Madrid City Council has launched a tender for a 74km-long forest belt to be developed around the city’s perimeters, with hundreds of thousands of new trees that will be planted to help improve the Spanish capital’s poor air quality.
Madrid authorities are looking to develop a huge “environmental belt” made up of between 100,000 and 450,000 trees, new parks and leisure areas and even green bridges over some of the city’s main motorways.

https://www.thelocal.es/20200710/madrid-wants-to-build-biggest-metropolitan-forest-in-europe

TADEAS: pokud ten pan na obrazku obecne zastupuje lidstvo jako celek, tak jo. brala jsem to jako vyvoj individualnich zivotu nasich deti a prislo mi to jako by moc optimisticky. neco jako "vsude ziji lide i kdyz je tam failed state, treba v afghanistanu" tj ze je proste potreba se adaptovat na nizsi zivotni uroven a vyssi kolektivismus ale vsechno se da.

Versus ze ja se predevsim bojim scenaru typu Severni Korea, ze lidi jsou cenne zdroje, takze zvitezi tuhe totality, zotrocovani lidi vladnouci tridou, spis nez nejaky zahradkareni

příklad ekologické výchovy od mladší generace směrem k rodičům. dítě (7) nás definitivně přesvědčilo přejít na ovesný mléko :)

YMLADRIS: ja tomu verim na mnoha rovinach, v osobni vzdycky bude bude vyhodny dobre kooperovat a vzdycky bude vyhodny se orientovat v managementu ekosystemu, jelikoz jim jsme. v ty nejsirsi rovine samozrejme chceme kooperativni a inkluzivni planetarni spolecenstvi, jakkoliv to na to nevypada, a dobre v planetarnim kontextu managovanej ekosystem potazmo klima. ona jina cesta dal, ve smyslu gradace civilizace k nejakymu dalsimu stadiu v principu stejne nevede. coz neznamena, ze to tamtudy pujde... ale klidne o sto let pozdeji s jednou miliardou zbyvajicich lidi, po masivnich konfliktech o zdroje, to stejne bude porad jedina cesta dal - vyvazat civilizaci ze spalovani biosystemu (stabilizovat klima) a managovat ekosystem v souladu s ekosystemovejma cyklama (regenerovat ekosystem).

Phytoplankton abundances in the Arctic Ocean have been increasing over recent decades as the region has warmed and sea ice has disappeared. The presumptive causes of this increase were expanding open water area and a longer growing season—at least until now. Lewis et al. show that although these factors may have driven the productivity trends before, over the past decade, phytoplankton primary production rose by more than half because of increased phytoplankton concentrations (see the Perspective by Babin). This finding means that there has been an influx of new nutrients into the region, suggesting that the Arctic Ocean could become more productive and export additional carbon in the future.

Changes in phytoplankton concentration now drive increased Arctic Ocean primary production | Science
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/369/6500/198

There's a major change happening in the Arctic. Dark waters are blooming with algae, as sunlight floods spaces long obscured by sheets of ice.
Over the past two decades, there's been a 57 percent increase in phytoplankton in the Arctic ocean, an analysis by researchers from Stanford University has revealed.

A Major Food Chain Shift Appears to Be Happening in The Arctic Right Now
https://www.sciencealert.com/...ft-in-how-the-arctic-locks-up-carbon-and-nobody-knows-what-to-expect

No a tady jeste na pozitivni notu nejakej aktualni prispevek od Roberta Walkera.

Btw NAGASAWA jestli te zajimaji hlasy proti hysterii a ekoalarmisu, tak myslim, ze zrovna tenhle celkem stoji za sledovani. Mam s tim celkovym vyznenim sice celkem problem, ale co jsem si ho tak cetl, tak nema sklon sklouzavat k demagogii, lzim a manipulacim jako treba takovej Bjorn Lomborg. Proste je to takovej rozenej optimista :)) A ma taky gigantickej rozhled, takze jsou ty jeho prispevky zajimavy cist i tak.

No risk of human extinction - and so much positive going on - Debunking Doomsday - Quora
https://www.quora.com/q/debunkingdoomsday/No-risk-of-human-extinction-and-so-much-positive-going-on

Tady je btw skvelej dokument o rediteli institutu geofyziky na Varsavske univerzite Szymonu Malinowskim. Imho top prikadu, jak byse mela komunikovat klimaticka zmena a hrozba, kterou predstavuje.

„Można panikować” reż. Jonathan L. Ramsey | "It's Okay to Panic" 2020 (napisy EN, PL, ES, RU)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osm5vyJjNY4

NAGASAWA: tady je kdyztak detailnejsi rozbor schellnbergovejch claimu ze stranek, ktery provozujou klimatologove (zalozili myslim klimatologove michael mann a gavin schmidt jako odpoved na narust dezinformacnich blogu)

Shellenberger’s op-ad « RealClimate
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2020/07/shellenbergers-op-ad/

jeden z problematicnosti jaderny energie jako reseni klimaticke krize a prechodu k nizkouhlikove ekonomice

Mluvčí jaderného dozoru v reakci na uvedená varování uvedl, že ONR požaduje, aby nové jaderné elektrárny byly schopny odolat přírodním katastrofám. Konkrétně mají být navrženy tak, aby bezpečně přečkaly extrémní jev, který se vyskytne jednou za deset tisíc let. Problém podle akademiků spočívá v tom, že z událostí, které se vyskytovaly velmi zřídka, nebo se dosud nevyskytly vůbec, může globální změna klimatu vytvořit nový fenomén.

Ve Velké Británii upozorňují experti jaderný dozor na bezpečnostní rizika změny klimatu - Temelín - atomová energetika v reálném světle
https://temelin.cz/...britanii-upozornuji-experti-jaderny-dozor-na-bezpecnostni-rizika-zmeny-klimatu

verite tomu nekdo?

Transformaci české energetiky může urychlit vítr, tvrdí Bloomberg | E15.cz
https://www.e15.cz/...ychlejsi-transformaci-ceske-energetiky-se-jmenuje-vitr-tvrdi-bloomberg-1371323

Bez zásadnějších nákladů zrychlit přechod na moderní energetiku a už v roce 2030 vyrábět 28 procent elektřiny z obnovitelných zdrojů. Takové jsou možnosti Česka podle studie Investice do obnovy a přeměny evropských uhelných regionů, kterou zveřejnila výzkumná organizace BloombergNEF

Peníze na podporu větrné energie máme. Nikdo je ale nechce, tvrdí náměstek pro energetiku Neděla | iROZHLAS - spolehlivé zprávy
https://www.irozhlas.cz/...o-vyroba-elektriny-obnovitelne-zdroje-bezemisni-energetika_2006301328_vtk

Peníze na podporu větrné energie máme. Nikdo je ale nechce, tvrdí náměstek pro energetiku Neděla
Za 20 let by mohly pokrývat větrníky čtvrtinu spotřeby elektřiny v Česku. Tvrdí to studie Ústavu fyziky atmosféry Akademie věd ČR. Máme podmínky pro rozvoj větrných elektráren, abychom jimi mohli nahradit spalování uhlí? Diskutovali o tom hosté pořadu Pro a proti Českého rozhlasu Plus.

TUHO:

TUHO: Time lags for equilibration vary between Earth systems: climate temperatures will catch up with the Pliocene with in a few decades, sea levels within a few centuries. But it gets worse. Because not only have we left the agriculture-sheltering Holocene. Not only have we zoomed through Pliocene the span than 1 human lifetime (reminder: we have no evidence that the large scale agriculture we depend upon, in our billions, for survival, is possible in this new climate. Cheers.). We are still going. We are accelerating, in fact, with concentrations of CO2 increasing faster and faster every year.

“_” : this is our unit of time, and it’s 1000 years long.
_ is 10 long human lifespans, 40 generations, the time separating us from the first millennium and the Middle Ages in European history, when Canute of Denmark ruled Britain, before Marco Polo traveled the Silk Road. It’s a long time by any human account: twice the duration of the Roman Empire.
_____ is 5'000 years. It’s the age of the oldest known living tree, Methuselah, in the Californian White Mountains.
____________ is 12'000 years. It’s the time span separating us from the last ice age. This time is the time during which humans slowly selected plants, developed agriculture, cities, writing: anything we would call civilization. It is the time when humans thrived, cultures multiplied, our population grew. This clement and stable climate interval, which sheltered us and the plants we depend upon to live so well, is known as the Holocene. Gaze upon that interval fondly, for it is already in our past.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ is 103'000 years: the duration of the last Ice Age. Ice Ages, compared with the Holocene, were pretty brutal times for human beings, and the plants and animals we depend upon. Human population was only 1–10 million at the end of the last ice age — and the one before that nearly wiped us out entirely.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ is 250'000 years, the rough age of Homo Sapiens, our species, us. This is the late stage of the Quaternary period: a time when our planet swung between ice ages and more clement interglacial periods (of which the Holocene was the latest one).
Now, time starts going much further back.
But stay with me (keep scrolling!): this is important. This is not just a distant past that our species never knew: it’s also a future we and our children will experience. Because time is moving slowly far back from us, but we are changing our climate with a rapidity never previously experienced on Earth. Ready? 3 million years to travel through now. Off — we — go!

https://medium.com/@JKSteinberger/cogs-in-the-climate-machine-167cf16750dd

As anthropogenic climate change continues the risks to biodiversity will increase over time, with future projections indicating that a potentially catastrophic loss of global biodiversity is on the horizon1,2,3. However, our understanding of when and how abruptly this climate-driven disruption of biodiversity will occur is limited because biodiversity forecasts typically focus on individual snapshots of the future. Here we use annual projections (from 1850 to 2100) of temperature and precipitation across the ranges of more than 30,000 marine and terrestrial species to estimate the timing of their exposure to potentially dangerous climate conditions. We project that future disruption of ecological assemblages as a result of climate change will be abrupt, because within any given ecological assemblage the exposure of most species to climate conditions beyond their realized niche limits occurs almost simultaneously. Under a high-emissions scenario (representative concentration pathway (RCP) 8.5), such abrupt exposure events begin before 2030 in tropical oceans and spread to tropical forests and higher latitudes by 2050. If global warming is kept below 2 °C, less than 2% of assemblages globally are projected to undergo abrupt exposure events of more than 20% of their constituent species; however, the risk accelerates with the magnitude of warming, threatening 15% of assemblages at 4 °C, with similar levels of risk in protected and unprotected areas. These results highlight the impending risk of sudden and severe biodiversity losses from climate change and provide a framework for predicting both when and where these events may occur.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2189-9

Menší požáry prospívají klimatu, zjistili vědci. Udrží uhlík v rašeliništích | Plus
https://plus.rozhlas.cz/...ary-prospivaji-klimatu-zjistili-vedci-udrzi-uhlik-v-raselinistich-8247411