• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    GORGworld conspiracy // 911 // new world order ... part 3 :: Love your local Illuminati :)
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    US forces 'out of control', says Reuters chief
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1580244,00.html
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    FBI to get veto power over PC software?

    The Federal Communications Commission thinks you have the right to use software on your computer only if the FBI approves.

    No, really. In an obscure "policy" document released around 9 p.m. ET last Friday, the FCC announced this remarkable decision.

    According to the three-page document, to preserve the openness that characterizes today's Internet, "consumers are entitled to run applications and use services of their choice, subject to the needs of law enforcement." Read the last seven words again.

    The FCC didn't offer much in the way of clarification. But the clearest reading of the pronouncement is that some unelected bureaucrats at the commission have decreeed that Americans don't have the right to use software such as Skype or PGPfone if it doesn't support mandatory backdoors for wiretapping. (That interpretation was confirmed by an FCC spokesman on Monday, who asked not to be identified by name. Also, the announcement came at the same time as the FCC posted its wiretapping rules for Internet telephony.)

    Nowhere does the commission say how it jibes this official pronouncement with, say, the First Amendment's right to speak freely, not to mention the limited powers granted the federal government by the U.S. Constitution.

    What's also worth noting is that the FCC's pronunciamento almost tracks the language of the 1996 Telecommunications Act. Almost.

    But where federal law states that it is the policy of the United States to preserve a free market for Internet services "unfettered by federal or state regulation," the bureaucrats have adroitly interpreted that to mean precisely the opposite of Congress said. Ain't that clever?

    Posted by Declan McCullagh

    http://news.com.com/2061-10804_3-5884130.html?tag=nefd.aon
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    This is Walter Wolfgang, a member of the Labour Party since before Tony Blair was born, and a fugitive from Nazi Germany where he lost his family. He was manhandled out of the Labour party conference by 'security' thugs and later held under the anti-terrorism act. His crime? Shouting 'nonsense' during a speech on Iraq.



    This is Blair's Britain, as it is Bush's America, a fascist state in all but name where dissent is crushed and the pathetic sycophants cheer on demand.



    'An 82-year-old Jewish fugitive from Nazi Germany who lost family in the Holocaust, Walter Wolfgang knows a thing or two about how freedom of speech is suppressed. He learned a little more yesterday when he was manhandled by Labour goons at the party conference for daring to shout 'nonsense' at Jack Straw's used car salesman's weasel words on Iraq. Time was when heckling was the lifeblood of politics in Britain but yesterday's scenes would not have been out of place in North Korea, with Mr Wolfgang even being detained briefly under anti-terror laws.'

    http://www.davidicke.com/icke/headlines.php

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/newscomment.html?in_page_id=1787&in_article_id=363795
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    THE AGENDA ROLLS ON: EU WINS POWER TO JAIL NATIONAL CITIZENS ... COURT JUDGEMENT STRIKES AT THE HEART OF NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY

    'The EU has been given the power to compel the national courts of its 25 Member States to fine or imprison people for breaking EU laws, even if a country's own Government and Parliament are opposed to that.

    An unprecedented ruling yesterday by the EU Court of Justice in Luxembourg gives Brussels the power to introduce harmonised criminal law across the EU, creating for the first time a body of European criminal law that all Member States must adopt. The judgment by the EU supreme court was opposed by 11 EU Governments - Ireland, Denmark, Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany, France,the UK, Spain, Portugal and Greece.'

    http://www.free-europe.org/blog/english.php?itemid=291
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Al-Qaeda cleric exposed as an MI5 double agent

    By Daniel McGrory and Richard Ford
    Allies say warnings were ignored

    ONE of al-Qaeda’s most dangerous figures has been revealed as a double agent working for MI5, raising criticism from European governments, which repeatedly called for his arrest.

    Britain ignored warnings — which began before the September 11 attacks — from half a dozen friendly governments about Abu Qatada’s links with terrorist groups and refused to arrest him. Intelligence chiefs hid from European allies their intention to use the cleric as a key informer against Islamic militants in Britain.

    Abu Qatada boasted to MI5 that he could prevent terrorist attacks and offered to expose dangerous extremists, while all along he was setting up a haven for his terror organisation in Britain.

    Among the scores of young militants who came to visit him in London was the chief suspect in the Madrid train bombings. His followers also included people who wanted to be suicide bombers for al-Qaeda, such as Richard Reid, the shoe bomber.

    A special tribunal that has investigated his operations in Britain described him as “a truly dangerous individual”.
    A ruling by the Special Immigrations Appeals Commission revealed yesterday that there was evidence to show that Abu Qatada “has been concerned in the instigation of acts of international terrorism”.

    A security source in Madrid said yesterday: “Who knows how much violence and bloodshed could have been prevented if Britain had heeded the warnings about this man a long time ago.”

    With terrorism at the top of the agenda at the European Union summit today in Brussels, Tony Blair is bound to be asked about MI5’s history with Abu Qatada and other militant clerics who have used Britain as their base.

    Spain, France, Italy, Germany, the United States and Jordan all asked to question Abu Qatada about his links to al-Qaeda but were refused.

    Instead, MI5 agents held three meetings with the cleric, who bragged of his influence among young Islamic militants and insisted that they were no risk to Britain’s national security.

    He pledged to MI5 that he would not “bite the hand that fed him”.


    He also promised to “report anyone damaging the interests of this country”. Instead, he was recruiting for al-Qaeda training camps.

    His continued liberty for years after international demands for his arrest was an embarrassment for Britain. When David Blunkett introduced his controversial Anti-terrorism Crime and Security Act, 2001, which allowed him to detain foreign suspects without trial, Abu Qatada claimed that the law “was enacted with him particularly in mind”.

    He disappeared from his family home in West London just before the law came into force.

    Indignant French officials accused MI5 of helping the cleric to abscond. While he remained on the run, one intelligence chief in Paris was quoted as saying: “British intelligence is saying they have no idea where he is, but we know where he is and, if we know, I’m quite sure they do.”

    Almost a year later Abu Qatada was found hiding in a flat not far from Scotland Yard.


    Abu Qatada was appealing against his continued detention in Belmarsh top security prison, but Mr Justice Collins ruled that the cleric was “at the centre in the UK of terrorist activities associated with al-Qaeda”.

    He is a Jordanian national who arrived here with a forged United Arab Emirates passport in September 1993 claiming asylum.

    Jordan told Britain that he had been convicted for terrorist attacks in Amman seven months before September 11.

    Spanish investigators produced evidence that a militant they had in custody in Madrid — Abu Dahdah — had visited the cleric more than 25 times, bringing him money and new recruits.

    Abu Qatada was banned by most mainstream mosques, so held his own meetings at the Four Feathers Club, near Baker Street in Central London. His lawyer says that he “entirely denies” any involvement with terrorism.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-3-1050175,00.html
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Bohemian Grove Employee Blows the Whistle on Inside Events







    http://prisonplanet.com/Pages/Sept05/290905Grove.htm
    PETVAL
    PETVAL --- ---
    ...
    V prvně jmenované zemi se kupříkladu vzhledem k rozporuplným, ba protichůdným teoriím Scotland Yardu o londýnských výbuších a policejní popravě osmi výstřely do hlavy již na zemi ležícího Brazilčana (zpráva vyšetřovací komise Independent Police Complaints Commission) ptají, kde že se to nachází hranice marciálního způsobu boje proti fenoménu „populárně“ (a nebo populisticky?) nazývanému "mezinárodní terorismus". V minulém roce přispěly ve Španělsku lži a manipulace okolo pumových atentátů v Madridu k pádu Aznarovy vlády, za nynější socialistické vlády se z podobných důvodů pokouší soudce Juan del Olmo z nejvyššího Národního soudu „právní cestou“ umlčet renomovaný španělský deník El Mundo. Ten totiž zveřejnil a několikrát detailně potvrdil nepříjemné informace, že španělská policie nejen o plánovaných útocích věděla, nýbrž že do akce, která stála život 192 lidí, byli dubiózním způsobem zapleteni špiclové a informátoři policie, Guardia Civil i tajné služby CNI. Vzhledem k těmto a podobným zkušenostem nepůsobí vidina „preventivní vazby“, o které v Německu uvažují „červený“ spolkový ministr vnitra Schily a jeho „černý“ bavorský kolega Beckstein zrovna uklidňujícím dojmem.
    ...
    Uvnitř západního společenství, jehož součástí jsme se po roce 1989 stali, probíhá proces, ve kterém se právo čím dál tím více stává obětí politické manipulace. Zatímco je pod heslem boje proti terorismu ignorovány platné mezinárodní právo i konvence a vedou se ilegální války (Jugoslávie, Irák), jejichž výsledkem jsou „kolaterální škody“ v podobě chaosu, devastace a desetitisíců civilních obětí, mění se tzv. otevřená společnost krok za krokem v dozorčí stát.

    Přitom je v občanovi vyvoláván dojem, že nebezpečí přichází zvenčí a demokratický právní stát má existenční patent s garancí věčnosti. Jenže i sebelepší ústava se změní v bezcenný cár potištěného papíru, iluze svobody, pokud společnost opustí vůle ji dodržovat. Perverzní na tom není eventuelní policejní přehmat, nýbrž fakt, že během proklamovaného exportu demokracie do světa dochází pod heslem zachování vnitřní bezpečnosti státu k jejímu postupnému omezování u jejích vývozců. Nejmodernější sledovací technika, zavádění průkazů totožnosti s biometrickými údaji, možnost vazby bez soudního rozsudku, vnitrostátní nasazení armády spolu s dalšími plánovanými „opatřeními“ pocit bezpečnosti spíše sugerují než zaručují a dlouhodobě poslouží spíše kontrole „průhledných“ občanů, než jejich ochraně před různorodě motivovaným teroristickým násilím. To je de facto v podmínkách probíhající globalizace, při které zároveň kolabují kdysi těžce vydobytá pravidla mezinárodního soužití, mocenskými prostředky právního státu de facto neuchopitelné.

    Trend současného vývoje „od presumpce neviny k předpokladu viny“ opouští jednu z základních filozofických zásad právního státu. Lze očekávat, že se tento trend v rámci obecně vládnoucího proudu reálně existující politiky nevyhne ani naší zemi. Na tyto teknotrendy naši osvědčení matadoři „občanské společnosti“ a bdělí ochránci „právního státu“ v čele s exprezidentem-dramatikem samozřejmě nereagují. Na jejich pozadí se jeví kauza CzechTeku jako zástupný problém odvádějící pozornost od problémů zásadních. Jako bychom chtěli v podmínkách technicky přebujelé civilizace za každou cenu imitovat postupný soumrak dávné římské republiky: čím menší je občanův reálný vliv na věci veřejné, tím žádanější jsou iluzionistická představení podobného typu, v jejichž souvislosti je možné vést vcelku nezávazné debaty na téma právo, svoboda, demokracie. Budoucnost ukáže, zda z nich zbude víc než možnost se občas vyřádit na zelené louce.

    http://blisty.cz/2005/9/12/art24921.html
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---


    Internet Thought Police

    USA Today | September 28 2005

    Transport George Orwell's novel 1984- in which a totalitarian Big Brother government tries to rule citizens' lives and control their thoughts - into the 21st century, and it would look a lot like China today.

    Consider what happened this week. Continuing a long battle to curb what it considers a subversive information source - the Internet - China tightened its censorship of online news services and bulletin boards.

    Major search engines and portals have been ordered to stop posting unauthorized commentary. Only opinion pieces from government-controlled sources are allowed. Private individuals and groups must register as "news organizations" before operating e-mail distribution lists. Anyone who violates the rules faces prison. Already, China has jailed a journalist for sending text of a Communist Party memo to foreign websites.

    Distressingly, Western companies, notably Yahoo, have cooperated with the authorities as a price of being allowed to do business in China. In doing so, they become partners of the totalitarian state. The specter arises that the Internet, usually assumed to be a catalyst for free speech and democracy, is becoming a tool for repression. If China is successful, other regimes no doubt would follow.

    China, of course, can't possibly stamp out all material it doesn't want its citizens to see. Internet use in China is soaring, along with cellphone use and text messaging. About 8% of China's 1.3 billion people are now Internet users. Many have proven adept at skirting the most advanced censorship methods in the world.

    At this point, it's anyone's guess how many Chinese will succeed in getting a free flow of information, and how many will be scared off by government intimidation or manipulated by censorship and propaganda.

    What's more clear is that democratic nations and their companies should not help China's Thought Police turn the Internet into a platform for Orwellian Newspeak and Doublethink. However appealing collaboration might seem, they would eventually find that the world of 1984 was not a pleasant place.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20050928/cm_usatoday/internetthoughtpolice;_ylt=A86.I1cOdjpDVPYAdhr9wxIF;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Special Report:Katrina/Rita Fallout Part Two

    Martial Law: The Pretext Is Now Set



    http://infowars.net/Pages/Sept05/280905Martiallaw.htm

    TABRIS
    TABRIS --- ---
    http://fishki.net/video/bush.swf - tak si pro osvezeni pohrajem. kdyby se zasek tak ho chytnete mysi a dolu, dolu s nim..:-)
    TABRIS
    TABRIS --- ---
    Vyborne, diky! Pokusim se vzdelat pribuzenstvo :-)
    I kdyz asi spis jen svoji generaci. Otec je dost nepruzny, rekl bych, ze se to od nej az odrazi, naprosto nedotyka. :-))
    PETVAL
    PETVAL --- ---
    na FTP jsem konecne k 9/11 In Plane Site nahral synchronizovane CZ titulky
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Viewpoint: The case for global integration

    As part of the BBC's Who Runs Your World? series, Richard N Haass, president of the US think-tank, the Council on Foreign Relations, assesses the limitations of US power and argues for deeper international collaboration.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4274714.stm
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Were British Special Forces Soldiers Planting Bombs in Basra?

    Suspicions Strengthened by Earlier Reports

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=KEE20050925&articleId=994
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    British Basra bomb bull

    Monday, September 26, 2005

    All the speculation has forced the British government to come up with a new Official Story on what the two police-murderin', anti-tank-weapon-totin', Arab-dress-sportin' soldiers were up to in Basra:

    "TWO SAS soldiers rescued last week after being arrested by Iraqi police and handed over to a militia were engaged in a 'secret war' against insurgents bringing sophisticated bombs into the country from Iran.

    The men had left their base near the southern Iraqi city of Basra to carry out reconnaissance and supply a second patrol with 'more tools and fire power', said a source with knowledge of their activities.

    They had been in Basra for seven weeks on an operation prompted by intelligence that a new type of roadside bomb which has been used against British troops was among weapons being smuggled over the Iranian border."

    and:

    "'Since the increase in attacks against UK forces two months ago, a 24-strong SAS team has been working out of Basra to provide a safety net to stop the bombers getting into the city from Iran,' said one source. 'The aim is to identify routes used by insurgents and either capture or kill them.'"

    You can replace 'source with knowledge of their activities' by 'Blair spin-artiste' to get a more accurate feeling for what is going on here. As propaganda goes, it's a twofer, simultaneously explaining that these weren't British agents provocateurs, and that Iran is somehow to blame for the problems in Basra. I suppose the secret mission in the hinterland of Basra explains what they were doing in Basra itself, near where there was to be a protest against the British seizure of a local leader blamed by the British for their recent problems in the area. It suppose it also explains why they didn't just identify themselves as British soldiers when challenged, instead of getting into a firefight with local authorities (who, after all, were just doing their jobs). I suppose it also explains why it took the British days and days to come up with their latest version of the truth. The Iraqis, who haven't got the luxury of lying to themselves about the motives of a government which, after all, is a documented liar on the reasons for entering the war in the first place, know what the truth is.


    In the meantime, in the last 24 hours we hear that the British are:


    1. definitely pulling out of Iraq starting next May; or

    2. definitely not pulling out; or

    3. sending in more SAS soldiers so they can definitely pull out.


    The bottom line is that Tony can't pull out British troops as it would leave his master George too politically exposed, and George - notwithstanding all the planning being done on the 'left' of American politics to make the pull-out as humane as possible - won't remove American troops as long as there are American bases in Iraq. Since there will be American bases in Iraq until the Americans are forced to give them up, I wouldn't be holding my breath on any Anglo-American troop withdrawal any time soon. When it does occur, I can guarantee that it will be done absolutely and completely without the slightest regard to the effect it will have on the Iraqi people, and for totally selfish American reasons.

    http://xymphora.blogspot.com/
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Entire 101st Airborne Deploying To Iraq

    News Channel 5.com
    9-26-5


    The 101st Airborne Division is once again answering the call to serve in Iraq.

    Around 20,000 soldiers got their final briefing Friday afternoon at Ft. Campbell. It's been two years since the division was last deployed to Iraq.

    Soldiers will board planes and be heading off Friday to do numerous duties, including helping train Iraqi law enforcement. Families took the afternoon to say goodbye.

    This is just the 5th time in the history of the 101st that the entire division has been deployed all at once. The soldiers will be gone a year.

    http://www.newschannel5.com/content/news/14622.asp

    Something big is up. The 101st isn't used to train cops.
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    So what were two undercover British soldiers up to in Basra?

    http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article314977.ece
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam