TADEAS: mela jsem za to, ze tva idea funcniho usporadani bez honby za neustalym rustem stoji na tom, ze potrebne statky by produkovala neziskova druzstva

TUHO: investovani do techle veci v cesku je zatim fakt charita

vetsi penize jdou tam, kde jsou vitany. to v cesku ale nepotrebujeme .]

TADEAS: dobrej rozhodvor, anderson do rockstroma celkem subtilne šíje, ale kdyz si to tak clovek prelozi, tak to je fakt takovej hodne sofistikovanej zpusob v podstate vedomyho denialu (od rockstromma) - nebudu radsi rikat, jaky klicky (negativni emise) v tech modelech jsou, protoze uz tak jsou nase aspirace uplne na hrane (i s tema klickama), takze let's hope for the best a nemysleme moc na realnou situaci



28:10 voluntary carbon schemes - "we really need to invest in nature, but we cannot use these sinks as offsets"

31:40 "we have failed so much, kicking the can down the road for so many decades, that the carbon budget can only exist thanks to assumptions of negative carbon emissions technologies"


rockstrom: rapidni snizovani emisi je dve procenta rocne, udrzeni 1.5 stupne je okolo 7 procent rocne, a udrzeni 1.5 bez CCS technologii je pres 10-15 procent rocne, coz by znamenalo totalni civilizacni marshalluv plan

SEJDA: referenda jsou sociologickej nastroj pro expozici toho guláše co maj lidi v palicich

TUHO: tak ale zas na druhu stranu hlubinne uloziste radioaktivneho odpadu je vec verejneho zajmu, ktoru si obce nebudu moct zakazat, na rozdiel od tych sukromnych (?) veternikov

SEJDA: mezitim u nas

Jsme ve válce, řekl o klimatických změnách řecký premiér - Novinky
https://www.novinky.cz/clanek/zahranicni-evropa-jsme-ve-valce-rekl-o-klimatickych-zmenach-recky-premier-40443904

Mozna jde o prehnane tvzeni, vzhledem na pocet obeti. Ale co do poctu nasazenych lidi, ci podilu na rozpoctu, muze skutecne o valku s klimatem jit.

Johan Rockström interview | Planetary boundaries, 'negative emissions', mitigation models & fairness
https://youtu.be/lLq8e73-FAw?si=ltNE7wE4dx4_IHhz


In this wide-ranging conversation with Kevin Anderson, recorded in Norway in March 2023, they discuss their respective views on the risks and challenges we face in delivering on our Paris climate commitments.

CONTENTS:
00:00 Introductions
01:05 Outlining the planetary boundary & tipping points framework
05:14 How long before we see tipping points occurring?
10:00 Climate impacts this century
17:45 Understanding the conservatism of the IPCC process
24:20 Integrated Assessment Models: do they rely too much on CO2 removal?
28:58 Is the promise of future 'carbon dioxide removal' undermining emission reductions?
37:06 How ready to deploy are 'negative emissions technologies' really?
40:39 Where is equity in Integrated Assessment Models?
46:36 Privileged scientists in wealthy countries have framed the mitigation agenda
49:15 Is change driven top-down or bottom-up?
52:21 The role for citizens' assemblies in guiding mitigation policy
56:39 Is academia biased towards the status quo, rather than real action on climate