• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    TUHOKlimaticka zmena / Destroying the Future Is the Most Cost-Effective
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Rattan Lal interview by Josie Watson
    320 Gigatons Drawdown by 2100: A "Win, Win, Win” Strategy
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/Soil4Climate/permalink/2280436375561437

    Eminent soil scientist, Dr. Rattan Lal, Director of the Ohio State University Carbon Management and Sequestration Center, in an exclusive interview with Soil4Climate’s International Policy Liaison, Josie Watson, at the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (UN FAO) headquarters in Rome on World Soil Day, December 5, 2018, said restoring degraded soils and vegetation can, by the year 2100, draw down 320 gigatons (billion metric tons) of carbon from the atmosphere — the equivalent of lowering the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration by 150 to 160 parts per million (ppm). Enumerating many co-benefits of this approach, including addressing the issues of poverty and food security, Lal calls soil restoration a “win, win, win” strategy.

    TRANSCRIPT

    Soil4Climate: How much drawdown of carbon dioxide into soil is possible, in the world?

    Dr. Rattan Lal: That's a very important and relevant question, especially on World Soil Day.

    We have estimated, along with many other colleagues, the possibility is about 150 to 160 gigatons of carbon cumulative until 2100. So, between now and 2100, maybe about 160 gigatons, which is approximately 75 to 80 parts per million (ppm) of CO2 (carbon dioxide) drawdown. Now, this includes all soils, including degraded soils, desertified soils, and so forth.

    But, even if we take the recent estimates of how much carbon has been depleted from the soils of the world, and that means we can replace that much back, that’s about 135 gigatons. So, the estimate of the world soil sink capacity for carbon between now and 2100, for the next 80 years, is somewhere between 130 to 150 gigatons of carbon, which is a very sizable amount.

    If you combine this with also what can be sequestered in the vegetation, that’s another 150 to 160 gigatons. So total, put together, we have a possibility of putting carbon in the terrestrial biosphere, soil and vegetation, about 320 gigatonnes of carbon, which is equal to about 150 to 160 parts per million CO2 drawdown from the atmosphere.

    This is a great opportunity. Not only that, it’s a natural process, it’s also cost-effective, and it has many co-benefits.

    Therefore, it’s very important that we support the activity of the (United Nation’s) Global Soil Partnership (GSP) and other initiatives that have been started throughout the world including (France’s) 4-per-1000 and AAA (Adaptation of African Agriculture).

    I think this is a thing that we should encourage the policymakers meeting right now in Poland to really discuss, support, and undertake.

    We should encourage our policymakers that this process of restoring degraded soils and ecosystems — desertified land — is a “win, win, win” option.

    It’s a bridge to the future. It buys us time until the no-carbon and low-carbon fuel sources take effect.

    At the same time, it is the best option to achieve the sustainable development goals of ending hunger, ending poverty, improving life on the terrestrial ecosystem, empowering women — women are the most important farming community in developing countries.

    So, soil carbon sequestration, terrestrial carbon sequestration, is something we cannot afford to miss. I will strongly support GSP (UN FAO Global Soil Partnership) to follow up with this activity.

    In last year, the congress that was held here at the FAO headquarters was a very successful event, and I hope a similar event can be done in the future.

    END

    Soil4Climate Interview with Dr. Rattan Lal on World Soil Day
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WB72kyaCBw
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    The Role of Carbon in the Soil with Rattan Lal
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7QuG7NmCbc


    John Kempf interviews Dr. Rattan Lal, an acclaimed soil scientist, researcher, and author. In the early 1990s, Dr. Lal was a pioneer of the now-mainstream idea that healthy soils are a defense against rising levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

    This episode is densely packed with information about soil health and how to achieve it, not only for farmers but also for policymakers and educators. As Dr. Lal says in his closing remarks, "Agriculture, if done properly, has to be a solution to environmental issues.”


    show notes:

    Regenerative Agriculture Podcast: The Role of Carbon in the Soil with Rattan Lal
    http://regenerativeagriculturepodcast.com/the-role-of-carbon-in-the-soil-with-rattan-lal
    BROZKEFF
    BROZKEFF --- ---
    aquaponie v mediich

    Pavel Lukáč pěstuje zeleninu za pomoci ryb. Se svými záhony uspěl i v soutěži - Deník.cz
    https://www.denik.cz/...stuje-zeleninu-za-pomoci-ryb-se-svymi-zahony-uspel-i-v-soutezi-20200623.html
    DRSH
    DRSH --- ---
    Hollan: Zachytávat dešťovou vodu je rozumné, dobře se s ní pere a ředí víno, i dům je třeba zalévat | Plus
    https://plus.rozhlas.cz/...vat-destovou-vodu-je-rozumne-dobre-se-s-ni-pere-a-redi-vino-i-dum-8234109
    DRSH
    DRSH --- ---
    Až naprší, uschne. Po pár týdnech dešťů pětileté sucho nezmizí, přišel ale správný čas s ním bojovat | Radio Wave
    https://wave.rozhlas.cz/...ne-po-par-tydnech-destu-petilete-sucho-nezmizi-prisel-ale-spravny-8234337
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TUHO: mi jdou slzy do oci, smi se to?
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Přírodovědec Hruška: Za sucho nemůže nedostatek deště, příčiny i řešení jsou jinde, vláda i média lidi děsí | Reflex.cz
    https://www.reflex.cz/...e-nedostatek-deste-priciny-i-reseni-jsou-jinde-vlada-i-media-lidi-desi.html
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    As we plot our political, design, and cultural interventions in response to climate crisis and global pandemics, we should always ask: For what Earth do we design? Tomorrow we’ll talk on this with Lukáš Likavčan — a researcher and theorist, writing on philosophy of technology, political ecology and visual cultures. He teaches at Center for Audiovisual Studies FAMU in Prague, and at The Terraforming programme at Strelka Institute for Media Architecture and Design in Moscow.

    Follow the link:
    Introduction to Comparative Planetology. Lecture by Lukáš Likavčan
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyQfqZuV83I
    MATT
    MATT --- ---
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Vznikla "stinova uhelna komise"


    Česká vláda se v roce 2019 konečně odhodlala k ustavení tzv. „uhelné komise“, která má určit harmonogram konce uhelné energetiky v Česku.
    Místo slíbené komise složené především z odborníků z různých oborů, vznikla ale komise tvořená hlavně politiky a zástupci různých silných zájmových skupin. Většina z nich není rychlému konci uhlí nakloněna. Někteří členové mají dokonce osobní finanční zájem na co nejdelším udržení uhelného průmyslu.
    První měsíce (ne)fungování uhelné komise pak potvrdily obavy z její nedostatečnosti.
    V reakci na to se zformovala stínová uhelná komise složená z nezávislých odbornic a odborníků a lidí zasažených dopady těžby uhlí a změny klimatu.
    Naším cílem je vyrovnávat nevyváženost vládního orgánu a být jí oporou v tom, v čem selhává:
    Budeme platformou pro opomíjená témata a pohledy.
    Budeme vytvářet otevřený prostor pro diskuzi o transformaci nutné ke zvládnutí krize.
    Budeme komentovat průběžné výstupy vládní komise i její finální doporučení.
    Zapojte se i vy do diskuze o budoucnosti české energetiky, krajiny a společnosti!
    Více v manifestu stínové uhelné komise.

    Stínová uhelná komise
    https://uhelnakomise.cz
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Alexander Ač
    Niekomu bolo 38 °C za polárnym kruhom málo. Čo tak 45 °C?

    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Europe does not need new gas infrastructure to safeguard security of supply, according to a new study by industry consultants Artelys, which warns that there is a risk of €29 billion being wasted on 32 mostly “unnecessary” gas projects.
    The European Parliament’s industry committee will vote on Wednesday (22 January) to reject or approve a proposed list of energy projects eligible to receive EU funding.

    Billions to be wasted on ‘unnecessary’ gas projects, study says – EURACTIV.com
    https://www.euractiv.com/...nergy/news/billions-to-be-wasted-on-unnecessary-gas-projects-study-says/
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    V zari vyjde cesky preklad "Neobyvatelne Zeme" od Davida Wallace-Wellse

    Neobyvatelná Země - Život po oteplení – Nakladatelství Host
    https://www.hostbrno.cz/neobyvatelna-zeme/

    DZODZO
    DZODZO --- ---
    PAD: mne eon vcera poslal liebesbrief kde mi oznamuje ze od 1.8.2020 mi zvysuju cenu cca o 10%, takze ono to zacne zachvilu davat zmysel aj grid-tie
    JIMIQ
    JIMIQ --- ---
    KEB: větrák co dáš na zahradu bude mít CF ještě nižší než FVE a výkon 200W :D
    PAD
    PAD --- ---
    PAD: jeste k tem ostrovnim systemum - smysl mi to dava samozrejme offgrid a/nebo kdyz chces poslat CEZ do prdele:)
    JIMIQ
    JIMIQ --- ---
    DZODZO: panely (o té standardní velikosti 1,7m2) nikdy nebudou mít 2000Wp :D teď se dají komerčně sehnat 380Wp/2m2. Nevím teď kolik je ten hraniční limit pro trojvrstvé (kolem 45% myslím), takže 900Wp/2m2
    PAD
    PAD --- ---
    TADEAS: Ja si to jen tak pronasobil v hlave - bez dotaci stoji 4.13kWp FVE asi 175kkc. Tato elektrarna by mi dala v prumeru ~4kWh za den listopad - unor (spise vice, https://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvg_tools/en/tools.html#PVP ). Takze kdybych vzal ten nejnepriznivejsi pripad lednovych mrazu, kdy (v mem pripade) je treba dodat asi 32kWh (do topne tyce v aku nadrzi), tak bych proste potreboval tech elektraren 8, coz je cca 54k EUR. Tohle je ten nejblbejsi pripad, u ktereho jsem skoncil s premyslenim, protoze

    a) kdybych to uvazoval realneji, tak nebudu palit elektrinu primo, ale v nejakem cerpadle, ktere by tu spotrebu snizilo na rekneme 30%
    b) ekonomika by u FVE vychazela lepe, protoze ty prebytky v obdobi brezen-rijen bych mohl zuzitkovat

    Musim ale rict, ze ani s FVE ani s tepelnym cerpadlem nemam primou zkusenost - nejdrive jsem to porovnaval s tim, co pouzivam (drevo) a tam ta ekonomika je jeste uplne nekde jinde.

    Ja to nehejtuju, me se to libi, jenom si myslim, ze v porovnani s jinymi technologiemi to nedava smysl a bez dotaci uz vubec ne. A nejsem si jisty, ze ty ostrovni systemy davaji celkove moc smysl. Myslim, ze prave na to sezonni ukladani bude davat vetsi smysl to trochu centralizovat (treba pro kazdou vesnici nebo region), kde by se prave ukladaly prebytky z FVE.
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Siemens Gamesa 14 MW Turbine to Make European Debut Offshore UK

    Siemens Gamesa has signed a preferred supplier agreement with innogy to deliver 100 of its new SG 14-222 DD turbines for the Sofia offshore wind project in the UK.
    The Sofia project will, therefore, be the first European project to install the 14 MW model that will be market-ready by 2024, on time for installation at the site 195km from the UK coast on Dogger Bank.
    Construction of the wind farm is due to begin onshore at its Teesside converter station site in early 2021, with offshore construction expected to kick off in 2023.
    “The selection of these state-of-the-art offshore wind turbines for Sofia, our largest offshore wind development project, reflects our ambition to strive for continuous innovation,” said Sven Utermöhlen, Senior Vice President Renewables Operations Offshore at innogy.
    “Siemens Gamesa’s towering 14 MW machine is a perfect match for our flagship Sofia project, together cementing offshore wind‘s central role in the world’s clean energy future. This turbine embodies the impressive technology we need to build our ground-breaking project, that is further from shore and more technically challenging than any of its predecessors.”

    Siemens Gamesa 14 MW Turbine to Make European Debut Offshore UK | Offshore Wind
    https://www.offshorewind.biz/.../22/siemens-gamesa-14-mw-turbine-to-make-european-debut-offshore-uk/
    KEB
    KEB --- ---
    DZODZO: a co koupit větrák? Na doplnění by stačil malý scény šly taky dolů. Nebylo by to řešení? Ten totiž může tocit v i noci :-)
    DZODZO
    DZODZO --- ---
    Ja by som si vedel predstavit 10x silnejsiu fve, ktora by moje energeticke potreby pokryla aj v zime, ale nemam tolko strechy, musim pockat kym budu povedzme 2000Wp panely, potom to bude fyzicky mozne a mozem ist komplet offgrid aj bez vacsieho uloziska
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    PAD: s fve co by vytapela sousedy za tu cenu - urcite? odmyslim, ze krome toho vodiku je to centrala pro rizeny vetrani a zaroven dohrev vody a 25kWh bateriovy uloziste. kolik teda bude generovat v zime ta fve za tuhle cenu? a bude to stacit na tu energetickou/topnou spotrebu? podle me teda ne.

    ano, ohledne omezeni sklenikovych plynu lze postupovat jak rikas a objekty co pouzivaj zarizeni tohoto typu takove jiste budou. jo, muze byt, ze ekonomika techle ostrovnich systemu nebude zavratna ani do budoucna, to neumim odhadnout. ale jakejkoliv obnovitelnej zdroj bud vyresi tu intermitenci ukladanim, anebo sezonnim importem ulozenyho (paliva). takze pak jde o to, kdo a kde nese naklady na tu infrastrukturu a v jakym meritku je budovana.

    materialova narocnost tech budovanejch infrastruktur je samozrejme otazkou, zariven ale materialy maj tu povahu, ze cirkulujou, zatimco energii potrebnou k jejich prepracovavani musime brat primo z toho slunecniho kanalu.
    PAD
    PAD --- ---
    TADEAS: Jako nerealny povazuju tu ekonomiku. Takze v budoucnu se toho snad doziju (protoze se mi to libi), ale momentalne existuji mnohem vhodnejsi (=rychlejsi/levnejsi) zpusoby na omezeni sklenikovych plynu - od uspor, pres fotovoltaiku nebo vitr. Nejde jen o to si to dovolit, ale taky, jestli ty naklady davaji smysl. Pokud to opravdu stoji tech 60-90k eur a zivotnost rekneme 20 let, tak kdyz to vezmu ad absurdum, tak by jsi za to mel fve, ze by jsi vytapel i v zime sebe i sousedy:)

    Kdyz jsem tu kdysi linkoval ten clanek o porovnavani Hinkley Point C vs wind farma, tak tam vychazeli z toho, ze by se v dobach prebytku generoval zemni plyn. Ten pak do rezervoaru a/nebo do trubek. Tohle si dovedu predstavit ve velkem mnohem snadneji - trubky i rezervoary jsou, spotrebice taky. Jeste jsem ale neprocetl ty zajimavy zdroje, co tu daval k tem power2gas systemum KEB.



    Jo, v principu budem vzdycky neco nekde kutat a nejak tim planetu zatezovat. I ta infrastruktura na vodik nebude ze dreva a kamene:)
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    “Fracking is over” – UK energy minister – DRILL OR DROP?
    https://drillordrop.com/2020/06/18/fracking-is-over-uk-energy-minister/

    The moratorium, introduced in England in November 2019 and still in force, was a response to seismic activity induced by fracking at Cuadrilla’s shale gas site at Preston New Road, near Blackpool.

    On August bank holiday in 2019, the company’s operations caused the UK’s strongest fracking-induced earth tremor, measuring 2.9ML. It was felt across the region and there were nearly 200 reports of damage to buildings made to the British Geological Survey.

    ...

    In March 2020, Cuadrilla withdrew equipment from the Preston New Road site. Last month, it predicted there would be no fracking at the site in 2020 and it was looking at “conventional” opportunities.

    Opponents of Cuadrilla’s operation welcomed Mr Kwarteng’s comments this evening.

    Susan Holliday, chair of Preston New Road Action Group, said:
    “This is positive news for communities that have been living under the cloud of fracking for years. We have always believed that the science did not support it, and it seems that the government are coming to that view too.

    “Cuadrilla should now restore the site at Preston New Road so that our community can put the nightmare of fracking behind us. Renewable energy has got to be the answer to our future energy needs.”
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Stranded Assets vs Active Change: Coal vs Hydrogen in Steel Production
    https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/stranded-assets-vs-active-change-coal-hydrogen-steel-production

    there is real potential for hydrogen technology to replace coking coal. The Materials Processing Institute (MPI), which was established 75 years ago as the British Iron and Steel Research Association, estimates that commercialisation of hydrogen steelmaking technology will be possible by 2030.

    The Swedish steel company SSAB aims to replace coking coal entirely with hydrogen and bring fossil free steel to the market by 2026. The Austrian steel producer Voestalpine has invested in the world’s largest hydrogen pilot plant, with an aim to reduce CO2 emissions in steelmaking by 80%. The German steelmaker ThyssenKrupp has conducted trials with hydrogen and aims to commission new hydrogen furnaces in the mid-2020s. The world’s largest steelmaking company, ArcelorMittal, has demonstrated the replacement of coal with hydrogen in the blast furnace. They are also in the process of converting their Ilva works (the largest steel plant in Europe) to use an Electric Arc Furnace (EAF), eliminating the need for coal. The first blast furnace is scheduled for closure and replacement with an EAF as early as 2024. Liberty Steel group, operating largely in Australia and Eastern Europe, has announced that it intends to be carbon neutral by 2030. It intends to achieve this by investment in new hydrogen steelmaking technologies.
    YMLADRIS
    YMLADRIS --- ---
    38 ℃ (100.4 ℉)
    The temperature last Saturday in Verkhoyansk, Siberia. If verified, it breaks the record for the highest temperature ever recorded in the Arctic. (The Washington Post | 5 min read)


    https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2020/06/21/arctic-temperature-record-siberia/
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    PAD: co je nerealny? nevim ted, na co presne reagujes. ze si nemuzes dovolit to sezonni ukladani do vodiku? to chapu, je to drahy. kdykoliv se nevyuziva uz vybudovana dostupna infrastruktura, ale ta infrastruktura se internalizuje (az do offgrid reseni), tak na sebe investor prenasi naklady na tuhle infrastrukturu.

    ty navrhujes zalozit udrzitelnost vytapeni na dreve/biomase. ok, v nejakym kontextu to dava smysl a jelikoz nam tu zkolabovaly plantaze stromu aka lesy, je to aktualne taky velmi levnej zdroj. drevo uz tolik nefunguje v kontextu koncentrovanejch sidel, rekneme ze na provoz takovyhohle domu co rikas potrebujes energeticky vyuzivat treba hektar lesa.

    co se tyce elektriny, vzdycky musis vymyslet jak vyrobu tak skladovani, a to sezonne, pokud se bavime o tom, ze se to generuje lokalne. samozrrjme se to da vzdycky odnekud importovat.

    je tam otazka ty automatizace - peletky si musi nechat privyzt, takze je kupujes, nekdo je udela, je to importovany palivo. nebo si je delas sam a pak musis intenralizocat tuhle infrastrukturu, starat se o ni a udrzovat ji v provozu. nebo se musis kazdodenne starat o zplynovaci kotel na drevo. drevem taky nemuzes dochladit, narozdil od TC na elektrinu. chlazeni tu bude za chvili stejny tema jako vytapeni.

    samozrejme, nejlip se to vyresi snizenim naroku na rozlohu budov atd. a snizenim prubezny energeticky narocnosti. ale v principu tu furt podle me zustava otazka, jak tyhle infrastruktury zivit energii aniz bychom spalovali produkci biosystemu, musime to brat z toho slunecniho kanalu rovnou.
    PAD
    PAD --- ---
    PAD: m3 jsem mel na mysli
    PAD
    PAD --- ---
    TADEAS: Je to super, snad se toho doziju. Zatim je to v ceskych podminkach nerealny. IMHO mnohem vetsi leverage daji uspory - zateplovani, mozna i zmenseni staveb (fakt nechapu, k cemu maji lidi dnes mnohdy i >200m2 plochy), fotovoltaika a tam, kde to lze, tak drevo.
    JIMIQ: To je cena celyho baraku, pokud ses ochotny leccos udelat sam. Nikdy se to nema sanci zaplatit. Cena dreva je dnes 400korun/m2 vcetne dopravy, cili topeni a TUV (okolo 70-80% veskere energie, co domacnost spotrebuje), muzes poresit za 5000 korun/rok (pri tepelnych ztratach ~8kw). Pokud leto pokryjes fotovoltaikou, tak jeste vic. Ani to nemusi byt pasiv. Nevyhodou je skladovani a pracnost (ta muze byt pro nekoho vyhoda).

    Chci tim celym jen rict, ze k udrzitelnejsimu bydleni neni treba high tech ani hodne penez. Staci jen chytre poskladat to, co uz je dostupne a obetovat trochu prace.
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam