• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    TUHODezinformace o klimatu // Time to fight back // evidence.ninja
    Jedním ze zásadních důvodů, proč je klimatická změna tak obtížné téma je obrovské množství dezinformací, které ho obklopuje. Sociologové identifikovali široké dezinformační hnutí, které je z části organizované fosilním průmyslem. Množství empirických důkazů ukazuje, že fosilní průmysl ročně vynakládá obrovské množství prostředků za cílem oddálit nebo neutralizovat politiky směřující k regulaci spotřeby fosilních paliv. Jak se ale v takové debatě vyznat? Jaká je česká debata v kontextu světa? Ale hlavně jaké subjekty se do dezinformací zapojují, jaké techniky a jaké prostředky používají k neutralizaci veřejné diskuze.
    rozbalit záhlaví
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    good one.
    lomborg jako obykle - manipulativni, nepravdivej, zavadejici

    Bjorn Lomborg
    US heatwaves 1895-2020

    Worst-ever in 1936 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1936_Nort…

    Obviously, doesn't fit the narrative, so very often data started in 1960, ignoring the 1930s, producing a convenient, upward trend
    (e.g. nytimes.com/2019/07/18/cli…)

    Data from EPA/NOAA, epa.gov/climate-indica…
    debunk zde:

    https://x.com/andrewdessler/status/1429099366250434562?s=46&t=nwPQW0MLXH-jm2eAzTizTA

    a taky zde
    https://x.com/rarohde/status/1429108539960745994?s=46&t=nwPQW0MLXH-jm2eAzTizTA
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    TUHO: nakej Bjorn Lomborg po dobe
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Climate change is ‘not the end of the world’ | Bjørn Lomborg
    https://youtu.be/lE-nxB73IUE?si=r8ezYgCaE2hRDEo3
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Some Realism About Environmental Skepticism: The Implications of Bjørn Lomborg's The Skeptical Environmentalist for Environmental Law and Policy
    Douglas A. Kysar
    Ecology Law Quarterly

    https://www.jstor.org/stable/24114215
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    BJORN LOMBORG CLIMATE DEATHS GRAPH DEBUNKED
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKL8Ajefj7Y
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    TUHO: Tady dobra rekapitulace Lomborgova vyvoje

    One of the chapters that I revised was on deforestation. Lomborg had consulted a new, authoritative report on the state of the world´s forests, published by FAO in the spring of 2001. This FAO report stated with much greater certainty than before that the global forest area was declining. Although Lomborg had read this, he did not change his original text, and still claimed that the global forest area is not declining, so that he could still present WWF as an unreliable institution. More than anything else, this proved to me that Lomborg was guilty of deliberate and malicious manipulation.

    index
    http://www.lomborg-errors.dk/lomborgstory.htm
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    trosku backgroundu k Bjorn Lomborgovi

    In 1998, when Lomborg first appeared in the Danish media, it soon had to be realized that Lomborg´s errors could not be corrected by simple correspondence in the newspapers. Kåre Fog was one of the persons who took the initiative to form an organized opposition by producing a book that pointed out the flaws of Lomborg´s book. This was done under the auspices of the Danish Ecological Council. Kåre Fog became a member of the editorial board, and got contact to many other experts that had tried to oppose Lomborg.

    When Lomborg published the English version of his book in 2001, the Ecological Council decided to make an English version of their counter-book (see link below). Kåre Fog had the job to revise several chapters on biological issues for the English version, and during this work, he realized that Lomborg had learned very little from the raised criticism, and that many of his statements were at variance with the facts that Lomborg knew. Thus, it became apparent that Lomborg´s text was deliberately misleading.

    index
    http://www.lomborg-errors.dk/cv.htm
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    starsi debunk lomborga

    Climate cost study authors accuse Bjørn Lomborg of misinterpreting results | Graham Readfearn | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/dec/02/climate-cost-study-authors-accuse-bjrn-lomborg-of-misinterpreting-results
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    This Wall Street Journal article comments on the fact that atoll islands in the Pacific are not all simply shrinking as sea level rises, because dynamic coastal processes can move sediment to build shorelines outward. However, the article doesn’t mention that sea level rise related to unchecked global warming would ultimately make many low-lying islands in the Pacific uninhabitable.

    The author, Bjorn Lomborg, cherry-picks this specific piece of research and uses it in support of a broad argument against the value of climate policy. He also misrepresents the Paris Agreement to downplay its potential to curb future climate change.

    Analysis of “About Those Non-Disappearing Pacific Islands” – Climate Feedback
    https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/sea-level-rise-those-non-disappearing-pacific-islands-bjorn-lomborg-wall-street-journal/

    plus neco z domacich lluhu a haaaju

    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    12 Ways the Planet Could Truly Be Saved | Bjørn Lomborg | EP 345
    https://youtu.be/Q9m_6TVJysI
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TADEAS:

    Climate Change Debate: Bjørn Lomborg and Andrew Revkin | Lex Fridman Podcast #339
    https://youtu.be/5Gk9gIpGvSE
    YMLADRIS
    YMLADRIS --- ---
    zase znovu me prekvapuje, proc to ten lomborg dela. on prece neni blby.

    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    #lomborg

    In this major assessment of leading climate-change skeptic Bjørn Lomborg, Howard Friel meticulously deconstructs the Danish statistician’s claim that global warming is “no catastrophe” by exposing the systematic misrepresentations and partial accounting that are at the core of climate skepticism. His detailed analysis serves not only as a guide to reading the global warming skeptics, but also as a model for assessing the state of climate science. With attention to the complexities of climate-related phenomena across a range of areas—from Arctic sea ice to the Antarctic ice sheet—The Lomborg Deception also offers readers an enlightening review of some of today’s most urgent climate concerns.

    Friel’s book is the first to respond directly to Lomborg’s controversial research as published in The Skeptical Environmentalist (2001) and Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist’s Guide to Global Warming (2007). His close reading of Lomborg’s textual claims and supporting footnotes reveals a lengthy list of findings that will rock climate skeptics and their allies in the government and news media, demonstrating that the published peer-reviewed climate science, as assessed mainly by the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, has had it mostly right—even if somewhat conservatively right—all along. Friel’s able defense of Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth against Lomborg’s repeated attacks is by itself worth an attentive reading.

    The Lomborg Deception
    https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300171280/the-lomborg-deception/
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Neco k Lomborgovi



    RealClimate: Bjørn Lomborg, just a scientist with a different opinion?
    https://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2015/08/bjorn-lomborg-just-a-scientist-with-a-different-opinion/
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TUHO: jo tak on tam placa neco o tom jak abys neco predikoval na 100 let, musis zapojit klimatickej model, socioekonomickej model, a ty modely maj X nejakejch predpokladu a ze kdyz se ti nejaky zhroutej tak ty kodely neplatej a cely je to na vode, nejaka takovehle dojmologie s krestansko-filosofickou omackou. ale neber me za slovo, kde ma nejakej nejvetai rozbor tohohle nevim, ale I trust lomborg my jeho duveruhodnost posila hodne hluboko :D ... jo a na svoje book tours lita private jetem, pochopitelne :)
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    41m "I trust Lomborg", "I don't lnow what environment is"

    Jordan Peterson: Life, Death, Power, Fame, and Meaning | Lex Fridman Podcast #313
    https://youtu.be/sY8aFSY2zv4
    HYNEK
    HYNEK --- ---
    Nevite nekdo naky vysvetleni, kde se vzal Lomborg tady "exkluzivne" ve FINMAGU?
    Na koho tam jsou kde jaky vazby?
    Ma tam pravidelne clanek kazdy mesic.
    Celkove mu tam otiskli vic nez (!!!) 30 clanku.

    Když přijde Putin, zelená jde stranou. Vyspělý svět konečně přiznal barvu | Finmag.cz
    https://finmag.penize.cz/politika/436003-kdyz-prijde-putin-zelena-jde-stranou-vyspely-svet-konecne-priznal-barvu
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Protahovani exponencial po druhe... A k tomu Lomborg, ktery tvrdi, ze snizeni emisi nic nezmeni .))

    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam