PALEONTOLOG: je to pseudoscience libivosr. Kategorie se nevylucujou prekrejvaj a vsechny sou win win. Mrdka
Most of the research supporting the MBTI's validity has been produced by the Center for Applications of Psychological Type, an organization run by the Myers–Briggs Foundation, and published in the center's own journal, the Journal of Psychological Type (JPT), raising questions of independence, bias, and conflict of interest.[10] Though the MBTI resembles some psychological theories, it has been criticized as pseudoscience[11] and is not widely endorsed by academic researchers in the psychology field.[12] The indicator exhibits significant scientific (psychometric) deficiencies, including poor validity, poor reliability, measuring categories that are not independent, and not being comprehensive.[13][14][15][16]