• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    TUHOKlimaticka zmena / Thank you so much for ruining my day


    "Given the sheer enormity of climate change, it’s okay to be depressed, to grieve. But please, don’t stay there too long. Join me in pure, unadulterated, righteous anger."


    "I don’t want your hope. I don’t want you to be hopeful. I want you to panic. I want you to feel the fear I feel every day. And then I want you to act. Once you start to act, the hope is everywhere."

    "Our best scientists tell us insistently that a calamity is unfolding, that the life-support systems of the Earth are being damaged in ways that threaten our survival. Yet in the face of these facts we carry on as usual."

    “We’ve got to stop burning fossil fuels. So many aspects of life depend on fossil fuels, except for music and love and education and happiness. These things, which hardly use fossil fuels, are what we must focus on.”

    A nejde o to, že na to nemáme dostatečné technologie, ty by na řešení použít šly, ale chybí nám vůle a představivost je využít. Zůstáváme při zemi, přemýšlíme až moc rezervovaně. Technologický pokrok to sám o sobě nevyřeší. Problém jsme my, ne technologické nástroje.

    Rostouci hladiny oceanu, zmena atmosferickeho proudeni, zmeny v distribuci srazek a sucha. Zmeny karbonoveho, fosforoveho a dusikoveho cyklu, okyselovani oceanu. Jake jsou bezpecnostni rizika a jake potencialni klady dramatickych zmen fungovani zemskeho systemu?
    Ale take jak funguji masove dezinformacni kampane ropneho prumyslu a boj o verejne mineni na prahu noveho klimatickeho rezimu post-holocenu.
    rozbalit záhlaví
    PALEONTOLOG
    PALEONTOLOG --- ---
    R_U_SIRIOUS: aktivisti mají solidní ataku, zřejmě se zástupci fosilního průmyslu nesmí na panelech scházet vůbec

    @deloma.bsky.social
    ·
    2h
    COP28 isn’t about solving Climatechange it’s about Oil ~ 800 private ✈️ are there ⛽️🌍 🌎 🌏 🔥 🥵

    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    https://twitter.com/TE2100Plan/status/1658728886916587522?s=19


    https://twitter.com/TE2100Plan/status/1658728893451214848?s=19
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---


    https://twitter.com/PCarterClimate/status/1637158399644413952?s=19
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    https://twitter.com/PCarterClimate/status/1632192746604892160?s=19
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    https://twitter.com/PCarterClimate/status/1617668020616433666?s=19
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    420, again

    https://twitter.com/PCarterClimate/status/1617316390184308736?s=19
    NJAL
    NJAL --- ---
    https://twitter.com/SonyKapoor/status/1616427224621813762
    GOJATLA
    GOJATLA --- ---
    The #IPCC releases its next major #ClimateReport today

    Tune in at noon (12 pm) CET to find out how #ClimateChange is affecting people & ecosystems.

    IPCC Press Conference - Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation & Vulnerability
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpK7eeYRhjQ
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    #climateChange?

    Francouzskou obec Agen zaplavil déšť. Místy stojí až dva metry vody, pomáhají hasiči - Aktuálně.cz
    https://zpravy.aktualne.cz/zahranici/francouzskou-obec-agen-zaplavil-dest-misty-stoji-az-dva-metr/r~74dc9782113111eca7d3ac1f6b220ee8/?utm_source=mediafed&utm_medium=rss&;amp;utm_campaign=mediafed

    Podle francouzské meteorologické služby Météo-France představuje 129,6 milimetrů srážek denní rekord v této oblasti za celou historii měření od roku 1941. V departementu Lot-et-Garonne, kde leží i Agen, během noci udeřilo přes 3000 blesků.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    lovelockovi bylo 102 ted

    2008


    James Lovelock: 'Enjoy life while you can: in 20 years global warming will hit the fan' | Climate change | The Guardian
    https://theguardian.com/theguardian/2008/mar/01/scienceofclimatechange.climatechange

    Lovelock has been dispensing predictions from his one-man laboratory in an old mill in Cornwall since the mid-1960s, the consistent accuracy of which have earned him a reputation as one of Britain's most respected - if maverick - independent scientists. Working alone since the age of 40, he invented a device that detected CFCs, which helped detect the growing hole in the ozone layer, and introduced the Gaia hypothesis, a revolutionary theory that the Earth is a self-regulating super-organism. Initially ridiculed by many scientists as new age nonsense, today that theory forms the basis of almost all climate science.

    For decades, his advocacy of nuclear power appalled fellow environmentalists - but recently increasing numbers of them have come around to his way of thinking. His latest book, The Revenge of Gaia, predicts that by 2020 extreme weather will be the norm, causing global devastation; that by 2040 much of Europe will be Saharan; and parts of London will be underwater. The most recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report deploys less dramatic language - but its calculations aren't a million miles away from his.

    ...

    "It's just too late for it," he says. "Perhaps if we'd gone along routes like that in 1967, it might have helped. But we don't have time. All these standard green things, like sustainable development, I think these are just words that mean nothing. I get an awful lot of people coming to me saying you can't say that, because it gives us nothing to do. I say on the contrary, it gives us an immense amount to do. Just not the kinds of things you want to do."

    ...

    Lovelock believes global warming is now irreversible, and that nothing can prevent large parts of the planet becoming too hot to inhabit, or sinking underwater, resulting in mass migration, famine and epidemics. Britain is going to become a lifeboat for refugees from mainland Europe, so instead of wasting our time on wind turbines we need to start planning how to survive. To Lovelock, the logic is clear. The sustainability brigade are insane to think we can save ourselves by going back to nature; our only chance of survival will come not from less technology, but more.

    Nuclear power, he argues, can solve our energy problem - the bigger challenge will be food. "Maybe they'll synthesise food. I don't know. Synthesising food is not some mad visionary idea; you can buy it in Tesco's, in the form of Quorn. It's not that good, but people buy it. You can live on it." But he fears we won't invent the necessary technologies in time, and expects "about 80%" of the world's population to be wiped out by 2100. Prophets have been foretelling Armageddon since time began, he says. "But this is the real thing."

    ...

    Humanity is in a period exactly like 1938-9, he explains, when "we all knew something terrible was going to happen, but didn't know what to do about it". But once the second world war was under way, "everyone got excited, they loved the things they could do, it was one long holiday ... so when I think of the impending crisis now, I think in those terms. A sense of purpose - that's what people want."

    ...

    There have been seven disasters since humans came on the earth, very similar to the one that's just about to happen. I think these events keep separating the wheat from the chaff. And eventually we'll have a human on the planet that really does understand it and can live with it properly. That's the source of my optimism."

    What would Lovelock do now, I ask, if he were me? He smiles and says: "Enjoy life while you can. Because if you're lucky it's going to be 20 years before it hits the fan
    PAD
    PAD --- ---
    PAD
    PAD --- ---
    Na tohle tema kolapsu je hezke vlakno na redditu: https://www.reddit.com/r/climatechange/comments/k1vyxo/scared_and_uncertain_about_collapse/

    Tohle se mi libi asi nejvice:

    What do we mean by a collapse? Does it matters when? is there even a "when"? Should it changes anything in our actions?

    The first point I think is important is to remove completely the idea of a "doomsday", that's not at all what a collapse is. A collapse is gradual, typically an uncontrolled "degrowth" of the society, a series of crisis and recessions that will generate wars for example...

    When you read serious books about the collapse they even say that we might not even realise that we will go through a collapse and it's only in a century or more that historians will qualify our period as a "collapse". The romans for example didn't realised their civilization collapsed. But here it's a bit different, it will be faster and more extreme if it happens.

    What I personally think is:

    We are already in the collapse of our industrial society. The very basis of our current civilization is the continuous growth and access to more and more energy. That can't and won't continue. Whether we like it or not we are already in a "degrowth" phase and not only because of the climate crisis impact but also due to the slow depletion of fossil fuels.

    It's already too late to avoid crossing some tipping points of the planetary system, and that will have consequences. We have entered an age of consequences from our destruction of the planet and of the climate. But it's not black and white, it's not either too late and we're fucked or we have time and we can go back to "normal". It's always too late and never too late at the same time. Yes it's too late to avoid 1.5°C of global warming and the consequences that go with it, it's almost too late to avoid 2°C... but it's not too late to avoid 3°C... and even if we don't do shit and in 20 years it's too late to avoid 3°C, then it still won't be too late to avoid 4°C, or 6°C... you get the picture!

    So it's irrelevant to put a date. "we have until 2030..." doesn't mean anything if not in context. If our goal is to stay below 2°C of Global warming then yes we have until 2030 to cut our emissions by 80% or something like that...

    Will there be wars because of the climate crisis? YES. Will there be famine? YES. Will there be chaos in some part of the world? YES. Will there be uninhabitable areas? YES... And it's already the case! It's all on a scale. If there's 1 billion people who end up having to migrate because their country has become uninhabitable, is it a collapse? If it's 3 billions people? If it's 6 billions? Where do you put the limit?

    The point is that, yes, it is already too late to avoid some very bad consequences of the climate crisis, and yes, our thermo-industrial society and its worship of economical growth has already started to collapse and MUST collapse.

    But it isn't an all or nothing situation. Everything is on a scale. We can have a "happy collapse" of our society, a controlled one that allow us to build a resilient one to replace it. We can have global mutual-aid and avoid many wars, we can help each others to mitigate the damage of the climate crisis. We might not be able to avoid 2°C of global warming but we can avoid 4°C! And that makes a huge difference.

    The collapse has already started, but there's many possible outcomes and type of collapse that we are still in control of... It's never too late to avoid even worse consequences and we should keep fighting because every bits of °C of global warming avoided means millions of lives saved!
    [Sorry za vetsi kus, ale prislo mi to fakt hezky sesumirovany.]
    PAD
    PAD --- ---
    Dobra diskuze na redditu: https://www.reddit.com/r/climatechange/comments/jtao1s/beginning_to_read_the_uninhabitable_earth/ , namatkove:

    It’s closer to fiction than fact, and is typically maligned by climate scientists and laughed at as being extremely misguided - even if for the right reasons.

    There’s a number of climate scientists who have remarked on this aside from what’s already been mentioned (I believe Glen Peters, Andrew Dessler and maybe Hausfather? I’m not going to find the links and I might be mixing people up).

    Generally, I don’t get my climate science information from non-scientists. These doomer types play right into the horseshoe theory - the science they ca cherry pick and use to manipulate in a slanted way is very reminiscent of what the climate change skeptics do. That’s not company you want to find yourself in.

    You want to read an accurate assessment of climate change, read the 2016 IPCC or (much more recommended) Executive Summary. Or wait for the 2021/2022 new report.


    Abych byl fer, tak jsem to vlastne taky cherry-picknul, doporucuji si to vlakno projit, knizku jsem necetl (z podobnych duvodu, jako zminuje autor ^^).

    --

    Tady podobne zajimava vec - https://www.reddit.com/...limatechange/comments/ju5xgk/unhaltable_global_warming_claim_withdrawn_by/ . Voda na mlyn smejdum jako V. Klausove atp.

    --
    Muj dojem z toho je, ze jak jde o obrovske prachy, tak casto prevazuji parcialni zajmy nad zajmem pravdy. Na obou stranach. Ani se nedivim: byt uspenym popiracem s sebou nese urcite spoustu vyhod, zrovna tak jako byt uspesnym alarmistou.
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Addressing the U.N. General Assembly, Xi said China would achieve a peak in carbon dioxide emissions before 2030 and carbon neutrality before 2060, the first time the world’s biggest emitter of carbon dioxide has pledged to end its net contribution to climate change.

    “China will scale up its intended Nationally Determined Contributions (to the Paris agreement) by adopting more vigorous policies and measures,” Xi said, urging all countries to pursue a “green recovery of the world economy in the post-COVID era.”

    Xi used the lectern to call for multilateral action on climate change after U.S. President Donald Trump called the Paris climate agreement - with nearly 200 signatories - a one-sided agreement and criticized China for being the world’s largest source of carbon emissions.

    China calls for global 'green revolution' as Trump goes solo on climate | Reuters
    https://uk.reuters.com/...ls-for-global-green-revolution-as-trump-goes-solo-on-climate-idUKKCN26D2DH
    PAD
    PAD --- ---
    Climate Change AI | Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning
    https://www.climatechange.ai/
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    World Meteorological Organization
    28 min · Sdíleno s: Veřejný
    We just had warmest May (tied with 2016) in NOAA's 141-year record. It was the 44th consecutive May and 425th consecutive month with temperatures above 20th century average.
    The 7 warmest Mays on record have been in past 7 years.
    The Northern hemisphere - and in particular Asia - had its warmest May on record.
    Much of northern and southeastern Asia, northern Africa, Alaska, the southwest contiguous United States and the northern Pacific Ocean were 1.5°C above average or higher. The most notable cool temperatures were observed across much of Canada, the eastern contiguous United States, eastern Europe and Australia,
    DETAILS at http://bit.ly/Global202005
    #ClimateChange
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam