Fossil fuels improve air quality. Solar and wind energy are bad for the environment. Only 2% of climate scientists believe that humans and fossil fuels cause climate change.

This is the misinformation that PragerU, a conservative digital media nonprofit, spread to more than 100 million people over the last 7 years on Facebook and YouTube, according to an analysis by Distilled.

PragerU used Facebook and YouTube ads to get videos with false claims about climate change and clean energy in front of millions of people. Between 2018 and 2022, PragerU spent about $20 million on Facebook ads. The nonprofit spent $4.5 million on Google and YouTube ads in 2021 alone. Many of the videos they promoted contain misinformation that isn’t marked by either platform.

How A Nonprofit Spread Climate Misinformation to 100 Million People
https://www.distilled.earth/p/how-a-nonprofit-spread-climate-misinformation

Kolo-kolo-kolovraatek

Kandidat na bludny balvan:
[BLOODRAT @ Nejlepší hlášky hlody a kecy]

uhlikova stopa neni ekologie ;)

AYOS: a to je ten pán přes spalovací motory, co se tak fundovaně vyjadřoval, chvilka napětí, k elektromobilitě.

btw není členem realistické energetiky i atomový wagner?

Koho by zajimalo obsahlejsi archiv kravin siricich uhelnymi lobbisty Konec uhli / Nova energie kolem Budinskeho (ex ODS, exPPF, exCEZ, exSeveroceske doly, nyni Euracoal)

tak zde .]]
Nová energie - konec uhlí stížnost spolku - Dokumenty Google
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mX0FI2igY2DAcnaOLjKrBadxBxJqbsNJzB8rPDdZqiY/edit

NYRLEM: Uplne bezne.

Co nám vláda tají? Další destruktivní zelená legislativa potichu přichází | Týdeník pro ekonomiku, politiku a byznys
https://www.tydenikhrot.cz/clanek/co-nam-vlada-taji-dalsi-destruktivni-zelena-legislativa-potichu-prichazi?#dop_ab_variant=0&dop_source_zone_name=hpfeed.sznhp.box

Na Párala z hrotu jsem úplně zapomněl

Shrnutí právních sporů a možností donucení fosilního průmyslu k odpovědnosti za dezinformační kampaně o kliamtických změnách.

Over two dozen U.S. states and municipalities have filed lawsuits against fossil fuel companies, seeking abatement orders and compensation for climate damages based on theories such as public nuisance, negligence, and failure to warn, and alleging these companies knew about the dangers of their products, intentionally concealed those dangers, created doubt about climate science, and undermined public support for climate action. This Article examines how tort plaintiffs can establish a causal nexus between public deception and
damages, drawing from past litigation, particularly claims filed against manufacturers for misleading the public about the risks of tobacco, lead paint, and opioids. A key finding is that courts may infer public reliance on false and misleading statements using multiple lines of evidence, including information about the scope and magnitude of the deceptive communications, defendants’ internal assessments of the efficacy of their disinformation campaigns, acknowledgements of intended reliance made by defendants, expert testimony on
the effects of disinformation, public polling data, and more. The Article concludes with a discussion of these potential strategies and evidentiary sources.

https://www.eli.org/sites/default/files/files-pdf/52.10995.pdf

NYRLEM: Tak vsichni vime, ze CO2 je uzitecny. Problem je, ze Peterson mele kraviny o klimatickym modelovani, klimaticky vede, ze ten problem bagatelizuje na zaklade vytrhnutejch veci z kontextu.
On ma model strejce, kterej prijde k topicimu v rybniku a zacne mu vykladat, ze voda je dobra, protoze s ni muzes zalejvat a plavou v ni ryby :))

NYRLEM: To s tou uzitecnosti nebude uplne tak jednoznacny - https://denikn.cz/1007767/planeta-je-misty-zelena-az-moc-sazenim-stromu-ji-nespasime-ochranou-je-rozmanitost-rika-ekolog/