NYRLEM, NYRLEM:

- ad "mala doba ledova" (aka problematika planetarni vs regionalni):

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Third Assessment Report considered that the timing and the areas affected by the Little Ice Age suggested largely independent regional climate changes, rather than a globally synchronous increased glaciation. At most, there was modest cooling of the Northern Hemisphere during the period. - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age


- ad "Kdo urci co je prihodna koncentrace co2 a proc":

zatim se teprve snazime o skutecne planetarni instituce odpovidajici na nasi schopnost prostrednictvim managementu zdroju potazmo developmentu civilizacnich infrastruktur planetu menit - IPCC, COP atp. cele ty scenare jsou o tom, jak chceme zit a co pro to musime delat. rozhodnuti sice padaji, nakolik jsme schopni te seberegulace jako spolecenstvi nebo nakolik naopak budeme zregulovani situaci, kterou vytvorime, to je pribeh prvni poloviny 21. stoleti (druha uz bude sklizen dusledku tech ne/rozhodnuti)


- ad "kdo vybral 1751 nebo 1850 jako referencni a proc"

To better define the Paris Agreement’s commitments, we need to select a suitable starting point for when humans began to influence the climate. However, there is no perfect choice.

Previously, the period 1850-1900 has been used as the historical baseline, but this period includes some large volcanic eruptions and is after greenhouse gas concentrations had already started to rise. We suggest that the earlier period of 1720-1800 is a better choice for this baseline. This is because the major natural factors that also affect Earth’s climate – the levels of solar and volcanic activity – were both at similar levels to today (see Figure 1).

This is important because we want to assess the changes due to human activity, rather than changes because of other factors. For example, the early 1800s were cooled by several large volcanic eruptions and so are unsuitable for a baseline. And before 1720 there was less solar activity and also several large volcanic eruptions. - https://www.climate-lab-book.ac.uk/2017/defining-pre-industrial/

NYRLEM:

Průmyslová revoluce – Wikipedie
https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pr%C5%AFmyslov%C3%A1_revoluce

NYRLEM: po tvym antre s pavedou a ideologii je vecna diskuze zbytecna, ale je dobre ti prioomenout, ze meles sracky

NYRLEM: meles blbosti

TUHO: musime ale zohlednit i odbouravani co2: ionizace, biomasa, sedimenty

NYRLEM: Historicky dluh - CO2 zustava (a ohriva) v atmosfere stovky let pote, co ho do ni vypustis. Krome toho, ze mame vyrazne vyssi kumulativni emise regionalne, stale mame vyssi emise (pres mirny a dlouhodoby snizvoani emisi v poslednich letech). A narozdil od CR tak Cina v poslednich letech karbonizace viditelne slape.

Which countries are historically responsible for climate change?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zP0L69ielU

NYRLEM: "bez dostaku stabilni energie dalsi rozvoj zeme nezajisti." presne tal, s dodatkem, ze bez dostatku stabilniho klimatu a dostatevne funkcnich ekosystemu (ahoj, oceáne) ten rozvoj taky nezajisti.

NYRLEM: Historickym dluhem jsem myslel to, kdy a v jake mire, se emice CO2 produkovaly, protoze se CO2 castecne kumuluje, nebo mozna lepe receno jenom castecne odbourava. A to je arguemnt, ktery pouzivaji rozvojove ekonomiky vzdy: "vy jste si vybudovali pokrocilou ekonomiku s pouzitim fosilnich paliv, a po nas chcete, abychom se jich uplne vzdali?"
CEZ si snizil emise tak, ze prodal uhelne eleketrarny. Udelat to musel, protoze podle pravidel o jednotnem a liberalnim trhu byl CEZ prilis velky pro cesky trh.

NYRLEM: protoze jsme lepsi nez Cina? A taky mame vetsi historicky dluh?
CEZ si snizi emise predevsim tim, ze elektrarny zprivatizoval, coz bylo narizene z EU.