• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    TUHODezinformace o klimatu // Rage Against the Fossil Machine
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Frank Luntz

    There’s a Better Way to Talk About Environmental Issues
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mT4cXt9TbPY
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Ever wonder what caused Global Warming Skepticism? Then meet Frank Luntz.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=py2L7UY06kQ
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Predsatvuju Franka Luntze - experta republikanu na komunikaci - ktery jim doporucil pouzivat "energy exporation" misto "oil drilling" a "climate chagne" misto "global warming" :) A taky, ze musi sirit pochybnosti o vede, dokud to jde. Nakonec otocil, ale v pozaru Skirmish fire v Kalifornii mu stejne shorel barak

    Frank Luntz created the term Climate Change
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-b1GCZWQF-M
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Paul N. Edwards. Doporucuju kazdymu, ktery ma zajem o historii kliamticky vedy. Ten clovek je kral.

    Both trust in climate knowledge and the truth it delivers descend from the organizational routines and truces necessary to share and maintain climate data. Starting in the 1990s, such routines and truces came under concerted attack. Mirroring trends in the larger society, an audit culture arose that sought to open the black boxes of scientific processes from positions outside the established boundaries of disciplinary expertise. Today, climate knowledge infrastructures are threatened by an American administration hostile to the very concept of anthropogenic climate change. It seeks to eliminate key instruments, de-fund climate data analysis and other research, rewrite the rules of peer review, and privatize the collection of Earth science data. These shifts target the chain of evidence regarding climate change, the stability of the peer review system, and the climate research funding paradigm in place since the 1950s. Virtually all scientific knowledge of public concern may be affected by this transformation.

    Knowledge infrastructures under siege | 2 | Climate data as memory, tr
    https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/oa-edit/10.4324/9781315167305-2/knowledge-infrastructures-siege-paul-edwards
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Abstract
    Action to tackle the complex and divisive issue of climate change will be strongly influenced by public perception. Online social media and associated social networks are an increasingly important forum for public debate and are known to influence individual attitudes and behaviours – yet online discussions and social networks related to climate change are not well understood. Here we construct several forms of social network for users communicating about climate change on the popular microblogging platform Twitter. We classify user attitudes to climate change based on message content and find that social networks are characterised by strong attitude-based homophily and segregation into polarised “sceptic” and “activist” groups. Most users interact only with like-minded others, in communities dominated by a single view. However, we also find mixed-attitude communities in which sceptics and activists frequently interact. Messages between like-minded users typically carry positive sentiment, while messages between sceptics and activists carry negative sentiment. We identify a number of general patterns in user behaviours relating to engagement with alternative views. Users who express negative sentiment are themselves the target of negativity. Users in mixed-attitude communities are less likely to hold a strongly polarised view, but more likely to express negative sentiment towards other users with differing views. Overall, social media discussions of climate change often occur within polarising “echo chambers”, but also within “open forums”, mixed-attitude communities that reduce polarisation and stimulate debate. Our results have implications for public engagement with this important global challenge.

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378015000369
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    TUHO: Pokornymu vysel v MF Dnes otevreny dopis, publikoval mj Neviditelny pes (nase dezinfo stalice)

    "Podle ní za globální oteplování mohou jen zvyšující se atmosférické koncentrace CO2, a to přesto, že z podrobnějších výsledků ledovcových analýz za posledních 420 tis. let vyplynula opačná příčinná závislost (koncentrace CO2 se zvyšovala až po zvýšení teploty).
    Je třeba naplno říci, že obrácení příčinných souvislostí a označení emisí CO2 za hlavní příčinu globálního oteplování se nezakládá na žádných vědecky naměřených datech, nýbrž je to pouhá neprokázaná hypotéza, založená na korelaci mezi globální teplotou a koncentrací CO2. Tím, že se této hypotézy chopili v Mezivládním panelu pro změnu klimatu (IPCC) a pomocí klimatických modelů, založených ovšem na nedokázaném příčinném vztahu, že růst emisí CO2 povede k růstu oteplování, začalo období strašení lidí a tím i získávání výzkumných prostředků na neopodstatněný výzkum."


    - tyve uz asi dvacet let omylana kravina, o tom, ze CO2 nezpusobuje otepleni. bullshit - ten vztah je oboustrannej (zesilujici zpetny vazby) - kdyz se exogenne zvedne teplota, zvysuje se obsah co2 a ten zvysuje teplotu... pak zas nastoupej jiny stabilizujici zpetny vazby... ale vyvozovat z toho, ze co2 nezvysuje teplotu je nekde na urovni flat earth society

    CO2 lags temperature - what does it mean?
    https://skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature-intermediate.htm

    KLIMA: Globální změnu zkoumejme vědecky, ne ideologicky - Neviditelný pes
    https://neviditelnypes.lidovky.cz/klima/klima-globalni-zmenu-zkoumejme-vedecky-ne-ideologicky.A221024_170042_p_klima_nef

    No a kdyz se koukneme do jejich vyrocnich zprav, tak mam pocit, ze tusim odkud vitr vane...

    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Jan Pokorny a skryty anti-vodni satanismus IPCC

    "Otocil se ke me clovek a rika - to sis vymyslel, to je cislo dablovo 666! No ne, skutecne kdyz si to najdete, je to cislo dablovo" :))

    Gigantický klimatický podvod a řešení pro planetu Zemi
    https://youtu.be/FMFQg1w6km0?t=980


    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    z tech ilustraci uz nemuzu fakt, guardian

    Screenshot-20221026-222841-Chrome
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Neumi mi nekdo otevrit tohodle Kaisera prosim? :)

    Šokující studie klimaskeptika: měřící stanice teplot jsou na špatných místech - Echo24.cz
    https://echo24.cz/a/SmfFy/studie-klimaskeptik-watts-merici-stanice-tepla-na-spatnych-mistech-tepelne-ostrovy
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Tohle je taky slusny (btw Oriental Review je zdroj zrejme spravovany ruskyma tajnyma sluzbama)


    The Genocidal Roots of the Green New Deal: The Limits to Growth and the Unchaining of Prometheus – OrientalReview.org
    https://orientalreview.org/2019/07/31/the-genocidal-roots-of-the-green-new-deal-the-limits-to-growth-and-the-unchaining-of-prometheus/
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    #lomborg

    In this major assessment of leading climate-change skeptic Bjørn Lomborg, Howard Friel meticulously deconstructs the Danish statistician’s claim that global warming is “no catastrophe” by exposing the systematic misrepresentations and partial accounting that are at the core of climate skepticism. His detailed analysis serves not only as a guide to reading the global warming skeptics, but also as a model for assessing the state of climate science. With attention to the complexities of climate-related phenomena across a range of areas—from Arctic sea ice to the Antarctic ice sheet—The Lomborg Deception also offers readers an enlightening review of some of today’s most urgent climate concerns.

    Friel’s book is the first to respond directly to Lomborg’s controversial research as published in The Skeptical Environmentalist (2001) and Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist’s Guide to Global Warming (2007). His close reading of Lomborg’s textual claims and supporting footnotes reveals a lengthy list of findings that will rock climate skeptics and their allies in the government and news media, demonstrating that the published peer-reviewed climate science, as assessed mainly by the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, has had it mostly right—even if somewhat conservatively right—all along. Friel’s able defense of Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth against Lomborg’s repeated attacks is by itself worth an attentive reading.

    The Lomborg Deception
    https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300171280/the-lomborg-deception/
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    JunkScience: investigating pseudoscience disinformation in the Russian Internet Research Agency tweets

    Recent research has identified anti-vaccination propaganda in the so-called Russian Troll Tweets strongly associated with the 2016 US Presidential election. This study builds on this: hypothesising that if vaccination content was found in the sample, the Russia Tweets would be likely to contain other science content, and perhaps, similar pseudo or anti-science messages. As well as vaccination, climate change, genetically modified organisms, Ebola, flat Earth beliefs (flat Earthism) and Zika were found in the Russia tweets. Genetically modified organisms and flat Earthism appear to have been camouflage content - tweeted at similar rates to other Twitter users - while climate change, Ebola, Zika and vaccination appear to have been emphasised beyond the background rate for strategic disinformation purposes.

    Library Genesis • scientific articles
    http://libgen.rs/scimag/10.1177%2F0963662520935071
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Diplomka o klimaskepsi v ceske politice
    „VĚTŠINĚ LIDÍ GLOBÁLNÍ OTEPLOVÁNÍ NEVADÍ“: KLIMASKEPSE V ČESKÉ POLITICE MEZI ROKY 2018–2021

    https://dspace.cuni.cz/bitstream/handle/20.500.11956/150474/120394760.pdf?sequence=1
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    TADEAS: Ja mam ale trochu problem, ze nemam zadnou akademickou afiliaci (a nesnasim psani proposalu :))
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TUHO: grantuj
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Climate Social Science Network Announces Climate Obstruction Research Grant Recipients

    Climate Social Science Network Announces Climate Obstruction Research Grant Recipients
    https://cssn.org/climate-social-science-network-announces-climate-obstruction-research-grant-recipients-2/
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Jeremy Walker
    takes us back to the origins of “fossil neoliberalism” in the 1930s, when links between the Australian economist Torleiv Hytten and the Australian members of the heavily thermoindustrial International Chamber of Commerce were developed. Hytten was invited to the first meeting of the Mont Pelerin Society and became the fi rst Australian member in 1951. He worked closely with the fi rst neoliberal Australian think tank, the Institute of Public Aff airs, founded in 1943 to oppose the Labor Party agenda. Another global dimension is uncovered in the history of the Murdoch media empire, which also originated in Australia. Although not in agreement with neoliberal agendas from the beginning, Murdoch developed a close alliance with fossil capital in the 1970s to oppose the resource-nationalist agenda of the short-lived Whitlam Labor government. The extraordinary mobilization of resources to defeat strong ecological and nationalization agendas in the primary sector explains the number of neoliberal business activists, think tanks, and dedicated commercial consultancies organized from the 1970s onward in Australia. A self-described “greenhouse mafi a” relies on old think tanks such as the Institute of Public Aff airs and on new ones, such as the somewhat more conciliatory Centre for Independent Studies, which emphasizes economic approaches to all policy questions, rather thandenying climate change. Walker points to the dramatic increase of Australian vulnerability in the face of climate change–related fi res and droughts, which at some point in the future may be considered indicators of the Pyrrhic victories won by fossil neoliberalism in Australia since the 1970s.

    Kapitolka

    Market Civilizations | Princeton University Press
    https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9781942130673/market-civilizations
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    In this event hosted by Naomi Oreskes and Geoffrey Supran, of Harvard University, top researchers of corporate deception discuss widening the lens of climate accountability beyond oil and gas companies to include multiple other industries and enablers. Hosted by climate journalist Amy Westervelt. An audio version of this discussion is also available on the podcast Drilled.

    Accountability for the Deception Industry
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rs6F0mASHWc&t=1s
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam