GORG: Pozri zakladny ciel projektu bol ten, ze ich chceli dostat z ulice. Na strane 15 je rozpisany vysledok. A mam pocit, ze je pomerne zjavne, ze ten co nechcel participovat na odchode z ulice sa z projektu vylucil.
Tj. na to aby vobec mohli dostavat peniaze, museli byt "v programe". Z dokumentu je uplne jasne, ze vyuzitie penazi bolo regulovane - je tam jasne spomenute, ze drogovo zavisli ucastnik najprv nakupil veci a nasledne ich predaval - kupil drogy a znova si nechal nakupit veci. Co je nieco co by nebolo nutne, ak by to nemalo obmedzenia.
The coordinator had access to a credit card and £500 petty cash. Action plans were agreed by the City
of London commissioner. Importantly, authorisation to spend money was received promptly from the
commissioner (usually within a day), enabling the coordinator to respond quickly to people’s requests:
Uz z tohto popisu je jasne, ze vobec neslo o priame, nekontrolovane financovanie ucastnikov.
Btw formulacia naco ten projekt bol:
It’s an idea to get people off the street. It’s a good idea.
If you want to, you can get yourself off the street. It’s down to the individual whether they want to
take it. If you’re on the street, it’s up to you if you want to take it.
Mne sa zas naopak zda, ze to cele malo pomerne jasne mantinely..