PREVIT: napsal mi do posty

RUDOLF:
BONGI:
Ma RO, takze ani kdybyste chteli! :)

RUDOLF: Zarekl jsem se, ze ne, ale proste mi uz selhaly nervy a nevydrzel jsem.

RUDOLF: Ta nejlepsi odpoved! :D

GREATDRAKE: Otazka byla spis recnicka, mne je prece take jedno, jak to vidis ty osobne a zda tobe se zda odpoved nasnade jako logicka. Me zajima odpoved tech, kteri se kriticky vyjadrili. A mimochodem - ty odpovedi, ktere se zdaji byt logicke a nejjednodussi, vubec nemuseji odpovidat skutecnosti. To zase naucila praxe me.
Jedna z odpovedi, ktera by mohla napriklad zanit je, ze negativismus vyjadreny LeaII se dotycnym zdal zavaznejsi a nebezpecnejsi, takze se proti nemu potrebovali vymezit. Ne z hlediska zajimavosti, ale protoze prispevky JII se jim zdaly byt prijatelnejsi. Ale to je jen jedna z moznych variant.
Takze, proc se dohadovat mezi sebou a proc mluvit za jine, nechcme to na nich, nebo to nechme byt.

BONGI: Ale mně je jedno jestli jsem odhadl jejich motivaci správně či ne... jen nevidím důvod proč hledat (a ptát se po) vysvětlení někde, kde jednoduché je zcela na snadě a vůbec není nelogické. :)

LEA1: to nebyl rozbor osobnosti, ale způsobu jakým argumentuješ. Proto pět příspěvků stačí.

RUDOLF:
GREATDRAKE:

tj. nikde jsem nemluvil o trestním řádu, ale o tom jak se kulturně dar chápe..
tj. nefunguje darová smyčka typická pro západ. Dar=závazek dar opětovat.

GREATDRAKE: tak nějak u nás není slušné dar přijmout, právě protože zavazuje..

RUDOLF: no tak nějak to funguje i u nás už od dob říma - není trestné přijímat dary, ale trestné je zohlednit dar při rozhodování :)

jinak v číně funguje korupce v jiném kulturním režimu... pokud je veřejná soutěž, je běžné a všeobecně známé že rozhodčí dostává dary ze všech stran.. co je ale specifické, že ony dary nejsou zavazující.. mám to přes kámoše, těžko říct jestli to má nějaký odraz v odborné literatuře..

sem to nepatří, ale navazuje to na ten vtipný text o tom jak nám čína bude vládnout..

sanctions for dummies: China-US-North Korea: A US-China draft resolution to tighten sanctions against North Korea for its 12 February nuclear detonation would impose some of the toughest sanctions ever ordered by the United Nations, US Ambassador Susan Rice said on 5 March.

Six new provisions are intended to make it harder for North Korea to move money and supplies for nuclear and missile activity.

The new sanctions would target the "illicit" activities of North Korean diplomats and the country's banking relationships for the first time.

Existing sanctions authorize nations to inspect for nuclear or missile-related contraband cargos in transit. One new provision would require states to inspect cargos on their territory. Ships that refused inspection would be prohibited from entering any port. Landing rights for aircraft suspected of transporting banned cargo would also be denied.

The import of luxury items has been banned, but the new sanctions itemize them. Prohibited goods include yachts, jewelry, luxury automobiles and racing cars.

The resolution would also target North Korean diplomats who support nuclear and missile-related activities abroad. Nations would be called on to monitor North Korean diplomats on their territory and prevent them from acting as couriers carrying, literally, suitcases stuffed with cash both to and from North Korea.

Comment: The draft took three weeks to negotiate, according to Ambassador Rice. It was sent to other Security Council members Tuesday.

The new sanctions are important for their specificity and for Chinese support. Specificity makes it harder for North Korean sympathizers to avoid getting caught.

However, China's support is highly significant because all of the transit-related sanctions directly affect China's relations with North Korea. As long as China served as an outlet for North Korean trade and transit, the North could never be quarantined or embargoed. It is impossible to enforce an embargo against a country with land borders unless all its neighbors agree.

This is the first time China has agreed, even for a limited selection of goods. Chinese airports, airspace, rail roads, seaports and territorial waters are essential to North Korea's ability to import contraband and to export weapons. Flights to Iran, for example, always use Chinese airspace, and have often used Chinese airports for en route stops. The primary serviceable rail line from Pyongyang only goes to the border town of Dandong, China, where it links to the well-developed Chinese rail road system in the northeast.

Finally, North Korea has been using its diplomatic pouches to finance sanctioned activities for years and to supply luxury goods to the Kim family. Additionally, diplomats usually are required to finance their own diplomatic posts by whatever means they can contrive. This usually means some form of smuggling. This resolution is the first to attempt to disrupt these longstanding North Korean practices.

Chinese backing for this unprecedented set of sanctions is a measure of its displeasure with North Korea's nuclear and missile activities.