Když čtete zprávy o českém klimatickém plánu, který minulý měsíc schválila Fialova vláda a který obsahuje pětkrát větší instalovanou kapacitu solárních a větrných elektráren v zemi, a současně něco od spisovatele a umírněného ekoaktivisty Michaela Shellenbergera, snadno dospějete k názoru, že buď české vládě, nebo proslulému Američanovi muselo přeskočit. S Shellenbergerem jsme mluvili v Londýně na první konferenci Asociace pro zodpovědné občanství (ARC), kterou zakládá slavný kanadský psycholog Jordan Peterson s několika dalšími nonkonformisty naší doby.

„Klimatická změna je nejmocnější kult dneška. Vědci hrají roli kněží“ - Echo24.cz
https://echo24.cz/a/HvnFe/tydenik-echo-rozhovor-klimaticka-zmena-je-nejmocnejsi-kult-dneska

Neco ze dneska .))



https://protiproud.info/politika/7579-klimaticke-nabozenstvi-silena-sekta-chce-vyvrazdit-lidstvo-vytvorte-umelou-nouzi-a-ovladnete-spolecnost-lidske-obeti-jako-u-azteku-zijte-bez-deti-slava-potratum-katastrofy-ani-valky-nestaci-potrebujeme-smrtici-virus.htm

Why conservative Christians don’t believe in climate change
Bernard Daley Zaleha and Andrew Szasz

Abstract
American Christians have become increasingly polarized on issues of climate change and environmental regulation. In recent years, mainline Protestant denominations and the Roman Catholic Church have made explicit declarations of support for global climate action. Prominent Southern Baptists and other evangelical Protestants, on the other hand, have issued statements that are strikingly similar to the talking points of secular climate skeptics, and have attempted to stamp out “green” efforts within their own ranks. An analysis of resolutions and campaigns by evangelicals over the past 40 years shows that anti-environmentalism within conservative Christianity stems from fears that “stewardship” of God’s creation is drifting toward neo-pagan nature worship, and from apocalyptic beliefs about “end times” that make it pointless to worry about global warming. As the climate crisis deepens, the moral authority of Christian leaders and organizations may play a decisive role in swaying public policy toward (or away from) action to mitigate global warming.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0096340215599789

ABSTRACT
Most obvious and explicitly illustrated by the politics of the Trump administration in the US, but also evident in Europe, far-right nationalism have merged with climate change denialism. This merge is just starting to get scholarly attention, despite this research may provide new and important knowledge of resistance towards effective climate politics as well as of broader political issues such as democracy, human rights and diversity. Sweden has high credentials in both environmental politics as well as in welcoming refugees, but these values and politic has of lately been heavily challenged by the neo-fascist party Sweden Democrats. This chapter deals with the environmental communication in this political landscape from 2013 and onwards with a specific focus on climate change denialism of Sweden Democrats (SD). Since two consecutive elections, SD are firmly placed in an unneglectable swing role that Swedish governments both of liberal-conservative and social democratic-green shapes have needed to consider. In this chapter we focus empirically on the period 2013–2017 and follow the arguments from and work by SD politicians. The chapter discuss how and in what way far-right and climate change denialist groups have merged with focus on anti-establishment rhetoric, marketing of doubts, industrial/breadwinner masculinities and nationalism.

The Far Right and Climate Change Denial | 8 | Denouncing environmental
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781351104043-8/far-right-climate-change-denial-martin-hultman-anna-bj%C3%B6rk-tamya-viinikka

TUHO: TUHO: detailni rozbor clauserovych claimu id gavina schmidta

John Clauser’s theory of climate explained.
Some of you will have heard of John Clauser because he was an awardee of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics for his role in the experimental verification of quantum entanglement. Some of you will have heard of him because the first thing that he did after winning the Nobel was join a climate denial organization and make some rather odd claims about climate science. And some of you will never have heard of him (in which case, feel free to skip this post!).

RealClimate: Clauser-ology: Cloudy with a chance of meatballs
https://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2023/11/clauser-ology-cloudy-with-a-chance-of-meatballs/

WILLIAM NORDHAUS, WHO turned 82 this year, was the first economist in our time to attempt to quantify the cost of climate change. His climate-modeling wizardry, which won him the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2018, has made him one of the world’s most consequential thinkers. His ideas have been adopted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, global risk managers, the financial services industry, and universities worldwide that teach climate economics. Nordhaus’s work literally could affect the lives of billions of people. This is because his quantification of the immediate costs of climate action — as balanced against the long-term economic harms of not acting — is the basis of key proposals to mitigate carbon emissions. It’s not an exaggeration to suggest that the fate of nations and a sizable portion of humanity depends on whether his projections are correct.

When Idiot Savants Do Climate Economics
https://theintercept.com/2023/10/29/william-nordhaus-climate-economics/

Hele knizka Tovarna na lzi - vyroba klimatickych dezinformaci byla zarazena do top 10 knih literatury faktu podle Deniku N .)

Knihy roku Deníku N 2023: Hlasujte o nejdůležitějších literárních počinech
https://denikn.cz/1282802/knihy-roku-deniku-n-2023-hlasujte-o-nejdulezitejsich-literarnich-pocinech/

O celkovym vitezi rozhodnou hlasy ctenarstva, tak kdybyste chteli podporit, tak muzete tu:

Knihy roku Deníku N 2023: hlasování veřejnosti
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdfmkt9aWyxmNcdhkH31xVtSSr6bKHKMlh6jxNeyuKcxVoRuw/viewform

Vitezslav Kremlik na youtube Tvorive spolecnosti (ex Allatra)

Boj s emisemi CO2 aneb válka proti životu? I Vítězslav Kremlík
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5t4BqHCwcJQ

TUHO: tak snad najmou i jordana petersona na prednasku

TUHO:

In China, when the party line cohered around the greener path in 2012, the space for that debate disappeared. The leadership in the state-run energy companies was largely purged during a recent anti-corruption campaign and now they would have very clear incentives not to promote denial, even if state-owned fossil fuel companies like Sinopec and China National Offshore Oil Corp. wanted to question the existence of climate change. “Top [oil and gas] executives have always been very much aware of the fact that their promotion depends on the Party,” a report from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies stated.

In the years leading up to the 2015 climate change negotiations in Paris, China’s government made low-carbon growth one of its top priorities. “It’s a totally different situation in China than the U.S.,” Wang said.

Another reason China’s skepticism receded is that climate change stopped serving the same ideological purpose. In Copenhagen, China felt attacked and humiliated by the United States and Europe. But in Paris, China worked closely with the United States to negotiate the world’s first comprehensive climate agreement. Obama phoned Chinese President Xi Jinping shortly after the talks “to express appreciation for the important role China played,” the White House said in December 2015. Climate change no longer made China look weak. It was now a story of China’s strength. “

#China

Low carbon plot: climate change skepticism with Chinese characteristics
Current sociological literature on climate change skepticism almost exclusively focuses on the discourses in the Western World. This paper seeks to broaden the scholarship by examining the Chinese case, and to bridge this body of literature with nationalism. Through critical discourse analysis of Chinese publications, I demonstrate the existence of an undercurrent of climate change skepticism in China. The main discursive patterns follow a conspiracy theory that sees climate change as a western plot to constrain China’s development space and to create a new site for financial accumulation. The result suggests that Chinese climate change skepticism stems from identity politics and mistrust towards Western countries. In China’s climate skepticism discourse, science also becomes a subject of national identity politics. This paper calls for a sociology of climate change ‘knowledge’ to move forward the study of climate change skepticism and denialism.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281197442_Low_carbon_plot_climate_change_skepticism_with_Chinese_characteristics

Proc v Cine chciplo klima-dezinformacni hnuti?

On Jan. 17, 2010, a highly popular — and provocative — television host named Larry Hsien Ping Lang devoted an entire episode of his current affairs talk show, Larry’s Eyes on Finance, to the “great swindle” of global warming. Lang, a University of Pennsylvania-educated economist who was once described as China’s version of Larry King, told his millions of viewers that the goal of Europe and the United States at the Copenhagen negotiations was to prevent China from being a global leader.

“The Western countries manufactured the climate myth without any scientific integrity,” and they have proceeded to “demonize and constrain China in the name of climate,” Lang said. Clips of the episode were viewed tens of millions of times on Youku, China’s YouTube.

Lang’s worldview seemed to resonate. “[The weather] is obviously getting colder and colder, but they are still lying through their teeth. These disgusting Westerners never stop trying to topple China,” argued one online commenter in response to Lang’s show. “These foreign bastards are so worried that China will rise and surpass the United States. Because they are jealous of China, they even made up lies about China … the scientists are all puppets controlled by politics,” read another. The commenter continued: “Copenhagen liars! American liars!”

Over the next year, more than a half-dozen books on the West’s climate conspiracy were published in China. Social media posts theorizing an American conspiracy proliferated.

Then something strange happened. After 2011, no more climate skeptic books were published. China’s state leaders stopped their skeptical statements, and the intense online discussions diminished. Just as it was gaining steam, the conspiracy theory seemed to disappear. And along with it, any public mention of climate change denial. As climate skeptics were gaining a steady foothold in U.S. politics, why did China’s suddenly vanish?

The Convenient Disappearance of Climate Change Denial in China – Foreign Policy
https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/05/31/the-convenient-disappearance-of-climate-change-denial-in-china/