• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • přihlásit
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    přihlásit se
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    TUHOKlimaticka zmena / Destroying the Future Is the Most Cost-Effective
    "Given the sheer enormity of climate change, it’s okay to be depressed, to grieve. But please, don’t stay there too long. Join me in pure, unadulterated, righteous anger."

    "I don’t want your hope. I don’t want you to be hopeful. ... I want you to act. Once you start to act, the hope is everywhere."

    "Our best scientists tell us insistently that a calamity is unfolding, that the life-support systems of the Earth are being damaged in ways that threaten our survival. Yet in the face of these facts we carry on as usual."

    Rostouci hladiny oceanu, zmena atmosferickeho proudeni, zmeny v distribuci srazek a sucha. Zmeny karbonoveho, fosforoveho a dusikoveho cyklu, okyselovani oceanu. Jake jsou bezpecnostni rizika a jake potencialni klady dramatickych zmen fungovani zemskeho systemu?
    Ale take jak funguji masove dezinformacni kampane ropneho prumyslu a boj o verejne mineni na prahu noveho klimatickeho rezimu post-holocenu.

    rozbalit záhlaví
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    "Pesticides for life? No thanks!": across France, protests against a "devastating" European deregulation project
    https://www.lemonde.fr/planete/article/2026/10/10/pesticides-a-vie-non-merci-partout-en-france-des-mobilisations-contre-un-projet-europeen-de-deregulation-devastateur_6790949_3244.html

    This time, the protest is against Omnibus X, a draft legislative text put forward by the European Commission. Intended to strengthen "food safety" and the competitiveness of European agriculture, the text includes a series of unprecedented relaxations of pesticide regulations.

    Omnibus X proposes in particular to thoroughly review their approval system by authorizing them indefinitely, with the exception of the most dangerous ones (classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction).

    Today, manufacturers must undergo a risk reassessment of their molecules every ten to fifteen years to obtain an extension of their authorization. This process allows for consideration of advances in scientific knowledge regarding the health and/or environmental effects of substances. Although considered imperfect due to its slowness caused by the backlog of applications—more than 400 active substances are currently authorized in the European Union—this system has led to the withdrawal of authorization for around thirty pesticides in fifteen years.

    ...

    This proposal has also sparked unprecedented outrage within the scientific and medical community. The International Society of Environmental Epidemiology, the European Society of Endocrinology, and many others have signed a dozen opinion pieces by learned societies. In mid-September, nearly 600 scientists and physicians from leading European research centers sent an open letter to the President of the European Parliament and the Council of Europe, warning of a "dangerous step backward" and demanding a suspension of negotiations until an independent study of the proposal's health and environmental impacts has been conducted. Unfortunately, on September 30, the 27 member states reached a "compromise" on the Commission's proposed text.

    The only "progress" is that the member states want to limit unlimited authorizations to pesticides classified as "low risk." Otherwise, they are endorsing Brussels' demands: extending authorization periods from ten to fifteen years for initial approval and from fifteen to twenty-five years for renewal; extending the grace period during which a substance can remain on the market beyond its ban to three years (compared to the current six months) to allow for the depletion of existing stocks; and extending the emergency exemptions for banned pesticides beyond the current 120 days.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    marsification in progress


    FB-IMG-1784500021647


    "Just stay inside"

    Y'all!
    Our farm is outside.
    The crops are outside.
    The food grows in the soil in a field. Outside.
    It's acres upon acres of open fields.
    Not just on our farm, but on every farm in Michigan.
    We appreciate the sentiment, but we cannot just 'stay inside'.
    And neither can our fellow farmers, ranchers, orchardists, and other food-growing colleagues.
    In Michigan, we are in the middle of our PEAK season.
    Across all of Michigan, there are hundreds of millions of dollars of crops growing right now. Outside.
    That's our livelihoods. Our life's work. The whole enchilada.

    I'm sorry, but we're going to be outside.
    I'm sorry that we have to be. We didn't ask for this.
    We're taking as many precautions as we can.
    And I'm sorry if seeing our team working outside makes you uncomfortable.
    Our nation has an unfortunate history of hiding how our food is grown and the people who grow it. Our farm has prided itself on being transparent with our customers. And we speak for all farmers when we tell you that we will continue to show up.
    Right now, there are tens of thousands of agricultural workers in the state of Michigan who are combatting incredibly challenging conditions to show up to grow your food. Please support your local farmers. Don't tell them to wait inside. That's not how this works.

    The more this week has progressed, the less sure we are that people know where their food comes from.

    Obviously we WANT to stay inside, but then the food would rot in the field. The market shelves would be empty. Our community would lack access to safe, organic, local food.

    The cruel irony is, in the midst of a parasite-infested-lettuce outbreak, our work on a local level is more important than ever. And at the same time, it is more hazardous than ever.

    Our region was #1 in the world for worst air quality this week. That's the wrong competition to be in first place.

    We have limited outdoor activity to only the most essential tasks. We have masks available for all staff. We have rearranged our schedules and our to-do lists.

    But when you come into our Market, you are going to find tables and shelves absolutely overflowing with abundance. And that is because of the work we're doing outside. Everyday. For you.

    Today, like everyday, we are incredibly grateful for our team. Everyone has stepped up to tackle this week with a level of gumption and can-do spirit that is rare these days. Those of us who are unable to safely work in these conditions are at home or inside. Those of us who are able to carry on, are showing up and stepping up.

    And deep down we know, that all of the things we are putting off for now, the so-called 'non-essentials', are piling on to our to-do list after the skies clear. Whenever that is. And the sheer amount of catching up that looms is almost more intimidating than the apocalyptic skies we are working under right now.

    On behalf of all Michigan farmers, thank you for your support. We're doing the best we can with the hand we've been dealt. If you need to find us, we'll be out here growing your food.

    "Just stay inside" Y'all! Our... - Bear Creek Organic Farm
    https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BpgE3qDmz/
    SCHWEPZ
    SCHWEPZ --- ---
    Trump’s attempt to crush clean energy progress not going to plan, experts say | Trump administration | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/28/trump-clean-energy-progress

    Trump označil čistou energii (energie bez emisí skleníkových plynů) jako hloupou a podvod, i přes jeho snahy ji omezit však v březnu poprvé vyrobily v USA elektrárny z obnovitelných zdrojů více elektřiny než ty plynové. Pohled americké veřejnosti na zelenou energii se navíc mění a podle průzkumu z února více než dvě třetiny republikánských voličů podporují solární energii.

    Čistá energie v USA překonala ve výrobě elektřiny plyn | iROZHLAS - spolehlivé zprávy
    https://www.irozhlas.cz/zpravy-svet/trump-mluvi-o-ciste-energii-jako-o-odpadu-ta-ale-v-usa-prekonala-ve-vyrobe_2604291349_elev

    „Nedovolíme stavět větrné elektrárny a nechceme solární panely. Fosilní paliva fungují,“ prohlásil Trump loni. O čisté energii řekl, že je odpad. Dlouhodobě zpochybňuje vědecký konsenzus o změně klimatu způsobené spalováním uhlí, ropy a plynu.

    Trump se po návratu do Bílého domu rozhodl naplnit jeho slova o obnovitelných zdrojích několika kroky.Zrušil řadu environmentálních regulací a Republikáni v Kongresu ukončily daňové pobídky na investice do čisté energie. Energetickým firmám dokonce nyní Trumpova administrativa vyplácí kompenzace za pozastavení nebo zrušení stovek projektů.
    "Jsem si docela jistý, že uhlí bude do mé smrti hlavním globálním zdrojem elektřiny,“ řekl minulý týden ministr energetiky Wright.
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    New book incoming

    Climate, Hydrocarbons, Sanctions: Perspectives on the Russian Arctic Hardcover – 16 April 2026

    by Arild Moe (Author), Anna Korppoo (Author)

    This timely book addresses the impact of global energy trends and rapid climate change on the Arctic’s increasing role in Russia’s hydrocarbon-based economy in the new geopolitical landscape. Arild Moe and Anna Korppoo utilise new data to provide a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of Russia’s Arctic development strategy and its economic underpinning, with its emphasis on hydrocarbon extraction and exports.
    Chapters analyse the potential developments that may impact Russia’s future activities in the Arctic. Key topics include scientific progress, the role of climate policy and public concerns, the economic foundation of mega-projects in the Arctic, and the repercussions of sanctions after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Moe and Korppoo offer key insights, arguing that geopolitics and the energy transition away from fossil fuels will be pressures Russia must eventually confront.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TADEAS: nate hagens ad cinske stagnujici emise TADEAS


    China's CO2 emissions were flat or slightly down, down 3/10ths of 1% in 2025. And again, every news outlet is framing this chart as proof the green transition is working. That's looking at the chart, but let's look at the system. Chinese coal production hit an all-time record of 4.8 billion tons in 2025, up 1.2%. Coal power capacity additions hit their highest level in a decade. New coal project proposals surged to a record 1.6 gigawatt and China still consumes nearly 40% more coal than the rest of the world combined.


    So where did the emission savings come from?

    Cement production collapsed close to 10% due to the real estate contraction. Building materials, metals, and steel all down. So the emissions decline isn't clean energy replacing dirty energy in a growing economy. It's partly a construction sector in freefall masking continued and growing coal dependence and the chemical sector which is coal to chemicals grew their emissions 12%.

    This is the EU renewable story again just from the other direction. The metric and the graphics in the news — flat emissions — looks like progress. But the system — record coal, collapsing cement on a real estate crisis — tells us something very different
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    IEA, NO PROGRESS ON COAL CONSUMPTION TO 2030

    International Energy Agency, Coal 2025.

    2030 World coal consumption 55% higher than 2000, and the same as 2020.

    China 2030 projected same as 2020.

    China's big 2020 jump is maintained

    World headed for climatic biospere collapse fast.

    https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/113a8274-500c-4684-951f-947d25bef3c9/Coal2025.pdf

    FB-IMG-1771415699915
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    nie panimaju

    "must sharply fall"

    Screenshot-20251126-221803-Facebook

    the world has moved from a safe operating space into zones of rising and high risk between 1997, 2015 and 2025. A business-as-usual path would further degrade ecosystems and strain societies. In contrast, effective overshoot management could still put the world on track for net-zero by mid-century and net-negative emissions by century’s end



    Commentary: rising planetary risks after missed decade of action — Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
    https://www.pik-potsdam.de/en/news/latest-news/commentary-scientists-outline-rising-planetary-risks-after-missed-decade-of-action

    In the commentary published in One Earth, scientists of The Earth League alliance conclude that “too little was done too late” in the last decade, from 2015 to 2025: global warming is on track to exceed 1.5°C in the coming years, with seven of nine planetary boundaries already breached. They also note that progress towards global sustainability goals is lagging: only 15 percent of the UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets are currently on track for 2030.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Compromises, voluntary measures and no mention of fossil fuels: key points from Cop30 deal | Cop30 | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/nov/22/roadmaps-adaptations-and-transitions-what-climate-measures-were-agreed-at-cop30

    The roadmap for the transition away from fossil fuels was blocked from the formal Cop30 decision and the Brazilian presidency announced the plan would proceed outside the UN process. It will be merged with a plan backed by Colombia and about 90 other countries, with a summit set for April. This “coalition of the willing” could push progress forward.

    The Cop30 president, André Corrêa do Lago, said the plan to develop the roadmap had the support of President Lula and would involve high-level dialogues over the next year, led by science and involving governments, industry and civil society. Once complete, he said they would report back to Cop.

    “Those governments committed to tackling the climate crisis at its source are uniting to move forward outside the UN, under the leadership of Colombia and Pacific Island states, to phase out fossil fuels rapidly, equitably, and in line with 1.5C,” said Nikki Reisch, at the Center for International Environmental Law. “The international conference next April is the first stop on the path to a livable future.”
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Elon Musk suggests AI satellites could dial down global warming
    https://interestingengineering.com/space/elon-musk-solar-radiation-management-geoengineering

    while Musk’s companies have unmatched reach in space infrastructure, scaling an SRM system to planetary levels is another story. “It would be far easier said than done,” as one analyst put it, especially given that even the most advanced SRM proposals remain largely theoretical.

    Beyond the science, there’s also geopolitics. Who decides when and how to shade the planet? And what happens if one nation’s cooling efforts trigger droughts in another?

    there’s no indication SpaceX is working on SRM-capable satellites. For now, the comment seems more like a thought experiment than a corporate roadmap.

    Yet Musk’s timing is telling. With heat records being broken year after year, and progress on emissions lagging, even the most radical climate ideas are starting to sound less far-fetched
    CHOSIE
    CHOSIE --- ---
    “New research explores climate change and the limits of human progress…

    "The deeper problem, he argues, lies in the complexity of civilization itself—a global industrial society that has grown both unsustainably expensive and dangerously vulnerable to the environmental stresses that accompany climate change."

    "A lot of people confuse pessimism with nihilism, apathy and despair," Scranton said. "But pessimism is actually about recognizing our limits, letting go of unrealistic goals, finding solidarity in the fact of human suffering and doing what you can now, not in some utopian future."

    "Modern pessimism emerged as a skeptical critique of early Enlightenment hubris, but it has roots in ancient wisdom from Sophocles to the Bhagavad Gita. Both the history of philosophy and modern insights from psychology show that pessimism is not only an effective way to deal with big problems, but a healthy approach to the unpredictability of circumstance, especially in fraught and difficult times."

    In "Impasse," Scranton examines the "myth of progress"—how cultures have navigated societal collapse, failures in climate change communication, political extremism and "the end of the world as we know it"—ultimately concluding that the situation does not seem to be comprehensible within progressive modernity.

    "Pessimism is fundamentally about recognizing and living within natural human limits,” Scranton writes. “It’s about recognizing that suffering is inevitable but not unbearable. It’s about learning to die and learning to live with death. And finally, it’s about committing to a radical and paradoxical hope: the hope that life might be worth living after the end of the world."

    https://phys.org/news/2025-09-explores-climate-limits-human.html
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Cop16 ends in disarry and indecision despite biodiversity breakthroughs | Cop16 | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/nov/03/cop16-ends-in-disarry-and-indecision-despite-biodiversity-breakthroughs

    Governments failed to reach a consensus on key issues such as nature funding and how this decade’s targets would be monitored. Many were forced to leave the talks early to catch flights, and negotiations were suspended at 8.30am when fewer than half of the countries were present, and the meeting lost quorum. Countries will need to continue the talks next year at an interim meeting in Bangkok.

    A number of countries expressed fury at the way the talks had been dragged out and the order of discussions, which left crucial issues undecided at the final hour.

    ...

    Governments were able to make some significant breakthroughs: they agreed on a global levy on products made using genetic data from nature, potentially creating one of the world’s largest biodiversity conservation funds; and formally incorporated Indigenous communities in the official decision-making of the UN biodiversity process, in what negotiators described as a “watershed moment” for indigenous representation.

    ...

    During the summit, it became clear that many countries were making weak or no progress on crucial aims such as reforming environmentally harmful subsidies, protected areas and even submitting national plans for meeting the targets.

    “We saw insufficient leadership from the wealthier countries, the European Union and France in particular, Canada, Switzerland, Japan, the UK, but also China. The executive secretary of the UN convention on biodiversity was also quite phantomatic,” said Oscar Soria, director of thinktank the Common Initiative.
    CHOSIE
    CHOSIE --- ---
    Pár dalších článků k COP(e)-29, mluvit o 1.5C je šaškárna. Ony i 2 stupně jsou na prahu dvěří.

    COP29 and the greenwashing of Azerbaijan
    https://archive.ph/6ZZd6
    Subscribe to read
    https://www.ft.com/content/d1959d12-c099-4c45-ab1f-3558ec3370c1


    Little progress at key meet ahead of COP29 climate summit
    https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20241011-little-progress-at-key-meet-ahead-of-cop29-climate-summit

    World fails first review of COP renewable energy goal – POLITICO
    https://www.politico.eu/article/dramatic-spending-surge-needed-to-hit-clean-energy-goals-world-renewables-agency-warns/

    x.com
    https://x.com/KiraTaylor15/status/1845896282772005273
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Europe was a leader on saving nature. Now, its backsliding could threaten global progress | Biodiversity | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/oct/09/europe-eu-green-deal-backsliding-nature-biodiversity-farmers-far-right-cop16-aoe

    EU leaders scaled back plans to cut pollution and protect habitats after angry protests from farmers at the start of the year. A law to restore nature was turned into a political punching bag, barely securing majorities in key votes to rubber-stamp the deal, and a regulation to reduce deforestation will be delayed by a year, the commission announced last week.

    The backsliding has alarmed conservationists and scientists, who fear that biodiversity loss is being pushed to the sidelines on the eve of the world’s most significant nature negotiations.

    ...

    The most vocal opponents of Europe’s nature protection plans are far-right parties, which completely oppose the EU’s “green deal”, and centre-right parties, which nominally back the project but have repeatedly tried to weaken it. Both groups gained seats at the expense of the Greens in European parliament elections in June, in a rightward shift that has been echoed in national and regional elections across the continent.

    ...

    Pe’er said: “Instead of resilience, sustainability and planetary boundaries – not to speak of nature or biodiversity – we now hear the words competitiveness, boosting our economy, and helping the industry.

    ...

    Europe’s recent efforts to protect nature have been mixed. The EU failed to meet its 2020 biodiversity targets and risks falling short of its 2030 protection targets, too. In 2021, most of its member countries failed to pay their fair share of a $20bn (£15.3bn) a year commitment to protect nature, according to an analysis from the ODI in June.

    Just eight of the 27 member states have revised their national biodiversity strategies and action plans, and only the same number have submitted pledges to protect nature
    MARSHUS
    MARSHUS --- ---
    MARSHUS: modely vs. realita:

    #Milton intensified 70mph in just ~12 hours and intensified 100mph from yesterday morning.

    One of the most extreme cases of rapid intensification we’ve ever seen in history and it’s still in progress/yet to hit peak intensity.
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    CHOSIE: cteme stejne, ale evidentne si vykladame autorovy cile sdeleni jinak.

    Electric vehicles (EVs) tap into this mentality,
    making them seem like an effective way for each of us to personally address climate change.

    - ale on to je effective way, jen nedosahujeme dostatecne rychlosti a skaly

    EVs are a clever marketing ploy that seems logical on the surface but lacks real substance.

    - woot?

    Fixating on
    EVs doesn’t change the larger transportation picture, which includes trucks, trains, and ships.

    - doporucuji autorovi nastudovat definici electric vehicle

    Looking closer, most of the growth in industrial oil use is tied to plastics and chemical feedstocks. That’s a major red flag.

    - tak zapomeneme na EVs, protoze jde o marketingovou zalezitost a protoze tezbu ropy drivuji i jine faktory? Kdyz ma pan tak rad cisla a zveda red flagy, jak vyroba plastu prispiva k emisim sklenikovych plynu? Vice, nebo mene nez ev?

    These products aren’t just a
    climate issue—they’re causing significant health problems for humans and animals alike. We’re talking about plastics, pesticides, and endocrine-disrupting
    microplastics that are already wreaking havoc well beyond the realm of climate change.

    - Takze ted uz nejde jen o klima, zapomeneme na 8% a zatahnem do toho i roztomily nekvantifikovany a neurcity zviratka? Jablka/hrusky/cisla/fakta/emoce

    The only real solution to our environmental crises—climate change being just one part—is a dramatic reduction in energy consumption.
    No amount of renewables or technological innovation will get around this hard truth: we have to use far less energy, period.

    But let’s be honest—that’s not going to happen voluntarily, any more than we’ll triple renewables and double efficiency in the next five years.

    - Kdo rika, ze bude civilizace net zero za 5 let? Znamena to, ze se nemame snazit o co nejvyssi rychlost transformace, prostredky jako EVs a Renewable energy? Protoze to z textu tak nastinuje. Ale jinak castecne souhlasim, nemeli bychom energii pouzivat neefektivne.

    Despite clear evidence that global decarbonization is failing, we’re repeatedly told that using more renewables and buying more EVs is the answer.
    That’s a cynical delusion, completely unsupported by the data.

    - woot? Unsupported by data? Absolutne mozna, ale ze tu mame paralelni rust spotreby a nejsme schopni vyrabet vic, je spis impulzem, ze bychom meli pridat a ne to vzdat?

    All it really does is funnel more public money into the hands of the same corporations
    that have been exploiting consumers for decades, all while creating the illusion of progress.

    - woot? Illusion of progress? V EV, bateriich a renewables jsme se nikam technologicky neposunuli za poslednich 10 let?

    This kind of optimism provides little more than false hope, downplaying the serious, complex challenge of truly cutting carbon emissions.

    - a to je dle pana jak? Jak uvadel, sam vi, ze civilozace se nezastavi. Nikdo zejtra veskerej proud, ani olej nevypne.

    Electric vehicles and renewable
    energy are a distraction from the hard realities we face.

    - tak urcite :))
    CHOSIE
    CHOSIE --- ---
    Electric Vehicles and Renewables: Misleading Solutions to a Deeper Climate Crisis
    ____________________________

    Cars dominate our energy mindset just like gasoline prices are the main way we understand energy costs. Electric vehicles (EVs) tap into this mentality,
    making them seem like an effective way for each of us to personally address climate change.
    ____________________________

    EVs are a clever marketing ploy that seems logical on the surface but lacks real substance. The reality is that passenger cars contribute only about 8 %
    of global emissions—a relatively small part of the bigger problem that is being overlooked.
    ____________________________

    // What about yesterday’s announcement from the International Energy Agency (IEA) claiming that renewables can get us two-thirds of the way to
    meeting Paris climate targets by 2030, and cut global emissions by 10 billion tonnes by the decade’s end?

    It sounds impressive, but here’s the catch: it demands ‘tripling renewables and doubling efficiency targets’ in just five years. That’s an incredibly
    unrealistic goal, and arguably disingenuous. Even the IEA admits it’s a steep climb, and reaching those objectives is far from guaranteed.
    ____________________________

    Isn’t it true that EV sales have tripled since 2020? Sure, that’s accurate, but it’s misleading. New car sales are just a tiny slice of the total vehicle fleet.
    In 2023, nearly 14 million electric cars hit the roads, bringing the global total to 40 million. But 40 million is only 2.8 % of all passenger cars. By 2025,
    they’ll make up just 4% of global light vehicles, and only 7% by 2030.
    ____________________________

    Yes, wind and solar are expanding rapidly, but here’s the problem: they aren’t cutting fossil fuel use. They’re simply being layered on top of it. The growth
    in renewables isn’t displacing fossil fuels—it’s just adding to the overall energy mix.

    Unfortunately, these energy sources mostly contribute to electricity, which is only about 20% of total energy consumption. Meanwhile, coal, natural gas,
    and oil aren’t going away—they’re still growing. Natural gas will rise by 0.8% per year, oil by 0.5%, and coal by 0.4%.

    When we focus on oil consumption, the problem becomes even clearer. Global oil end use is projected to grow 0.7% annually through 2035. Fixating on
    EVs doesn’t change the larger transportation picture, which includes trucks, trains, and ships. Nor does it address the industrial sector’s energy demands.
    In fact, industrial oil use will grow at twice the rate of transportation over the next decade, and that’s where the real challenge lies.
    ____________________________

    Looking closer, most of the growth in industrial oil use is tied to plastics and chemical feedstocks. That’s a major red flag. These products aren’t just a
    climate issue—they’re causing significant health problems for humans and animals alike. We’re talking about plastics, pesticides, and endocrine-disrupting
    microplastics that are already wreaking havoc well beyond the realm of climate change.

    In reality, they’re (renewable energy, EVs) more about corporations adapting to a shifting landscape and finding new ways to make money. The climate
    angle is secondary to the business opportunities these technologies present.
    ____________________________

    The only real solution to our environmental crises—climate change being just one part—is a dramatic reduction in energy consumption.
    No amount of renewables or technological innovation will get around this hard truth: we have to use far less energy, period.

    But let’s be honest—that’s not going to happen voluntarily, any more than we’ll triple renewables and double efficiency in the next five years.
    Our growth-obsessed society simply can’t make the hard choices or accept the drop in living standards necessary for a much lower-energy
    or renewable-based economy.

    Despite clear evidence that global decarbonization is failing, we’re repeatedly told that using more renewables and buying more EVs is the answer.
    That’s a cynical delusion, completely unsupported by the data. All it really does is funnel more public money into the hands of the same corporations
    that have been exploiting consumers for decades, all while creating the illusion of progress.

    This kind of optimism provides little more than false hope, downplaying the serious, complex challenge of truly cutting carbon emissions. Instead of
    pretending we’re nearing some IEA-style “mission accomplished,” we should be bracing for the impending crisis. Electric vehicles and renewable
    energy are a distraction from the hard realities we face.

    Electric Vehicles and Renewables: Misleading Solutions to a Deeper Climate Crisis | Art Berman
    https://www.artberman.com/blog/electric-vehicles-and-renewables-misleading-solutions-to-a-deeper-climate-crisis/
    CHOSIE
    CHOSIE --- ---
    China has more than 1 billion tons/year of new coal mines in pipeline, report says
    https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/china-has-more-than-1-bln-tonsyear-new-coal-mines-pipeline-report-says-2024-09-10/
    China developing 1.28 bln tons of coal mining capacity
    Chinese mines in progress more than half global pipeline
    35% of projects in pipeline under construction
    Current large-scale capacity is 3.88 mln metric tons/year
    China responsible for 70% of coal mine methane emissions
    YMLADRIS
    YMLADRIS --- ---
    #dopady

    povodne v pakistanu, hlad. Je mi 14, měla jsem radost že se budu vdávat. Myslela jsem že dostanu rtěnku a šaty. Ale manžel nemá práci a můj život je ještě horší než dřív (s půlročním kojencem). Rodina žije za dolar na den, za nevěstu dostane třeba 720 dolarů, jenže ženich to pořídil na dluh a nemá z čeho splácet

    "We would expect to see an 18 percent increase in the prevalence of child marriage, equivalent to erasing five years of progress," it said in a report after the 2022 floods.

    Dildar Ali Sheikh, 31, had planned to marry off his eldest daughter Mehtab while living in an aid camp after being displaced by the floods.

    "When I was there, I thought to myself 'we should get our daughter married so at least she can eat and have basic facilities'," the daily wage labourer told AFP.

    Mehtab was just 10 years old.

    "The night I decided to get her married, I couldn't sleep," said her mother, Sumbal Ali Sheikh, who was 18 when she married.

    An intervention from the NGO Sujag Sansar led to the wedding being postponed, and Mehtab was enrolled in a sewing workshop, allowing her to earn a small income while continuing her education.

    But when the monsoon rains fall, she is overcome by dread that her promised wedding will also arrive.

    How Extreme Weather Is Leading To Rise In Child Marriages In Pakistan
    https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/how-extreme-weather-is-leading-to-rise-in-child-marriages-in-pakistan-6347952
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    YMLADRIS: Mozna te spatne chapu, ale tak imho tam dlouho jsme. Napriklad viz RCP a pozdeji SSP scenare IPCC.

    Shared Socioeconomic Pathways - Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_Socioeconomic_Pathways

    Plus IPCC ma k tomu nekolik 2 tisice stran dlouhou zpravu, to mi prijde celkem dost

    Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change
    The Working Group III report provides an updated global assessment of climate change mitigation progress and pledges, and examines the sources of global emissions. It explains developments in emission reduction and mitigation efforts, assessing the impact of national climate pledges in relation to long-term emissions goals.

    https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_FullReport.pdf
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam