'I continue to protest, but with a knot in my stomach': How Sweden is discouraging foreigners fro... - JustPaste.it
https://justpaste.it/gzbbd

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/m-le-mag/article/2026/05/01/i-continue-to-protest-but-with-a-knot-in-my-stomach-how-sweden-discourages-foreigners-from-taking-climate-action_6753046_117.html

On September 17, 2023, Isabelle Letellier left her home in western Stockholm early in the morning. Active for just over four years with the group Scientist Rebellion, a branch of the environmental movement Extinction Rebellion, the university lecturer – who holds a PhD in psychology – was due to meet others at Bromma airport, three kilometers from her home, to join a protest against private jets, which are major emitters of CO₂. Her sons, now 9 and 11, had a basketball game and a birthday party that afternoon. She expected to be home by lunchtime. But nothing went as planned.

With curly hair and round glasses, sitting in her living room with books lining the walls, 43-year-old Letellier recalled the moment everything changed. There were 17 activists that day, gathered in the parking lot in front of the private jet terminal. She was holding a banner calling for a ban on private jets when two of her fellow activists threw red paint on a hangar and a jet. Armed police arrived and placed all the demonstrators under arrest.

In mid-April 2026, all 17 activists stood trial for "vandalism and complicity in vandalism" at the Attunda court, in the north of the capital, during a three-day hearing where they justified their actions as a response to the "climate emergency." The Frenchwoman's case drew particular attention. Beyond illustrating the growing crackdown on environmental activists in Sweden, it shed light on a double penalty for foreign nationals: In August 2024, Letellier was denied Swedish citizenship. "To obtain Swedish citizenship, the applicant must have led and continue to lead a calm and respectable life in Sweden," the immigration authorities argued.

The world is threatened by a “suicidal” model of capitalism that is leading to war, fascism and the potential extinction of humanity, Colombia’s president has said, as he convened 57 governments to address the climate crisis.

Gustavo Petro blamed fossil fuel interests for taking ever more desperate measures to prevent a transition to green energy. “There is inertia in the power and the economy of this archaic form of energy – fossil fuels – that lead to death. Undoubtedly, that form of capital can commit suicide, taking with it humanity and [other] life,” he said. “The question that needs to be asked is whether capitalism can truly adapt to a non-fossil energy model.”

‘Suicidal’ model of capitalism leading to war and fascism, climate summit told | Climate crisis | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/apr/29/capitalism-colombia-climate-summit-gustavo-petro

The Blueprint for System Change | Ash Sarkar Meets Extinction Rebellion Founder Roger Hallam
https://youtu.be/UC2VT3RkiYo?si=WR7F32DXf_pg2Zb9


This week on Downstream, Ash Sarkar is joined by one of the most controversial political figures on the Left: Roger Hallam. Whether you like or loathe his tactics, it’s hard to deny the disruptive impact he has had through the activist organisations he has led; Extinction Rebellion and Just Stop Oil.

He joins us fresh from his latest stint in a prison cell, where he wrote a treatise for Your Party called ‘Grasping the Enormity of the Moment’. It’s a blueprint for a radical change, in which he sets out his vision for an emancipated future, and strategies for how to get there. Does Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana’s party still have potential? What is the point of sending activists to prison? And what role will Zoom calls play in the coming revolution?

00:00​ Intro
02:40​ Your Party’s Moment
05:18​ The Revolutionary Potential of Zoom Calls
11:18​ Creating Networks Through Door Knocking
14:50​ Drawing Inspiration From the Belgian Workers’ Party
17:58​ What Motivates People: Emotion Versus Reason
26:09​ The Problem With the Censorious Left
34:11​ What’s the Point of Political Prisoners?
44:09​ The Demographics of JSO and XR
52:47​ On Sortition
1:04:42​ Building Relationships of Solidarity
1:11:40​ Zack Polanski and the Green Party
1:14:22​ Talking, Listening, Action

Suicide (Paperback) – JUST RELEASED – Revolution in the 21st Century
https://rev21.earth/product/suicide/

From a cell in Wayland Prison, Roger Hallam—farmer, researcher, and co-founder of Just Stop Oil—delivers a searing indictment of a legal system that punishes those who resist, while protecting those who destroy. In July 2024, Hallam was dragged from a British courtroom for refusing to stay silent about the climate crisis. For “conspiracy to cause a public nuisance,” he was sentenced to five years in prison, the harshest punishment for civil disobedience in the UK in modern British history. The case made front-page news and drew global outcry.

Suicide is part memoir, part political reckoning. Drawing on Hallam’s award-winning research and experience representing himself in four Crown Court trials, it lays bare the moral and legal failures of a society sleepwalking into catastrophe. From climate science and the right of necessity, to the collapse of democratic norms and the illusions of secular reason, this is a radical call to rethink justice, truth, and duty in the face of extinction.

lyžujte než to roztajou

Glaciers to reach peak rate of extinction in the Alps in eight years | Glaciers | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/dec/15/alpine-glaciers-rate-extinction-climate-crisis

TADEAS:
Za mě zkrátka za těch pár let co od něj občas něco vidím se snaží diskreditovat to co vybočuje z mainstreamu a přibarvuje realitu (podobně jako Gates/Richie, jestli si pamatuji byla mezi nimi i nějaká spolupráce) a označení "hopium" je na místě - můj problém tedy je, že to není vědecky upřímné - například jako argument používá zjednodušené ZEC modely a TCRE/CWC odhady, zatímco kritizuje ECS odhady a ignoruje ESS. Nemluvě o výrocích, které jsou lživé.

To že potom hází do jednoho pytle to co vybočuje (např. James Hansen, či obecně kritika IPCC apod.) společně s lidmi, kteří propagují NTHE (near-term human extinction) - např. McPherson, Dowd - je přinejmenším nečestné. A stejně lze za "nečestné" a "neupřímné" označit ty, kteří NTHE hlásají, je to v podstatě druhá strana mince.

Takže to není jen o nějaké bublině, tady se bavíme o datech, která selektivně ignoruje. Pokud je třeba ta zmíněná kritika IPCC nebo publikace Hansena fakticky špatná, tak to lze přeci obhájit vědecky místo škatulkování, že jsou to všechno "doomeři". A poté tuto škatuly, do které hází široké spektrum vědců a expertů nazývá "mentální poruchou", H. Richie "horší než popírači" (oprava mé předchozí zprávy)

Some of the friendly fire comes from fellow scientists who have gone down the path of doomism or at least what we might call "soft doomism," that is, emissions reductions alone are not adequate to prevent catastrophic warming.

Even revered climate scientist James Hansen, whose early predictions of warming proved prophetic, has gotten sucked into the vortex of soft doomism. The scientific consensus is that we can still avert a catastrophic planetary warming of 1.5 degrees Celsius (3 degrees Fahrenheit) if we rapidly reduce carbon emissions this decade.
(https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/climate-change/action-on-climate-change-faces-new-threat-the-doomers-who-think-its-too-late-to-act)

Nicméně samozřejmě jsou mnohem horší lidé a dá se jasně říct, že "taháme za stejný provaz", jen jsme myslím v dostatečně specifickém vláknu, kde je prostor na pro tuto diskuzi.

Další materiál k tématu:

I read Michael Mann’s The New Climate War so you don’t have to. – Another End of the World is Possible
https://anotherendoftheworld.org/2021/03/23/i-read-michael-manns-the-new-climate-war-so-you-dont-have-to/

GBU Episode 2: Good Bad & Ugly - Science Communicators - Michael Mann / Bill Nye Corporate Shills.
https://youtu.be/YxMCxgv5wGE

David King

We passed the 1.5C climate threshold. We must now explore extreme options | David King | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/apr/07/climate-solutions-extreme-options


R Hallam
https://www.facebook.com/share/1AP5yJSuWn/


The former UK government’s chief scientific adviser, the foreign secretary’s special representative for climate change and the head of the University of Cambridge’s chemistry department, Sir David King states that as we have passed 1.5C "we must now explore extreme options". I could not agree more. I trust and respect science experts when they say we cannot save ourselves without geo-engineering. This goes against my culture as a former organic farmer but facts are facts and I am not an expert.

The question then is whether natural scientists like Sir David King will trust social scientists/experts like myself who have been saying for the last decade that only through mass civil disobedience and resistance will the policies insisted upon by him and others be implemented. This is not because I like creating disruption any more than scientists like the risks of geo-engineering. It is simply a matter of rationally looking at reality.

We are in an existential emergency; without drastic action the deaths of billions of people will be locked in in the next decade, not to mention the prospect of human extinction. It is time to do what is necessary - what is most likely to work.

As I wrote recently on the news that JSO has been prevented from continuing its actions due to the mass imprisonment of its organisers, the reason for our failure is the refusal of key members of the elites to "defect," as is the word in the literature. This means they lead the marches, get arrested, and receive prison sentences.

I would bet my life that if 50 individuals of Sir David's social standing decided to act to save our country to the point of being imprisoned then policy change would happen in the UK. And the same would happen in other Western states. The reason nothing is happening is that civil society leaders refuse to act on their sacred duty and honour to protect the people of our country. They are violating their values through their cowardice, and they know it.

As Sir David says, we don't want to leave it too late. "The longer we delay, the fewer options remain on the table and the more likely that deployment will happen without the proper due diligence at a point of desperation." In social scientific terms what he means is that if we don't act now because it is only poor black people (over there) that will die, by the time we are forced to engage in civil resistance because "nice" white people in the home counties are dying, it will be way too late for us too. Won't it.

⚰️ Why The Human Race is Going Extinct this Century
https://rogerhallam.com/blog-extinct/

TADEAS: lehce malm vibrs

In the first chapter, Malm describes a protest he participated outside the COP1 United Nations climate conference in 1995.[2] He asks "At what point do we escalate?",[5]: 8  stating that the modern climate movement has remained committed to "absolute non-violence" and avoided property destruction.[5]: 22–23  He criticizes what he defines as "moral pacifism" for failing to account for defensive violence[5]: 30–32  and argues that "strategic pacifism" as advocated by Bill McKibben and Extinction Rebellion is ahistorical, discussing the radical flank effect in the context of the civil rights movement and questioning whether there are "convincing reasons" to believe that "the struggle against fossil fuels ... will succeed only on condition of utter peacefulness".[5]: 34–54 

Malm describes Ende Gelände 2016, during which he and other activists blockaded the Schwarze Pumpe power station, writing that politicians and the media described the action as violent because the activists broke fences. He quotes The Wretched of the Earth by Frantz Fanon, stating that Fanon wrote violence "frees the native 'from his despair and inaction; it makes him fearless and restores his self-respect'". He concludes that "There has been a time for a Gandhian climate movement; perhaps there might come a time for a Fanonian one. The breaking of fences may one day be seen as a very minor misdemeanour indeed."[5]: 158–161 

How to Blow Up a Pipeline - Wikipedia
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Blow_Up_a_Pipeline

X-Risk
How Humanity Discovered Its Own Extinction
By Thomas Moynihan

Tracing this untold story, Moynihan revisits the pioneers who first contemplated the possibility of human extinction and stages the historical drama of this momentous discovery. He shows how, far from being a secular reprise of religious prophecies of apocalypse, existential risk is a thoroughly modern idea, made possible by the burgeoning sciences and philosophical tumult of the Enlightenment era. In recollecting how we first came to care for our extinction, Moynihan reveals how today's attempts to measure and mitigate existential threats are the continuation of a project initiated over two centuries ago, which concerns the very vocation of the human as a rational, responsible, and future-oriented being.


X-Risk
https://mitpress.mit.edu/9781913029845/x-risk/

Fears of ‘mass grave’ in Valencia as storms batter Majorca & 5,000 more troops deployed
https://youtu.be/tL9Q_cZxSMY?t=258&si=jGF01ohrKSae3uhG


Wars, famines, droughts, floods
Hurricanes, heat waves, murders, thugs
Chaos, refugees, stress, disease
Extinction, disaster, I-P-C-C

TADEAS

TADEAS:

I've Been Sentenced to 5 Years in Prison - Here's Why
https://rogerhallam.com/5-years-in-prison/

My 'crime'?

Giving a talk on civil disobedience as an effective, evidence-based method for stopping the elite from putting enough carbon in the atmosphere to send us to extinction.

I have given hundreds of similar speeches encouraging nonviolent action and have never been arrested for it. This time I was an advisor to the M25 motorway disruption, recommending the action to go ahead to wake up the British public to societal collapse.

I was not part of the planning or action itself.

lol, hallam uz je pro guardian nehodny titulku, uz jen "climate protest accused" :D


Climate protest accused defies judge to give hours-long speech in court | UK news | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jul/02/climate-protest-accused-defies-judge-to-give-hours-long-speech-in-court

A climate protester ignored a judge’s instructions and refused to leave the witness box, instead delivering an hours-long speech telling jurors that his alleged role in a conspiracy to block the M25 was justified by the risk of human extinction.

Roger Hallam, 58, spoke for more than two hours on why a judge was wrong to rule that he and co-defendants could not bring evidence in their defence on the impacts of climate breakdown, and why such evidence justified the sort of acts of which they are accused.

The judge Christopher Hehir sent out the jury three times during Hallam’s extended address and interrupted Hallam many times to make clear it was not his place to instruct jurors on points of law.

But Hehir eventually let Hallam continue, to the defendant’s apparent surprise. “I apologise to you if I’m a little bit incoherent,” Hallam told jurors towards the end of his address. “I didn’t actually expect that I was going to get this far.”