• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    TUHOKlimaticka zmena / Thank you so much for ruining my day


    "Given the sheer enormity of climate change, it’s okay to be depressed, to grieve. But please, don’t stay there too long. Join me in pure, unadulterated, righteous anger."


    "I don’t want your hope. I don’t want you to be hopeful. I want you to panic. I want you to feel the fear I feel every day. And then I want you to act. Once you start to act, the hope is everywhere."

    "Our best scientists tell us insistently that a calamity is unfolding, that the life-support systems of the Earth are being damaged in ways that threaten our survival. Yet in the face of these facts we carry on as usual."

    “We’ve got to stop burning fossil fuels. So many aspects of life depend on fossil fuels, except for music and love and education and happiness. These things, which hardly use fossil fuels, are what we must focus on.”

    A nejde o to, že na to nemáme dostatečné technologie, ty by na řešení použít šly, ale chybí nám vůle a představivost je využít. Zůstáváme při zemi, přemýšlíme až moc rezervovaně. Technologický pokrok to sám o sobě nevyřeší. Problém jsme my, ne technologické nástroje.

    Rostouci hladiny oceanu, zmena atmosferickeho proudeni, zmeny v distribuci srazek a sucha. Zmeny karbonoveho, fosforoveho a dusikoveho cyklu, okyselovani oceanu. Jake jsou bezpecnostni rizika a jake potencialni klady dramatickych zmen fungovani zemskeho systemu?
    Ale take jak funguji masove dezinformacni kampane ropneho prumyslu a boj o verejne mineni na prahu noveho klimatickeho rezimu post-holocenu.
    rozbalit záhlaví
    KEB
    KEB --- ---
    DZODZO: že tys ty články ani neotevřel? Do roku 25 povinnosti 25% Rpet do roku 30% Rpet. Použít PET z popelnice je problém kvůli kontaminaci proto je chtějí vykupovat aby je mohli čistý použít znovu. Bez toho je tak akorát spálí
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    DZODZO: moje odpoved zalezi na tom, co je tvoje vize. ze budou vsichni pit jen vodu z vodovodu? nebo ze se bude vsechno stacet do sklenenych lahvi a prevazet dvojnasobnou vahu?

    imho zalohovat plasty je nesmysl. mozny reseni je zapojit AI do tridicich linek (coz uz se deje, linky tu nekde byly) a dosahnout tak na vyssi procenta recyklace a se zbytkem treba pretavit plasmou na vodik (linky tu opet byly). taky existuji procesy liquidifikace plastu, posledni dobou prichazeji vedci s enzymama, ktery plasty rozlozi...

    pokud budou auta (osobni i popelari) jezdit na elektrinu ze zelenych zdroju, tak by pak davalo smysl v masovym meritku i to sklo, verim, ze by se eko stopa toho lifecyclu dost zmenila, porad ale zustanou pripady, kdy je plast lepsi. treba africky zeny a jejich krky si dost oddechly s plastovejma flaskama / kanystrama. a sklo jim moc neulehci

    cely co se snazim rict, ze pausalne odsuzovat plasty je nesmysl. plast neni zlo. zlo prichazi vzdycky s chovanim lidi :)

    linky muzu dodat v pripade zajmu, necucam si to z prstu, ale sem na mobilu a uz to tu vsechno bylo, kdo cte, vi
    DZODZO
    DZODZO --- ---
    SHEFIK: ale aka je pridana hodnota balenych napojov? ano pokial zacnu napojove firmy pouzivat viac ako 6,6% recyklatu ako v roku 2017 potom to nebude taky problem, ale cielom ma byt primarne reduce, aky ma vyznam financovat system na vykupovanie plastovych lahvi, ked aj ak by sme dosiahli 100% zberu, tak obalove firmy z toho pouziju povedzme 10% na nove lahve a zvysnych 90% budu stale brat z ropy

    ja stale nevidim ten prakticky vyznam balenych vod, tahas sa s tym z obchodu, potom sa musis s prazdnymi (neseslapavat) tahat do obchodu a za to vsetko zaplatis 100x viac ako keby si si napustil cistu vodu a urobil si sirup zo zalohovanej lahve v skle, ktoru staci kupit raz za mesiac :)
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    DZODZO: nejak sem to tam nenasel, co vim, tak dopad na zivocichy je porad predmetem dohadu, nepodarilo se nic poradne prokazat, i kdyz by si to hodne lidi pralo. zato jsem nasel:

    However, it is the management of plastic waste that determines the risk of plastic entering the ocean. High-income countries have very effect waste management systems; mismanaged waste – and plastic that ends up in the oceans – is therefore very rare. Poor waste management across many middle- and low-income countries means that these are the main sources of global ocean plastic pollution

    ...

    protoze jsem se tim sam driv zabejval, tak tak 70% plastovyho odpadu v oceanech zpusobuji tri reky, prochazejici rozvojovymi staty. zbytek maji na svedomi dalsi reky a namorni doprava.

    jinymi slovy, ten problem neni v pouzivani plastu, ale v chovani lidi, jako vzdy. kdyz budem v cr pouzivat petky a nakladat s odpadem nejlip co umime, nikomu to moc neuskodi a muze to naopak pomoct pred sirenim nemoci, dodat trvanlivosti vyrobku apod.

    https://www.discovermagazine.com/...tics-are-everywhere-but-their-health-effects-on-humans-are-still

    WHO
    WHO calls for more research into microplastics and a crackdown on plastic pollution
    https://www.who.int/...lls-for-more-research-into-microplastics-and-a-crackdown-on-plastic-pollution

    Based on the limited information we have, microplastics in drinking water don’t appear to pose a health risk at current levels. But we need to find out more. 

    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    DZODZO: s tim souhlasim. ale co rikam, je to vzdy o zdravym rozumu a celkovym lifecyclu vyrobku. neda se pausalne rict, ze baleni do plastu skodi prostredi. melo by se vzdycky premejslet a pocitat
    DZODZO
    DZODZO --- ---
    SHEFIK: v tescu sa daju kupit okurky aj bez kondomov (v sezone), ale okurky stranou, su ovela horsie sposoby plastovania, snad uz je to zakazane, ale par rokov dozadu v UK som videl tie nakrajane pomarance na platky zafoliovane na polystyrenovom tacku, to je hodne ujete :)
    DZODZO
    DZODZO --- ---
    SHEFIK: nieco k mikroplastom a vplyvu na prirodu je tuto:

    Plastic Pollution - Our World in Data
    https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution

    There is increasing evidence that microplastic ingestion can affect the consumption of prey, leading to energy depletion, inhibited growth and fertility impacts. When organisms ingest microplastics, it can take up space in the gut and digestive system, leading to reductions in feeding signals. This feeling of fullness can reduce dietary intake.

    samotne mikroplasty v ludskom tele asi nie su taky problem, nieco ako ked zjes kocku lega, tak ju najdes v zachode celu, ale opat to nemozeme vztahovat iba na seba, treba to brat komplexne ako cely ekosystem a ten je ovlivneny dost zasadne
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    DNF: jinak si me mozna od zacatku spatne pochopil, nikdy jsem neporovnaval rozlozeni petky oproti rozlozeni okurky. co jsem porovnaval, je pocet vyhozenych okurek a nutne vstupy pro jejich vypestovani, vs pouziti jednoho kondomu z min nez 1g ropy, ktera diky tomu zachrani X okurek pred zbytecnou dopravou a vyhazovanim, protoze nevydrzela dostatecne dlouho cerstva
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    DNF: porovnej si materialovej vstup na kondom kolem okurky a jeho ekologickou stopu a vstupy na okurku a jeji ekologickou stopu, pak se muzeme bavit.

    to co nevidis jsou objemy. na ten pytlik, nebo petku potrebujes opravdu minimum materialu. diky tomu mas pak uspory z rozsahu v doprave, cimz snizujes tu ekologickou stopu, a to pravdepodobne i pri zapocitani tezby.

    hadat se nebudu, mysli si co chces.

    jinak mikroplasty v prirode problem co vim nedelaj. posli mi plz studii, pokud nejakou znas
    DNF
    DNF --- ---
    DZODZO: To mi neprijde jako zbytecna otazka.

    SHEFIK: nebudes porovnavat pozkozeni ekosystemu mikroplastama vs rozlozenyma castma okurky, ze ne? Navic - to co prisuzujes okurce ma petka za sebou taky - od tezby materialu, ktera je super cista, sure, pres vyrobu v chemickach az po zlikvidovani. Oproti okurce taky neexistuje zpusob jak ji vypestovat zcela ekologicky. Jakoze s motykou a seminkem - ukaz se :) Opet to mas prekroucene aby to vyhovovalo tvoji technooptimisticke vizi - a navic si myslis, ze to je pravda, vid?

    Uz jsem si zvykli, ze ty tvoje primery jsou fakt z jinyho sveta, ale tohle je jedno z nejhorsich co jsem od tebe slysel.

    Zijeme v dobe intenzivniho zemedelstvi, ten problem jsi aspon pojmenoval spravne.
    DZODZO
    DZODZO --- ---
    SHEFIK: jedna petka v krovi urcite nikoho nezabila, ale to je opat vztiahnute na nase prostredie, miliony petiek v mori uz su problem

    v tom clanku z idnes co som postoval pisali, ze miera znovupouzitia recyklovaneho PET na lahve vyrobcami napojov je 6,6%... to bolo sice v roku 2017 ale neocakavam odvtedy nejaky raketovy rast pouzivania recyklatu, takze k tej ekologickej stope petky asi tolko, ze stejne sa vyraba z novej ropy, takze zacat treba opat u vyrobcov balenych vod, ktori nam tuto svoju propagandu tlacia
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    DZODZO: tohle je uplne zbytecna otazka. neni dulezity, co je petka a kolik ji pouzivame, ale jak velkou ma ekologickou stopu a jak ji predejit, nebo znovu zpracovat tak, aby se snizila

    k tvy diskuzi, jestli je lepsi vyhodit plast, nebo okurku, ti chybi ta druha strana rovnice, kolik ta okurka stoji a jakou ma ekologickou stopu ona - prostorove (suchy pole misto jiny vegetace), rust (voda, hnojiva, biocidy, traktor), pece na poli (tezka technika, udrzba, nafta, oleje), dusledky (eroze, vycerpani pudy, ekosystemu, ubytky fauny), distribuce (jak z pole, tak na sklad, tak do kramu a nasledne domu), atd.

    troufam si rict, ze nizsi ekologickou stopu ma ten kondom kolem okurky, a pokud ho druhotne zpracujes / materialove premenis za pomoci green energie, muze byt per okurka blizky nule.

    bez potravin neprezijeme a zijeme v dobe intenzivniho zemedelstvi. kdezto par pytliku umime zpracovat, i kdyz mozna globalne pokulhavame v recyklaci. nicmene petka v krovi jeste nikoho nezabila a dopad mikroplastu na prirodu je porad predmetem vyzkumu, s tim, ze se neprokazala skodlivost (neco jineho jsou velke casti plastu v mori, ktere si zvirata pletou s potravou naopak s mikroplasty si bakterie v mori umi poradit).
    DZODZO
    DZODZO --- ---
    KEB: a tebe to pride normalne ze ludia kupuju mraky petek?
    GOJATLA
    GOJATLA --- ---
    Equilibrium climate sensitivity above 5 °C plausible due to state-dependent cloud feedback
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-020-00649-1
    https://sci-hub.st/downloads/2020-10-26/b3/10.1038@s41561-020-00649-1.pdf
    For decades, global climate models have predicted it as between approximately 2 and 4.5 °C. However, a large subset of models participating in the 6th Coupled Model Intercomparison Project predict values exceeding 5 °C.
    The difference has been attributed to the radiative effects of clouds, which are better captured in these models, but the underlying physical mechanism and thus how realistic such high climate sensitivities are remain unclear.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Mediterranean basin facing irreversible environmental damage, warns new UNEP report | UNEP - UN Environment Programme
    https://www.unep.org/...s-release/mediterranean-basin-facing-irreversible-environmental-damage-warns

    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Arctic Sea Ice Isn't Freezing In October for the First Time on Record - VICE
    https://www.vice.com/.../7k9pvg/arctic-sea-ice-isnt-freezing-in-october-for-the-first-time-on-record

    “The rapid retreat and low ice extent in the Laptev Sea this summer is truly exceptional and wasn't really predicted by models,” Krumpen said. “It basically tells us that the interaction between ice, ocean, and atmosphere is very complex and not fully understood.”

    “In order to better understand the impact of climate change on the Arctic Ocean, we need more and better observations to feed the models with,” he concluded.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    About Doughnut Economics
    About Doughnut Economics | DEAL
    https://doughnuteconomics.org/about-doughnut-economics





    KEB
    KEB --- ---
    DZODZO: a přesně proto by ti to nefungovalo. Finsko záloha na pětku půl eura, jestli si to dobře pamatuju a na plechovku 20c a viděl jsem jich povalovat po zemi naprosté minimum a když jo tak je houmledi sbírali.
    KEB
    KEB --- ---
    DZODZO: to v přírodě znamená u na skládce a pak to není nijak nadstrelene číslo. Normální realita co vidím trčet v parku z košů.

    Dej zálohu dvacku a vyhozených jich skončí minimum. Protože přesně ti bezdaci to po omladině posbiraji na cuco.

    Ale nechme to být. Zacyklil ses na tom, že ty petek kupuješ minimum a nedokážeš pochopit, že jsou lidi co jich kupují mraky.
    PETER_PAN
    PETER_PAN --- ---
    Episodes | The Regenerative Agroforestry Podcast
    https://www.regenerativeagroforestry.org/episodes
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Heidegger and Stiegler on failure and technology
    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00131857.2019.1654855

    Stiegler has several important addendums to Heidegger's thesis. Heidegger fails to fully appreciate the early Greek myth of Prometheus, and the technological depth that fire offers all human societies. The fall, or failure, is doubled in the myth of Prometheus, and is at the root of all cultures. Since the onset of Information Technology, the acceleration of life is disorientating our Being. I argue the fall in both Heidegger and Stiegler has encaptured their imagination. Education is vital for generating the imaginary, along with the ability to think critically, and ensures the authenticity of political processes, but as importantly, it helps us to imagine the future beyond the Armaggedon scenarios of climate change, and ecological devastation. The Arts and Humanities are at the core of generating a new future.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    The Crisis of Global Politics - Perspectives from Continental Philosophy
    The Crisis of Global Politics
    https://lseideas.atavist.com/philosophy

    How does this relate to technology and the ‘we’? Heidegger argues that this classical 'Cartesian' subjectivity of Descartes is actually just how technology also operates. The essence of technology is how it reveals the world to human comprehension in a very specific way: as a representation of objects in being, in an ongoing process Heidegger terms enframing. The danger is, the deeper down this path one goes, and the more enframed objects become, the greater the difficulty is in reconciling the certainty of the subject with the increasingly complex (and mathematical) object. If science reaches the point where the object is lost to the senses, then the subject as ‘I’ is lost as well. It can no longer be certain of itself. Heidegger terms this state an ‘objectlessness’.

    For instance, this enframing can be observed in General Circulation Models (GCM), which form the basis of climate science. GCMs work by examining the changes within and between a system of smaller and smaller grids of air, placed upon the planet. Earth Systems science, which is responsible for bringing the Anthropocene into being, uses a similar form of ‘Integrated Assessment Model.’ And, although it is only through these models that we are aware of the Anthropocene, they are so incredibly complex that no human mind can actually comprehend their processes and calculations. Hence, in something as large and complex as the Anthropocene, there is no ‘object’ to represent back to subjectivity. There is no certainty for this ‘I’ in this objectlessness of endless calculations. Hence, with no ‘I’, the subiectum becomes the ‘We’ of all of humanity.

    The danger is that both sides of the debate over the Anthropocene are falling into the same trap of positing a planetary humanity as ‘we’, arguing that ‘we’ can only see ourselves as a species now, and that humankind is a unified entity (the anthopos), the central actor in a new kind of ‘Anthropocene earth’. This implies risk and disaster for any distinct cultural, religious, linguistic, geographical etc. pluralities or groups, that do not wish to become part of this homogenous ‘we’. It endangers any form of difference, outside of the collective ‘we’ of the group.

    This global crisis is not merely ecological, therefore, but also conceptual. A loss of certainty in where ‘I’ am in the world, means people seek self-certainty more from group and identity politics, where the ‘we’ is more easily established across greater scales of time and space.
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam