• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    TUHOKlimaticka zmena / Thank you so much for ruining my day
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    #China

    Little over a decade ago, China was strongly arguing against reducing the emissions being caused by its booming, coal-fuelled economic growth. Instead, it said rich, developed nations should be leading the way.
    Speaking to a diverse range of experts within China and beyond, Carbon Brief has learned that Xi has personally played “the most important role” in this shift in views.
    Below, Carbon Brief describes nine key moments over the past two decades that have helped to influence China’s attitudinal change.
    These moments – many of which have not been widely reported before – do not include the more obvious important incidents, such as Xi becoming China’s leader in 2012, or China ratifying the Paris Agreement in 2016.

    Analysis: Nine key moments that changed China’s mind about climate change - Carbon Brief
    https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-nine-key-moments-that-changed-chinas-mind-about-climate-change
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    modlit se za klima


    COP26: Why The UN Climate Conference Matters Like Never Before
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidrvetter/2021/10/22/with-one-week-till-cop26-climate-talks-experts-set-out-whats-at-stake/?sh=19fa74eb585d

    Rockstrom:

    “The message to take to Glasgow is that the science has never been so clear: that every tenth of a degree matters, and that 1.5 is for real,” explains Johan Rockström, professor and director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany.

    “At 1.5 degrees we're telling our kids that we, the adults who are in charge of Earth now, are handing over the planet in a less liveable state for all future generations,” he adds.

    Rockström delivers these words calmly, in measured tones. As one of the most influential climate scientists working today, he isn’t a man readily inclined to dramatic turns of phrase. So when he talks like this, the effect is alarming.

    “That’s where we are,” he continues. “That’s why we talk about a climate emergency. I mean, academics don't like those kinds of words, but we are forced to use them today because now it's a crunch moment.”

    Rockström points to the UN’s latest synthesis report, released September 17, which indicates that, with all countries’ current climate commitments taken into account, the world is currently on a trajectory to warm by 2.7 degrees Celsius by the end of the century.

    “I barely even want to talk about 2.7 degrees,” Rockström says. “If we go beyond 2 degrees it’s very likely that we have caused so many tipping points that you have probably added another degree just through self-reinforcing changes. And that’s without even talking about extreme events.”

    His frustration is palpable as he sums up the situation: “It is a very special moment in time. We have 30-plus years of scientific advancements; 150 years of unsustainable pressures rising; and we've come to this point now where we can prove that we've basically saturated the system. There's no more room to maneuver, which means the only way out is 100% sustainability.”
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TADEAS:

    Gail Whiteman
    https://twitter.com/GenerationCO2/status/1448866636904161289?s=19

    As background, here is the paper that published in June on the feasibility of various pathways including the Shell Sky scenario.

    All options, not silver bullets, needed to limit global warming to 1.5 °C: a scenario appraisal - IOPscience
    https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/abfeec/meta

    And the accompanying op Ed that Johan and I wrote:

    Shell’s net zero plan will be judged on science, not spin
    https://www.climatechangenews.com/2021/05/18/shells-net-zero-plan-will-judged-science-not-spin/
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    J Rockstrom
    https://twitter.com/jrockstrom/status/1450779252396331012?s=19

    #ProductionGap report shows that governments’ production plans and projections would lead to:

    ⚫️ 240% more coal
    🛢57% more oil
    🔥 71% more gas

    in 2030 than would be consistent with limiting global warming to 1.5°C.

    2021 Home - Production Gap
    https://productiongap.org/
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TADEAS: :)) rockstrom v shell

    Inside, @jrockstrom, my hero, took the mic and addressed van Beurden and Shell's "science"..
    "Your negative emissions scenario is not plausible" he said.
    So yeah, we had the the legit director of @PIK_Climate calling out @Shell's manipulations. Glorious

    https://t.co/i5vwiGjg1y
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TADEAS:

    Alexandria Villaseñor
    https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1448844795082776576.html

    I'm gonna recap what happened when the largest speaking organization in the world, invited the CEO of @Shell to speak at their flagship climate conference

    In addition to platforming the CEO of the 2nd largest fossil fuel company on the planet, @TEDCountdown put local @Fridays4future, @GNDRising and @StopCambo youth activist, Lauren MacDonald, on the stage with him

    first, and he did what we expected, he called out consumers demand for oil as the problem, said oil needs to "fund" the transition to renewable energy, and ignored Shell's role in decades of climate disinformation and anti-climate lobbying

    ...

    when van Beurden wouldn't agree to end Shell's appeal of the Dutch court's ruling, which demands they reduce emissions by 45% by 2030 - which is what the SCIENCE SAYS MUST HAPPEN - Lauren was done. She stood up, took off her mic, and walked out

    ...

    Outside, Lauren joined a huge protest led by @StopCambo, amplifying Shell's misdeeds, decrying the platform given to van Beurden and RE-PLATFORMING those most affected by the climate crisis. @NomikiKonst has a great thread on the protest here



    Shell CEO Roasted at TED Countdown Climate Conference
    https://gizmodo.com/shell-ceo-roasted-at-ted-climate-conference-he-was-fool-1847862767
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    20211024-212758
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    updated

    20211024-220239
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Sucho začíná tam, kde končí život v půdě
    https://youtu.be/mlrX0AGpZWg
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    #questions

    Microplastics May Be Cooling—and Heating—Earth’s Climate | WIRED
    https://www.wired.com/story/microplastics-may-be-cooling-and-heating-earths-climate/

    The good news is that microplastics may be reflecting a tiny bit of the sun’s energy back into space, which would actually cool the climate ever so slightly. The bad news is that humanity is loading the environment with so much microplastic (ocean sediment samples show that concentrations have been doubling every 15 years since the 1940s), and the particles themselves are so varied, that it’s hard to know how the pollutant will ultimately influence the climate. At some point they may end up heating the planet.
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    //Btw nemate nekdo nejakej dobrej clanek o vyvoji cen energii v dlouhodobejsim horizontu? Dejme tomu 30-40 let? Dik
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    YMLADRIS
    YMLADRIS --- ---
    YMLADRIS: titulek je

    Why fossil fuel subsidies are so hard to kill
    YMLADRIS
    YMLADRIS --- ---
    SCHWEPZ: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02847-2

    Some analysts argue that the hidden costs of fossil fuels — such as their impacts on air pollution and global warming — are, in effect, a kind of subsidy, because polluters are not paying for the damage they cause. Last month, the International Monetary Fund calculated3 total fossil-fuel subsidies in 2020 at $5.9 trillion, or almost 7% of global gross domestic product (GDP), largely as a result of these external costs. But some disagree with this approach. “The damage caused by fossil fuels is massive, but I would not call it a subsidy,” says Johannes Urpelainen, who specializes in energy policy at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies in Washington DC.

    ...

    Some countries don’t agree that they have any subsidies to remove. The UK government, for example, says it has none, although the IISD rates it as among the worst of the OECD-member nations, calculating that it gave $16 billion a year to support fossil fuels in 2017–19, on average

    :-)

    Cim dal vic lidi dokaze prokouknout tak akorat tezko rict co

    JINDRICH
    JINDRICH --- ---
    Sociologický ústav Akademie věd ČR
    Jsme rozděleni klimatem? O sociálních souvislostech environmentální krize před časem na Ekologických dnech Olomouc 2021 debatovala naše sociální antropoložka Lucie Trlifajová, kulturolog a sociolog životního prostředí Jan Vávra a sociolog Daniel Prokop.
    Debatu, kterou uspořádal Salon Práva, si můžete pustit ze záznamu či se pustit do jejího úplného přepisu

    Jsme rozděleni klimatem? Debata o společenských aspektech klimatické změny | Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v. v. i.
    https://www.soc.cas.cz/aktualita/jsme-rozdeleni-klimatem-debata-o-spolecenskych-aspektech-klimaticke-zmeny

    Dalšími environmentálními tématy se budou v příštím týdnu zabývat účastníci a účastnice workshopu Pro les nevidíme stromy?, mezi nimiž se objeví také Jan Vávra nebo socioložka Jana Stachová.
    XCHAOS
    XCHAOS --- ---
    Energie zdražuje dovoz plynu, stát má pomoct lidem, kterým skokově vyrostou náklady
    https://mikulas-peksa.eu/cena-energie-elektrina-zemni-plyn/
    Konkrétně se od ledna do září 2021 změny projevily tak, že emisní povolenky prodražily elektřinu vyrobenou z plynu o 10 EUR/MWh, zatímco rostoucí cena dovozového plynu o 90 EUR/MWh (zdroj zde, strana 2 dole).
    SCHWEPZ
    SCHWEPZ --- ---
    SCHWEPZ:
    "fosilní lobby, utrpěla v uplynulých letech těžké ztráty: například celosvětová kampaň za stažení investic z fosilního průmyslu vedla k tomu, že fosilní průmysl už si nesáhne na fondy a portfolia v celkové hodnotě patnácti bilionů dolarů. Prakticky žádná fosilní infrastruktura už nevzniká bez veřejného odporu. Čím dál víc lidí dokáže prokouknout falešné snahy fosilního průmyslu natírat se nazeleno."
    SCHWEPZ
    SCHWEPZ --- ---
    Americký novinář a občanský aktivista za záchranu klimatu Bill McKibben shrnuje politickou situaci před světovým summitem o klimatu, který začne na konci října v Glasgow, a rozebírá, co je v sázce.

    Je snadné propadnout klimatickému zoufalství, ale mám pro vás dvě dobré zprávy
    https://denikreferendum.cz/clanek/33244-je-snadne-propadnout-klimatickemu-zoufalstvi-ale-mam-pro-vas-dve-dobre-zpravy?

    (...) Aspoň už dnes nikdo nemůže tvrdit, že nechápe vážnost situace. Od Pařížské konference svět zaznamenal nejhorší vlny veder, nejničivější bouře s nejvyššími zaznamenanými rychlostmi větru, nejprudší deště; zmatečně se začíná chovat tryskové proudění ve vyšších vrstvách atmosféry i Golfský proud, tak zásadní pro stabilitu klimatu na Zemi. Přírodní svět, jenž byl kdysi jen kulisou dějin, se najednou ocitá v záři reflektorů na jevišti v hlavní roli.

    Tou první je stále ještě pokračující, fascinující sešup cen obnovitelných zdrojů energie a baterií k jejímu uložení. Trend byl evidentní už v čase pařížské konference, ale přesto příliš nový, aby se na něj dalo plně spolehnout: stále jsme ještě tehdy přemýšleli o slunci a větru jako o drahých zdrojích a o přechodu k nim jako o oběti.

    Dnes už chápeme, že se jedná o zázraky — jak techniky, tak ekonomické. Zhruba před měsícem zveřejnil tým expertů Oxfordské univerzity — nedostatečně zpravodajsky pokrytou — studii, jejíž závěr zní takto: „Srovnáme-li možnost pokračování energetického systému založeného na fosilních palivech s možností rychlého přechodu na zelenou energetiku, vychází druhá možnost výhodněji v řádu bilionů dolarů — a to dokonce i bez započtení úspor na nápravě poškozeného klimatu i dalších příznivých ekonomických dopadů klimatické politiky.“

    https://www.inet.ox.ac.uk/files/energy_transition_paper-INET-working-paper.pdf
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam