DZODZO: ok, tak to sem si spatne vylozil. o to hur, ze s celym tim lockdownem, zavrenejma fabrikama, nelitanim, odstavenejma uhlenejma elektrarnama, rekordni produkci energie ze solaru atd. mame jen 11% snizenou produkci co2 :)

SHEFIK: zachrani nas odchod od uhlia a ropy e.g. surovin, ktore po miliony rokov ticho cusali v zemi, tak ako to tam ostatne pisu:

(2) the additional input of CO2 to the atmosphere (and hence to the system as a whole) by burning fossil fuels which have laid buried deep beneath the ground or ocean floor for millions of years

SHEFIK: vice mene se nepletu, z clanku:

In other words, without the lockdown, the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere would have increased by 0.68% in 2020, compared to the 2019 global average. But with the lockdown, we project the increase to be 0.60%.

If global emissions reduce by 8% over the year, with the largest reduction in April, the annual minimum monthly CO2 by September will be 410.6ppm (±0.6), compared to 411.1ppm (±0.6) expected without the Covid-19 impact.

jinymi slovy, dopad covidu je minimalni (max 8% novyho prirustku) a uskromnit se nam v budoucnu vubec nepomuze, muzeme zacit klidne zas vesele litat. zachrani nas jen CCS nebo natural sinks, temata, o kterych mluvi TADEAS apod.

dekuju za prostor k monologu .)

Američané mnohem méně jezdí auty a utlumení průmyslu i těžby způsobilo mnohem menší emise skleníkových plynů. Od doby, kdy v březnu začala platit opatření proti nemoci covid-19, se USA podle nové zprávy Road Ecology Center Kalifornské univerzity v Davisu začaly blížit splnění klimatických cílů pařížské dohody.

Kvůli koronaviru v USA prudce klesají emise, země možná splní i pařížskou dohodu — ČT24 — Česká televize
https://ct24.ceskatelevize.cz/...viru-v-usa-prudce-klesaji-emise-zeme-mozna-splni-i-parizskou-dohodu

But a key question for climate change is what impact this has had on the overall amount of CO2 in the atmosphere – the principal driver of global temperature rise. In our analysis for Carbon Brief, we assess whether the global drop in emissions will have a noticeable impact on atmospheric CO2 concentrations this year.

Analysis: What impact will the coronavirus pandemic have on atmospheric CO2? | Carbon Brief
https://www.carbonbrief.org/...sis-what-impact-will-the-coronavirus-pandemic-have-on-atmospheric-co2

jeste neco k reuse jadernyho odpadu. uz je nekolik reseni, tim se efektivita celyho procesu ziskavani energie z jadra vyrazne zvysuje a minimalizuje dopad na zivotni prostredi

Team develops new way to recycle nuclear waste - Futurity
https://www.futurity.org/...source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=nuclear-waste-recycling-2355402-2

Recent climate models may overestimate future warming - Futurity
https://www.futurity.org/...ce=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=climate-models-future-warming-2355302

The researchers say that projections from one of the leading models, known as CESM2 (Community Earth System Model, version 2), are not supported by geological evidence from a previous warming period roughly 50 million years ago.

The researchers used the CESM2 model to simulate temperatures during the Early Eocene, a time when rainforests thrived in the tropics of the New World, according to fossil evidence.

But the CESM2 model projected Early Eocene land temperatures exceeding 55 degrees Celsius (131 degrees F) in the tropics, which is much higher than the temperature tolerance of plant photosynthesis—conflicting with the fossil evidence. On average across the globe, the model projected surface temperatures at least 6 degrees C (11 degrees F) warmer than estimates based on geological evidence.

DZODZO: Jj, rejected energy jsou ztraty

TUHO: rejected energy sa tu mysli odpadne teplo? iba tak hadam vzhladom na to aka cast pochadza z transportation

TADEAS: předpokládám, že ten Tadeáš zmíněný v textu je tvoje maličkost, že jo? :-)

František Marčík: Klimatické odpustky aneb Jak spolehlivě smazat vlastní uhlíkovou stopu? - Ekolist.cz
https://ekolist.cz/...-marcik-klimaticke-odpustky-aneb-jak-spolehlive-smazat-vlastni-uhlikovou-stopu

vc biouhlu .)

Sci-Hub | A half century of Holistic Management: what does the evidence reveal? Agriculture and Human Values | 10.1007/s10460-020-10016-w
https://www.sci-hub.tw/10.1007/s10460-020-10016-w
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-020-10016-w

Holistic Management (HM) is a decision-making framework based on triple bottom line thinking and a proactive approach to managing complexity. Primarily associated with an approach to managing livestock, it has spurred long running and still unresolved debates in rangeland ecology and management. Less studied are the social, cultural, and psychological aspects of HM, which may hold the key to successful ecological outcomes. In this article, we describe the main tenets of HM as conceived by wildlife biologist Allan Savory and address the longstanding and unresolved controversy over its legitimacy. We then provide a meta-analysis that not only provides an up-to-date review of the multidisciplinary evidence and ongoing arguments about HM, but also provides a novel explanation for the controversy—that it is grounded in epistemic differences between disciplines associated with agricultural science that rule out any chance of resolution. We conclude that the way to resolve the controversy over HM is to research, in partnership with ranchers, rangeland social-ecological systems in more holistic, integrated ways. This can account for the full range of human experience, co-produce new knowledge, and contribute to social-ecological transformation.