PALEONTOLOG: vida, bazén zadarmo. Vila nad jezerem!

SHEFIK: XCHAOS: snad nam chlapci nechce zakazovat tradice!!

Handful of countries responsible for climate crisis, top court told | Climate crisis | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/dec/02/handful-of-countries-responsible-for-climate-crisis-icj-court-told

Over the next two weeks, the court will hear statements from 98 nations, including wealthy developed nations with the greatest historical responsibility for the climate emergency, such as the UK and Russia, and states that have contributed very little to global greenhouse gas emissions but stand to bear the brunt of their impact, including Bangladesh and Sudan as well as Pacific island nations.

The US and China, the world’s biggest emitters, will make statements too, even though neither fully recognises the court’s authority.

Regenvanu told the court that states continued to emit vast amounts of greenhouse gases in spite of “increasingly dire warnings” from scientists, noting that emissions had increased by more than 50% since 1990.

...

Wewerinke-Singh said responsible states were required to make full reparation for the injury they had caused and this must be “proportionate to historic contributions to the harm”. She said this could include monetary compensation in addition to cash committed under the UNFCCC.

YMLADRIS: No, tak je to v tom clanku napsany.

2.3. Conflict and negative emissions technologies
Only recently has a first framework been constructed to elucidate the potential geopolitical dimensions of negative emissions technologies as a broad suite of large-scale energy production, resource usage, carbon storage, and land-use systems [58]. Direct air capture approaches rely on massive energy costs which could be coupled with either existing fossil-fuel or novel renewable infrastructures - possessing the potential to entrench or reorient the global carbon economy and its geopolitics [59,60]. Meanwhile, land-use approaches (large-scale forestry or agricultural management) by necessity entail heavy spatial and resource usage as well as pose inequities and trade-offs for the populations currently resident on or adjacent to the land [61]. Ocean based and marine carbon removal, and even the protection of coral reefs for ecosystem restoration, could also intersect with fisheries conflicts around the world [62].
This deliberately geopolitical focus on various aspects of negative emissions and carbon removal is nascent, but raises issues highlighted by antecedent conflicts in global food systems. These studies cite land-grabs and ownership conflicts, the food versus ethanol dilemma (e.g. the 2005 global food crisis), “phantom commodities”, the consequences of shifting prices in one-resource economies, and other issues and challenges confronting rural, smallholder communities – often accompanied by the particular pressures experienced by indigenous populations, or in the global South [[63], [64], [65]]. Others cite extractive industries in energy and other natural resources as relevant antecedents, raising questions of hazardous siting and carbon infrastructure lock-in [66]. As carbon removal technologies and their related approaches are looking beyond the terrestrial and into coastal and oceanic environments, some are increasingly concerned that the same logics of exploitation and conflict more familiar in the former could be repeated [67,68].

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X22002255

Abstract
The impacts of global climate change on international security and geopolitics could be of historic proportion, challenging those of previous global threats such as nuclear weapons proliferation, the Great Depression, and terrorism. But while the evidence surrounding the security impacts of climate change is fairly well-understood and improving, less is known about the security risks to climate-technology deployment. In this study, we focus on the geopolitical, security, and military risks facing negative emissions and solar geoengineering options. Although controversial, these options could become the future backbone of a low-carbon or net-zero society, given that they avoid the need for coordinated or global action (and can be deployed by a smaller group of actors, even non-state actors), and that they can “buy time” for mitigation and other options to be scaled up. We utilize a large and diverse expert-interview exercise (N = 125) to critically examine the security risks associated with ten negative emission options (or greenhouse gas removal technologies) and ten solar geoengineering options (or solar radiation management technologies). We ask: What geopolitical considerations does deployment give rise to? What particular military applications exist? What risks do these options entail in terms of weaponization, misuse, and miscalculation? We examine such existing and prospective security risks across a novel conceptual framework envisioning their use as (i) diplomatic or military negotiating tools, (ii) objectives for building capacity, control, or deterrence, (iii) targets in ongoing conflicts, and (iv) causes of new conflicts. This enables us to capture a far broader spectrum of security concerns than those which exist in the extant literature and to go well beyond insights derived from climate modelling or game theory by drawing on a novel, rich, and original dataset of expert perceptions.

PAN_SPRCHA: Ach tak. No kdyby se holka držela submissive porn, asi by udělala líp :))

L4MA: to by mě zajímalo, jak si paní lisková představuje spektrum plynů v atmosféře :) kyslík tvoří těch 21% troposféry u země a zbytek sloupce je dusík? :)

solved

PALEONTOLOG: Ja taky. S jednim panem z osady jsem se o tom bavil. Ma k tomu svy duvody - rika, ze smrk je provereny, ze kdo vi, co klimatem bude, ze taky stejne jine drevo neproda, ze roste rychle, ze sazenice jsou dostupnejsi. Tezko presvedcis takoveho cloveka, on to proste vidi jinak. Ma dlouhou zkusenost svoji, sveho taty a dedy, atp a ta mu rika, ze smrk je pro nej nejlepsi. Taky si zazil, ze mu tvrdili, ze nejlepsi je vstoupit do drustva, zapomenout na Boha, prejit na Marxismus, vykopat meliorace, zasit repku misto psenice, ... Treba bude mit pravdu (kdyz se neco stane s AMOCem a bude zima, napriklad), treba nebude, lehne mu to znova, ale mezitim uz mnoho lidi bude mit zasazeno jine druhy a jeho syn/vnuk uz to udelaji jinak ... Krom toho hodne lidi (napr ja), to zas tak aktivne neresi a nechavaji to zaburovat prirodne. I kdyz se to nesmi a je to v rozporu s Planem ministerstva. Pred par lety jsme tam, kde to zral brouk, nastrkali do pudy zaludy. Po 3 letech, zrovna, kdyz jsme to tam smitili, zacaly vylejzat:) Proste tohle chce cas. Ja smrk nevnimam jako neco spatneho - semenacky taky nechavam, vsak at si rostou, kdyz bude tu a tam smrk mezi jedlemi, javory nebo duby, tak co?

ROGER_WILCO: Na Vysocine se to uz stalo. Kolem Polne, Trebice, nebo Pribyslavi napriklad vidis jen tu a tam prezivsi modrin nebo borovici, smrky (aspon ty odrostlejsi) to vzdaly. Ale uz ted jde videt, ze priroda si s tim nejak poradi. Zaburuje to brizkami, hodne se vysemenuji duby, ktere tu drive vubec nebyly, protoze tu na ne byla zima, samozrejme i javorky nebo ty modrinky a borovicky. Jo a taky jedlicky ... proste neni vse ztraceno:)

Ale lidi, co maji zivobyti kolem zpracovani dreva, z toho nadseni nejsou, ze.

Máme v Brně takovýho renesančního poly-vedce Jeníka Hollana, asperger rules. Když jsem z něj se snažila dostat info jak teda dopadnou lesy u nás, působil dojmem že na zapojeny les to nevypadá a že je nějaký Dub španělský, zvládající sucho a mráz. Ale že by třeba Czechglobe měl konkrétní laikům srozumitelné infografiky nebo něco, to neměl. Co se dalo kde posbírat jsme dali do článku https://www.extinctionrebellion.cz/fakta/cesko-v-roce-2050/

Dnes si ale myslím, že geoinzenyring je neodvratný, takže situace je nepřehledná

myslel jsem, ze ho mam odsad a jdu sem na nej zareagovat, ale nejni tu.
rekl bych, ze velmi validni povidani. dost me to zasahlo. kdyz od nej nahlas slysim, to co ve skrtytu duse tusim a obavam se.. treba predpoklada, ze tretina stromu v evorpe zkolabuje.

VIZE ČESKA 2024 Přednáška č. 8 - RNDr. Václav Cílek, CSc. (geolog, klimatolog)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=at90nX_OyBg


In French forests, mortality up 80% in ten years amid massive dieback
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/environment/article/2023/10/18/in-french-forests-mortality-up-80-in-ten-years-and-massive-dieback_6182945_114.html

At least one-third of European trees not adapted to global warming
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/environment/article/2024/04/29/at-least-one-third-of-european-trees-not-adapted-to-global-warming_6669916_114.html

Climate change-induced background tree mortality is exacerbated towards the warm limits of the species ranges | Annals of Forest Science | Full Text
https://annforsci.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13595-022-01142-y