• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    TUHOKlimaticka zmena / Thank you so much for ruining my day
    PER2
    PER2 --- ---
    TADEAS: ty to mozna delas pro dobro veci a budes z toho mit nejaky promile te castky, nekdo kdo to chce vysat si pripravi lepsi projekt, pac papir snese vsechno ;) nic to nemeni na tom, ze dotace jsou zlo, jakekoliv
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    PER2: treba ja, jestli tam nebudou nejaky nejaky dementni podminky
    AIM_FREEMAN
    AIM_FREEMAN --- ---
    TADEAS: made my morning angerpression.
    (můj nový hybrid depresivně laděného naštvání)
    PER2
    PER2 --- ---
    TADEAS: kazda kapka na rozkradeni se pocita, je uplne jedno na co dotace jdou, par lidi se na to uz urcite klepe ;)
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    PER2: agrobaronum se posila rocne 40 procent rozpoctu EU, takze kapka v mori
    PER2
    PER2 --- ---
    TADEAS: ah 100 milionu na rozkradeni, fer :D
    TADEAS: porad cekam na nejakou organizaci ve stylu "Army of the Twelve Monkeys" a kdy nejaka vlada aktivisty prohlasi za teroristy :)
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    EU pošle 100 milionů na rozvoj agrolesnictví v Česku. Bojuje tak s klimatickou změnou | Hospodářské noviny (HN.cz)
    https://archiv.hn.cz/c1-67050390-eu-posle-100-milionu-na-rozvoj-agrolesnictvi-v-cesku-bojuje-tak-s-klimatickou-zmenou

    V roce 2019 pak vznikla při ministerstvu zemědělství pracovní skupina pro agrolesnictví, ve které v současné době finalizujeme podobu opatření na investiční podporu pro zakládání agrolesnických systémů. Měla by se rozběhnout v příštím roce v rámci Programu rozvoje venkova, který patří do Společné zemědělské politiky EU,“ vysvětluje Lojka.

    Agrolesnictví není zatím v českém zemědělství oficiálně definováno a nepobírá ani žádnou finanční podporu. I proto nemohou agrolesníci komerčně využívat stromy pěstované na svých pozemcích.

    Od roku 2023 je plánována podpora pro založení 900 ha agrolesnických systémů v objemu větším než 3,9 milionu eur.
    Následná péče o založený agrolesnický systém bude podporována částkou ve výši téměř 754 eur na 1 ha po dobu pěti let.

    Plánována je podpora pro založení 900 hektarů agrolesnických systémů v objemu téměř čtyř milionů eur (101 milionů korun, pozn. red.). Tedy každý agrolesník dostane do začátku na první rok na výsadbu a založení více než čtyři tisíce eur. Následná péče bude podporována částkou 754 eur (19 tisíc korun, pozn. red.) na jeden hektar po dobu pěti let. Podpora by měla začít na jaře 2023.

    „Agrolesnické systémy mají v porovnání se standardním zemědělstvím velmi příznivé environmentální benefity a mohou přispět k tlumení klimatických extrémů. Reagují tak na jeden z aktuálních cílů Společné zemědělské politiky EU,“ dodává Bílý.

    V roce 2023 by se zároveň pojem agrolesnictví měl stát oficiálně uznávaným zemědělským názvem a stromy v agrolesnických systémech by zemědělci mohli začít komerčně využívat. To teď ještě nemohou. „Nyní stromy nemůžeme pokácet a prodat na dřevo, protože v současném stavu je máme zapsané jako krajinné prvky, které se nesmí porušit. V agrolesnickém systému už se bude počítat i s výnosem ze dřeva,“ pochvaluje si zemědělec Pitek

    Větší zemědělské podniky se ovšem do agrolesnické produkce v nejbližší době zřejmě nepřipojí. „Nevíme o středním či větším zemědělském podniku, který by se do dotačního titulu podpora agrolesnictví chtěl zapojit,“ říká mluvčí Zemědělského svazu ČR Vladimír Pícha. Svaz sdružuje převážně větší zemědělská družstva. „Agrolesnictví nezavrhujeme, jde o jednu z alternativ, ale pro produkční zemědělce nepůjde o důležitý směr,“ konstatuje Pícha.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Seven new oil and gas projects approved since IPCC report called for an end to fossil fuels | Euronews
    https://www.euronews.com/green/2022/04/10/seven-new-oil-and-gas-projects-approved-since-ipcc-report-called-for-an-end-to-fossil-fuel
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Anna Šabatová

    Podepsala jsem výzvu vládě, aby rozhodla o ukončení nákupu plynu a ropy z Ruska.

    Strašlivá válka na chvíli možná vytlačila z našich úvah hlubokou krizi klimatickou a dramaticky zamíchala kartami.

    Odvážná vláda by se neměla bát spojit odpověď na válečnou i klimatickou krizi v jedno zásadní rozhodnutí: vykročit směrem k ekologicko sociální transformaci naší závislosti na fosilních palivech.

    Sociálně citlivá vláda přitom musí stále myslet na sociálně slabší část populace a podpořit ji zřetelně a výrazně, tak, aby se transformace neděla na její úkor.
    Dokáže být česká vláda odvážná a zároveň i sociálně citlivá?

    Dopis vládě ČR s požadavkem na zastavení dodávek ropy a plynu z Ruska - Petice.com
    https://www.petice.com/dopis_vlad_r_s_poadavkem_na_zastaveni_dodavek_ropy_a_plynu_z_ruska
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    politika bilkovin

    IPES food | REPORT | The Politics of Protein
    http://www.ipes-food.org/pages/politicsofprotein

    A major new report by IPES-Food, The Politics of Protein: Examining claims about livestock, fish, ‘alternative proteins’ and sustainability, sheds light on misleading generalisations that dominate public discussion about meat and protein, and warns of the risks of falling for meat techno-fixes.

    Big meat, dairy and seafood companies are fast rolling out a range of technologies - such as plant-based alternatives, lab-grown meat, and precision livestock and fish-farming - with the backing of governments worldwide.

    IPES-Food warns that a number of misleading claims dominate public discussion about meat and protein, leading to a disproportionate focus on ‘protein’, a systematic failure to account for differences between production systems and world regions — and ultimately to the wrong solutions.

    Op-ed: Fake Meat Won’t Solve the Climate Crisis | Civil Eats
    https://civileats.com/2022/04/07/op-ed-fake-meat-wont-solve-the-climate-crisis/

    the idea that these alternative proteins can save the planet is highly speculative. These claims are based on a narrow assessment of which products can deliver the most protein for the least CO2. But that doesn’t tell the whole story. Products like the Impossible Burger and Beyond Burger source their ingredients from chemical-intensive (and therefore fossil fuel-intensive) monocultures and rely on heavy processing—all of which has major impacts on human health, biodiversity, and climate change.

    Factory farming clearly has huge impacts of its own, but the environmental and social impacts of livestock vary massively. In some parts of the world, raising animals helps to use limited land and resources efficiently, buffer against food shocks, and provide livelihoods where few options are available. Livestock contributes to the livelihoods of 1.7 billion smallholder farmers in the Global South, and plays a crucial economic role for approximately 60 percent of rural households in developing countries.

    Highly processed alternative proteins may therefore be more harmful than animal source foods in some contexts, depending on how they are produced.

    the idea that these products can “disrupt” the status quo and challenge the power of the corporate food industry is highly misleading. Start-ups may have initiated the boom, but nearly all of the world’s meat and dairy giants have now rolled out their own “fake meats” or bought up existing players. Nestlé, for example, has acquired Sweet Earth, while Unilever has bought up The Vegetarian Butcher. JBS, the world’s largest meat processor, has snapped up another market-leading meat-free brand, Vivera, adding to its portfolio of more than 100 brands—including organic meat lines
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    don't look up / just stop oil

    Miranda Whelehan | ITV | Good Morning Britain | 11 April 2022 | Just Stop Oil
    https://youtu.be/O6T-iwy0bOU


    Screenshot-20220413-225833-Facebook
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    novej smil byl?


    How the World Really Works
    https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/319/319141/how-the-world-really-works/9780241454398.html

    In this ambitious and thought-provoking book we see, for example, that globalization isn't inevitable - the perils of allowing 70 per cent of the world's rubber gloves to be made in just one factory became glaringly obvious in 2020 - and that our societies have been steadily increasing their dependence on fossil fuels, making their complete and rapid elimination unlikely. For example, each greenhouse-grown supermarket-bought tomato requires the equivalent of five tablespoons of diesel oil for its production; and we still lack any commercially viable ways of making steel, ammonia, cement or plastics on the scale required globally without fossil fuels.

    Vaclav Smil is neither a pessimist nor an optimist, he is a scientist; he is the world-leading expert on energy and an astonishing polymath. This is his magnum opus and a continuation of his quest to make facts matter. Drawing on the latest science, including his own fascinating research, and tackling sources of misinformation head on - from Yuval Noah Harari to Noam Chomsky - ultimately Smil answers the most profound question of our age: are we irrevocably doomed or is a brighter utopia ahead? Compelling, data-rich and revisionist, this wonderfully broad, interdisciplinary masterpiece finds faults with both extremes. Looking at the world through this quantitative lens reveals hidden truths that change the way we see our past, present and uncertain future.



    How long can humans survive? - UnHerd
    https://unherd.com/2022/01/how-long-can-humans-survive/

    Smil identifies these four basic pillars of human civilisation as steel, cement, plastic and ammonia. Producing them takes enormous amounts of fossil fuels. It takes, for instance, 25 gigajoules of energy to produce one ton of steel, roughly twice the amount of energy used by the average UK household per year. In 2019, the world used 1.8 billion tons of steel; its production is responsible for about 8% of the world’s total carbon emissions. But we can’t do without it: the frameworks of our cities are built of it; the pipes we send our water and gas through, too. Our cars, our transporter ships, our knives and cooking pots. Our machines for making all these things. Cement and plastic are similarly vital, and are responsible for comparable amounts of our total carbon output. We can’t do without them, and there’s no easy carbon-free alternative way of making them

    And then there’s ammonia, which rarely features in any conversation about cutting carbon emissions.
    ...
    It requires huge amounts of energy, and hydrogen, usually taken from natural gas. We now spread hundreds of millions of tons of ammonia on our fields — about 50% of the total nitrogen going into food production comes from it. Smil quotes an author, writing in 1971: “industrial man no longer eats potatoes made from solar energy; now he eats potatoes partly made of oil.”

    This means the world is able to eat. The share of the global population that is underfed has plummeted, even as the actual population has ballooned – about 65% of people could not get enough to eat in 1950, compared to about 9% in 2019. So, “in 1950 the world was able to supply adequate food to about 890 million people,” as Smil puts it: “but by 2019 that had risen to just over 7 billion”. That is not entirely down to ammonia, but ammonia is a large part of the story. If fertiliser were removed, perhaps half the world’s population would starve.

    Agriculture, then, depends on the whalefall: the glut of energy provided by fossil fuels. Our deep reliance on fossil fuels, to create materials most of us don’t appreciate we need, is unnerving. Especially when Smil points out that much of the world — notably, sub-Saharan Africa — lives on well below average levels of energy use. Africa uses just 5% of the world’s total ammonia supplies, despite having almost 25% of the population. About 40% of the world — 3.1 billion people — has a per capita energy supply “no higher than the rate achieved in both Germany and France in 1860”. “In order to approach the threshold of a dignified standard of living,” writes Smil, “those 3.1 billion people will need at least to double — but preferably triple — their per capita energy use.”

    Can we do that while also reducing our carbon emissions? Not fast, says Smil. For all the boasts and pledges — all the “government targets for years ending in zero or five”, about which Smil is very sniffy — the world relies too heavily on fossil fuels, for too many things, to rapidly stop using them.

    ...

    We need to wean ourselves off fossil fuels, and the sooner the better. But it will be a long and difficult job — as Smil demonstrates, they are threaded through our society at every level, entwined like knotweed in the systems that provide our food, our housing, our machinery, our transport. We forget how complex our society is until it stops working in some way — as when supply chains broke down in the pandemic and our hospitals ran out of rubber gloves (an issue Smil talks about in a section on globalisation). As it stands, if we were to reduce fossil fuel consumption by the sort of degrees that some demand, it would lead to disaster, because we haven’t unpicked the threads yet.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    disruptive protest

    Thread by @berglund_oscar on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App
    https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1513626228858802176.html

    Disruptive protest is by far the easiest way to get media attention. March through a town with a thousand people and nobody will care. Block a road, occupy an important building or important infrastructure and the media is much more likely to engage.

    Disruptive protest provokes and creates tension. It polarises. It pushes some people away whilst pulling others towards the cause, to care more, to engage or just to become more aware.

    But disruptive protest is very very rarely counterproductive. It does not turn people against its cause. Nobody who cares about climate change stops caring because of some annoying protestors. People don’t work like that even if they pretend to.

    Protests are rarely popular with the majority but still often further the cause. That doesn’t mean that being unpopular is unproblematic. We also need a broad and diverse climate movement and people don’t want to join one if all their friends will think they are dicks.

    Direct action can get direct results. Achievable demands are good. If not immediately achievable, it’s good if demands are clear & make sense to people. Insulating homes & stopping new fossil fuel projects are better demands than ‘telling the truth’ or ‘acting now’.

    It matters what your target is. Blocking the M25 gets you in the papers but its relationship to insulating homes is otherwise non-existent. That means that there are no partial wins beyond getting to talk about insulation on TV.

    If your target is the thing you are trying to stop, then you’ve already won something by causing disruption. The fossil fuel industry is the enemy of humanity so disrupting it is inherently worthwhile even without policy change. It makes fossil fuels a little less profitable.

    Don’t get arrested for the sake of it. Don’t call the cops on yourself. It looks terrible and privileged and like it’s all a theatre. It’s harder to get people’s sympathy if you’ve done something otherwise pointless just in order to get arrested.

    If you’re going to get arrested, make it count. Block an oil refinery, occupy a museum receiving oil money, occupy a bank funding oil. When the cops come it will be clear who they’re there to protect. Not people, but the profit of the forces that are destroying the world.

    At its best, direct action brings to light the unholy trinity of the fossil fuel industry, the financial sector and the state with all its repressive forces that are all driving us towards climate disasters.

    The best data for this is in @djbailey231’s dataset that shows what he calls militant protest to sometimes achieve its goals whereas non-militant protest pretty much never achieve its goals

    This is part of XR original strategy and draws on US civil resistance literature, not least Engler & Engler’s ‘This is an uprising’

    Also from Engler & Engler ‘This is an uprising’ but I draw this conclusion from looking at opinion polls about the protests themselves (unpopular) & the policies they support (popular). Case by case basically.

    My own book ‘Extinction Rebellion and Climate Change Activism’ has plenty on this point.

    Anarchist direct action literature is useful here. Graeber etc. also referenced in my book on XR
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    2020

    Extinction Rebellion and Climate Change Activism | SpringerLink
    https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-48359-3
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    https://twitter.com/JustStop_Oil/status/1513528586115989504

    Episode 2 - How to Disable a Tanker

    For those willing to join in civil resistance against our government. A govt willing to sacrifice the existence of organized human life, not in the distant future, for money.
    PER2
    PER2 --- ---
    haha, lidstvo je tak mrtvy

    dont look up 2
    Richard Madeley Clashes With Climate Activist In Fiery Oil Protest Debate | Good Morning Britain
    https://youtu.be/-M0jRaOOkT8
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    R Hallam
    https://twitter.com/RogerHallamCS21/status/1513914490177437708?s=19

    "This March was #India's hottest in 122 years, with a severe heatwave scorching significant swathes of the country throughout the month."
    I met a world expert a while ago who predicted that Indian wheat production will be halved by 2030.

    It is a well known fact in such circles that India is likely to be the first country to experience the first human "mass mortality event". Where is the spirit of Gandhi in the land of his birth?

    Delhi Swelters In Severe Heatwave, Records Hottest Day Of The Year
    https://news.abplive.com/news/india/delhi-swelters-in-severe-heatwave-records-hottest-day-of-the-year-1524628
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    XR CZ
    https://fb.watch/cmnO98ZRo3/

    Členové hnutí Extinction Rebellion zastavili blokády dopravy probíhající v uplynulých dvou týdnech v centru Prahy v rámci kampaně 3 °C pro Ukrajinu - 3 °C for Ukraine. Reagují tak na komentář ministra vnitra Víta Rakušana. Ten se v pátek pro cnn.prima vyjádřil, že by podle něj bylo „lepší vést diskuzi jinak, než někde na ulici mezi auty.” Aktivisté se nyní na Rakušana obracejí s výzvou, aby se s nimi setkal při diskuzi o závislosti České republiky na dovozu plynu z Ruska.

    „Už tři roky nechceme nic jiného, než reálnou diskuzi s politiky o tom, jak budou postupovat při ukončení naší závislosti na fosilních palivech. Nyní je tato otázka ještě urgentnější, protože i díky našim nákupům ruského plynu a fosilních paliv obecně umírají na Ukrajině nevinní lidé. Podle evropské diplomacie jsme na pomoc Ukrajině z EU dali již více než 1 miliardu EUR. Stejný objem peněz ale platíme za každý další den Putinovi za fosilní paliva. Taková situace je morálně neobhajitelná,“ vyjádřila se mluvčí Rebelie Veronika Holcnerová.

    V rámci kampaně blokovali protestující osmkrát dopravu na různých místech v centru Prahy. Několikrát se setkali s agresí ze strany řidičů a vyslechli si ostrou kritiku.

    Cílem kampaně 3 °C pro Ukrajinu - 3 °C for Ukraine bylo přesvědčit vládu, aby nařídila snížení teploty vytápění komerčních a kancelářských prostor a škol alespoň po zbytek topné sezóny na zákonem dané teplotní minimum. K takovému kroku vláda doposud nepřistoupila. Evropský parlament však mezitím schválil rezoluci vyzývající k úplnému zákazu dovozu fosilních paliv z Ruska.

    “Věříme, že ministr vnitra dostojí svým vlastním slovům a ukáže, že je ochoten vstoupit s námi do diskuze. Nestojíme tu sami za sebe, ale i ve jménu lidí na Ukrajině a s přesvědčením, že snížením spotřeby plynu zároveň napomůžeme zmírnění klimatické krize a zachráníme mnohé životy, které jí jinak v padnou v budoucnu za oběť,” dodala Holcnerová.

    Skupina pro tuto chvíli blokády ukončila, zároveň ale potvrdili, že toto není konec jejich aktivit a v podobných kampaních hodlají v budoucnu pokračovat, jen ve větším měřítku.

    --------------------------

    Zdroje:

    - https://cnn.iprima.cz/jdi-se-vykoupat-do-vltavy-vole-ridice-znovu-namichli-aktiviste-lezici-na-silnici-89668
    - https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/apr/08/slugs-ban-european-flights-cities-car-use-hurt-putin-russia-oil-gas-income-report

    - https://www.novinky.cz/valka-na-ukrajine/clanek/zadny-rusky-plyn-ropu-ani-uhli-okamzite-vyzval-evropsky-parlament-clenske-staty-40393147
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Apolena Rychlíková: Klimatická krize je největším globálním ohrožením. Nevkusné aktivity českých Extinction Rebellion od ní pozornost odpoutávají | Plus
    https://plus.rozhlas.cz/apolena-rychlikova-klimaticka-krize-je-nejvetsim-globalnim-ohrozenim-nevkusne-8722555

    Na rozdíl od XR ale ty jejich nejsou nikdy namířeny proti lidem, nikoho neohrožují, spíše míří přímo na fosilní průmysl či korporace, které na klimatické krizi vydělávají, či instituce, které dostatečně důrazně nejednají.

    vs.


    YMLADRIS:
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    rethink shit

    Backed-up pipes, stinky yards: Climate change is wrecking septic tanks
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2022/04/12/backed-up-pipes-stinky-yards-climate-change-is-wrecking-septic-tanks/

    As climate change intensifies, septic failures are emerging as a vexing issue for local governments. For decades, flushing a toilet and making wastewater disappear was a convenience that didn't warrant a second thought. No longer. From Miami to Minnesota, septic systems are failing, posing threats to clean water, ecosystems and public health.

    About 20 percent of U.S. households rely on septic, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Many systems are clustered in coastal areas that are experiencing relative sea-level rise, including around Boston and New York. Nearly half of New England homes depend on them. Florida hosts 2.6 million systems. Of the 120,000 in Miami-Dade County, more than half of them fail to work properly at some point during the year, helping to fuel deadly algae blooms in Biscayne Bay, home to the nation’s only underwater national park. The cost to convert those systems into a central sewer plant would be more than $4 billion.
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam