective reality as well as formal reality.
3. All ideas and only ideas have objective reality.
4. All ideas have the same amount of formal reality.
5. Different ideas have different amounts of objective reality.
6. The cause of an idea must account for the objective reality as well as the formal reality of the idea.
7. The cause of an idea must have at least as much formal reality as the amount of formal reality the idea has.
8. The cause of an idea must have at least as much formal reality as the amount of objective reality the idea has.
9. If i is an idea of x, then x is the object of i.
10. The amount of objective reality an idea has is equal to the amount of formal reality that its object has, or would have if it existed.
11. Let i be an idea, iF be the amount of formal reality i has, iO the amount of objective reality i has, and let c be the cause of i.
12. Then c must have formal reality that is equal to or greater than iF and that is also equal to or greater than iO. (In most cases, iO will be greater than iF.)
13. Let g be God. Then g has infinite formal reality, and the idea of g has infinite objective reality.
14. The cause of the idea of g must have infinite formal reality.
15. Descartes has an idea of God. Hence that idea exists.
16. Every idea has a cause. Hence Descartes’s idea of God has a cause. Hence that cause exists.
17. No being other than God has infinite formal reality. Hence the cause of Descartes’s idea of God must be God.
Hence God exists.

Nevidime dnes nic, co chce byt vetsi, tusime, ze stale jeste pokracuje pokles,
pokles smerem ke svemu ridsimu, dobrotivejsimu, chytrejsimu, pohodlnejsimu,
prumernejsimu, lhostejnejsimu, cinstejsimu, krestanstejsimu - clovek, neni o
tom pochyb, je cim dal "lepsi"... A prave v tom spociva neblahy osud Evropy -
spolu se strachem z cloveka jsme prisli o lasku k nemu, o uctu pred nim, o
nadeji v nej, ba o vuli k nemu. Pohled na cloveka uz jen unavuje - co je dnes
nihilismus, ne-li prave tohle? ... Jsme znaveni clovekem...

The question of good and evil will always be one of philosophy's most intriguing
problems, up there with the problem of existence itself. I'm not quarreling
with your choice of issues, only with your intellectually diminished approach.
If evil means to be self-motivated, to live on one's own terms, then every
artist, every thinker, every original mind, is evil. Because we dare to look
through our own eyes rather than mouth cliches lent us from the so-called
Fathers. To dare to see is to steal fire from the Gods. This is mankind's
destiny, the engine which fuels us as a race. -- Autor #1, umelec

Co znamena to nahle probuzeni - v tomhle temnem pokoji - se zvuky mesta, ktere
je znenadani cizi? A vsechno je mi cizi, vsechno, neni bytosti, ktera by mi
patrila, neni mista, kde by se zacelila tato rana. Co tady delam, jaky smysl
maji ta gesta, ty usmevy? Nejsem odtud - a odjinud taky ne. A svet uz je jenom
neznama krajina v niz se me srdce nema oc oprit.
Cizinec, kdo muze vedet, co tohle slovo znamena. -- Autor #2, spisovatel

Uvazme konecne jeste, jaka to vubec naivnost, rikati "takovy a takovy mel by
byti clovek". Skutecnost ukazuje nam rozkosne bohatsvi typu, hojnost
marnotratne hry a promeny forem: a nejaky ubohy ocumujici moralista pravi k
tomu: "Ne! Clovek mel by byti jiny" ?.. Vi vubec tento ubozak a svatousek,
jaky by mel byti? Namaluje sebe na stenu a di k tomu "ecce homo"! -- Autor #3, filosof