TUHO:

• FireShot Capture 049 - Antarctica's Collapse Could Begin Even Sooner Than Anticipated - Scie_ - .png

Bohuzel paywalo

On December 26, 2019, Erin Pettit trudged across a plain of glaring snow and ice, dragging an ice-penetrating radar unit the size of a large suitcase on a red plastic sled behind her. The brittle snow crunched like cornflakes underneath her boots—evidence that it had recently melted and refrozen following a series of warm summer days. Pettit was surveying a part of Antarctica where, until several days before, no other human had ever stepped. A row of red and green nylon flags, flapping in the wind on bamboo poles, extended into the distance, marking a safe route free of hidden, deadly crevasses. The Thwaites Ice Shelf appeared healthy on the surface. But if that were the case, Pettit wouldn’t have been there.

Antarctica's Collapse Could Begin Even Sooner Than Anticipated - Scientific American
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/antarcticas-collapse-could-begin-even-sooner-than-anticipated/

Je to sycak, ten trh

Znamená to, že trh tvořil příliš nízké ceny, které neumožnily výrobcům investovat do nových elektráren?

Je to tak, dlouhá léta. Měli jsme luxusně nízké ceny elektřiny. Dlouhá léta, možná dekádu platilo, že velkoobchodní cena elektřiny byla plus mínus padesát eur za megawatthodinu.
Ale za padesát eur se nevyplatí postavit ani nová jaderná, ani nová plynová elektrárna. Uhelné elektrárny jsou zase nežádoucí kvůli emisím. Je evidentní, že změna pravidel je nutná.

Léta jsme měli luxusní ceny elektřiny. Za ně se nové elektrárny stavět nedaly - Seznam Zprávy
https://www.seznamzpravy.cz/clanek/ekonomika-byznys-rozhovory-leta-jsme-meli-luxusni-ceny-elektriny-proto-se-nestavely-elektrarny-217564

Kdyz tedka kazdej druhej mluvi o rozlejvani polivky jako o terorismu.
Tak neco ke skutecnymu ekofasismu a ekoterorismu...

“Eco-fascism” has recently regained prominence following two of the most lethal extreme right terrorist attacks: the murderous assault on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, which killed fifty-one, and the massacre at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas, which killed twenty-two. Both of these attacks were justified by their perpetrators, at least in part, in environmental terms. Brenton Tarrant, the Christchurch terrorist, went so far as to proclaim himself an “eco-fascist.” Whilst “radical right” populism is often associated with climate denial, “extreme right” environmentalism, with its roots in the “blood and soil” thinking of Nazism, is concerned with protecting the spiritual link that supposedly exists between man and nature. Having established the historical lineage of such ideas, the article explores how contemporary extreme right groups have reacted to population growth, migration, and climate change. It explores the emergence of a particular form of “dark green” environmentalism that builds upon the “blood and soil” ideas of Nazism, synthesizing them with an anti-human ecology derived from several sources including Greco-French Hitler-worshipper Savitri Devi; the “Unabomber” Ted Kaczynski; and the Finnish environmentalist and misanthrope Pentti Linkola. The misanthropic ideas of these three ideologues and their extreme “solutions” to environmental degradation and overpopulation represent an increasingly prevalent ideological tendency within extreme right subcultures online. The violent panaceas they advocate and envisage as being necessary to defend the natural environment will undoubtedly gain greater prominence as climate change-driven migration northwards to Europe intensifies.



https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09546553.2022.2069928

Chinese Steel Manufacturers On The Brink Of Bankruptcy | OilPrice.com
https://oilprice.com/Metals/Commodities/Chinese-Steel-Manufacturers-On-The-Brink-Of-Bankruptcy.html

Nizsi emise incomming

Rok 1992, popojedem .))

One common denominator between these reactionary takes is that they’re often not based on empirical evidence. The claim is that these disruptive (or radical, extreme or whatever you want to call it) tactics don’t work. In fact, people not only claim these tactics are ineffective, but they also claim they’re counterproductive, and lead to a movement being weaker overall. So why don’t we examine this claim?

First of all, there is a clear strategy being used by Just Stop Oil, and other disruptive organisations – the radical flank effect. The radical flank effect is where more radical factions of a social movement can increase support for more moderate factions. For moderate groups, this can mean increased support for their goals, increased mobilisation, or additional donations. However, there is some debate about whether the radical flank effect is positive (it helps moderate groups) or negative (it harms moderate groups). To test this theory, I’ll quickly summarise some academic literature on the topic.

What’s everyone got against throwing soup? - by James Ozden
https://jamesozden.substack.com/p/whats-everyone-got-against-throwing

What does it take? How far must we go to alert other people to the scale of the crisis we face? Only one answer is clear: further than we have yet gone. We are hurtling towards planetary tipping points: the critical thresholds beyond which Earth systems collapse. The consequences are unimaginable. None of the horrors humanity has suffered, great as they are, even hints at the scale of what we now face.

Everywhere I see claims that the “extreme” tactics of environmental campaigners will prompt people to “stop listening”. But how could we listen any less to the warnings of scientists and campaigners and eminent committees? How could we pay any less attention to polite objections by “respectable” protesters to the destruction of the habitable planet? Something must shake us out of our stupor.

Do we really care more about Van Gogh’s sunflowers than real ones? | George Monbiot | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/oct/19/van-gogh-sunflowers-just-stop-oil-tactics