TADEAS: z toho clanku co jsi linkoval treba:
The decision has yet to be formally adopted by German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s cabinet and would likely require a vote in Parliament. Some details are still under discussion, three senior government officials said. A cabinet decision would also need to wait on the outcome of an assessment of Germany’s energy needs that will be concluded in the coming weeks but which the officials said was a foregone conclusion.
Still, while a formal decision could be weeks off, the government believes two key conditions allowing a temporary extension of the life of the three remaining plants, now expected to close on Dec. 31, have been met: Germany is facing a likely shortage of gas and letting the reactors operate longer poses no safety concern, the officials said.
“The reactors are safe until Dec. 31, and obviously they will remain safe also after Dec. 31,” a senior official said.
Extending the life of the three plants beyond their current closing date is no panacea for Germany’s looming energy bottleneck this winter. The country is mainly missing natural gas, which is used primarily for heating and manufacturing.
Yet by allowing the plants, which together account for around 6% of the country’s electricity production, to stay online, Berlin would remove the need to replace them with gas- or coal-powered plants, allowing gas to be used in areas where it can’t be replaced by other fuels.
neni to jiste, neni nic schvalene jeste ... problem je, ze nemaji dalsi palivo objednany, takze by dojizdeli na tom, ktery maji ted, plus pravidena desetileta udrzba uz se u tehlech elektraren nedelala asi 13 let (pac se planovalo, ze se zavrou), pokud by je chteli jen nechat dojet s tim, co ted maji a dozdimat palivo, co maji, asi no problem, pokud by je chteli nejak dal vyuzivat, byla by nutna odstavka nekolikamesicni a udrzba a hodne penez ...
s tim, ze to nemci chteli odstavit hlavne kvuli bezpecnosti je to celkem funny situace