TUHO: kam se muzu podivat, abych videl zduvodneny to "second to"? aneb nuclear war, second only to climate change

A tohle by se koneckoncu taky mohlo libit .]

Second Only to Nuclear War: Science and the Making of Existential Threat in Global Climate Governance

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/530b51b6e4b0ce720625fb66/t/5c2d2e4a352f534b797ff250/1546464844214/Allan_2017_Second-to-nuclear-war.pdf

TUHO: A koukam, ze uz mu vyslo neco i v Nature

From carbon pricing to green industrial policy, economic ideas have shaped climate policy. Drawing on a new dataset of policy reports, we show how economic ideas influenced climate policy advice by major international organizations, including the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and the World Bank, from 1990 to 2017. In the 1990s, the neoclassical notion of weak complementarity between environmental protection and growth dominated debates on sustainable development. In the mid-2000s, economic thought on the environment diversified, as the idea of strong complementarity between environmental protection and growth emerged in the green growth discourse. Adaptations of Schumpeterian and Keynesian economics identified investment in energy innovation and infrastructure as drivers of growth. We thus identify a major transformation from a neoclassical paradigm to a diversified policy discourse, suggesting that climate policy has entered a postparadigmatic period. The diversification of ideas broadened policy advice from market-based policy to green industrial policy, including deployment subsidies and regulation.

The evolution of ideas in global climate policy | Nature Climate Change
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-020-0739-7

Koukam, ze Bentley Allan pracuje na novy knizce “Producing the Climate: Geopolitics and Geophysics in the History of Global Climate Governance.” a ma k tomu i nejaky novy texty v odbornejch casacich. Jeho prvotinu Scientific Cosmology and International Orders jsem zhltnul na jeden zatah a doporucuju vsem, ktery zajima vztah mezinarodni politiky a vyvoje zapadniho vedeni a metafyziky na plochach staleti. V podstate je to o tom, jak se z ancien regime vyloupla modernita a co to vsechno znamenalo.

No a slibovanej clanek:

The rise of green industrial policy has injected purpose and competition into global environmental politics. Efforts to build green industry have raised the economic and geopolitical stakes of environmental issues as states seek to position their firms in global value chains and reshore strategic industries. This could help to generate the technologies and political momentum needed to accelerate global decarbonization. At the same time, these green interventions confront status quo interests and a variety of industrial policies that support fossil fuel-based industries. To help make sense of this new landscape, this introduction to the special issue defines green industrial policy and situates it within domestic political economy, social policy, and global geopolitics. We present six new studies that demonstrate and explore the global politics of green industrial policy. To illustrate the kinds of effects and implications of green industrial policy we are interested in exploring, we show how green industrial policy has transformed climate politics. Changes in state practice, ideas about the environment and economy, and technological cost declines came together to produce a new opportunistic and competitive climate politics. We then identify areas for further investigation as we call for a new climate politics research agenda, integrating green industrial policy more intentionally into studies of global environmental politics.

Green Industrial Policy and the Global Transformation of Climate Politics | Global Environmental Politics | MIT Press
https://direct.mit.edu/glep/article/21/4/1/107853/Green-Industrial-Policy-and-the-Global

XCHAOS: je to jejich chyba, že nemaj klimatizaci

pokud si chce někdo počíst co si myslí další lidi (ačkoliv biased, protože reddit :D ) o Smilovi

Vaclav Smil was wrong about everything. : energy
https://www.reddit.com/r/energy/comments/t0jtgj/vaclav_smil_was_wrong_about_everything/

a nechápejte mě špatně, já jsem velký fanoušek vodní elektřiny (já jsem ostatně i fanoušek jádra, o to jsem smutnější z toho kam se jádro dostalo), ale ten potenciál tam prostě už není a ty překážky ve formě vhodných toků a environmentalismu jsou dle mě zásadní

Tady je pěknej grafík (resp. několik) na samostudium

Electricity Mix - Our World in Data
https://ourworldindata.org/electricity-mix

jak co roste :)

a pak tohle přečíst

The Potential of Hydroelectric Power
https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/baseload/the-potential-of-hydroelectric-power/

The theoretical potential of hydroelectric power, setting aside all other considerations than what can hypothetically be produced from all sources on the planet, is estimated to be about 2,800 gigawatts. However, a lot of that potential must remain undeveloped due to environmental and economic concerns.

Bohužel ten článek je 11 let starej, tak tam ještě není zachycený růst v Číně, která tím svůj potenciál vyčerpala