• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    KERRAYoO( ) psychedelické memy ( )O๑.. ॐ ..๑O( ) psychedelic memes ( )Oo
    Pokud nemáš čas přečíst tohle záhlaví, nemá vůbec cenu pokračovat v čtení.

    Co sem patří si přečtěte na nástěnce. Klidně můžete chválit či diskutovat, ale počítejte s tím, že věci, které sem nesedí, se mažou hned, a věci, které sem nesedí, ale jsou zajímavé, se taky mažou, jen o něco později - aby v archivu zůstávaly jen psychedelické memy.

    Pro čtenáře
    Co si o klubu pomyslí čtenář, je jen a pouze na něm. Můžou tu klidně být matoucí či provokativní věci. Můžou tu být věci, které jsou pravý opak psychedelie - a je na vás, abyste se zarazili, a řekli si - no momentík. Většinou nemá cenu brát to tu doslovně nebo dokonce hodnotit jednotlivé příspěvky - buďto mně něco osloví, nebo neosloví. Obsah je cílen na návštěvníka, který si je schopen hrát s významy a odlesky slov, je ochoten se dívat na věci ze zajímavých úhlů, aniž by to pro něj nutně znamenalo, že těmto náhledům musí věřit. A pokud by něco z obsahu pomohlo třeba jen jedinému člověku (tobě? :) k probuzení, splní svůj účel dokonale.

    Do your own thinking!
    Není důležité souhlasit, ale zamyslet se / zkusit si jiný úhel pohledu
    rozbalit záhlaví
    JAZZZ
    JAZZZ --- ---
    KILLIAN: slunce by byla ještě taková roztomile neškodná modla :)
    KILLIAN
    KILLIAN --- ---
    SINECURVE: Koloběh uzavřen. Zpět k uctívání slunce. :]
    SINECURVE
    SINECURVE --- ---
    CRS
    CRS --- ---
    jde o úhel pohledu
    SINECURVE
    SINECURVE --- ---
    CRS
    CRS --- ---
    CRS
    CRS --- ---
    CRS
    CRS --- ---
    THE_HOG
    THE_HOG --- ---
    MTO
    MTO --- ---
    "Štěstí je snění o tom, co nás v realitě nakonec štve."

    - Slavoj Zizek
    FEKALNIK
    FEKALNIK --- ---
    MTO
    MTO --- ---
    CRS
    CRS --- ---
    DLOUHA_POTVORA
    DLOUHA_POTVORA --- ---
    old but gold

    Eli Pariser: Beware online "filter bubbles" | TED Talk
    https://www.ted.com/talks/eli_pariser_beware_online_filter_bubbles#t-525293

    "... So it's not just Google and Facebook either. This is something that's sweeping the Web. There are a whole host of companies that are doing this kind of personalization. Yahoo News, the biggest news site on the Internet, is now personalized -- different people get different things. (...) And this moves us very quickly toward a world in which the Internet is showing us what it thinks we want to see, but not necessarily what we need to see. As Eric Schmidt said, "It will be very hard for people to watch or consume something that has not in some sense been tailored for them. ..."

    "... What they discovered was that in our Netflix queues there's this epic struggle going on between our future aspirational selves and our more impulsive present selves. You know we all want to be someone who has watched "Rashomon," but right now we want to watch "Ace Ventura" for the fourth time. So the best editing gives us a bit of both. It gives us a little bit of Justin Bieber and a little bit of Afghanistan. It gives us some information vegetables; it gives us some information dessert. ..."

    "... And the thing is, we've actually been here before as a society. In 1915, it's not like newspapers were sweating a lot about their civic responsibilities. Then people noticed that they were doing something really important. That, in fact, you couldn't have a functioning democracy if citizens didn't get a good flow of information, that the newspapers were critical because they were acting as the filter, and then journalistic ethics developed. It wasn't perfect, but it got us through the last century. ..."
    INK_FLO
    INK_FLO --- ---
    Slavoj!

    The biggest achievement of the new cognitive-military complex is that direct and obvious oppression is no longer necessary: individuals are much better controlled and “nudged” in the desired direction when they continue to experience themselves as the free and autonomous agents of their own life… But all these are well-known facts, and we have to make a step further.

    The predominant critique proceeds in the way of demystification: beneath the innocent-sounding research into happiness and welfare, it discerns a dark hidden gigantic complex of social control and manipulation exerted by the combined forces of private corporations and state agencies. But what is urgently needed is also the opposite move: instead of just asking what dark content is hidden beneath the form of scientific research into happiness, we should focus on the form itself. Is the topic of scientific research on human welfare and happiness (at least the way it is practiced today) really so innocent, or is it already in itself permeated by the stance of control and manipulation? What if the sciences are here not just misused? What if they find here precisely their proper use? We should put in question the recent rise of a new discipline, “happiness studies.” How is it that, in our era of spiritualized hedonism when the goal of life is directly defined as happiness, anxiety and depression are exploding? It is the enigma of this self-sabotaging of happiness and pleasure which makes Freud’s message more actual than ever.

    We should risk here even a step further and inquire into the hidden side of the notion of happiness itself. When, exactly, can a people be said to be happy? In a country like Czechoslovakia in the late 1970s and 1980s, people in a way effectively were happy. Three fundamental conditions of happiness were fulfilled there. (1) Their material needs were basically satisfied, but not too satisfied, since the excess of consumption can in itself generate unhappiness. It is good to experience a brief shortage of some goods on he market from time to time (no coffee for a couple of days, then no beef, then no TV sets). These brief periods of shortage functioned as exceptions which reminded people that they should be glad that the goods were generally available; if everything is available all the time, people take this availability as an evident fact of life and no longer appreciate their luck. Life thus went on in a regular and predictable way, without any great efforts or shocks, and one was allowed to withdraw into one’s private niche. (2) A second extremely important feature: there was the Other (the Party) to be blamed for everything that went wrong, so that one did not feel really responsible. If there was a temporary shortage of some goods, even if stormy weather caused great damage, it was ‘their’ fault. (3) And, last but not least, there was an Other Place (the consummerist West) about which one was allowed to dream, and even visit sometimes. This place was just at the right distance, not too far, not too close. That fragile balance was disturbed – by what? By desire, precisely. Desire was the force which compelled the people to move on – and end up in a system in which a large majority is definitely less happy…

    Happiness? No, Thanks! - The Philosophical Salon
    https://thephilosophicalsalon.com/happiness-no-thanks/
    KERRAY
    KERRAY --- ---
    BURAN
    BURAN --- ---
    MTO: pred 20 lety bych nevedel nic, ted vim aspon pulku :o)
    MTO
    MTO --- ---

    PRAASHEK
    PRAASHEK --- ---
    eh, jsem myslel, jsem v NIH... pokud vadí, tak to smázněte. ale vlastně to sem sedí
    PRAASHEK
    PRAASHEK --- ---
    CRS:
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam