"Would you rather be right or would you rather be free?"

-Byron Katie

YBUKO: to je IMHO jeste malo psychedelicky, potvrdi kazdej psycholog ;)

Love is Evil

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJPhA9TGRls


What would be my... how should I call it,
spontaneous attitude towards the universe?
It's a very dark one.

The first thesis would have been a kind of total vanity:
There is nothing, basically. I mean it quite literally,
like... ultimately... there are just some fragments,
some vanishing things. If you look at the universe, it's one big void.

But then how do things emerge? Here, I feel a kind
of spontaneous affinity with quantum physics,
where, you know, the idea there is that universe is a void,
but a kind of a positively charged void. And then particular things
appear when the balance of the void is disturbed.
And I like this idea of spontaneous very much that the fact that it's
just not nothing...Things are out there. It means something
went terribly wrong...
that what we call creation

is a kind of a cosmic imbalance, cosmic catastrophe, that things exist by mistake.
And I'm even readyto go to the end and to claim that the only way
to counteract it is to assume the mistake and go to the end.
And we have a name for this.

It's called love.

Isn't love precisely this kind of a cosmic imbalance?
I was always disgusted with this notion of "I love the world,"
universal love. I don't like the world. I don't know how...

Basically, I'm somewhere in between "I hate the world" or "I'm indifferent towards it. "

But the whole of reality, it's just it. It's stupid. It is out there.
I don't care about it. Love, for me, is an extremely violent act.
Love is not "I love you all. "Love means I pick out something,
and it's, again, this structure of imbalance. Even if this something
is just a small detail... a fragile individual person... I say "I love you
more than anything else. " In this quite formal sense,love is evil.

a jeste klasika z tehoz zdroje:)

All too often, when we love somebody, we don't accept him or her as what the person effectively is. We accept him or her insofar as this person fits the co-ordinates of our fantasy. We misidentify, wrongly identify him or her, which is why, when we discover that we were wrong, love can quickly turn into violence.
There is nothing more dangerous, more lethal for the loved person than to be loved, as it were, for not what he or she is, but for fitting the ideal.

YBUKO: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dice_Man

Our fundamental delusion today is not to believe in what is only a fiction, to take fictions too seriously. It's, on the contrary, not to take fictions seriously enough.
You think it's just a game? It's reality. It's more real than it appears to you.
For example, people who play video games, they adopt a screen persona of a sadist, rapist, whatever. The idea is, in reality I'm a weak person, so in order to supplement my real life weakness, I adopt the false image of a strong, sexually promiscuous person, and so on and so on. So this would be the naive reading. I want to appear stronger, more active, because in real life, I'm a weak person.
But what if we read it in the opposite way? That this strong, brutal rapist, whatever, identity is my true self. In the sense that this is the psychic truth of myself.
And that in real life, because of social constraints and so on, I´m not able to enact it.
( Slavoj Zizek, http://www.csfd.cz/film/223182-perverts-guide-to-the-cinema-the )

zodpovědnost?

Ať je život šťastný či nešťastný, plný úspěchů či neúspěchů, vždy je neobyčejně zajímavý.

Svoboda znamená zodpovědnost. To je důvod, proč se jí většina lidí bojí.

G. B. Shaw

[ LITTLEFOX @ CITATY ... aneb veci, ktere vam pomohly otevrit oci ... ]

Katrine is just an idea I have of myself.
I have bought into this idea for the longest time, invested in it, given it energy/attention (life).
The hanging on to the idea that Katrine is the doer is the first contraction.
It blurs the perception of the effortless flow that life is. Life already is effortless!
Deep inside, this is known.
The more identified I am with Katrine as the doer, the more narrow the perception.
What is perceived is more and more "extracted" from the juice that is life in the action to begin with.
... more and more separate .... less and less love is perceived.
The idea that Katrine is the doer, the very fact that I narrow myself into that idea, this itself is the selfishness.
It is not bad - it is simply a misperception.
What it takes to align the perception to what actually is, is proper Guidance ... Love.
And this is the Guru within. The sacred, holy principle.
So thank God for meditation!

Katrine

Perfect love casts out fear.
If fear exists,
Then there is not perfect love.

But:

Only perfect love exists.
If there is fear,
It produces a state that does not exist.

Z knihy 'A Course in Miracles'

"Spočívejte bez fixace."

- Gotsangpa: Lampa ze zářivých drahokamů



"Přirozeně nahlédněte do podstaty všeho, co vyvstává."

- Chagmey Rinpočhe: Jednota mahámudry a dzogčhenu

KERRAY: anebo trosku starsi :)
Is the universe a dodecahedron? - http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/18368

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126911.300-our-world-may-be-a-giant-hologram.html?full=true

YMLADRIS: http://xhamster.com/movies/100732/if_you_like_extreme_take_a_look_here_3.html

Zdravé děti se nebudou bát života, jestliže jejich předkové budou mít dost integrity, aby se nebáli smrti.

-- Erik Erikson