TUHO: Decarbonization efforts and sustainability transformations represent highly contested socio-political projects. Yet, they often encounter various forms of depoliticization. This article illuminates how a grand socio-ecological challenge like the energy transition gets depoliticized by an unusual suspect, namely Germany's Green Party. Based on a qualitative content analysis of Green Party programs, party conventions, and additional documents published between 1980 and 2021, this article traces how the Green Party has depoliticized the energy transition over time, emphasizing a shift from radical societal change to ecological modernization. The changing stance of the German Greens on the country's energy transition reflects more profound changes of a future society the party collectively envisions through their energy and climate change agenda. These changes result from a struggle between moderates advocating incremental political reforms and radicals aiming for more fundamental and systemic societal change. By merging sustainability transition research with science and technology studies, this article makes a twofold contribution: First, it proposes a conceptual framework to investigate social and political futures envisioned through energy and climate politics. Second, the article empirically demonstrates the long process of depoliticization for an unusual but critical case. Germany's Green Party has embraced a technocentric vision of the energy transition, thereby suppressing earlier notions of broader societal change, such as anti-capitalism and energy democracy. This article spells out implications for the wider field of energy and climate politics and concludes with suggestions for future research.

O půdě pozemské i té vnitřní (mikrobiom) mluví dobře dr Bush. Na cestě od mikrobuněčného výzkumu rakoviny až k průmyslovému využití glyfosfátů a jejich všudypřitomnost, vypráví krásný nový příběh, který má sílu proměňovat.

GMOs, Glyphosate & Gut Health
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWgnkgYtqnw

TADEAS: pricina a dusledek nejsou vzdy tak jednoznacny, jak by se mohlo zdat, nicmene s druhym odstavcem souhlasim, klimaticka otazka vyzaduje multidisciplinarni odpovedi ÷)

PALEONTOLOG: prezentace o regenerativnim zemedelstvi jsou limitovany klimatem mysli naslouchajicich i prezentujicich, protoze typicky uplne preskakujiu tema te syatemišůčnosti, zpusobu rozhodovani v (eko)systemu, atd. jede se a-systemicky uvazovani ala pricina a dusledek. :) nepisu to primarne pro tebe, spis varuju ostatni pred tebou zde predkladanym zpusobem uvazovani a jednani :)

pokud je predmetem studia takovy system, kde clovek pusobi tak, ze to vede k podporeni procesu vzniku biomasy+nekromasy pudy (od fotosyntezy ke stsbilnim formam uhliku v pude), tak aby se toto dalo studovat, musi to take existovat, probihat. muze to byt zcasti v domene pedologie, z jinych casti to bude v domene vedy o systemech.

PALEONTOLOG: "co jde" muze vyzkoumat veda na zaklade toho, ze to nekdo udelal, at uz v zavislosti nebo nezavisle na nejakem typu vědění.

tema je management systémů, podtema je management ekosystemu, napr. ekosystemu pudy. "regenerace", regenerativita muze byt kontext cloveka, ktery ten management vykonava, uplatnuje svou agency vuci tomu systemu. ten kontext, definice toho co chce a jak toho dosahuje je klicova pro ty rozhodnuti.

"hospodaření"/management neni veda. existuje urcite veda/vedeni o managementu systémů, potazmo o regenerativnim managementu ekosystemu.

"regenerativni zpusob hospodareni neni vhodnej pro XY" -- regenerace muze byt kontext pro management toho daneho eko/systemu, neexistuje nic jako "regenerativni zpusob hospodareni" ve smyslu nejaky dokola uplatnovany sady praktik. to je predstava traktoristy se zakladkou .]

MATT:

2023 Microbial solutions to soil carbon sequestration
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652623021510

PALEONTOLOG: tak nekomu neco unika, s tim souhlasim :)

PALEONTOLOG: temer paradigmaticke otazky.