Blizi se COP26 v Glasgow a fosilni masinerie jede...

The leak reveals Saudi Arabia, Japan and Australia are among countries asking the UN to play down the need to move rapidly away from fossil fuels.
It also shows some wealthy nations are questioning paying more to poorer states to move to greener technologies.
This "lobbying" raises questions for the COP26 climate summit in November.
The leak shows countries pushing back on UN recommendations for action, just days before they will be asked at the summit to make significant commitments to slow down climate change and keep global warming to 1.5 degrees.

COP26: Document leak reveals nations lobbying to change key climate report - BBC News
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-58982445

Jinak origo studie zde

Building upon recent work on other major fossil fuel companies, we report new archival research and primary source interviews describing how Total responded to evolving climate science and policy in the last 50 years. We show that Total personnel received warnings of the potential for catastrophic global warming from its products by 1971, became more fully informed of the issue in the 1980s, began promoting doubt regarding the scientific basis for global warming by the late 1980s, and ultimately settled on a position in the late 1990s of publicly accepting climate science while promoting policy delay or policies peripheral to fossil fuel control. Additionally, we find that Exxon, through the International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association (IPIECA), coordinated an international campaign to dispute climate science and weaken international climate policy, beginning in the 1980s. This represents one of the first longitudinal studies of a major fossil fuel company’s responses to global warming to the present, describing historical stages of awareness, preparation, denial, and delay.

Early warnings and emerging accountability: Total’s responses to global warming, 1971–2021 - ScienceDirect
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378021001655

TUHO: Podobně postupovala i společnost Elf, která se spojila s Totalem v roce 1999, poukazuje server Franceinfo. V roce 1986 sepsalo oddělení životního prostředí společnosti Elf důvěrnou zprávu, ve které si všímala klimatického rizika. Píše se v ní, že „akumulace CO2 a CH4 (metanu) v atmosféře a skleníkový efekt, ve který ústí, nevyhnutelně promění naše životní prostředí. Všechny modely jednomyslně předpovídají oteplování“. Stejně jako Total i Elf se rozhodl raději klimatickou změnu veřejně bagatelizovat, než změnit své počínání.

Stejně jako zmíněné společnosti si byl i francouzský Total vědom obrovských rizik, která představuje zvyšování teploty spojené se spalováním fosilních paliv, a přesto svými veřejnými prohlášeními opakovaně podkopával důvěru v klimatickou vědu.

„Američtí historici už deset let analyzují strategie amerických společností, které se vyhýbaly zodpovědnosti a oddalovaly regulace na ochranu životního prostředí. Ve Francii jsme ale měli tendenci věřit, že naši šampioni jsou ctnostnější než ExxonMobil. Naše studie přehodnocuje uklidňující příběh, který jsme si vytvořili,“ uvedl jeden z autorů zprávy, Christophe Bonneuil, který je ředitelem v Centru historických výzkumů.

Francouzský koncern Total věděl o změnách klimatu 50 let, přesto je popíral - Seznam Zprávy
https://www.seznamzpravy.cz/clanek/francouzsky-koncern-total-vedel-o-zmenach-klimatu-50-let-presto-je-popiral-178372

ne uplne dezinfo, ale o strukturach fosil prumyslu…

State Petrochemical Plants in Turkmenistan Channel Exports Through Obscure U.K. Companies — With Ties to President’s Nephews - OCCRP
https://www.occrp.org/en/the-pandora-papers/state-petrochemical-plants-in-turkmenistan-channel-exports-through-obscure-uk-companies-with-ties-to-presidents-nephews

TUHO: konecne grassroots iniciativa visjak .))

#chevron #greenwashing

One of the world’s top polluters of atmosphere-altering greenhouse gases has aired nearly 30,000 TV advertisements over the past 15 months, trying to convince people that it is green.
From June 2020 to August 31st of this year, Americans have been bombarded with ads from the California-based oil-and-gas-producer Chevron, according to new data from the analytics firm AdImpact first reported on Morning Consult. During July 2021 alone, the fossil-fuel giant aired 4,402 ads, the data shows.
More than 80 percent contained terms such as “sustainable,” “renewable,” “environment,” and “clean.” In reality, however, Chevron has contributed more than 43 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent into the atmosphere since 1965, data from the Climate Accountability Institute shows, placing it among the most climate-damaging companies on the planet. “The large majority of ads Chevron is airing are touting their shift to more clean energy,” says Rachel Haskin, senior marketing manager for AdImpact.

Chevron Is Playing Americans for Fools with 'Green' Ad Blitz - Rolling Stone
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/chevron-climate-change-green-ad-campaign-1240053/

Je dvanact let od Climategate. Od jednoho z nejznamejsiho fabrikovanyho skandalu klima dezinformacni masinerie, ktery mel torpedovat COP v Kodani. Bohuzel dodnes nechava falesny obvineni na klimatickejch vedcich, ze fixluji udaje, prinesl jim vyhruzky smrst nenavisti, vcetne vyhruzek smrti a prominentniho klimatologa Philla Jonese psychickej tlak dotahl nedaleko sebevrazdy.
Tedka bude mit svuj dokument na BBC.

‘This is a story that needs to be told’: BBC film tackles Climategate scandal | Climate science denial | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/oct/10/this-is-a-story-that-needs-to-be-told-bbc-film-tackles-climategate-scandal

Zraje jako vino .)) Jordan Peterson o globalnim ochlazovani hehe

oui yeaaah

Google zakáže od listopadu reklamy, které popírají klimatickou změnu. Od prosince i YouTube | iROZHLAS - spolehlivé zprávy
https://www.irozhlas.cz/veda-technologie/technologie/google-reklama-youtube-klimaticka-zmena-blokovani_2110081839_ban

TUHO:

College and university biology majors who are not climate change deniers may yet be unaware of the degree of scientific consensus on climate change and unprepared to communicate about climate science to others. This study reports on a population of climate change accepting biology majors at a large, private research university in the American northeast. Our students tended to greatly underestimate the degree of scientific consensus around climate change, to be only moderately worried about climate change, and to be unconfident in their ability to communicate about the state of the scientific consensus around climate change. After an introduction to the scholarly literature that substantiates and quantifies the scientific consensus on climate change in the context of a course on biological research literature, our students showed significant increases in their estimates of the consensus on climate change, and their estimates were more accurate. Additionally, they became more worried about climate change as well as more confident in their ability to communicate about the scientific consensus to others. These results are in line with the Gateway Belief Model, which positions perception of scientific agreement on climate change as an important driver of acceptance and motivation toward action.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.5960

Internal Facebook documents obtained by Popular Information reveal that, prior to the removal of the fact-check, Science Feedback's fact-check of The Daily Wire article was brought to the attention of top Facebook executives including VP of Global Affairs and Communications Nick Clegg, VP of Global News Partnerships Campbell Brown, and VP of Global Public Policy Joel Kaplan. The documents also show that Facebook was asked by the office of Congressman Mike Johnson (R-LA), a powerful member of Republican leadership, to reverse the fact-check.

Facebook and the executive director of Science Feedback deny that Facebook pushed Science Feedback to remove the "partly false" rating. But the incident raises questions about the integrity of Facebook's fact-checking process, Facebook's deference to far-right publications, and the company's commitment to fighting climate misinformation.

Fact-check of viral climate misinformation quietly removed from Facebook | Emily Atkin
https://heated.world/p/fact-check-of-viral-climate-misinformation

Tech’s complicity in environmental destruction is not just limited to toxic manufacturing waste and a large carbon footprint. Companies also have a large influence on the climate crisis in the context of policy, the broader economy, and the flow of information. Reports in 2019 revealed that Google has made significant contributions to climate denialist groups, including the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), which helped convince the Trump administration to withdraw from the Paris Agreement in 2017. Facebook has come under fire for lax action against climate change denial on their platform, where disinformation can easily spread without diligent fact-checking. Google, Microsoft, and Amazon have partnered with large oil companies to build machine learning tools that streamline oil production. In fact, the oil industry invested an estimated $1.75 billion in 2018 into machine learning tools, which is projected to grow to $4.01 billion by 2025.

Our purpose in throwing light onto this destructive behavior is not simply to paint a bleak future. Through public pressure and the collective organizing of tech employees, there has been media coverage of some success in holding the tech industry responsible for their environmental destruction. In 2019, after the Amazon Employees for Climate Justice organization led a large walkout in support of the global climate strike, Amazon pledged to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2040. Similarly, in response to employee pressure, Google pledged to stop funding climate change deniers in 2020. Google also promised to rescind all future contracts with oil companies in response to a Greenpeace report about tech’s oil contracts

The Hidden Cost of Digital Consumption
https://parametric.press/issue-02/streaming/

Fosilni prumysl se snazi stale ve velkym blokovat klimatickou akci

InfluenceMap
@InfluenceMap
The American Petroleum Institute is flooding Facebook with ads aimed at blocking key climate initiatives in the $3.5t budget reconciliation.
The group has eclipsed its previous daily spend record, which was set when Joe Biden announced his climate plan during the 2020 election.

TUHO: I didn’t know it, but when I’d used the word “consensus,” I’d hit a land mine. For those who claim that climate change is a myth, the term “consensus” will — boom! — trigger a backlash. That’s because their strategy is based on spreading the idea that the science is still unsettled. Why? Because if you don’t know for sure there’s a problem, you can’t justify doing anything about it.
As an ad from the coal industry had it, “How much are you willing to pay to solve a problem that may not exist?”

Around the time this was happening, I met the Caltech historian Erik Conway. He’d come across material about the campaign to stop ozone depletion by curbing chlorofluorocarbons use. Erik said one of the people attacking me had done the same to Sherwood Rowland, a co-recipient of the Nobel Prize for his work on ozone depletion.

Like many people, I used to think the scientific community was divided about climate change. Then in 2004, as part of a book I was doing on oceanography, I did a search of 1,000 articles published in peer-reviewed scientific literature in the previous 10 years.

I asked how many showed evidence that disagreed with the statement made in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s report: “Most of the observed warming over the past 50 years is likely to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations.” I found that none did. Zero.

Naomi Oreskes Imagines the Future History of Climate Change - The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/28/science/naomi-oreskes-imagines-the-future-history-of-climate-change.html