jinak MinuteEarth ma ted upresnujici video k tem jadernym valkam

15 vybuchu = pokles teploty o dva stupne


odpalit vsechno = 16 stupnu, co se tyce toho hladomoru, tak jim to vychazi 5B lidi by hladovelo prvni, ovsem v severnich sirkach 99.9 procent populace. dal to nerozebiraji, jako jake jsou svetove zasoby potravin, jak dlouho se mrak udrzi atd. Cili porad je to lehce lepsi nez ty 4 stupne otepleni podle Postupimi :) ale tak jako, no

Why It's Impossible To Win a Nuclear War
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLLKeXbSKJ0

ad degrowth, se to furt snazim naroubovat na zachovani te kapitalisticke inovace, ale to tak nejspis fakt neni proste mysleny

je ti teplo devenko

Reid Allen Bryson (1920–2008) was a forceful orator who consistently fought against institutional pressures to get his messages out to the public. In the 1960s, Bryson was a leader in the wider academic turn toward politically charged interdisciplinarianism. To the dismay of many of his colleagues, he publicly made climatological prognoses in the 1970s, becoming a significant figure in the media landscape. He was not swayed by the arguments for global warming, even as the framing became the recognized face of climate change in the late 1980s. By examining the controversies that Bryson instigated and the currents that he swam against, we can see the wider community crystallizing and promoting positions that may have previously gone unstated. In addition, Bryson's personal contribution to the rise of climate discourse has been underexplored in the historical literature. Bryson was instrumental in bringing climate onto the political radar during the World Food Crisis of 1973, shocking both the US and Canadian political establishments into paying more attention to the issue. Bryson's narrative linking climate change to both food supply and a series of climate anomalies in the 1970s remained predominant in the first World Climate Conference of 1979. Bryson also helped break a seal on climatologists speaking directly to the media, leading to unprecedented climate discourse in the 1970s and giving climate change a springboard to become one of the defining issues of the 21st century.

https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/wcc.744

SEJDA: kazdy technologicky provadeny management ekosystemu (lesniho, agrolesniho, stromove-plantazoveho) bude mit vzdycky nejake vstupy extra-somaticke energie (nerezes pilou, ale motorovkou, nesvazis konmo, ale stroji) ... takze v nejaky realite dnesni civilizace v oblastech lde mas drahou lidskou praci to ani jinak nez stroji neni mozne... a zaroven pokud mas napr. agrolesnicle systemy, tak toho drevniho materialu ten biosystem generuje pomerne dost. nejlepsi je lokalni vyuziti pro kogemeraci tepla, elektriny a biouhlu, kterej se da zas zpetne vyuzit v tom ekosystemu... ale tam zatim nejsme :) nicmeme ta biomasa ma, mela by mit vyuziti.