• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    TUHONew materialism — All memories are machines
    PALO_FABUS
    PALO_FABUS --- ---
    TUHO: jj, rozhodně, taky z něj čerpám, je i online: https://monoskop.org/media/text/hoerl_burton_eds_2017_general_ecology/
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    PALO_FABUS: Tyjo, jsem vubec neznal. Parada, diky moc!

    Tenhle sbornik vypada taky dobre (a neda se stahnout sakra, asi budu muset koupit .]])

    General Ecology: The New Ecological Paradigm: Erich Hörl: Bloomsbury Academic
    https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/general-ecology-9781350014695/
    PALO_FABUS
    PALO_FABUS --- ---
    TUHO: obecnou ekologii už pár let rozvíjí v Německu Erich Hörl, viz např. článek "A Thousand Ecologies: The Process of Cyberneticization and General Ecology"
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Peknej clanek o Guattariho Three Ecologies...


    Consequently Guattari’s argument is that ‘Environmental ecology, as it exists today, has barely begun to prefigure the generalised ecology that I advocate here, the aim of which will be to radically decentre social struggles and ways of coming into one’s own psyche… Ecology must stop being associated with the image of a small nature-loving minority. Ecology in my sense questions the whole of subjectivity and capitalistic power formations.’ (2) For Guattari then, as with Bateson, ecology is far more than a concern for the environment, it is an epistemological system based on an understanding of nonlinear systems governed by feedback loops and nonlinear causality. An understanding of connectivity, of balanced systems, network topography and complexity theory are fundamental to the way in which this ecosophical model operates. In contrast to a capitalist system predicated on economic growth, Guattari’s ecosophy seeks balance allied with a reevaluation of what we value; going well beyond GDP as an indicator of quality of life, in what can be understood as a decentred socialism, or ecologically informed variant of anarchism, where goals are collectively negotiated rather than dictated by economic elites.

    According to Guattari, creating such an ecosophical society requires a reorientation of thought, so that we understand ourselves, the society we live in and the ecosystem we inhabit as three different scales of ecology, linked by a series of processes (or abstract machines). ‘Now more than ever, nature cannot be separated from culture; in order to comprehend the interactions between ecosystems, the mecanosphere and the social and individual Universes of reference, we must learn to think ‘transversally’. (43) Indeed Guattari goes as far as to argue that ‘It is quite wrong to make a distinction between action on the psyche, the socius and the environment. Refusal to face up to the erosion of these three areas, as the media would have us do verges on a strategic infantilization of opinion and a destructive neutralization of democracy. We need to kick the habit of sedative discourse, particularly the ‘fix’ of television, in order to apprehend the world through the interchangeable lenses of the three ecologies.’ (42)

    The Three Ecologies – Felix Guattari | Media Ecologies and Digital Activism
    https://mediaecologies.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/the-three-ecologies-felix-guattari/
    FONTAN
    FONTAN --- ---
    CICHLASOMA: uplne jsem zrehledl/zapomnel: je to rozsirene o pozdniho del. + guattariho s tim, ze, po strucnem proklikani te diplomky, prvni cast te knihy je velmi podobna te praci
    CICHLASOMA
    CICHLASOMA --- ---
    FONTAN: Nevíte někdo, nakolik je to předělaný?
    FONTAN
    FONTAN --- ---
    CICHLASOMA: diplomka zkonvertovala do knihy

    Člověk v šíleném dění světa - Prášek Petr | Knihkupectví Karolinum
    http://cupress.cuni.cz/ink2_ext/index.jsp?include=podrobnosti&id=394186&jazyk=cs
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Deleuze a Guattari a masakr v Columbine...


    In this paper I investigate the mechanics of killing, brining together neuroscience, military history, and the work of the French philosophers Gilles Deleuze & Félix Guattari. Investigating the Columbine killers and the way they negotiate with the intensity of the act of killing allows me to construct a concept of “political physiology,” defined as “interlocking intensive processes that articulate the patterns, thresholds, and triggers of emergent bodies, forming assemblages linking the social and the somatic, with sometimes the subjective as intermediary.” While most people must be in a blind rage to kill at close range, the Columbine killers raised the threshold at which an evolutionarily inherited non-subjective “rage agent” kicks in, thus allowing themselves to be subjects in the act of killing. Yet they were not “cold-blooded killers,” either, those who lower the intensity of the act of killing below the threshold that prevents most interpersonal violence from reaching lethal proportions, since they committed suicide soon after their killing spree from burning out. The success of the Columbine killing machine warns us of a “machinic phylum” whose singularities are virtually available for incorporation into bodies by subjects willing to undergo extreme experiments in political physiology.

    John Protevi, Political Physiology in High School: Columbine and After - PhilPapers
    https://philpapers.org/rec/PROPPI
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Narazil jsem ted nahodou na clanek, si jen tak odkladam na pozdejsi cteni (sorry teda, ani nevim, jestli sotji za to :)...


    An ethico-aesthetic paradigm as an alternative discourse to the quality assurance discourse
    Gunilla Dahlberg Stockholm University, Sweden
    Abstract This article analyses the discourse and practices of quality assurance and quality control through the lens of neo-liberal governing as expressed in economic rationalities such as new public management, total quality management, public choice and human capital. As an alternative to this form of governing, an ethico-aesthetic paradigm is enacted, inspired by Spinoza’s concept of ‘affect’ and Félix Guattari’s and Gilles Deleuze’s ‘ontology of immanence’. This opens up to a reconstruction of the pragmatic scene of didactics as it border-crosses the discourse and practices of ‘action at a distance’, manipulating the classroom space from outside of the situation by measurements and procedures constructed by others. Moreover, it opens up to another construction of the human subject – a processual and event-centred construction of human subjectivity – which also opens up to leakages, movement, creativity and hope in the present.
    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1463949115627910
    PALO_FABUS
    PALO_FABUS --- ---
    TUHO: inu, tento záhyb jsem zanedbal :)
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    PALO_FABUS: A ty ses zjevne obeznamenej s krizi reprezentace, ze si sem nedal vedet, kdyz si mel prednasky v Praze v Brne .]] Sem propas :-/
    PALO_FABUS
    PALO_FABUS --- ---
    TUHO: připadá mi, že autor není obeznámen s původem krize reprezentace, tak mu nezbývá než mluvit o strachu z hermeneutiky :)
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    necetl jsem ,jen si odkladam na pozdeji :))

    The embarrassment of being human
    A critique of new materialism and object‐oriented ontology
    Abstract
    New materialism and object‐oriented ontology have recently gained widespread attention. Taking as exemplary the work of Jane Bennett and Graham Harman (yet also drawing on other figures within these materialist fields), this paper argues that the theories are self‐contradictory and rooted in what I label semiophobia (an unease with human reality as embedded in a semiotic reality). In addition, I argue that Harman's poetics (weird realism) and Bennett's strategic anthropomorphism are inconsistent and fail to deliver what they promise. Finally, I argue that in spite of its honorable intentions new materialism entails undesirable ethical and political consequences.
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/oli.12174

    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    TUHO:Bozi shrnuti, radost poslouchat :)
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    LOWRIDER
    LOWRIDER --- ---
    TUHO: no já to četl jenom tak zběžně, názor zatím nemám. Nepřišlo mi to úplně skvěle napsaný, nicméně M. Charvát je zajímavej. Teď vydal taky tohle, možná to sem patří taky: O nových médiích, modularitě a simulaci

    Mám to rozečtený, je to taková docela zběsilá čítanka téměř všech autorů, co mají k filosofii médií co říct, ale systém v tom je.
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    LOWRIDER: Jo, mne to prislo pomerne povedeny, mam ji nekde doma, zkusim nekdy vecer nakouknout :) Btw jenom takovej detail co me napadne vzdcyky, kdyz vidim preklad "asignifikatntni semiotika", ktera mi trosku evokuje "nedulezita semiotika" misto autory zamysleneho "neoznacujici semiotika", ale to se teda vyskytuje i v ceskym prekladu Tisic plosin...
    CICHLASOMA
    CICHLASOMA --- ---
    LOWRIDER: "hlouběji na povrch" je boží! ("nejhlubší je kůže"!)
    LOWRIDER
    LOWRIDER --- ---
    FIDEL:
    Reaguji na "vypada to fakt povedene, akorat mi prijde, ze v ramci proklamovane interdisciplinarity by si jeho pristup zaslouzil mnohem vice psychologie."
    No psychologie tam vlastně taky je, zejména jsem se hodně inspiroval problémem "multiple self" a pak zásadně knihou Arto Wittemana Architektura vnitřního světa člověka

    Nicméně, chtělo by to hlouběji na povrch
    LOWRIDER
    LOWRIDER --- ---
    Zdar, už jste tu diskutovali tohle:
    Gilles Deleuze. Asignifikantní sémiotika

    Myslím, že jako jediná česká monografie o Deleuzovi by to zasloužilo. Je to taky přepis dizertace, z roku 2016.
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam