• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    TUHOKlimaticka zmena / Destroying the Future Is the Most Cost-Effective


    "Given the sheer enormity of climate change, it’s okay to be depressed, to grieve. But please, don’t stay there too long. Join me in pure, unadulterated, righteous anger."


    "I don’t want your hope. I don’t want you to be hopeful. ... I want you to act. Once you start to act, the hope is everywhere."

    "Our best scientists tell us insistently that a calamity is unfolding, that the life-support systems of the Earth are being damaged in ways that threaten our survival. Yet in the face of these facts we carry on as usual."

    Rostouci hladiny oceanu, zmena atmosferickeho proudeni, zmeny v distribuci srazek a sucha. Zmeny karbonoveho, fosforoveho a dusikoveho cyklu, okyselovani oceanu. Jake jsou bezpecnostni rizika a jake potencialni klady dramatickych zmen fungovani zemskeho systemu?
    Ale take jak funguji masove dezinformacni kampane ropneho prumyslu a boj o verejne mineni na prahu noveho klimatickeho rezimu post-holocenu.
    rozbalit záhlaví
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TADEAS:




    Europe drove decarbonization of power supply but did not drive electrification. They're on the top left-hand side above the Americans, but not on the top right-hand side where the Chinese are to be found.

    - The Germans and Italians shut down nuclear as an essential part of their politics of green modernization, but they agonizingly extended the protection for the coal sectors.
    - They created a market for power supply through feed-in tariffs, then surrendered that market to the Chinese, and then slapped on protectionism anyway.
    - They introduced the carbon pricing mechanism but took almost fifteen years to make it work. It now does work—carbon prices in Europe are at very significant levels, sometimes above one hundred euros per ton—but they were unprepared for the shock of delivering that particular price signal.
    - Rather than focusing on new energy models, European politics and interest groups converged on the diesel, and the European car industry was milked as a source of dividends for its oligarchic investors. And they now complain about Chinese competition and demand protectionism.
    - The Europeans were clearly at odds with both Russia and the US, and yet did nothing to develop strategic autonomy with regard to either of them.






    On the left-hand side, the ramp-up you see: the formation period of this new synthesis of green governance in Europe through to the maximum level of investment in 2011 at $131 billion. And then you see, in the wake of the Eurozone crisis—which of course dramatically affected southern Europe, where unsurprisingly the investment in solar was particularly dramatic—as that crisis hits under the sign of austerity, the European push collapses. And this is the moment of China's overtaking.
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    TADEAS: Po netu beha ovsem tohle, ale v tyhle scene se nevyznam, nevim, co si myslet...

    💙💛 Regina Laska
    @Sunnymica
    Translated from German
    Volcano Group: Nah, that wasn't us! ☝️
    That's a gamechanger.

    If the statement is genuine – and it's on Indymedia, so the right channel – then here's what we're seeing:

    ▸ The real Volcano Group from 2011 is explicitly distancing itself
    ▸ It says: "The texts and actions of recent years don't come from us"
    ▸ It reflects on the changed context since 2014 (Ukraine) – that infrastructure attacks can now become "part of a general destabilization"
    ▸ It criticizes that its name "is being used to legitimize, explain, or politically charge current attacks"


    What stands out:
    The tone. It sounds exactly like in earlier texts: reflective, self-critical, politically nuanced. They position themselves against Putin and Trump. They explain why they've withdrawn. It has intellectual substance.

    The key sentence:
    "With Russia's attack on Ukraine in 2014, the context fundamentally shifted."
    That's an analysis no Russian troll would ever write.

    Why only now?
    They've stayed silent because they've seen that infrastructure sabotage since 2014 exists in a completely different context. That someone – presumably Russia – might have co-opted their methods and name to carry out destabilization.

    And they didn't want to:
    ▸ Be part of it
    ▸ Legitimize it through their own actions
    ▸ Provide a stage for it

    The problem:

    Their silence is exactly what enabled what they wanted to prevent – someone else hijacked their name.

    The uncomfortable implication:
    If that's true, then the attacks from 2018, 2021, 2024, 2025, and now 2026 – so over a decade – weren't from them.
    That would mean: The domestic intelligence service has been chasing a group for years that no longer existed in that form. And possibly classified Russian operations as "left-wing extremism."
    That would be a failure on multiple levels.
    The question remains: Can they substantiate that? Or is it just their claim against the authorities'?

    And of course: This statement could theoretically be forged too. The question is just – who would have an interest in faking a disavowal?

    That makes the false-flag theory more plausible, not less.

    Dobrindt has a problem now.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TADEAS: aneb naznaky klimatickeho povstani, pro mainstream levicova anarchie.


    We can no longer afford the rich.
    We can initiate the end of the imperial lifestyle.
    We can stop the plundering of the Earth.
    In the greed for energy, the Earth is being drained, sucked dry, burned, abused, razed, raped, and destroyed. Entire regions are rendered uninhabitable by the heat. They simply burn up. Or habitats disappear beneath the waves during floods or due to rising sea levels.
    Shutting down fossil fuel power plants is a task that can be accomplished by hand. Have courage.
    We know we must interrupt this destruction. We know we are not alone. Don't give up hope for a world where life has space, not the greed for money, power, and destruction.

    ...

    Last year, the CO₂ concentration in the atmosphere rose to 423.9 parts per million, a value that surpasses all previous records. At the same time, climate scientists agree that the massive transatlantic ocean currents will collapse sooner or later due to global warming. This collapse of ocean currents, which has so far afforded the North a mild climate, is only one part of the catastrophe that awaits us. The extent of this devastation is simply ignored, abstracted, and discussed at global climate conferences until the scale of the destruction disappears into tables and declarations of intent.
    But the insatiable hunger for energy is eating its way through the Earth's crust and our lives, among other things to feed artificial intelligence, which then spouts stereotypes and absurdities, confusing, disorienting, and/or manipulating us. Meanwhile, with each new "learning" of the AI ​​using previous data, language, expression, and vitality are increasingly reduced, mutilated, and limited.

    ...

    We don't claim to know the way out. But we do know we must stop this destruction. Hedonism can no longer hold us captive once we've tasted the sweat of fear that spreads when there's no way out. No going forward, no going back. Only the horror of where we, as humanity, have ended up. When the question falls back on us, what did you actually do to prevent what was coming? You saw it coming, the survivors, the next generations, ask us. Please don't bring up the political parties. Please don't bring up the brown-shirted alternatives in pinstriped suits and dresses. And not the Greens or the Left either. Don't bring up the economy, whose free market will supposedly solve the problem. Economics and politics deal with death every day. With dictatorships and butchers. Their concerns vanish into thin air when it comes to satisfying our energy needs, for example. Russia is still supplying gas to Europe via Nord Stream 1. And the US wants Venezuela's oil. That's why military attacks are now taking place. And fracked gas arrives by ship from all over the world. Currently, 79% comes from the USA! Fracking is extremely environmentally damaging in its production. Even during extraction, a methane loss of 6 to 10 percent is assumed, which further warms the atmosphere.

    95% of the gas burned in Germany is imported. At climate summits, only tactical lip service is forthcoming because the oil-producing countries are not interested in climate protection but in money. Because the major cities base their policies on money and growth, lobbyists in Europe are being handed the end of the combustion engine phase-out.

    For example, the German Minister of Economic Affairs, Katharina Reiche, was State Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Transport, a lobbyist for the Association of Municipal Enterprises (VKM), and a manager at the E.ON subsidiary Westenergie. Minister Reiche presents herself as a supporter of hydrogen but primarily relies on natural gas. She intends to issue tenders for additional gas-fired power plants with a capacity of 10 gigawatts, which are to be connected to the grid by 2031, corresponding to approximately 25 new power plants. 20 billion euros are earmarked for these new gas-fired power plants.

    Reiche would prefer to postpone Germany's climate neutrality target from 2045 to 2050 anyway.

    The main culprits behind human-induced climate destruction are not those who suffer the most, those who pay with their health and their lives. The people of the Global South are already paying the highest price. The countries of the Global North, and soon China among others, are deciding the fate of everyone. China, as a communist, racist, and patriarchal dictatorship, can use "rare earth elements" to blackmail countries that don't toe the line, gradually weaving countries, cultures, and political systems into the cocoon of this new dictatorial world power. Over 85% of the world's refined "rare earth elements" come from China. And it is the rich who are the problem. It is the super-rich who are setting the world ablaze. In the East, in the West, in the South, and in the North. Sixty percent of the super-rich's investments worldwide go into gas and oil. And around 300 super-rich countries emit more CO₂ than the 110 poorest countries in the world. These criminals know it. They don't care. Their greed for even more wealth and power sets the standard by which everyone else follows
    XCHAOS
    XCHAOS --- ---
    Akkoma
    https://agora.echelon.pl/notice/B1fhNk6JHuFf51GvYm
    Rare sighting in Russia - grassroots protests in #Irkutsk against mass scale logging on thousands of square kilometers of tayga, including around Baykal lake. The wood is logged legally and illegally (on much larger scale) mostly by China companies who consider Russian Siberia to be practically their property in exchange for keeping Russia on lifeline and allowing it to barely survive the war it started.
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    BEIJING, Oct 14 (Reuters) - A Chinese container ship has completed a pioneering journey through the Arctic to a UK port, state-run news agency Xinhua reported, cutting in half the usual transit time for the electric vehicles and solar panels aboard destined for Europe.

    The Istanbul Bridge's maiden voyage, originally expected to take 18 days, was delayed by two days due to a storm off the coast of Norway but the ship still reached Europe earlier than the 40 to 50 days it takes freighters going through the Suez Canal or around the Cape of Good Hope.

    The new Northern Sea Route, running entirely through Arctic waters and within Russia's exclusive economic zone, can now be navigated by ships due to global warming.

    https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/chinese-freighter-halves-eu-delivery-time-maiden-arctic-voyage-uk-2025-10-14/
    SCHWEPZ
    SCHWEPZ --- ---
    DRILL BABY, DRILL

    Rusko objevilo během nedávným expedic jednu z největších zásob ropy na planetě, která se nachází pod zamrzlou hladinou Weddellova moře - to je část kontinentu, která se blíží Jižní Americe. Toto odhalení vyvolalo poplach ve vládách a institucích po celém světě kvůli potenciálnímu environmentálnímu a geopolitickému dopadu.

    Podle informací Newsweeku ruští vědci objevili v Antarktidě rozsáhlé ložisko ropy, které se odhaduje na 511 miliard barelů, což výrazně překračuje mnoho z největších známých zásob. Pro srovnání, toto množství je téměř dvojnásobkem zásob Saúdské Arábie a desetkrát větší než celková produkce Severního moře za posledních 50 let.

    Jde o část sektoru Antarktidy, který si nárokuje Velká Británie, ale kromě ní i Argentina a Chile, což situaci ještě více zostřuje. Překrývající se zájmy zvyšují napětí ohledně kontroly a budoucího využívání tohoto regionu. Rostoucí ruská přítomnost v Antarktidě vyvolává otázky ohledně jeho skutečných cílů. I bez formální územní kontroly jeho aktivity v Antarktidě přitahují pozornost dalších mocností.

    Až dosud se všichni spoléhali na Antarktickou smlouvu, podepsanou v roce 1959. Ta zakazuje veškeré vojenské a ekonomické těžební aktivity na kontinentu. Region byl označen za zónu věnovanou vědeckému výzkumu a mezinárodní spolupráci. Nedávnou činnost Rusů v oblasti sledují ostatní s obavami. Zprávy naznačují, že seismické studie prováděné ruskými vědci mohou být ve skutečnosti součástí úsilí o průzkum zdrojů. To vyvolává podezření, že země obchází principy smlouvy tím, že maskuje ekonomické iniciativy pod hlavičkou „čistého“ výzkumu v zájmu vědy.

    Antarctica’s oil jackpot: Russia’s colossal find threatens to reshape geopolitics under the ice - BusinessToday
    https://www.businesstoday.in/world/story/antarcticas-oil-jackpot-russias-colossal-find-threatens-to-reshape-geopolitics-under-the-ice-483286-2025-07-06

    https://www.centrum.cz/rusko-si-dela-zalusk-na-obri-zasoby-ropy-problem-je-ze-mu-nepatri-f817dca9-bc58-5aa1-9ae3-72f0a237a686

    Russia Discovers 511 Billion Barrels of Oil in Antarctica: Treaty at Risk l Putin’s Jackpot
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxtEz2VvJWE&t=1s
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    ‘We’re the canary in the coalmine’: when will Russia take action on the climate? | Climate crisis | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/jul/18/when-will-russia-take-action-on-the-climate

    the country remains the world’s fourth-largest emitter of greenhouse gases and is often described as a laggard – or even an obstructionist – on climate policy. (Russia is the second largest emitter of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, but is not signed up to the global methane pledge.)

    Angelina Davydova, a leading Russian environmental expert, said: “Russia keeps saying that the climate is important, that international cooperation on climate change is important. But then Russia is not doing anything to combat it. I don’t think it’s a pressing issue; they are happy with the status quo.”

    This may be because, in no small part, Russia’s economic stability depends on the fossil fuels that are one of the root causes of the crisis.
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    Aspon, ze to nadeli vsem stejne. Mysleno Rusku, ne tem starenam

    ...

    Today, St. Petersburg, Russia is facing its first major flood in 160 years. July 04, 2025

    Storm winds reaching 28 meters per second have brought down trees, injuring two women, aged 56 and 84.

    https://x.com/WeatherMonitors/status/1941172323614334989?t=7HJT42OX2WFbwXqPi7sGlA&s=19
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    Tak a ted uz bude jen dobre

    Putin stated: “The most important issue in the country today is climate change.”

    Oh sure. Not the war. Not poverty.Not the fact that Russia has become a raw materials appendage, not the economic crisis,not the decline in education and culture

    Putin has decided to focus on ecology.

    @antongerashchenko.bsky.social on Bluesky
    https://bsky.app/profile/antongerashchenko.bsky.social/post/3lqz6dgiljk2f
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Faced with major security challenges, Europe is preparing to boost its defence capacity. To defend itself against Russia without the United States, Europe needs to rapidly increase spending from the current level of about 2 percent of GDP to an estimated 3.5 percent of GDP – an increase of about €250 billion annually (Burilkov and Wolff, 2025). In March, the European Commission proposed the ReArm Europe Plan/Readiness 2030 1 , which seeks to mobilise €800 billion in defence spending.

    Some see increased defence spending as being in conflict with the climate agenda 2 , arguing that boosting defence spending by 1.5 percent of GDP while increasing climate spending by 2 percent of GDP, as required to meet EU climate objectives (Pisani-Ferry and Tagliapietra, 2024), would be unsustainable.

    While there will be a trade-off when it comes to public spending – especially in the budgets of countries with more limited fiscal space than Germany, but also in the EU budget itself – the defence and climate agendas are not entirely in conflict. Here, we outline seven major converging interests. These areas should form the basis for a common defence and climate agenda which would allow the EU to develop more coherent policy for the future.

    Defence and climate: seven points for a common agenda
    https://www.bruegel.org/analysis/defence-and-climate-seven-points-common-agenda
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Martin AbelMartin Abel
    Navigating the metacrisis with pessimism of the intellect and optimism of the will.

    📅 From now on, EU Member States have less than 1 year to identify renewables acceleration areas (hashtag#RAAs).

    Shortly after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the EU decided to further boost the clean energy transition by designating low-conflict areas with extra easy permitting procedure for the renewables. The hashtag#red3 directive gave states until 21.02.2026.

    🤔 With some delay, NGOs, consultancies and finally the European Commission itself started to issue guidelines on how to complete this unprecedented task. Now, many Member States had already identified priority areas before, but a few if any were ready (and indeed allowed) to drop the thorough assessment of individual projects (incl. EIA). Unfortunately, none of those guidelines really explains how to do it on the technical level.

    🪰 The fly in the ointment is - as almost ever - the resources. Not € as much as people. With the ongoing brain drain in the public sector (particularly in CEE and southern states), even the willing governments find it challenging to find the experts for the job. Nowhere is the problem more tangible than in biological site assessments. The EU law says: choose RAAs, you have 2.5 years. But the EU law also says: whatever you choose, send authorised professionals there to survey the area. And one need not be an expert to understand that 1000s km2 cannot possibly be all surveyed in a year - there is just not enough people.

    ⚖️ With the hashtag#red3 deadline approaching, most EU countries must choose which directive they are going to abide by and, in effect, whether to prioritise the speed of the transition or the integrity of the biosphere on site. And hey, before you exclaim that the world is burning and we need those renewables to replace the the fossil fuels and lower our dependence on Russia, consider that globally the renewables have done little to squeeze out (but rather supplemented) the fossil energy so far and that the biosphere needs to be respected now more than ever.

    So... what would you do?

    I'm happy I could work on the topic in CZ with colleagues from Ministerstvo životního prostředí and Výzkumný ústav pro krajinu, v. v. i. and I'm certainly looking forward to discussing these issues at ESEW in Brussels this June.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TADEAS:

    The Past and Future of the Mammoth Steppe Ecosystem
    https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-25038-5_10

    The current state of Pleistocene Park, Russia (An experiment in the restoration of megafauna in a boreal environment)
    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0959683620932975
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Handful of countries responsible for climate crisis, top court told | Climate crisis | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/dec/02/handful-of-countries-responsible-for-climate-crisis-icj-court-told

    Over the next two weeks, the court will hear statements from 98 nations, including wealthy developed nations with the greatest historical responsibility for the climate emergency, such as the UK and Russia, and states that have contributed very little to global greenhouse gas emissions but stand to bear the brunt of their impact, including Bangladesh and Sudan as well as Pacific island nations.

    The US and China, the world’s biggest emitters, will make statements too, even though neither fully recognises the court’s authority.

    Regenvanu told the court that states continued to emit vast amounts of greenhouse gases in spite of “increasingly dire warnings” from scientists, noting that emissions had increased by more than 50% since 1990.

    ...

    Wewerinke-Singh said responsible states were required to make full reparation for the injury they had caused and this must be “proportionate to historic contributions to the harm”. She said this could include monetary compensation in addition to cash committed under the UNFCCC.
    CHOSIE
    CHOSIE --- ---
    https://x.com/AkshatRathi/status/1862064097799598377
    Just days after scoring a win at COP29, Saudi Arabia, along with Russia and Iran, is at it again trying to weaken the global plastics treaty.
    Článek: https://www.climatechangenews.com/2024/11/27/global-plastics-pact-hangs-in-balance-as-petrostates-block-talks/
    PER2
    PER2 --- ---
    onovitelne zdroje ve valce
    Ukraine has seen success in building clean energy, which is harder for Russia to destroy | AP News
    https://apnews.com/article/ukraine-clean-renewable-energy-russian-bombing-distributed-1f226213742cc057f9f65208167e6f38

    Attacks on two DTEK solar farms last spring are a good example. They destroyed many solar panels and some of the transformers, which step up voltage for long distances or step it down for use in homes. Replacing the transformers and swapping out destroyed panels allowed the farms, which generate 400 megawatts, to be back up in seven days.

    Timchenko said an attack on a thermal generating station, which experienced a similar amount of damage, took three to four months to rebuild.

    “That’s the difference between centralized and so-called decentralized generation. It’s much more resistant and difficult to destroy,” said Timchenko.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Russia-Ukraine war live: Moscow claims advance in Ukraine’s east has ‘accelerated’ | Ukraine | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2024/nov/23/russia-ukraine-war-live-latest-news-updates

    Russia has included the territories it occupies in Ukraine in its recent greenhouse gas inventory report to the United Nations, drawing protests from Ukrainian officials and activists at the Cop29 climate summit this week.

    ...

    “We see that Russia is using international platforms to legalise their actions, to legalise their occupation of our territory,” Ukraine’s deputy environment minister Olga Yukhymchuk told Reuters.

    She said Ukraine is in touch with officials from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the U.N.’s main climate body, to ask it to resolve the dispute.

    Officials representing the Russian foreign ministry and the UNFCCC did not respond to requests for comment sent on Thursday.

    At issue is Russia’s National Inventory Report of greenhouse gas emissions for 2022, which Moscow submitted to the UNFCCC on 8 November. In the submission, reviewed by Reuters, Russia said it could only provide data for 85 out of 89 of its territories “due to the absence of baseline data on land use for the territories of the Donetsk People’s Republic, Luhansk People’s Republic, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions, annexed in September 2022.”

    Russia had already included emissions from Ukraine’s Crimea region, annexed in 2014, in its last few reporting submissions to the UNFCCC. It also included Crimea’s land development plans in a report to the UN Global Biodiverity Framework in 2020.

    Ukrainian environment minister Svitlana Grynchuk raised the issue in a speech to delegates at the Cop29 summit earlier this week, saying Russia’s reporting on Ukraine territories undermines the integrity of global climate efforts.
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Climate change presents serious problems for Russia, from intensifying forest fires to the melting of the permafrost that covers roughly two-thirds of Russian territory. However, in the coming decades, Russia’s most serious problems will be caused not by climate change itself, but by the actions other governments are taking to mitigate it. Chief among these is the shift away from the burning of fossil fuels towards renewable sources of energy.

    Russia, Climate Change and the Global Energy Transformation | Royal United Services Institute
    https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/russia-climate-change-and-global-energy-transformation
    CHOSIE
    CHOSIE --- ---
    YMLADRIS: Ano, trochu už to pár týdnů sleduji, ne že by od toho mohl člověk moc očekávat. :shrug:
    “China and US push each other on priorities for UN COP29 climate talks…

    “Washington’s top climate diplomat John Podesta has pressed Chinese leaders to come up with ambitious plans to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 2035 in one of the final meetings between the world’s two largest polluters ahead of the UN COP29 climate summit in November.”

    Subscribe to read
    https://www.ft.com/content/784bb728-a0d7-485a-9ab9-89da0d516f61
    https://archive.fo/ecZe9
    ___
    “Good Cop, Bad COP29: Azerbaijan’s greenwashing ahead of crucial climate summit…

    “Since it was announced as this year’s host in November last year, Azerbaijan has intensified crackdowns on independent media and academics, arresting dozens on falsified charges this year alone. And concerns are intensifying around Azerbaijan’s commitments to expanding its fossil fuel industry.”
    https://www.sbs.com.au/news/podcast-episode/good-cop-bad-cop29-azerbaijans-greenwashing-ahead-of-crucial-climate-summit/j5qm1xxq5
    ___
    "Satellite data shows an increase in gas flaring since Azerbaijan last reported its emissions six years ago, calling into question BP and state oil company’s pledge to eliminate methane flaring by 2030."

    "Under the 2015 Paris Agreement, countries are required to submit their emissions data every two years. Yet Azerbaijan, which will host the COP29 climate summit in November, has failed to do so since 2018. "
    wonderful

    "The Presidency of COP29 is headed by Mukhtar Babayev, who is currently serving as Ecology and Natural Resources of Azerbaijan, Babayev previously worked as the SOCAR’s Vice President for ecology."

    https://www.globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/fossil-gas/cop29-host-azerbaijan-failing-report-ever-growing-methane-emissions/
    ___
    Several major oil-producing countries, including Saudi Arabia and Russia, are pushing back against talks on an agreement at the upcoming COP29 climate summit to mitigate the use of fossil fuels.

    https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Petrostates-Push-Back-Against-UN-Talks-on-Shift-from-Fossil-Fuels.html
    ___
    “COP29 host’s own climate plans are ‘critically insufficient’, says expert group…

    “Campaigners have expressed concerns about the selection of yet another country that is heavily reliant on the sale of oil and gas to oversee the world’s most important climate negotiations. Questions about human rights followed after several arrests of government critics.”

    Subscribe to read
    https://www.ft.com/content/8ca61260-743a-4e4b-8699-e937a07d7cfc
    https://archive.fo/Nlg2O
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Australian fossil fuel exports ranked second only to Russia for climate damage with ‘no plan’ for reduction | Climate crisis | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/aug/12/australian-fossil-fuel-exports-ranked-second-globally-for-climate-damage-with-no-plan-for-reduction

    Australia ranked second on an emission basis. It overtook the US due to a majority of Australia’s exports being coal, a particularly emissions-intensive fuel.

    It meant that while Australia releases about only 1% of global emissions at home, it was linked to about 4.5% once its exports were counted.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TADEAS:

    Keir Starmer refuses to intervene over lengthy Just Stop Oil prison sentences
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/07/19/former-justice-secretary-uncomfortable-just-stop-oil-prison/

    Millionaire Labour donor Dale Vince pressures Keir Starmer to repeal protest law that led to Just Stop Oil founder being jailed for 'disproportionate' five years over M25 plot - likening it to somethi...
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13651323/Millionaire-Labour-donor-Dale-Vince-pressures-Keir-Starmer-repeal-protest-law-led-Just-Stop-Oil-founder-jailed-disproportionate-five-years-M25-plot-likening-Putins-Russia.html
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam