TUHO: Twitter wasn’t designed to provide accurate info. Twitter is designed to maximize people’s attention and engagement. And how do you do that? You surface sensational, emotionally evocative content rather than surface deliberative rational information,” she said. “That’s not sexy, it’s all about the architecture.”

Earlier this week, a search for “climate” on Twitter resulted in “#ClimateScam” as the top term on the platform. Tweets using that hashtag were a miasma of climate disinformation, cherry-picked statistics and conspiracy theories. On another day, the top result was “climate lockdown,” a reference to the Great Reset conspiracy theory that claims a group of global elites is planning to shut down economic activity around the world to cut carbon emissions (Climatewire, Dec. 6).

TUHO: Indeed, the number of tweets rejecting climate science have never been higher than in 2022, according to research by the University of London conducted on behalf of The Times newspaper. There have been more than 850,000 climate denial tweets or retweets so far this year. There were 650,000 such messages in 2021 and 220,000 in 2020, the analysis found.

twitter, musk a dezinformace

Marc Morano, who runs a blog that routinely attacks climate science, said that since Musk bought Twitter the appearance of his name in climate search results “appear to be juiced by the new algorithms.”

“My Twitter account and many others opposing the ‘consensus’ climate view have all increased visibility dramatically since Musk took over Twitter,” he said in an interview. “Whatever Musk is altering, I hope he keeps it up.”

Climate misinformation spreads on Musk's Twitter - E&E News
https://www.eenews.net/articles/climate-misinformation-spreads-on-musks-twitter/

Fossil fuels improve air quality. Solar and wind energy are bad for the environment. Only 2% of climate scientists believe that humans and fossil fuels cause climate change.

This is the misinformation that PragerU, a conservative digital media nonprofit, spread to more than 100 million people over the last 7 years on Facebook and YouTube, according to an analysis by Distilled.

PragerU used Facebook and YouTube ads to get videos with false claims about climate change and clean energy in front of millions of people. Between 2018 and 2022, PragerU spent about $20 million on Facebook ads. The nonprofit spent $4.5 million on Google and YouTube ads in 2021 alone. Many of the videos they promoted contain misinformation that isn’t marked by either platform.

How A Nonprofit Spread Climate Misinformation to 100 Million People
https://www.distilled.earth/p/how-a-nonprofit-spread-climate-misinformation

Kolo-kolo-kolovraatek

Kandidat na bludny balvan:
[BLOODRAT @ Nejlepší hlášky hlody a kecy]

uhlikova stopa neni ekologie ;)

AYOS: a to je ten pán přes spalovací motory, co se tak fundovaně vyjadřoval, chvilka napětí, k elektromobilitě.

btw není členem realistické energetiky i atomový wagner?

Koho by zajimalo obsahlejsi archiv kravin siricich uhelnymi lobbisty Konec uhli / Nova energie kolem Budinskeho (ex ODS, exPPF, exCEZ, exSeveroceske doly, nyni Euracoal)

tak zde .]]
Nová energie - konec uhlí stížnost spolku - Dokumenty Google
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mX0FI2igY2DAcnaOLjKrBadxBxJqbsNJzB8rPDdZqiY/edit