#Great reset #conspiracy theory a popirani klimaticke zmeny

ISD has tracked the spread of conspiracy theories regarding the Great Reset from the beginning. After the WEF initiative was launched on 3 June 2020, the first video describing the call-to-action as a “New World Order power grab” was posted four days later on alt-tech video platform Bitchute. The video has since been viewed over 100,000 times. Towards the end of June, an op-ed written by Justin Hawkins of the Heartland Institute, a leading climate change-denying think tank, was published on Fox News, in which he wrote the Great Reset’s “socialist outline is clear: destroy the global capitalist economy and reform the Western world.”

The ‘Great Reset’ - ISD
https://www.isdglobal.org/explainers/the-great-reset/

Kind of related. Proc konspiracni teorie frci an TikToku

Why TikTok Is Becoming A Conspiracy Playground
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X66MGRN364c

TUHO: While most climate scientists agreed that human-caused climate change was a real issue that would require action, a small group argued there was no cause for alarm. The plan was to pay these sceptics to give speeches or write op-eds - about $1,500 (£1,250) per article - and to arrange media tours so they could appear on local TV and radio stations

TUHO:

Though few outside the PR industry might have heard of E Bruce Harrison or the eponymous company he had run since 1973, he had a string of campaigns for some of the US's biggest polluters under his belt.
He had worked for the chemical industry discrediting research on the toxicity of pesticides; for the tobacco industry, and had recently run a campaign against tougher emissions standards for the big car makers. Harrison had built a firm that was considered one of the very best.
Media historian Melissa Aronczyk, who interviewed Harrison before he died in 2021, says he was a strategic linchpin for his clients, ensuring everyone was on the same page.
"He was a master at what he did," she says.

Autoforum a dezinformace o elektromobilech #EV

ANALÝZA: Štve vás elektromobilita? Možná vás překvapí, co vám utvořilo názor - strana 3 - iDNES.cz
https://www.idnes.cz/technet/technika/overovani-informaci-garbage-in-garbage-out-elektromobilita.A240529_152128_tec_technika_nyv/3#space-a

The percentage of organizations not employing PR firms ranged from 0% for the Gas & Oil Sector to a high of 33% for Renewable Energy Sector. Overall, on average, organizations engaged a PR firm 13.4 times over the entire study period. This ranged from a low of an average of 3 PR firms engaged by the Renewable Energy Sector organizations to a high of an average of 23.22 PR firms engaged by Utilities Sector organizations. An analysis of variance showed that the Utilities Sector had a significantly higher frequency of engaging PR firms than any of the other sectors.Footnote7 The high use of PR firms in the Utilities Sector was driven by the exceptional use of PR firms by General Electric and Siemens. These are highly visible corporations, and they clearly make a large investment in hiring PR firms. The public nature of most other utilities did not impact their levels of PR firm hiring in a manner at all comparable to GE and Siemens. Additionally, while the Gas & Oil Sector has an overall higher frequency of PR firm hiring than any of the other sectors in absolute terms, there is no statistically significant difference between the Coal/Steel/Rail Sector, the Gas & Oil Sector, and the Environmental Movement in terms of their PR firm use at the organizational level. Due to the small number of cases, an analysis of the Renewable Energy Sector was not conducted.

The role of public relations firms in climate change politics | Climatic Change
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-021-03244-4

Boze muj

Evropa a globální oteplování — Demagog.cz
https://demagog.cz/diskuze/evropa-a-globalni-oteplovani#video

Climate Facts Europe is a database created in collaboration with 24 member organisations of the European Fact-Checking Standards Network, supported by the European Climate Foundation. Its purpose is to increase cross-country collaboration while promoting access to verified climate information. In the database, you will find fact-checks, disinformation debunks, prebunking articles and narrative reports on transcontinental climate trends.

EFCSN Climate Facts
https://climatefacts.efcsn.com/

it becomes clear that the energy source with the highest mining burden is coal. Generating one gigawatt-hour of electricity with coal requires 20 times the mining footprint as generating the same electricity with low-carbon power sources like wind and solar. Producing the same electricity with natural gas requires moving about twice as much rock.


Want less mining? Switch to clean energy. | MIT Technology Review
https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/04/25/1091765/want-less-mining-switch-to-clean-energy/#:~:text=Generating%20one%20gigawatt%2Dhour%20of,about%20twice%20as%20much%20rock