• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    přihlásit se
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    TUHOKlimaticka zmena / Destroying the Future Is the Most Cost-Effective
    "Given the sheer enormity of climate change, it’s okay to be depressed, to grieve. But please, don’t stay there too long. Join me in pure, unadulterated, righteous anger."

    "I don’t want your hope. I don’t want you to be hopeful. ... I want you to act. Once you start to act, the hope is everywhere."

    "Our best scientists tell us insistently that a calamity is unfolding, that the life-support systems of the Earth are being damaged in ways that threaten our survival. Yet in the face of these facts we carry on as usual."

    Rostouci hladiny oceanu, zmena atmosferickeho proudeni, zmeny v distribuci srazek a sucha. Zmeny karbonoveho, fosforoveho a dusikoveho cyklu, okyselovani oceanu. Jake jsou bezpecnostni rizika a jake potencialni klady dramatickych zmen fungovani zemskeho systemu?
    Ale take jak funguji masove dezinformacni kampane ropneho prumyslu a boj o verejne mineni na prahu noveho klimatickeho rezimu post-holocenu.

    rozbalit záhlaví
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    The Plan To End BIG Oil Tyranny | Aaron Bastani Meets Tessa Khan
    https://youtu.be/IUBc1fDySqg?si=XXw_a_3gg_mgxVb2


    Tessa Khan is the founder of Uplift - an organisation that works to challenge the fossil fuel lobby and decarbonise our energy system before it’s too late. The former human rights lawyer realised a decade ago that none of the other social questions matter, if we don’t address the climate crisis. With family in Bangladesh, a nation with 175 million people, that is set to go underwater first, she understands what is at stake better than most. She also understands that Britain is rich in renewables, and the green transition is not just a challenge, but an opportunity to fix our broken economy.

    Should Britain drill for more oil in the North Sea, or is this a distraction planted by the fossil fuel lobby? Should the energy system in Britain be nationalised? Are renewables also susceptible to economic shocks? What can we learn from the transition from oil to gas? How does the ageing population impact climate politics? And what exactly should Andy Burnham do, on climate change?
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Jem Bendell - The current El Nino event is progressing to...
    https://www.facebook.com/share/1GbrdLcdPy/

    The current El Nino event is progressing to be the strongest in the modern observational record, exceeding the previous extreme in 2015–16.

    We know from the previous ones what is likely, locally. The rainy season in Bali will start late, with the temperatures remaining high until the new year, less overall rain, despite momentary downpours. Tourists and expats will be happy with sunny days and dry evenings, switching on the aircon more often. But the general public won't be happy, as fresh food prices will spike. The process is as follows:

    Strong El Niño + background global heating → Indonesian rainfall suppression → extended dryness → depleted soil moisture → irrigation demand → stressed vegetation → increased pest/fire vulnerability → lower food yields and poorer appearance → higher prices and lower total farm income → slight increase in poverty → slight increase in crime → increase in illogical and unhelpful explanations → social unease and reactionary politics.

    We will also see more wildfires, as is already being experienced in the rest of Indonesia the past few months.

    There are many people in Bali who are being told this is coming, who got rich from tourism, and won't have their tourism businesses badly affected (unless unlucky from a wildfire). Will they do anything to help farmers and poorer workers prepare and adapt? Will they seize this near term experience of the inevitable climatic difficulties in years to come, as a moment for public learning, dialogue and adaptation? Sadly most will continue to mine Bali's culture and environment for more cash. But not all. Can you tell me what's positively being done?

    In my case, I'm sponsoring Indonesian kids in-school and after school education on caring for the environment and adapting to disruption. We will also discuss how best to prepare at Bekandze Farm, (while we still operate it).
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    45 million people now living in drought - and there's no rain in sight
    https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/45-million-drought-no-rain-sight-4697190

    Around 45 million people – three-quarters of England – are now living in drought conditions after the country recorded its driest July since records began in 1836.

    The National Drought Group said all areas of England were facing water shortages – with farming, and the environment particularly impacted. Hose pipe bans are now affecting 27 million people and some regions are now facing bans on washing cars, watering outdoor plants on commercial premises, and filling public swimming pools.

    And the group, made up of water companies, the Environment Agency, the Met Office and government, warned that conditions will get worse following a dry start to August.”
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    áha

    Trump says he’s decided on a punishment for Canada over wildfire smoke blanketing the US: ‘You’ll find out’ | The Independent
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-canada-wildfires-smoke-b3026558.html
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Jem Bendell
    https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19J9oSeJRh/


    As we examined in the environmental courses I taught since 12 years ago, even the media outlets that are good enough to cover environmental issues with some concern, never look deeper or give space to those who do. Instead they platform those who seek respect within the systems which are culpable.

    The latest example on Channel 4.

    Journalist: tone of - incredulity and worry.
    Eco pundit: tone of - change is doable.
    Consultant: tone of - positive changes thanks to some politicians.
    Scientist: tone of - it's complicated so let's keep trying.

    These tones each reflect and comprise a constellation of professional class subcultures that maintain denial and exclude honest appraisal of why capitalism makes this eco-social tragedy inevitable, how that's been known for decades, and what to do about it.

    The journalist would not need such incredulity if the producer had interviewees who would explain the economic system drives the destruction, sells false solutions, and then rewards reactionary politics. Monbiot gets close to it, but maintains his acceptability with the establishment.


    Europe is BURNING - why are politicians not acting?
    https://youtu.be/TQatRrNcmww?si=CPUy34Mix3nkvHHl
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    make future great again

    Tony Blair tells Starmer and rivals: abandon net zero and move closer to Trump | Labour | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/may/26/tony-blair-labour-abandon-net-zero-support-donald-trump

    Blair argued for the government to crack down on welfare spending, abandon restrictions on oil and gas and smooth relations with Donald Trump.

    The Labour Party Is Playing With Fire Over Its Future and the Future of the Country
    https://institute.global/insights/politics-and-governance/the-labour-party-is-playing-with-fire-over-its-future-and-the-future-of-the-country
    PAN_SPRCHA
    PAN_SPRCHA --- ---
    "For far too long Climate Activism has been used by Dumocrats to scare Americans, push horrible Energy Polices, and fund BILLIONS into their bogus research programs," he continued. "Unlike the Dumocrats, who use Climate Alarmism nonsense to push their GREEN NEW SCAM, my Administration will always be based on TRUTH, SCIENCE, and FACT!"

    Trump rips Democrats after UN climate committee drops extreme projections | Fox News
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-celebrates-un-climate-committee-moves-away-extreme-global-warming-scenario
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Fossil fascism: the supreme form of climate obstruction?

    The last decade witnessed a proliferation of literature on far-right nationalism and climate obstruction. Scholars referred to “fossil fascism” to discuss these trends. This article emphasises fossil fascism’s weaponisation of intermediary institutions to advance a gendered and racialised vision of society that feeds off fossil fuels. This aspect, we argue, distinguishes fossil fascism from other conceptualisations of the so-called “backlash” against climate policies. We explore the concept to trace its continuities with historical fascism and situate its emphasis on intermediate institutions. We highlight fossil fascism’s racialised and gendered vision and explain its implications for climate obstruction. Our goal is to introduce a working definition of fossil fascism that takes into account its historical lineage and internal complexities. This conceptual endeavour provides a platform for studies on far-right nationalism and climate obstruction to develop in line with the practice and background, rather than the narratives, of institutional far-right politics.

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01419870.2026.2665720
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    plantážníci...


    The U.S. Forest Service isn’t... - Alt National Park Service
    https://www.facebook.com/share/1ak7oZnSM4/

    The U.S. Forest Service isn’t managing forests anymore. It’s running a timber operation and poisoning everything else to do it.

    A yearlong investigation by Mother Jones found that the Forest Service and private logging companies are systematically spraying thousands of acres of national forest with glyphosate (Roundup) to kill off native shrubs and wildflowers that compete with commercially valuable trees like Douglas firs and sugar pines.

    After wildfires, forests naturally rebound with diverse vegetation and wildlife. What’s replacing that recovery is rows of industrial saplings surrounded by silence. No insects, birds, or flowers. It’s just dead zones.

    Glyphosate application in California’s forests has quintupled over the last two decades in one year 266,000 pounds were sprayed a record. The World Health Organization classifies glyphosate as a carcinogen. The Forest Service is using it at industrial scale, on public land, to benefit private timber interests.

    This is what “multiple use management” looks like when timber wins every time. Ecological health, wildlife habitat, native plant communities all of it gets written off as competition.

    We Are Bombarding America’s Forests With Roundup – Mother Jones
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/04/roundup-glyphosate-spraying-forests-monsanto-science-retraction-cancer-health-concerns-maha-trump-executive-order-supreme-court-bayer-lawsuits/
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    This Technology Will Change EVERYTHING. Here's Why. | Aaron Bastani Meets Nicolas Niarchos
    https://youtu.be/nBydfKZ3rY0?si=Ti7yT5Glfl7-Z4Rp


    The 21st century runs on lithium ion batteries: from phones and laptops, to electric vehicles, drones and clean energy. Embedded in these technologies are batteries containing rare earth minerals, drawn from a brutal supply chain that begins in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The race to electrify the global energy system is underway, but awareness about this supply chain is woefully inadequate among the users of these technologies – many of whom profess to have green politics.

    On Downstream this week, Aaron Bastani spoke with Nicolas Niarchos, author of The Elements of Power: A Story of War, Technology, and the Dirtiest Supply Chain on Earth.

    How has the history of the Democratic Republic of the Congo unfolded over the past two centuries? How has China come to control so much of the rare earth supply chain? Is foreign states' activity in the DRC development, or a new form of colonialism? And is this supply chain now set to replace fossil fuels in the 21st century, as the dirtiest supply chain on earth?

    https://www.amazon.com/Elements-Power-Technology-Dirtiest-Supply/dp/0593492013
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    ‘Yes to fields of wheat, no to fields of iron’: how the world’s greenest country soured on solar | Denmark | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/20/solar-power-renewable-energy-denmark-backlash-national-elections

    In one telling of the story, the golden fields of a proud farming nation are under attack. Besieged by an industrial sprawl of solar panels, they are being smothered at the behest of an urban elite.

    That narrative has failed to thrive in conservative heartlands such as Texas and Hungary, which have embraced solar power while lambasting green rules. But it is taking root in Denmark, the most climate-ambitious nation on Earth. “We say yes to fields of wheat,” said Inger Støjberg, the leader of the rightwing populist Denmark Democrats in a speech in 2024. “And we say no to fields of iron!”

    Jernmarker, or iron fields, was chosen as the Danish word of the year in December after the solar backlash swayed municipal elections and prompted some councils to pull projects. The spectre of barren metal landscapes has since returned to the campaign trail as Danes prepare to vote in national elections on Tuesday. “We need more common sense in the green transition,” Støjberg said in the first televised debate between party leaders last month.

    Pockets of resistance to clean energy have hardened across Europe as far-right parties focus on climate action as their second target after migrants. Until now, solar panels had escaped the wrath of powerful campaigns that have stymied the rollout of wind turbines, heat pumps, electric cars and plant-based meat.

    But in Denmark, which generates 90% of its electricity from renewables and aims to cut planet-heating pollution faster than any other wealthy country, the spread of solar power has alarmed some regions in which construction is concentrated. Solar tripled from 4% of Danish power production in 2021 to 13% in 2025. And a handful of villages have found themselves surrounded by silicon.

    Opponents of solar farms say the photovoltaic panels are ugly, destroy nature and deflate property prices in neglected hinterlands. As drone shots of encircled farmhouses have become a symbol of urban overreach, the campaign has led even some established parties to soften their support of solar.

    The backlash had been brewing locally, but Lukas Slothuus, a climate politics researcher at the University of Sussex who grew up in a rural town near the Danish-German border, said the Denmark Democrats had provided a “clear vector to articulate that discontent politically” across the nation. “The far right have realised – and decided – that climate is a potent electoral battleground,” he said. “It’s just about finding one issue to centre it around.”
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Informal Institutions in Policy Implementation : Comparing Low Carbon Policies in China and Russia
    Anna Korppoo, Iselin Stensdal, Marius Korsnes


    "At a time of global climate crisis, this crucial book examines the prospects for implementing low-carbon policies in the two global superpowers of China and Russia, focusing on the role of informal institutions in achieving reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Chapters shed light on how informal institutions function and work in practice, how and why they take shape and how they influence formal low-carbon policies. Forensically examining five critical cases relating to Chinese and Russian institutions, this book demonstrates how informal institutions can both support and obstruct the achievement of formal policy goals. Through comparisons within and between each country, it shows how these dynamics differ and offers key hypothesis on the role of these institutions in policy implementation. Comprehensive and incisive, this book will be important reading for scholars researching public policy in China and Russia, particularly those specialising in environmental science and politics. The practical insights derived from new case studies will also be useful for policymakers working on climate mitigation policy"-- Provided by publisher

    Informal Institutions in Policy Implementation : Comparing Low Carbon Policies in China and Russia - Anna’s Archive
    https://annas-archive.gd/md5/b2183bbd0083aa22b3f3767acdb4178b
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Cina / China

    Implementing a Low-Carbon Future
    Climate Leadership in Chinese Cities
    Weila Gong
    Studies in Comparative Energy and Environmental Politics

    - Based on extensive interviews with government officials and policy practitioners across different levels of government in China
    - Introduces the conceptual framework of "bridging leadership" to explain uneven subnational climate policy engagement
    - Meticulous process tracing of local climate policymaking in agenda setting, policy formation, and implementation in four low-carbon pilot cities


    https://global.oup.com/academic/product/implementing-a-low-carbon-future-9780197757420?cc=sk&lang=en
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    end times for the lulz

    Trump receives shiny trophy as he’s named ‘Undisputed Champion of Beautiful Clean Coal’ by mining executives at White House | The Independent
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-clean-coal-white-house-meeting-b2918708.html
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    "Climate hushing"—the quiet trend undermining global climate action
    https://www.talkingclimate.ca/p/climate-hushingthe-quiet-trend-undermining?

    As political winds have shifted in the United States and elsewhere over the past year, “climate hushing” has become a real thing: and that’s bad news. “When leaders don’t talk about something, enthusiasm falls among voters,” Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island writes here. “In politics, you can often make your own wind, or you can make your own doldrums.”

    Unfortunately, climate hushing is going global. This year, when world leaders spoke at the World Economic Forum’s meeting in January, nearly every single one of them avoided the topic—even Prime Minister Mark Carney, a former UN Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance. Why is this? “In today’s deeply polarizing U.S. political stance, climate discussion has come to feel so radioactive that many leaders would rather avoid it,” sustainable business professor Anjali Chaudhry writes.

    The only major leader to break the silence was Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, who used his speech to press for collaborative climate action. ”We invite enterprises from all over the world to embrace the opportunities from the green and low-carbon transition, and work closely with China in such areas as green infrastructure, green energy, green minerals and green finance,” he said.

    The organization We Don’t Have Time hosted an alternative WEF speech, held on a pile of snow and featuring several of my colleagues and leading systems thinkers, including Dr. Johan Rockström, Sandrine Dixson-Declève, and former Unilever CEO Paul Polman, who said,

    “We know what needs to be done [about climate change]. It is not a failure of resources. Global capital has never been more abundant. It is a failure of collaboration and collective action. A failure of governments to align around shared interests rather than narrow advantage; of businesses to act as system-shapers rather than short-term competitors; and of leaders across sectors to share risk, and act in service of a common good.”
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TADEAS:




    Europe drove decarbonization of power supply but did not drive electrification. They're on the top left-hand side above the Americans, but not on the top right-hand side where the Chinese are to be found.

    - The Germans and Italians shut down nuclear as an essential part of their politics of green modernization, but they agonizingly extended the protection for the coal sectors.
    - They created a market for power supply through feed-in tariffs, then surrendered that market to the Chinese, and then slapped on protectionism anyway.
    - They introduced the carbon pricing mechanism but took almost fifteen years to make it work. It now does work—carbon prices in Europe are at very significant levels, sometimes above one hundred euros per ton—but they were unprepared for the shock of delivering that particular price signal.
    - Rather than focusing on new energy models, European politics and interest groups converged on the diesel, and the European car industry was milked as a source of dividends for its oligarchic investors. And they now complain about Chinese competition and demand protectionism.
    - The Europeans were clearly at odds with both Russia and the US, and yet did nothing to develop strategic autonomy with regard to either of them.






    On the left-hand side, the ramp-up you see: the formation period of this new synthesis of green governance in Europe through to the maximum level of investment in 2011 at $131 billion. And then you see, in the wake of the Eurozone crisis—which of course dramatically affected southern Europe, where unsurprisingly the investment in solar was particularly dramatic—as that crisis hits under the sign of austerity, the European push collapses. And this is the moment of China's overtaking.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TADEAS: aneb naznaky klimatickeho povstani, pro mainstream levicova anarchie.


    We can no longer afford the rich.
    We can initiate the end of the imperial lifestyle.
    We can stop the plundering of the Earth.
    In the greed for energy, the Earth is being drained, sucked dry, burned, abused, razed, raped, and destroyed. Entire regions are rendered uninhabitable by the heat. They simply burn up. Or habitats disappear beneath the waves during floods or due to rising sea levels.
    Shutting down fossil fuel power plants is a task that can be accomplished by hand. Have courage.
    We know we must interrupt this destruction. We know we are not alone. Don't give up hope for a world where life has space, not the greed for money, power, and destruction.

    ...

    Last year, the CO₂ concentration in the atmosphere rose to 423.9 parts per million, a value that surpasses all previous records. At the same time, climate scientists agree that the massive transatlantic ocean currents will collapse sooner or later due to global warming. This collapse of ocean currents, which has so far afforded the North a mild climate, is only one part of the catastrophe that awaits us. The extent of this devastation is simply ignored, abstracted, and discussed at global climate conferences until the scale of the destruction disappears into tables and declarations of intent.
    But the insatiable hunger for energy is eating its way through the Earth's crust and our lives, among other things to feed artificial intelligence, which then spouts stereotypes and absurdities, confusing, disorienting, and/or manipulating us. Meanwhile, with each new "learning" of the AI ​​using previous data, language, expression, and vitality are increasingly reduced, mutilated, and limited.

    ...

    We don't claim to know the way out. But we do know we must stop this destruction. Hedonism can no longer hold us captive once we've tasted the sweat of fear that spreads when there's no way out. No going forward, no going back. Only the horror of where we, as humanity, have ended up. When the question falls back on us, what did you actually do to prevent what was coming? You saw it coming, the survivors, the next generations, ask us. Please don't bring up the political parties. Please don't bring up the brown-shirted alternatives in pinstriped suits and dresses. And not the Greens or the Left either. Don't bring up the economy, whose free market will supposedly solve the problem. Economics and politics deal with death every day. With dictatorships and butchers. Their concerns vanish into thin air when it comes to satisfying our energy needs, for example. Russia is still supplying gas to Europe via Nord Stream 1. And the US wants Venezuela's oil. That's why military attacks are now taking place. And fracked gas arrives by ship from all over the world. Currently, 79% comes from the USA! Fracking is extremely environmentally damaging in its production. Even during extraction, a methane loss of 6 to 10 percent is assumed, which further warms the atmosphere.

    95% of the gas burned in Germany is imported. At climate summits, only tactical lip service is forthcoming because the oil-producing countries are not interested in climate protection but in money. Because the major cities base their policies on money and growth, lobbyists in Europe are being handed the end of the combustion engine phase-out.

    For example, the German Minister of Economic Affairs, Katharina Reiche, was State Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Transport, a lobbyist for the Association of Municipal Enterprises (VKM), and a manager at the E.ON subsidiary Westenergie. Minister Reiche presents herself as a supporter of hydrogen but primarily relies on natural gas. She intends to issue tenders for additional gas-fired power plants with a capacity of 10 gigawatts, which are to be connected to the grid by 2031, corresponding to approximately 25 new power plants. 20 billion euros are earmarked for these new gas-fired power plants.

    Reiche would prefer to postpone Germany's climate neutrality target from 2045 to 2050 anyway.

    The main culprits behind human-induced climate destruction are not those who suffer the most, those who pay with their health and their lives. The people of the Global South are already paying the highest price. The countries of the Global North, and soon China among others, are deciding the fate of everyone. China, as a communist, racist, and patriarchal dictatorship, can use "rare earth elements" to blackmail countries that don't toe the line, gradually weaving countries, cultures, and political systems into the cocoon of this new dictatorial world power. Over 85% of the world's refined "rare earth elements" come from China. And it is the rich who are the problem. It is the super-rich who are setting the world ablaze. In the East, in the West, in the South, and in the North. Sixty percent of the super-rich's investments worldwide go into gas and oil. And around 300 super-rich countries emit more CO₂ than the 110 poorest countries in the world. These criminals know it. They don't care. Their greed for even more wealth and power sets the standard by which everyone else follows
    JINDRICH
    JINDRICH --- ---
    #odemceno
    USA parizske zavazky sabotuji, evropa preslapuje a cina co2 politiku zachranuje levnou produkci, ktera snizuje emise v rozvojovych zemich...

    A Flood of Green Tech From China Is Upending Global Climate Politics
    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/10/climate/cop30-belem-climate-energy-technology-china.html?unlocked_article_code=1.0E8.sjQJ.kEnuEjoTDebM&smid=nytcore-android-share
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    James Hansen & Clare Farrell - Climate Reckoning in ATLAS25, Operaatio Arktis
    https://youtu.be/Y2UME_Z8oig?si=QfncJgk0QZ6qKb_g


    James Hansen—the NASA scientist who first alerted the world to climate change in 1988—brings groundbreaking findings that explain why global temperatures suddenly spiked in 2023-2024, leaving even climate scientists baffled. His research reveals that we've entered a period of accelerated warming that changes everything we thought we knew about climate timelines.

    In conversation with Clare Farrell, co-founder of Extinction Rebellion UK, Hansen will present evidence that the climate science community has been systematically underestimating both the speed and scale of change. Together, they'll explore why current climate assessments miss critical signals and what this means for our situation and the tools needed to address it.

    Following Hansen's 30-minute presentation, Farrell will lead an interview about what these findings mean for our societies, our souls, our politics, and the movements fighting for climate justice. If we have entered a new era of human and planetary history, what is asked of us as communities, as institutions, or as a species?
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam