• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    TUHODezinformace o klimatu // Rage Against the Fossil Machine
    Jedním ze zásadních důvodů, proč je klimatická změna tak obtížné téma je obrovské množství dezinformací, které ho obklopuje. Sociologové identifikovali široké dezinformační hnutí, které je z části organizované fosilním průmyslem. Množství empirických důkazů ukazuje, že fosilní průmysl ročně vynakládá obrovské množství prostředků za cílem oddálit nebo neutralizovat politiky směřující k regulaci spotřeby fosilních paliv. Jak se ale v takové debatě vyznat? Jaká je česká debata v kontextu světa? Ale hlavně jaké subjekty se do dezinformací zapojují, jaké techniky a jaké prostředky používají k neutralizaci veřejné diskuze.
    rozbalit záhlaví
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    TUHO: Hnuti Ducha je ex-Greenpiss aneb zdanlive "satiricka stranka", ve skutecnosti PR projekt SEVEn energy...
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Evropě v prvním lednovém týdnu hrozil masivní blackout, tedy rozsáhlý výpadek elektřiny. Uhelná společnost Severní energetická začala s rakouskými firmami Wien Energie a EVN šířit informaci, že za výpadek mohou obnovitelné zdroje energie, a že hrozbu odvrátily naopak uhelné a jaderné elektrárny. Takovouto interpretaci událostí však pro Deník Referendum vyvrátil jak provozovatel české přenosové sítě ČEPS, zahraniční energetičtí experti, ale dokonce i sama firma Wien Energie.

    https://denikreferendum.cz/...ek/32220-medialni-blackout-lez-tykacova-sevenu-se-sirila-ceskymi-medii
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---

    Jen v ČR vynakládáme miliardy na to, aby průměrné globální teploty v roce 2050 nevzrostly o 2 °C, ačkoli jen o 1,5 °C oproti hodnotám před průmyslovou revolucí. Kverulant.org je přesvědčen, že je to nesmyslný cíl. Je také evidentní, že způsoby vedení tohoto boje jsou neúčinné a drahé. Cílem této kauzy je významně přispět ke změně tohoto kolizního kurzu. Podpořte Kverulanta v jeho boji proti environmentalistickým alarmistům alespoň symbolickým darem 100 Kč.

    https://www.kverulant.org/cases/nesmyslny-a-drahy-boj-proti-co2
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    I decided to peek at the Twitter accounts of the Republican Party’s favorite climate “experts” over the weekend. I wanted to see what they were saying about the deadly, violent riots President Donald Trump invoked at the U.S. Capitol—specifically, whether they were spreading misinformation about it with the same ease they spread misinformation about the climate crisis.

    The first account I looked at was Michael Shellenberger. The founder of the pro-nuclear group Environmental Progress accepts the existence of climate change, but rejects science showing catastrophic impacts. Earlier this year, Shellenberger downplayed the health consequences of climate change as the Republican-called witness at a House climate hearing.

    https://heated.world/p/the-antler-guy-isnt-a-climate-activist
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    They are both repeating the same misinformation that battery-electric vehicles are more polluting than gasoline-powered vehicles due to electricity being mainly produced by gas and coal in some places — something that has been proven false by several studies.

    Not only is it already not accurate in most places, but it’s also short-sighted to focus on that considering the electric grid is also rapidly getting cleaner as new deployment of renewable energy is becoming significantly cheaper than coal and gas.

    https://electrek.co/2021/01/04/bosch-takes-bold-dumb-stance-against-electric-cars
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    McKenzie Funk has spent the last six years reporting around the world on how we are preparing for a warmer planet. Funk shows us that the best way to understand the catastrophe of global warming is to see it through the eyes of those who see it most clearly—as a market opportunity.
    Global warming’s physical impacts can be separated into three broad categories: melt, drought, and deluge. Funk travels to two dozen countries to profile entrepreneurial people who see in each of these forces a potential windfall.
    The melt is a boon for newly arable, mineral-rich regions of the Arctic, such as Greenland—and for the surprising kings of the manmade snow trade, the Israelis. The process of desalination, vital to Israel’s survival, can produce a snowlike by-product that alpine countries use to prolong their ski season.
    Drought creates opportunities for private firefighters working for insurance companies in California as well as for fund managers backing south Sudanese warlords who control local farmland. As droughts raise food prices globally, there is no more precious asset.
    The deluge—the rising seas, surging rivers, and superstorms that will threaten island nations and coastal cities—has been our most distant concern, but after Hurricane Sandy and failure after failure to cut global carbon emissions, it is not so distant. For Dutch architects designing floating cities and American scientists patenting hurricane defenses, the race is on. For low-lying countries like Bangladesh, the coming deluge presents an existential threat.
    Funk visits the front lines of the melt, the drought, and the deluge to make a human accounting of the booming business of global warming. By letting climate change continue unchecked, we are choosing to adapt to a warming world. Containing the resulting surge will be big business; some will benefit, but much of the planet will suffer. McKenzie Funk has investigated both sides, and what he has found will shock us all.

    Windfall: The Booming Business of Global Warming: Funk, Mckenzie: 9781594204012: Amazon.com: Books
    https://www.amazon.com/Windfall-Booming-Business-Global-Warming/dp/1594204012
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Nakladatelstvi Host vydava preklad knizky od Nathaniela Riche "Jak ztratit Zemi", kde se venuje i dezinformacnim kampanim fosilniho prumyslu...


    Už dlouho víme, co se s naší planetou děje. Toto je příběh o tom, proč nic neděláme.
    Během osmdesátých let hrstka vědců a politiků riskovala vlastní kariéry, aby v zoufalství varovala před hrozbou, kterou na sebe svět přivolává rostoucí spotřebou fosilních paliv. Jejich snaha měla kromě vzniku mezinárodních panelů a prvních pokusů o globální spolupráci na snížení uhlíkových emisí ještě jeden paradoxní důsledek: koordinovaný lobbing těžařských a energetických společností, které popírají podíl lidské civilizace na klimatických změnách. Co v osmdesátých letech znělo jako jasný úkol, to se posléze proměnilo v ideologické bojiště, na němž má vědecký fakt stejnou váhu jako politický názor.
    Kniha Jak ztratit Zemi reportážně mapuje, jak vznikl vědecký konsenzus ohledně dopadu lidské aktivity na klima a jak tragický osud měla následná politická řešení. Kniha sice líčí historický vývoj — je však zásadní především pro ten budoucí.

    Jak ztratit Zemi – Dějiny včerejška – Nathaniel Rich | Nakladatelství Host
    https://www.hostbrno.cz/jak-ztratit-zemi/
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Jeden starsi dobry rozbor Alexandera Ace ....

    História podnebia vo svetle moderného vedeckého poznania. Alebo nie? - Alexander Ač (blog.sme.sk)
    https://ac.blog.sme.sk/...55/historia-podnebia-vo-svetle-moderneho-vedeckeho-poznania-alebo-nie.html
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Henrik Svensmark
    Rebuttal to Svensmark assertions: Svensmark has received a fair amount of attention in the denialist world. But why? He says he is being ignored. But Why? Is it because there is a great conspiracy of scientists trying to hide the truth about galactic cosmic rays? Or is that that Svensmarks conclusions were not supported by the work presented? As it turns out, his conclusions were not sufficiently supported.

    Henrik Svensmark — OSS Foundation
    http://ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/myths/henrik-svensmark
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Jinak casti sborniku Alexandera Vondry jsou out. Petr Pokorny tam vede dialog se Zdenkem Konopaskem (a je to teda znacnej thrash, posudte sami):

    Zdeněk Konopásek, Petr Pokorný: Lítáme v tom (I.) » Kontexty
    https://casopiskontexty.cz/litame-v-tom-i/
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Jo a tohle by nemelo uniknout pozornosti Naomi Oreskses je top svetova kapacita na studium dezinfo kampani fosilniho prumyslu...

    Do doctors really know what they are talking about when they tell us vaccines are safe? Should we take climate experts at their word when they warn us about the perils of global warming? Why should we trust science when our own politicians don’t? In this landmark book, Naomi Oreskes offers a bold and compelling defense of science, revealing why the social character of scientific knowledge is its greatest strength—and the greatest reason we can trust it.

    Tracing the history and philosophy of science from the late nineteenth century to today, Oreskes explains that, contrary to popular belief, there is no single scientific method. Rather, the trustworthiness of scientific claims derives from the social process by which they are rigorously vetted. This process is not perfect—nothing ever is when humans are involved—but she draws vital lessons from cases where scientists got it wrong. Oreskes shows how consensus is a crucial indicator of when a scientific matter has been settled, and when the knowledge produced is likely to be trustworthy.

    Based on the Tanner Lectures on Human Values at Princeton University, this timely and provocative book features critical responses by climate experts Ottmar Edenhofer and Martin Kowarsch, political scientist Jon Krosnick, philosopher of science Marc Lange, and science historian Susan Lindee, as well as a foreword by political theorist Stephen Macedo.

    Why Trust Science? | Princeton University Press
    https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691179001/why-trust-science
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    The podcast Drilled investigates the propaganda campaign of the century — the creation of climate denial.

    Season 1 traced the corporate-funded creation and spread of climate denial, including interviews with former Exxon scientists, primary source documents, and an in-depth look at the history of fossil fuel-funded influence campaigns.

    Season 2: Hot Water follows a group of West Coast crab fisherman who are experiencing firsthand the devastating impacts of climate change. And this unlikely group of climate activists just became the first industry to sue Big Oil.

    Season 3: The Mad Men of Climate Denial digs into the history of fossil fuel propaganda and the few “Mad Men of climate denial” who shaped it.

    Drilled: A True Crime Podcast About Climate Change | DeSmog
    https://www.desmogblog.com/drilled-climate-podcast-episodes
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    KEB: a co teprv kolik energie se musi dodat jaderny elektrarne aby tak strasne kourila
    KEB
    KEB --- ---
    Copy pasta z diskuze na oenergetice o 14mw turbínách

    Lukas
    19. prosinec 2020, 17:10
    A si predstavte, ze medzi nami ziju ludia, ktory si myslia, ze tie turbiny funguju opacne, je im dodavana EE aby fungovali ako ventilator a ovladali pocasie v EU, to som pocul presne pred par dnami na obede v praci od spolusediacich :D A vsetci okolo to zrali, slintali a krochkali nad tym ako odhalili obrovsku konspiraciu...

    Pro pobavení...
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    But the Competitive Enterprise Institute — a longtime disseminator of disinformation on climate science and supported by petroleum funding sources including the oil giant ExxonMobil and petrochemical billionaire Koch foundations — dismisses this imperative and instead tries to portray electrified transport as environmentally problematic in a paper titled, “Would More Electric Vehicles Be Good for the Environment?”

    “This is a grab bag of old and misleading claims about EVs [electric vehicles],” said David Reichmuth, a senior engineer in the clean transportation program at the Union of Concerned Scientists. “If you want to answer this question [posed by the report’s title], you have to also look at the question of what are the impacts of the current gasoline and diesel transport system, and this report just ignores that.”

    Climate Deniers Are Claiming EVs Are Bad for the Environment — Again. Here’s Why They’re Wrong. | DeSmog
    https://www.desmogblog.com/...1/17/climate-competitive-enterprise-institute-electric-vehicles-report
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    This is especially true for climate disinformation on social media. On Twitter, more than a quarter of the tweets about climate change come from bots (with the vast majority of these bots spreading lies). Investigative reporting by The New York Times recently revealed a well-funded effort to create “astroturf” grassroots campaigns supporting oil companies (when the campaigns were in fact funded by energy companies).
    Right-wingers have long understood that fiction can be much more persuasive than truth, and that selling their pro-pollution, anti-worker platform requires them to lie. “A compelling story, even if factually inaccurate, can be more emotionally compelling than a dry recitation of the truth,” as GOP strategist Frank Luntz advised conservatives in his infamous 2002 memo on climate messaging.
    A disturbing number of the most viral stories on any given day are from far-right pseudo-news sources like The Daily Wire, Ben Shapiro’s conservative media arm, which is owned by the Wilks, a family that made billions on fracking. Republicans are outperforming Democrats in this digital echo chamber, in no small part because they use a network of big Facebook pages to cross-promote content.

    Why Democrats Lose on Social Media While Republicans Lie and Win Big | The Nation
    https://www.thenation.com/article/society/social-media-right-wing/
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    'Vast Blind Spot': IPCC Accused of Ignoring 'Decades Long' Fossil Fuel Misinformation Campaign on Climate | DeSmog
    https://www.desmogblog.com/...c-accused-ignoring-research-fossil-fuel-funded-misinformation-campaign
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam