RADIQAL: nj, uz nejakou dobu se hraje spis o to, v jak moc velky knedli jsme nez o to, jestli v ni jsme :))

TADEAS:

Nomad Century
https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/444202/nomad-century-by-vince-gaia/9780141997681

TUHO: Plus o tom, jak u vzniku moderni klimaticky vedy staly masivni investice vojenskyho prumyslu a studena valka

Global Warming, Cold War, and the Evolution of Research Plans
Spencer R. Weart
Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences
Vol. 27, No. 2 (1997), pp. 319-356 (38 pages)

https://www.jstor.org/stable/27757782

TUHO: plus jeste

The development of the ‘greenhouse’ theory of global climate change from Victorian times
F. B. Mudge

https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.1477-8696.1997.tb06243.x

Neco z historie klimaticky vedy:

T. C. Chamberlin, Climate Change, and Cosmogony
James R Fleming

This paper examines the life and work of T. C. Chamberlin, a prominent glacial geologist who developed an interest in interdisciplinary earth science. His work on the geological agency of the atmosphere informed his understanding of climate change and other terrestrial phenomena and led him to propose a new theory of the formation of the Earth and the solar system.

Chamberlin's graduate seminar at the University of Chicago in 1896 contained all the themes that informed his research programme over the next three decades. These included the carbon dioxide theory of climate change in its relationship to diastrophism and oceanic circulation, the role of water vapour feedbacks in the climate system, and the relationship between multiple glaciations, the climate system, and the formation of the planet.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1355219800000150

The Anthropocene signifies the start of a no-analogue trajectory of the Earth system that is fundamentally different from the Holocene. This new trajectory is characterized by rising risks of triggering irreversible and unmanageable shifts in Earth system functioning. We urgently need a new global approach to safeguard critical Earth system regulating functions more effectively and comprehensively. The global commons framework is the closest example of an existing approach with the aim of governing biophysical systems on Earth upon which the world collectively depends. Derived during stable Holocene conditions, the global commons framework must now evolve in the light of new Anthropocene dynamics. This requires a fundamental shift from a focus only on governing shared resources beyond national jurisdiction, to one that secures critical functions of the Earth system irrespective of national boundaries. We propose a new framework—the planetary commons—which differs from the global commons framework by including not only globally shared geographic regions but also critical biophysical systems that regulate the resilience and state, and therefore livability, on Earth. The new planetary commons should articulate and create comprehensive stewardship obligations through Earth system governance aimed at restoring and strengthening planetary resilience and justice.


https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2301531121

PETER_PAN: tak zrovna tohle ale určitě standardizovat půjde. Lidi za 30 let třeba nebudou idioti, na rozdíl od našich vrstevníků...

Co se týče životnosti, tak možná se na základě analýzy poškození první generace základů přijde s nějakými lepšími absorbéry vibrací, nebo něco. Betonové stavby mají běžně životnost 100 let, zejména něco takového jako základy, a podle mě by to mělo jít vychytat...

Nevim jestli bylo https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/5f6596de6c4445a58aec956532b9813d/page/The-European-overview/?data_id=dataSource_22-Income_change_farmers_4827-1%3A158%2CdataSource_21-Income_change_farmers_4827-2%3A158

pekne zpracovane mapy vlivu GO na Evropu. Zajimave mi prijde, ze v pripade adaptace uvadeji net-pozitivni impakt na zemedelstvi ve stredni Evrope, ale bez adaptace naopak. Jako nejvetsi riziko se asi zdaji ty flash floods, zejmena v nizinach.

MLEKAR_STEIN: diky moc. Ted jsem trochu hledal a zda se, ze se to odstranovani aspon nekdy deje - budto to odstrani cele, anebo aspon do hloubky ~1m, aby se to dalo prekryt pudou: https://www.windfarmbop.com/second-life-the-destiny-of-turbine-foundations-after-decommissioning/ . Ve Francii se zda, ze je nejaky zakon, ze uz pri vystavbe musi stavitel zaplatit 50tis euro na budouci uvedeni mista do puvodniho stavu: https://www.kallistaenergy.com/en/renewable-energy/decommissioning-repowering/ .

Zajimalo by me, zda je to tak v CR taky? Protoze jestlize to plati pro uhelky, melo by to platit i pro vrtule, ne?
PETER_PAN: jak se resi ten stroboskopicky efekt v CR, nevis prosim? musi to v prislusnou dobu odstavovat?