Predsatvuju Franka Luntze - experta republikanu na komunikaci - ktery jim doporucil pouzivat "energy exporation" misto "oil drilling" a "climate chagne" misto "global warming" :) A taky, ze musi sirit pochybnosti o vede, dokud to jde. Nakonec otocil, ale v pozaru Skirmish fire v Kalifornii mu stejne shorel barak

Frank Luntz created the term Climate Change
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-b1GCZWQF-M

Paul N. Edwards. Doporucuju kazdymu, ktery ma zajem o historii kliamticky vedy. Ten clovek je kral.

Both trust in climate knowledge and the truth it delivers descend from the organizational routines and truces necessary to share and maintain climate data. Starting in the 1990s, such routines and truces came under concerted attack. Mirroring trends in the larger society, an audit culture arose that sought to open the black boxes of scientific processes from positions outside the established boundaries of disciplinary expertise. Today, climate knowledge infrastructures are threatened by an American administration hostile to the very concept of anthropogenic climate change. It seeks to eliminate key instruments, de-fund climate data analysis and other research, rewrite the rules of peer review, and privatize the collection of Earth science data. These shifts target the chain of evidence regarding climate change, the stability of the peer review system, and the climate research funding paradigm in place since the 1950s. Virtually all scientific knowledge of public concern may be affected by this transformation.

Knowledge infrastructures under siege | 2 | Climate data as memory, tr
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/oa-edit/10.4324/9781315167305-2/knowledge-infrastructures-siege-paul-edwards

Abstract
Action to tackle the complex and divisive issue of climate change will be strongly influenced by public perception. Online social media and associated social networks are an increasingly important forum for public debate and are known to influence individual attitudes and behaviours – yet online discussions and social networks related to climate change are not well understood. Here we construct several forms of social network for users communicating about climate change on the popular microblogging platform Twitter. We classify user attitudes to climate change based on message content and find that social networks are characterised by strong attitude-based homophily and segregation into polarised “sceptic” and “activist” groups. Most users interact only with like-minded others, in communities dominated by a single view. However, we also find mixed-attitude communities in which sceptics and activists frequently interact. Messages between like-minded users typically carry positive sentiment, while messages between sceptics and activists carry negative sentiment. We identify a number of general patterns in user behaviours relating to engagement with alternative views. Users who express negative sentiment are themselves the target of negativity. Users in mixed-attitude communities are less likely to hold a strongly polarised view, but more likely to express negative sentiment towards other users with differing views. Overall, social media discussions of climate change often occur within polarising “echo chambers”, but also within “open forums”, mixed-attitude communities that reduce polarisation and stimulate debate. Our results have implications for public engagement with this important global challenge.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378015000369

TUHO: Pokornymu vysel v MF Dnes otevreny dopis, publikoval mj Neviditelny pes (nase dezinfo stalice)

"Podle ní za globální oteplování mohou jen zvyšující se atmosférické koncentrace CO2, a to přesto, že z podrobnějších výsledků ledovcových analýz za posledních 420 tis. let vyplynula opačná příčinná závislost (koncentrace CO2 se zvyšovala až po zvýšení teploty).
Je třeba naplno říci, že obrácení příčinných souvislostí a označení emisí CO2 za hlavní příčinu globálního oteplování se nezakládá na žádných vědecky naměřených datech, nýbrž je to pouhá neprokázaná hypotéza, založená na korelaci mezi globální teplotou a koncentrací CO2. Tím, že se této hypotézy chopili v Mezivládním panelu pro změnu klimatu (IPCC) a pomocí klimatických modelů, založených ovšem na nedokázaném příčinném vztahu, že růst emisí CO2 povede k růstu oteplování, začalo období strašení lidí a tím i získávání výzkumných prostředků na neopodstatněný výzkum."

- tyve uz asi dvacet let omylana kravina, o tom, ze CO2 nezpusobuje otepleni. bullshit - ten vztah je oboustrannej (zesilujici zpetny vazby) - kdyz se exogenne zvedne teplota, zvysuje se obsah co2 a ten zvysuje teplotu... pak zas nastoupej jiny stabilizujici zpetny vazby... ale vyvozovat z toho, ze co2 nezvysuje teplotu je nekde na urovni flat earth society

CO2 lags temperature - what does it mean?
https://skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature-intermediate.htm

KLIMA: Globální změnu zkoumejme vědecky, ne ideologicky - Neviditelný pes
https://neviditelnypes.lidovky.cz/klima/klima-globalni-zmenu-zkoumejme-vedecky-ne-ideologicky.A221024_170042_p_klima_nef

No a kdyz se koukneme do jejich vyrocnich zprav, tak mam pocit, ze tusim odkud vitr vane...

Jan Pokorny a skryty anti-vodni satanismus IPCC

"Otocil se ke me clovek a rika - to sis vymyslel, to je cislo dablovo 666! No ne, skutecne kdyz si to najdete, je to cislo dablovo" :))

Gigantický klimatický podvod a řešení pro planetu Zemi
https://youtu.be/FMFQg1w6km0?t=980

Tohle je taky slusny (btw Oriental Review je zdroj zrejme spravovany ruskyma tajnyma sluzbama)


The Genocidal Roots of the Green New Deal: The Limits to Growth and the Unchaining of Prometheus – OrientalReview.org
https://orientalreview.org/2019/07/31/the-genocidal-roots-of-the-green-new-deal-the-limits-to-growth-and-the-unchaining-of-prometheus/

Diplomka o klimaskepsi v ceske politice
„VĚTŠINĚ LIDÍ GLOBÁLNÍ OTEPLOVÁNÍ NEVADÍ“: KLIMASKEPSE V ČESKÉ POLITICE MEZI ROKY 2018–2021

https://dspace.cuni.cz/bitstream/handle/20.500.11956/150474/120394760.pdf?sequence=1

Climate Social Science Network Announces Climate Obstruction Research Grant Recipients

Climate Social Science Network Announces Climate Obstruction Research Grant Recipients
https://cssn.org/climate-social-science-network-announces-climate-obstruction-research-grant-recipients-2/

In this event hosted by Naomi Oreskes and Geoffrey Supran, of Harvard University, top researchers of corporate deception discuss widening the lens of climate accountability beyond oil and gas companies to include multiple other industries and enablers. Hosted by climate journalist Amy Westervelt. An audio version of this discussion is also available on the podcast Drilled.

Accountability for the Deception Industry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rs6F0mASHWc&t=1s

Tak ctvrtej dil o klimatickej dezinformacich je na svete, tentokrat o kontextu vzniku think-tankoveho ekosystemu, ktery ji ve verejnem prostoru tlaci. Okdud se vzal Cato Insitute, Heartland, The Heritage Foundation a proc se tak casto angazujou v anti-environmentalnim aktivismu... A ktery mj maj i znacny vliv na informovani v Cesku.

Komnaty ozvěn, klimatická krize a pravicová revoluce – A2larm
https://a2larm.cz/2022/10/komnaty-ozven-klimaticka-krize-a-pravicova-revoluce/