Go Meetup v praze, http://eventle.com/golang-meetup/5676 agenda jeste neni jasna, ale casu dost, 12.11.2015.

LangNext 2014 (C++, Rust, D, Go)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBbv1ej0fFo

KING: Odkazy z komentaru ktere asi jeste lepe oteviraji skutecne problemy -- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9267211 && http://tmikov.blogspot.cz/2015/02/you-dont-like-googles-go-because-you.html

co se týká generic v Go, tak existuje tenhle dokument, který sumarizuje přístupy použité v jiných jazycích a které jsou na stole. http://goo.gl/lGuidN

KING: Clanek imho problematiku diskutuje z hodne nevhodnyho uhlu, diskuze o inteligenci programatoru by rozhodne nemela bejt klicovou. Nektery veci ale rozhodne nejsou daleko od pravdy, a to ze Rob Pike furt tvrdi ze Go je opinionated language a odmita spoustu hodne popularnich zlepseni mne dost casto dost sere.

Co rikate na tenhle clanek?

Why Go’s design is a disservice to intelligent programmers | Nomad Software
http://nomad.so/2015/03/why-gos-design-is-a-disservice-to-intelligent-programmers/

Fulfilling a Pikedream: the ups of downs of porting 50k lines of C++ to Go. | To:goto To;
https://togototo.wordpress.com/...ling-a-pikedream-the-ups-of-downs-of-porting-50k-lines-of-c-to-go/

"""
The tl;dr
In business terms, the project was a success: completed ahead of schedule, performing acceptably, and less than 10k LOC long (this massive LOC reduction was of course partially due to the removal of features that were deprecated or not needed by the team behind the rewrite). In personal terms however I feel the outcome was suboptimal, in the sense that I wrote two to three times as much code as would have been needed in a language with parametric polymorphism. Some of this was due to type-safety: Go forces a tradeoff to be made between verbosity and type-safety, and I settled somewhere in the middle; it could have used less code and been less type-safe, or used more code and been more type-safe.
"""

Go Is a Shop-built Jig - Cocoaphony
http://robnapier.net/go-is-a-shop-built-jig