TUHO: jenze...

Odbornost: je problem sehnat odborniky i v korporacich, natoz vymenit ty neodborny. Drzet treba kontinuitu odbornosti v tymu je v dynamickejch dobach globalniho veku dost narocny, jen co se lidi nauci zvladat svuj obor, chtej jit za lepsim, nebavi je dlouho neco budovat a prekonavat prekazky. (u statni spravy to bude opacne - lide si zajedou koleje a zmenu nebudou chtit). Kdybys chtel odbirne zaridit statni spravu, musel bys mit stesti na desitky tisic nadsencu, vnitrne motivovanejch pro vykon svyho, ne vzdy zabavnyho povolani.

Atraktivita: platy se imho statnim urednikum za babise zvysovali nekolikrat, jinak moc nevidim, co ve statni sprave atraktivizovat, kdyz se musi striktne drzet zakonu a krom nejvyssich postu jde vpodstate jen o exekuci s minimem stupnu volnosti (coz je mozna i jeden z hlavnich problemu). K motivaci pak patri treba jistota zamestnani, uredni hodiny atd. Coz jsou z dlouhodobeho pohledu spis demotivacni faktory pro realny vykon.

Robustnost: tohle je spis problem, lidi je tam urcite dost "V roce 2021 pracovalo podle dat, která deníku Echo24 poskytla analytička NRR Dlouhá, v sektoru vládních institucí 942,7 tisíc fyzických osob. Ty byly z hlediska zaměstnání přepočítány na 879,3 tisíce plných úvazků. Na celkovém průměrném evidenčním počtu zaměstnanců v ekonomice se tedy vládní sektor v roce 2021 podílel cca 22,1 %. "

Spis by se mela resit efektivita jak aplikovanejch procesu (zacit u samotnejch zakonu), tak vykonu zamestnancu, nejaky meta-oddeleni cross vladnim sektorem pro optimalizaci a automatizaci. Odbornost kde to jde outsourcovat na 'nezavisle' subjekty (napr. studie deloitte - jsme schopni a llkdy prejit kompletne na renewables) a nechat nejakym zpusobem validovat snemovnu, predschvalenim od odborny komise - vcetne osazenstva lidi, kteri se tim denne zivi... pripadne referenda (u nas radeji ty odborny komise a snemovna).

PETER_PAN: ze mame dlouhodobe neschopne vlady focusovat se na priority rizeni statu?

PETER_PAN: Zajimavy rozhovor, ktery potvrzuje vsechno co jsem o tom tematu zatim zjistil.

TADEAS: zrovna vcera si kolega posteskl, ze nevie ako dlho este bude byvat na hajenke na vysocine, lebo mu smrdi voda v studni, takze tam teraz nema zdroj pitnej vody

The European Union and the Geopolitics of the Arctic
Andreas Raspotnik, Senior Research Fellow, Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Norway and Senior Fellow, The Arctic Institute, US
Publication Date: 2018 ISBN: 978 1 78811 208 6 Extent: 240 pp
The Arctic is a region that has seen exponential growth as a space of geopolitical interest over the past decade. This insightful book is the first to analyse the European Union’s Arctic policy endeavours of the early 21st Century from a critical geopolitical perspective.

The European Union and the Geopolitics of the Arctic
https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/the-european-union-and-the-geopolitics-of-the-arctic-9781788112086.html

Revealed: the huge climate impact of the middle classes | Greenhouse gas emissions | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/nov/20/revealed-huge-climate-impact-of-the-middle-classes-carbon-divide


The world’s richest 10% encompasses most of the middle classes in developed countries – anyone paid more than about $40,000 (£32,000) a year. The lavish lifestyles of the very rich – the 1% – attract attention. But the 10% are responsible for half of all global emissions, making them key to ending the climate crisis.

...

When climate negotiations began in the 1990s, most of the inequality in people’s carbon emissions was between rich and poor nations. Three decades on, the situation has reversed. Now, most of the inequality in emissions between the rich and poor exists within individual countries.

This shift has enormous implications for how the climate crisis can be ended, researchers say, although international support for the poorest and least polluting nations remains vital.

Data from the International Energy Agency (IEA) details the energy-related CO2 emissions per person in 2021 in a dozen major countries, plus the 27-nation EU. In the US, UK, EU and Japan, the richest 10% have carbon footprints about 15 times greater than the poorest 10%. In China, South Africa, Brazil and India, the top 10% cause 30-40 times more emissions than the bottom 10%.